ImageImageImageImageImage

The Good Luck/Lottery Selection Thread

Moderators: KF10, codydaze

User avatar
tru6playa
Pro Prospect
Posts: 905
And1: 103
Joined: Aug 09, 2008
Location: San Francisco, CA
     

Re: The Good Luck/Lottery Selection Thread 

Post#41 » by tru6playa » Thu May 31, 2012 1:06 am

dozencousins wrote:I am know hoping for Drummond , Gilcrest then Barnes in that order

I wouldnt mind trading the # 5 & filler such as Garcia for the # 6 & #11 picks !


I don't see how moving up one spot is worth the 11th pick, too? I'd do it... if it was ever offered.
bennith13 wrote:We are going to win. Sac can not compete with our offer our or owners or our arena plan. They just don't have their act together like we do at this point in time.


Supersonics41 wrote:This thing is over for Sacramento! Well they might get the return of the Monarch's.
dozencousins
Analyst
Posts: 3,031
And1: 135
Joined: Jan 11, 2007

Re: The Good Luck/Lottery Selection Thread 

Post#42 » by dozencousins » Thu May 31, 2012 1:12 am

tru6playa wrote:
dozencousins wrote:I am know hoping for Drummond , Gilcrest then Barnes in that order

I wouldnt mind trading the # 5 & filler such as Garcia for the # 6 & #11 picks !


I don't see how moving up one spot is worth the 11th pick, too? I'd do it... if it was ever offered.



I never said it was offered . Come on now . Really man . I am saying I wouldnt mind . Never said it was happening .
Bobo the King
Ballboy
Posts: 48
And1: 1
Joined: Apr 09, 2005

Re: The Good Luck/Lottery Selection Thread 

Post#43 » by Bobo the King » Thu May 31, 2012 2:05 am

pillwenney wrote:I mean, 2 or 3 would certainly be nicer than 5, and much nicer than 6 or 7, but I'm going to be thinking trade if it's anything but Frida Kahlo in that Kings jersey.


I just wanted to say I may be the only person who got your brilliant reference.
User avatar
YC42Balla
Rookie
Posts: 1,054
And1: 62
Joined: May 30, 2010
Location: NorCal

Re: The Good Luck/Lottery Selection Thread 

Post#44 » by YC42Balla » Thu May 31, 2012 3:39 am

Bobo the King wrote:
pillwenney wrote:I mean, 2 or 3 would certainly be nicer than 5, and much nicer than 6 or 7, but I'm going to be thinking trade if it's anything but Frida Kahlo in that Kings jersey.


I just wanted to say I may be the only person who got your brilliant reference.


LMAO. I had to google who hell Frida Kahlo was. Freakin' hilarious.
SAC-RA-MEN-TO #HEREWESTAYED
SacKingZZZ
RealGM
Posts: 24,085
And1: 1,084
Joined: Feb 19, 2005
Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."

Re: The Good Luck/Lottery Selection Thread 

Post#45 » by SacKingZZZ » Thu May 31, 2012 4:05 am

ADoaN17 wrote:Well with Davis going to NO, Okafor is on the block. You guys still like him?



As an "oh **** what do we do now"....maybe, but that contract is awful even at two years remaining. He's a C, Davis is a PF so I don't think it's necessarily a given he's gone at all cost.
User avatar
City of Trees
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,851
And1: 5,511
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Roseville, CA
   

Re: The Good Luck/Lottery Selection Thread 

Post#46 » by City of Trees » Thu May 31, 2012 4:41 am

Cant say I didnt see this coming. I figured #5 was our best case scenario. I guess I should I be happy? :blank:
User avatar
RIPskaterdude
RealGM
Posts: 92,818
And1: 37,039
Joined: Jul 10, 2003
Location: #MakeAmericaGreatAgain
   

Re: The Good Luck/Lottery Selection Thread 

Post#47 » by RIPskaterdude » Thu May 31, 2012 5:22 am

Guess this means Landry is probably not going back to NO.
Image
User avatar
City of Trees
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,851
And1: 5,511
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Roseville, CA
   

Re: The Good Luck/Lottery Selection Thread 

Post#48 » by City of Trees » Thu May 31, 2012 5:48 am

xx_skaterdude_xx wrote:Guess this means Landry is probably not going back to NO.


I thought the exact same thing! Oddly enough I still follow Landry on Twitter. He was one of the first people on my TL to tweet NOH 1st pick!!!! Good dude, just short. :lol:

Return to Sacramento Kings