ImageImageImage

Kahn: "[Y]ou can assume five or six players will be back."

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

jscott
Veteran
Posts: 2,967
And1: 1,227
Joined: Oct 14, 2004
 

Re: Kahn: "[Y]ou can assume five or six players will be back 

Post#21 » by jscott » Sun Jun 3, 2012 4:17 pm

eyeteeth wrote:Barea and Ridnour are both very solid bench players. It might seem redundant to keep both of them but they provide such remarkably different things for the team that I think it's a real asset to have them both as options. Barea provides instant energy and dribble penetration, Ridnour calms things down and is great at knocking down the open J. They are both affordable and very reliable. Barea was a key piece on a championship team and Ridnour just won the sportsmanship award for the year. Unless there's a very good reason to trade one, they should both be back.

This is how I feel.

The only way I look at trading someone is if Malcolm Lee develops into a dribble penetration PG/SG - then Barea becomes slightly more expendable. But for the record I have no problem keeping both of JJ and Luke on this team.
Narf
Head Coach
Posts: 6,550
And1: 882
Joined: Sep 05, 2009

Re: Kahn: "[Y]ou can assume five or six players will be back 

Post#22 » by Narf » Sun Jun 3, 2012 10:59 pm

IMHO Rubio, Ridnour and Barea are all better than anyone we've had starting on this team since Cassell other than maybe Sessions (who vastly improved his 3 point shooting after he left). I'd take all of them over Foye and friends though.

I don't have a problem with having 3 solid PGs, especially since Ridnour and Barea are solid combo guards off the bench and play well with Rubio. How many backup SGs are better than Ridnour in the league? Certainly not 30.

Our problem is we don't have a starting SG/SF. But everyone knows that, including Kahn.
User avatar
AQuintus
RealGM
Posts: 10,425
And1: 2,458
Joined: Jan 10, 2008
Location: But let me speak for the weak, I mean the rookies
   

Re: Kahn: "[Y]ou can assume five or six players will be back 

Post#23 » by AQuintus » Sun Jun 3, 2012 11:46 pm

Narf wrote:IMHO Rubio, Ridnour and Barea are all better than anyone we've had starting on this team since Cassell other than maybe Sessions (who vastly improved his 3 point shooting after he left). I'd take all of them over Foye and friends though.

I don't have a problem with having 3 solid PGs, especially since Ridnour and Barea are solid combo guards off the bench and play well with Rubio. How many backup SGs are better than Ridnour in the league? Certainly not 30.

Our problem is we don't have a starting SG/SF. But everyone knows that, including Kahn.


The problem is that there's a total of 96 minutes per game between the PG and SG positions. Rubio should be getting at least 30, and that leaves 66 between the SG (who should also be getting 30+) and Barea and Ridnour. That last 36 or less minutes is just not enough to keep both Ridnour and Barea happy. And that's not even mentioning minutes for Lee or Ellington.

There's also the problem of money. Both Ridnour and Barea are being paid like backups. Having a third stringer, who is playing less than 18 mpg, being paid like a backup doesn't make much sense.

I don't necessarily mind keeping Ridnour and Barea around while Rubio is recovering, but as soon as Rubio is able to play 30+ mpg again, then I don't see any reason to keep a guy talented enough to be a backup somewhere as our third stringer when we could be using him in a trade to upgrade the talent on the wings.
Image
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,819
And1: 22,403
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Kahn: "[Y]ou can assume five or six players will be back 

Post#24 » by Klomp » Sun Jun 3, 2012 11:58 pm

AQuintus wrote:The problem is that there's a total of 96 minutes per game between the PG and SG positions. Rubio should be getting at least 30, and that leaves 66 between the SG (who should also be getting 30+) and Barea and Ridnour. That last 36 or less minutes is just not enough to keep both Ridnour and Barea happy. And that's not even mentioning minutes for Lee or Ellington.

Barea came here knowing there were two other PGs on the roster ahead of him. If he were to be unhappy about minutes, he never would've signed here.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
User avatar
The J Rocka
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,570
And1: 1,732
Joined: Jun 27, 2009
Location: Minneapolis
   

Re: Kahn: "[Y]ou can assume five or six players will be back 

Post#25 » by The J Rocka » Mon Jun 4, 2012 12:08 am

AQuintus wrote:
Narf wrote:IMHO Rubio, Ridnour and Barea are all better than anyone we've had starting on this team since Cassell other than maybe Sessions (who vastly improved his 3 point shooting after he left). I'd take all of them over Foye and friends though.

I don't have a problem with having 3 solid PGs, especially since Ridnour and Barea are solid combo guards off the bench and play well with Rubio. How many backup SGs are better than Ridnour in the league? Certainly not 30.

Our problem is we don't have a starting SG/SF. But everyone knows that, including Kahn.

I don't necessarily mind keeping Ridnour and Barea around while Rubio is recovering, but as soon as Rubio is able to play 30+ mpg again, then I don't see any reason to keep a guy talented enough to be a backup somewhere as our third stringer when we could be using him in a trade to upgrade the talent on the wings.

This is pretty much where I stand. Once Rubio is back to full strength and can play +30 mpg, then decide between Barea/Ridnour. Doesn't make sense to pay 8.5 mil for two backups at the same position.
User avatar
Vindicater
General Manager
Posts: 7,948
And1: 423
Joined: Apr 11, 2004

Re: Kahn: "[Y]ou can assume five or six players will be back 

Post#26 » by Vindicater » Mon Jun 4, 2012 1:09 am

Klomp wrote:Thats fair. I just get the impression far too often that it is not about positional need, and more that people just think either/both suck. Maybe I've just seen too many posts from Vindicator, though.


