Gallinari went into full-on Blake Griffin flop mode at the end of that game...
Is that the new "How to play the Lakers in tight games" guideline around the league or something?
So is Hill > than sessions?
Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb
Re: So is Hill > than sessions?
-
Kilroy
- Forum Mod - Lakers
- Posts: 21,603
- And1: 12,316
- Joined: Jul 10, 2006
- Location: The Motel 9 in Vegas
-
Re: So is Hill > than sessions?
Never have rice at Hanzo's house...
Re: So is Hill > than sessions?
-
OOO
- Banned User
- Posts: 1,554
- And1: 22
- Joined: Apr 04, 2012
Re: So is Hill > than sessions?
Kilroy wrote:Gallinari went into full-on Blake Griffin flop mode at the end of that game...
Is that the new "How to play the Lakers in tight games" guideline around the league or something?
LOL exactly what I was thinking. Even the ref told him to get up.
Re: So is Hill > than sessions?
-
MettaWorldPen15
- Ballboy
- Posts: 6
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 08, 2012
Re: So is Hill > than sessions?
A better question is, " HIll + Sessions > our TPE?"
WIth the current trend of cost cutting moves, I could see the Lakers sitting on the TPE this summer and letting it expire; this would be especially true if they re-signed hill and/or sessions. So factoring in long term financial flexibility, which seems to be of the utmost importance under Jimmy and this new CBA, what asset is most valuable to Lakers this offseason? Hill, Sessions, or the TPE?
WIth the current trend of cost cutting moves, I could see the Lakers sitting on the TPE this summer and letting it expire; this would be especially true if they re-signed hill and/or sessions. So factoring in long term financial flexibility, which seems to be of the utmost importance under Jimmy and this new CBA, what asset is most valuable to Lakers this offseason? Hill, Sessions, or the TPE?