ImageImageImageImageImage

Division Series format changed..

Moderator: JaysRule15

pinklemo
Sophomore
Posts: 152
And1: 0
Joined: May 03, 2012

Division Series format changed.. 

Post#1 » by pinklemo » Fri May 18, 2012 3:45 pm

NEW YORK -- Major League Baseball owners approved a one-year shift of the format for the best-of-five game Division Series at their joint meeting on Thursday morning.

For this season only, the Division Series will begin with two home games for lower-seeded teams, followed by up to three home games for higher-seeded teams. The change, which will eliminate a travel day prior to a Game 5, was necessary because the 2012 regular-season schedule had no wiggle room to accommodate the one-game Wild Card playoff games that will be added this year.

The regular-season schedule was announced last year before an agreement on the expanded postseason format was reached between the owners and Players Association that will add one Wild Card team in each league. There will still be a scheduled travel day between Games 2 and 3 in the Division Series.


anyone agree with this? yeah the higher seed team gets one more game but doesn't this defeat the purpose of home field advantage. Not only would you get more games but the first 2, and this doesn't have that.
User avatar
Kurtz
RealGM
Posts: 15,568
And1: 16,489
Joined: Aug 07, 2002
Location: Toronto

Re: Division Series format changed.. 

Post#2 » by Kurtz » Fri May 18, 2012 3:52 pm

The lower-seed team gets the first two games at home in a 3 game series. Yep, that's pretty silly.

Baseball totally fudged up the way they handled the extra wild card slot. Expanding the playoff entrants was a good move and long overdue, but they way they structured the whole thing is absurd.
Image
s e n s i
RealGM
Posts: 17,098
And1: 3,629
Joined: Mar 19, 2008
Location: Toronto
       

Re: Division Series format changed.. 

Post#3 » by s e n s i » Fri May 18, 2012 3:56 pm

Kurtz wrote:The lower-seed team gets the first two games at home in a 3 game series. Yep, that's pretty silly.

Baseball totally fudged up the way they handled the extra wild card slot. Expanding the playoff entrants was a good move and long overdue, but they way they structured the whole thing is absurd.


no the wild card playoff is a 1 game do-or-die, played at the park of the WC team with the better record. this change is for the ALDS/NLDS...instead of the typical 2-2-1 format, they are changing it to 2-3, with the division winner getting the 3 games at home.
galacticos2 wrote:MLB needs to introduce an Amnesty clause. Bautista would be my first victim.

Bautista outplays his contract by more than $70 million over the next four seasons (2013-2016).
User avatar
Skin Blues
Veteran
Posts: 2,625
And1: 872
Joined: Nov 24, 2010

Re: Division Series format changed.. 

Post#4 » by Skin Blues » Fri May 18, 2012 7:01 pm

The first two rounds of the playoffs weren't enough of a joke already, apparently. Now to accomodate the ridiculousness of a one-game "series", they give the better team home field disadvantage.
User avatar
RocLaFamilia
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,657
And1: 34
Joined: Mar 23, 2009
Location: Corner of the DVP and 401

Re: Division Series format changed.. 

Post#5 » by RocLaFamilia » Fri May 18, 2012 7:14 pm

s e n s i F Y C wrote:
Kurtz wrote:The lower-seed team gets the first two games at home in a 3 game series. Yep, that's pretty silly.

Baseball totally fudged up the way they handled the extra wild card slot. Expanding the playoff entrants was a good move and long overdue, but they way they structured the whole thing is absurd.


no the wild card playoff is a 1 game do-or-die, played at the park of the WC team with the better record. this change is for the ALDS/NLDS...instead of the typical 2-2-1 format, they are changing it to 2-3, with the division winner getting the 3 games at home.


That's how I understood it as well, which too me is still a big advantage for the top seed, because if they can steal a game in the first 2, they then have 3 games straight at home.
dacrusha wrote:
In 2009, when Wright asked a Colorado judge to intervene, Weems didn’t even bother sending a lawyer to court.


Since when does Weems bring any kind of defense to the court anyway?
User avatar
Parataxis
General Manager
Posts: 9,433
And1: 5,738
Joined: Jan 31, 2010
Location: Penticton, BC
       

Re: Division Series format changed.. 

Post#6 » by Parataxis » Sat May 19, 2012 12:11 am

Skin Blues wrote:The first two rounds of the playoffs weren't enough of a joke already, apparently. Now to accomodate the ridiculousness of a one-game "series", they give the better team home field disadvantage.


It's still home field advantage. If the home team wins each game, the higher seeded team still wins. And being down 2-0 doesn't mean much if you can win the next three.
pinklemo
Sophomore
Posts: 152
And1: 0
Joined: May 03, 2012

Re: Division Series format changed.. 

Post#7 » by pinklemo » Sat May 19, 2012 12:13 am

Parataxis wrote:
Skin Blues wrote:The first two rounds of the playoffs weren't enough of a joke already, apparently. Now to accomodate the ridiculousness of a one-game "series", they give the better team home field disadvantage.


It's still home field advantage. If the home team wins each game, the higher seeded team still wins. And being down 2-0 doesn't mean much if you can win the next three.


if im the better team, id still want a 2-0 lead than 1-1 tie or being behind 0-2.

its a joke really
User avatar
Parataxis
General Manager
Posts: 9,433
And1: 5,738
Joined: Jan 31, 2010
Location: Penticton, BC
       

Re: Division Series format changed.. 

Post#8 » by Parataxis » Sat May 19, 2012 12:18 am

pinklemo wrote:
Parataxis wrote:
Skin Blues wrote:The first two rounds of the playoffs weren't enough of a joke already, apparently. Now to accomodate the ridiculousness of a one-game "series", they give the better team home field disadvantage.


It's still home field advantage. If the home team wins each game, the higher seeded team still wins. And being down 2-0 doesn't mean much if you can win the next three.


if im the better team, id still want a 2-0 lead than 1-1 tie or being behind 0-2.

its a joke really


If I'm the better team, all I really care about is that at the end of the series, I have three wins.

It's not the best way of organizing it, but it's not as bad as some people are making out. And it's much better than doing it the other way (3-2)

Return to Toronto Blue Jays