I don't hate Ridnour.

I just think he is a useless point guard with little to no ability at controlling an offense. That is why I want him gone.

Barea I would be willing to give one more season too as I think injury to both himself and Rubio did not give us enough to see what we really have in him.

In conclusion: Deal Ridnour now while his value is high from inflated numbers due to Rubio leaving.
"That's why the last two years weren't guaranteed," Walsh said. "Either way, he knew it could have happened either way."
dukeknicksirish
Analyst
Posts: 3,165
And1: 2,447
Joined: Nov 02, 2010
 

Re: Kahn: "[Y]ou can assume five or six players will be back 

Post#27 » by dukeknicksirish » Mon Jun 4, 2012 1:23 am

Pek
Love
Williams
Luke
Rubio
----
Barea

Those are 6 for sure...

Do they:
- amnesty Darko
-trade Wes and a pick for somebody else?
Dewey
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,898
And1: 1,070
Joined: May 22, 2001

Re: Kahn: "[Y]ou can assume five or six players will be back 

Post#28 » by Dewey » Mon Jun 4, 2012 11:56 pm

sadly this is a real topic ... frick, we gave tons of minutes to wes, web, and beas and hoped for the best - we got nothing from it other confirmation they all suck more than we even considered at the start.
Flip response to Love wanting out, "He has no reason to be upset, you're either a part of the problem or a part of the solution"
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,819
And1: 22,403
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Kahn: "[Y]ou can assume five or six players will be back 

Post#29 » by Klomp » Tue Jun 5, 2012 12:53 am

Love
Rubio
----------
Pekovic or Williams
Barea
Ridnour
Johnson
Lee
Tolliver
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
User avatar
jade_hippo
Starter
Posts: 2,383
And1: 135
Joined: Jan 05, 2009
Location: Take off... eh!
 

Re: Kahn: "[Y]ou can assume five or six players will be back 

Post#30 » by jade_hippo » Tue Jun 5, 2012 2:23 am

I hate to agree with Klomp on this, but Tolliver will likely be on of the guys, he's got grit, comes cheap and knows his role (and can do his role.) You need guys like that.
Dan's with the Wolves
Pro Prospect
Posts: 787
And1: 17
Joined: Nov 06, 2004

Kahn: "[Y]ou can assume five or six players will be back." 

Post#31 » by Dan's with the Wolves » Fri Jun 8, 2012 11:26 pm

jade_hippo wrote:I hate to agree with Klomp on this, but Tolliver will likely be on of the guys, he's got grit, comes cheap and knows his role (and can do his role.) You need guys like that.

Tolliver seemed to be in Adelman's doghouse most of last year
shangrila
RealGM
Posts: 13,511
And1: 6,584
Joined: Dec 21, 2009
Location: Land of Aus
 

Re: Kahn: "[Y]ou can assume five or six players will be back 

Post#32 » by shangrila » Fri Jun 8, 2012 11:31 pm

He could be back, but I doubt he's important enough to be included in Kahn's comment. His hustle didn't add up to much this season and his offence was non-existant. I'd rather try out some other hustle guy from the D League.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,819
And1: 22,403
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Kahn: 

Post#33 » by Klomp » Fri Jun 8, 2012 11:37 pm

Dan's with the Wolves wrote:
jade_hippo wrote:I hate to agree with Klomp on this, but Tolliver will likely be on of the guys, he's got grit, comes cheap and knows his role (and can do his role.) You need guys like that.

Tolliver seemed to be in Adelman's doghouse most of last year

Disagree. He was dealing with a wrist injury most of the year.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,819
And1: 22,403
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Kahn: "[Y]ou can assume five or six players will be back 

Post#34 » by Klomp » Thu Jul 26, 2012 3:46 pm

Klomp wrote:BTW that quote sounds like its 5 or 6 in addition to Rubio/Love, not including Rubio/Love. Adjust your lists accordingly.

Rubio
Love
----------------
Pekovic
Williams
Barea
Ridnour
Lee
Tolliver still TBD

Hmmm, looks like he was right once again...
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
dunkonu21
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,299
And1: 40
Joined: Sep 19, 2005
Location: An Igloo
   

Re: Kahn: "[Y]ou can assume five or six players will be back 

Post#35 » by dunkonu21 » Thu Jul 26, 2012 3:52 pm

Yeah, when I think of Klomp it brings to mind the ultimate truth speaker.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,819
And1: 22,403
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Kahn: "[Y]ou can assume five or six players will be back 

Post#36 » by Klomp » Thu Jul 26, 2012 3:53 pm

dunkonu21 wrote:Yeah, when I think of Klomp it brings to mind the ultimate truth speaker.

Well obviously...
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
User avatar
Basti
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 37,613
And1: 3,849
Joined: Sep 07, 2005
Location: Æ ha en ståkukk!
   

Re: Kahn: "[Y]ou can assume five or six players will be back 

Post#37 » by Basti » Fri Jul 27, 2012 12:42 pm

Well Klomp says a lot so he has to be right every once in a while ;)
User avatar
Vindicater
General Manager
Posts: 7,948
And1: 423
Joined: Apr 11, 2004

Re: Kahn: "[Y]ou can assume five or six players will be back 

Post#38 » by Vindicater » Fri Jul 27, 2012 2:29 pm

Basti wrote:Well Klomp says a lot so he has to be right every once in a while ;)


:lol: This was the first thing I thought when I read Klomp's post. beat me to it.
"That's why the last two years weren't guaranteed," Walsh said. "Either way, he knew it could have happened either way."

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves