2012 NFL win totals

Post #1 » by **HMFFL** » Mon May 28, 2012 2:55 pm

If we have enough to participate in the Realgm NFL Contest I plan on having these part of the contest.

2012 NFL REGULAR SEASON Over/Under WIN Totals:

Cardinals 6.5 over +110/under -130

Falcons 9.0 over -130/under +110

Ravens 10.0 over +110/under -130

Bills 7.5 over +110/under -130

Panthers 7.5 over -120/under even

Bears 9.0 over -110/under -110

Bengals 8.0 over -110/under -110

Browns 4.5 over -120/under even

Cowboys 8.5 over -140/under +120

Broncos 8.5 over -150/under +130

Lions 9.0 over -120/under even

Packers 12.0 over -120/under even

Texans 9.5 over -145/under +125

Colts 5.0 over -130/under +110

Jaguars 5.0 over +120/under -140

Chiefs 8.0 over +110/under -130

Dolphins 7.5 over even/under -120

Vikings 6.0 over even/under -120

Patriots 12.5 over even/under -120

Saints 9.5 over -110/under -110

Giants 8.5 over -130/under +110

Jets 8.5 over -145/under +125

Raiders 7.5 over +130/under -150

Eagles 10.5 over -120/under even

Steelers 10.5 over +140/under -160

Chargers 9.0 over +110/under -130

49ers 9.5 over -140/under +120

Seahawks 7.0 over +120/under -140

Rams 5.5 over +115/under -135

Bucs 5.0 over -155/under +135

Titans 7.5 over +115/under -135

Redskins 6.0 over even/under -120

Post #2 » by **Da Schwab** » Mon May 28, 2012 6:03 pm

Looks like they were very generous to Atlanta, Sandy Eggo and Houston.

Post #3 » by **Maritimer** » Mon May 28, 2012 8:59 pm

The Texans get to play against Andrew Luck, Blaine Gabbert, and Jake Locker a combined 6 times. Considering they were a top 3 team in the AFC last year, and looking like a good bet to go to the Super Bowl pre-Schaub injury, 9.5 looks pretty good to me.

Post #4 » by **Icness** » Mon May 28, 2012 9:24 pm

Easiest sports gambling $$ you can make is betting NFL season win totals. I've funded my family vacations for years doing this, have never made less than $1400 in a year with a layout of no more than $2K.

Two that jump out as very attractive is the under for the Saints (what if Brees doesn't play?) and over for the Bengals. I typically don't bet until August but I suspect that Saints number is only going to go down, not up, so I might lay an early $100 on it.

Post #5 » by **Icness** » Thu May 31, 2012 3:08 pm

Liking the Jaguars to go over 5.5 too.

If I had more (any?) disposable income I would lay a lot of it on the Jets going under. I don't see how that offense is going to score more than three times a game and the defense isn't all that.

YuhanLiu · Post #6 » by **YuhanLiu** » Thu May 31, 2012 10:13 pm

Spam.

HMFFL

Bleeding Blue · Post #7 » by **Bleeding Blue** » Fri Jun 1, 2012 12:04 am

Where are some good, legal online places to place sports bets?

Bucksfans1and2 · Post #8 » by **Bucksfans1and2** » Fri Jun 1, 2012 1:39 am

HMFFL wrote:If we have enough to participate in the Realgm NFL Contest I plan on having these part of the contest.

2012 NFL REGULAR SEASON Over/Under WIN Totals:

Cardinals 6.5 over +110/under -130

Falcons 9.0 over -130/under +110

Ravens 10.0 over +110/under -130

Bills 7.5 over +110/under -130

Panthers 7.5 over -120/under even

Bears 9.0 over -110/under -110

Bengals 8.0 over -110/under -110

Browns 4.5 over -120/under even

Cowboys 8.5 over -140/under +120

Broncos 8.5 over -150/under +130

Lions 9.0 over -120/under even

Packers 12.0 over -120/under even

Texans 9.5 over -145/under +125

Colts 5.0 over -130/under +110

Jaguars 5.0 over +120/under -140

Chiefs 8.0 over +110/under -130

Dolphins 7.5 over even/under -120

Vikings 6.0 over even/under -120

Patriots 12.5 over even/under -120

Saints 9.5 over -110/under -110

Giants 8.5 over -130/under +110

Jets 8.5 over -145/under +125

Raiders 7.5 over +130/under -150

Eagles 10.5 over -120/under even

Steelers 10.5 over +140/under -160

Chargers 9.0 over +110/under -130

49ers 9.5 over -140/under +120

Seahawks 7.0 over +120/under -140

Rams 5.5 over +115/under -135

Bucs 5.0 over -155/under +135

Titans 7.5 over +115/under -135

Redskins 6.0 over even/under -120

I'd go over on Bengals, Giants, Seahawks, Jaguars, and Colts.

I'd go under on Vikings and Eagles.

Post #9 » by **Maritimer** » Fri Jun 1, 2012 11:33 pm

Holy crap, Vikings at 6? There's no way Christian Ponder and Toby Gerhart are getting them to 7 wins. Their defense will be OK, but I just don't see how they can score enough points to win on a regular basis. Worse case scenario is a push.

CentralQB5 · Post #10 » by **CentralQB5** » Sun Jun 3, 2012 6:14 pm

Bucs are gonna win more than 5 games. Imma give them 8 with the new additions Freeman will have a much better year than last, he will have a repeat of his 2010 season but prob a bit better

Post #11 » by **Icness** » Mon Jun 4, 2012 8:03 pm

CentralQB5 wrote:Bucs are gonna win more than 5 games. Imma give them 8 with the new additions Freeman will have a much better year than last, he will have a repeat of his 2010 season but prob a bit better

I think the Bucs are going to be the worst team in the league, but there is too much potential there for me to put any money on it. Schiano is either going to get them turned around quickly or be more gasoline on the grease fire.

Bucksfans1and2 · Post #12 » by **Bucksfans1and2** » Tue Jun 5, 2012 5:04 pm

Icness wrote:
CentralQB5 wrote:Bucs are gonna win more than 5 games. Imma give them 8 with the new additions Freeman will have a much better year than last, he will have a repeat of his 2010 season but prob a bit better

I think the Bucs are going to be the worst team in the league, but there is too much potential there for me to put any money on it. Schiano is either going to get them turned around quickly or be more gasoline on the grease fire.

Freeman's an interesting guy.

Tampa fans see him as the guy he was in his second year. Everybody else seems to think he's somewhere in the middle of what he was in year 2 and year 3. If you see Freeman as he was in year 2, then they're underrated. If you see him as a below average QB, then they're going to suck.

I like what they did with their coaching staff though. Bostad was a great hiring.