ImageImageImageImageImage

2012 NBA Draft - Part V

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

Mizerooskie
Junior
Posts: 369
And1: 46
Joined: May 19, 2010

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part V 

Post#541 » by Mizerooskie » Thu Jun 14, 2012 2:07 pm

Brenice wrote:Please explain to me what makes Beal better than Crawford? Crawford may be streaky and chuck, but at least he can create his own shot and shoot too. Both are slightly undersized.

I think Robinson is an over-achiever. Nothing wrong with that, but he has his professional limitations. He will be playing as a man among men now, instead of as a man among boys as a Jr. in college.

I'm leaning to drafting Barnes. He has legit size for his position, and can shoot. We already got creaters and defenders.

Higher basketball IQ, better rebounder, more athletic, better defender, better shooting mechanics (i.e. potentially a better shooter), better team player, etc.
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 16,354
And1: 7,457
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part V 

Post#542 » by FAH1223 » Thu Jun 14, 2012 2:24 pm

Jay81 wrote:which is better

drafting Trob and signing Eric Gordon

or drafting beal and signing Illysaova?


Ersan would help us on the boards greatly and be able to stretch the floor
Image
Brenice
Banned User
Posts: 4,071
And1: 464
Joined: Dec 27, 2004
Location: DC

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part V 

Post#543 » by Brenice » Thu Jun 14, 2012 2:31 pm

Mizerooskie wrote:
Brenice wrote:Please explain to me what makes Beal better than Crawford? Crawford may be streaky and chuck, but at least he can create his own shot and shoot too. Both are slightly undersized.

I think Robinson is an over-achiever. Nothing wrong with that, but he has his professional limitations. He will be playing as a man among men now, instead of as a man among boys as a Jr. in college.

I'm leaning to drafting Barnes. He has legit size for his position, and can shoot. We already got creaters and defenders.

Higher basketball IQ, better rebounder, more athletic, better defender, better shooting mechanics (i.e. potentially a better shooter), better team player, etc.


Which of those have Beal proven on the NBA level? I'm not saying Crawford is better, I'm just saying is Beal going to be #3 or closer to a Crawford level player in the NBA.

Then compare Beal to Barnes, considering they play different positions. Especially since Barnes is closer to ideal size for his position, and a better athlete.
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 16,354
And1: 7,457
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part V 

Post#544 » by FAH1223 » Thu Jun 14, 2012 2:34 pm

Barnes is an EG pick... all world potential who will fail at the next level

Barnes, Drummond, and PG3 are the 3 guys I'm sure will dissappoint
Image
verbal8
General Manager
Posts: 8,354
And1: 1,377
Joined: Jul 20, 2006
Location: Herndon, VA
     

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part V 

Post#545 » by verbal8 » Thu Jun 14, 2012 2:41 pm

Jay81 wrote:which is better
or drafting beal and signing Illysaova?


I see this as being the most likely of the two and the best case. Although Illysaova is a PF, I think he could be paired with Booker and Vesley at the Forward positions at least part time.

I don't see New Orleans letting Eric Gordon go.
Mizerooskie
Junior
Posts: 369
And1: 46
Joined: May 19, 2010

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part V 

Post#546 » by Mizerooskie » Thu Jun 14, 2012 2:53 pm

Brenice wrote:
Mizerooskie wrote:
Brenice wrote:Please explain to me what makes Beal better than Crawford? Crawford may be streaky and chuck, but at least he can create his own shot and shoot too. Both are slightly undersized.

I think Robinson is an over-achiever. Nothing wrong with that, but he has his professional limitations. He will be playing as a man among men now, instead of as a man among boys as a Jr. in college.

I'm leaning to drafting Barnes. He has legit size for his position, and can shoot. We already got creaters and defenders.

Higher basketball IQ, better rebounder, more athletic, better defender, better shooting mechanics (i.e. potentially a better shooter), better team player, etc.


Which of those have Beal proven on the NBA level? I'm not saying Crawford is better, I'm just saying is Beal going to be #3 or closer to a Crawford level player in the NBA.

Then compare Beal to Barnes, considering they play different positions. Especially since Barnes is closer to ideal size for his position, and a better athlete.
Obviously, he has proven none of that at the NBA level. What has Barnes proven at the NBA level? What about Davis?
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,602
And1: 23,070
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part V 

Post#547 » by nate33 » Thu Jun 14, 2012 3:00 pm

Brenice wrote:I'm leaning to drafting Barnes. He has legit size for his position, and can shoot. We already got creaters and defenders.

But he really can't shoot all that well. We're talking about a guy whose claim to fame is that he's a deadeye shooter, yet he shot just 34% from 3 in his freshman year, and 35% his sophomore year. His eFG% was just .488 and .487 in his first two seasons respectively. His TS% was just .520 and .528 respectively. And he posted those lackluster numbers while getting a ton of good looks on a team with a good PG and a great college center.

It's also a red flag that he showed almost no improvement between his freshman and sophomore years.

By contrast, Beal had a 3P% of .339, an eFG% of .525, and a TS% of .575 as a freshman despite a slow start. His 3P% was .360 over the second half of the season (when facing stiffer competition) and my guess is that his eFG% and TS% improved accordingly. And Beal did it on a team with lousy offensive teammates and ball-hogging guards. Beal also beat Barnes by a significant margin in rebound percentage, assist percentage, steal percentage and block percentage. For all of Barnes' length and athleticism, Beal out rebounded him and blocked more shots!
Brenice
Banned User
Posts: 4,071
And1: 464
Joined: Dec 27, 2004
Location: DC

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part V 

Post#548 » by Brenice » Thu Jun 14, 2012 3:32 pm

Thanks Nate. That's what I'm looking for. An analysis, not a debate.
popper
Veteran
Posts: 2,867
And1: 405
Joined: Jun 19, 2010

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part V 

Post#549 » by popper » Thu Jun 14, 2012 3:37 pm

Dark Faze wrote:Given portlands needs i really dont understand why we cant trade for the #6. Id offer booker, crawford and vesely. No way they say no. Beal/Barnes pairing.


EG would be admitting that Ves was not worth the #6 last year, therefore I don't see it happening. There are later first round picks we might be able to acquire, especially if we package our high second round pick with something or someone. I'm all for it in this deep draft.
Brenice
Banned User
Posts: 4,071
And1: 464
Joined: Dec 27, 2004
Location: DC

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part V 

Post#550 » by Brenice » Thu Jun 14, 2012 3:37 pm

Now, we are modeling after OKC. OKC has hit home runs. Durant was an obvious pick. Westbrook was a scouting home run, not an obvious home run. Is their any, first of all, home runs in this draft after Davis, or is Beal the pick because of scouting the best player available?

In other words, damn Ernie, who would OKC management draft for the current Wizards team.
WizarDynasty
Veteran
Posts: 2,604
And1: 278
Joined: Oct 23, 2003

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part V 

Post#551 » by WizarDynasty » Thu Jun 14, 2012 3:45 pm

who was beal competing with for rebounds and what was their rebounding rate. Barnes is competing with two potential lottery bigs who strength happen to be rebounds.
Neither Zeller or Henson are known for creating easy shots for others or for their passing. Neither is great at setting picks. I think Barnes game will flourish here with Wizards if both AD's are gone. I would target beal with a mid 1st round pick but he isn't a dominant offensive player and he definitely doesn't change the game defensively. Role player that goes after pick 10 is how he would rate in most drafts. If he was very long and considered a shut down defender---he would boost his stocks...then he would need to be able to overmatch defenders physically every night. He is a two leg jumper, small hands, and not fast at all. He has nice shifty moves, and can draw contact once he has his man beat but he can't finish against length in the post. I have seen this guy shot get swatted by mediocre college players. He may be able to shoot wide open shots but he doesn't create shots himself under pressure with the clock clicking down. he is a catch and shoot wide open shot type of guy who fits into a system, but you can't build an offense around him. You need your shooting guard to create mismatches on the perimeter in a half court set. EG does this with his quick first step and ball handling, Harden creates and advantages by using his 220lb bulky frame, Gilbert did it with his 215 pound frame and explosive one leg leaping ability, and explosive first step and body control.

at the bare minimum, a shooting guard needs speed and exceptional bulk--harden, gordon, and gilbert, explosive athleticism, body control, and above the rim finishing jumping off one leg hang time--jordan, kobe, ray allen, clyde drexler, j. erving, dwade at age 24, tmac, dominique wilkens. drafting beal compared to players that have proven to be allstars is a huge mistake.
Build your team w/5 shooters using P. Pierce Form deeply bent hips and lower back arch at same time b4 rising into shot. Elbow never pointing to the ground! Good teams have an engine player that shoot volume (2000 full season) at 50 percent.Large Hands
Jay81
Veteran
Posts: 2,615
And1: 576
Joined: Nov 10, 2010

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part V 

Post#552 » by Jay81 » Thu Jun 14, 2012 3:45 pm

its funny when i read headlines saying that "CHO is modeling OKC model:

Does that model include the sheer amount of stupidity and luck involved in getting a once in a generation player like Durant?

What if Memphis had taken Harden instead of Thatbeet. Alot of the OKC model is based on ernie like stupidity from other GM's
popper
Veteran
Posts: 2,867
And1: 405
Joined: Jun 19, 2010

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part V 

Post#553 » by popper » Thu Jun 14, 2012 4:04 pm

I'd would be happy with the following draft assuming we could acquire another second round pick.

Beal - round 1

Plumlee - round 2

Crowder - round 2

English - round 2
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,602
And1: 23,070
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part V 

Post#554 » by nate33 » Thu Jun 14, 2012 4:13 pm

popper wrote:I'd would be happy with the following draft assuming we could acquire another second round pick.

Beal - round 1

Plumlee - round 2

Crowder - round 2

English - round 2

I seriously doubt we will add another 2nd rounder. If anything, we will combine our two 2nds and move up.
Severn Hoos
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,443
And1: 223
Joined: May 09, 2002

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part V 

Post#555 » by Severn Hoos » Thu Jun 14, 2012 4:14 pm

Jay81 wrote:which is better

drafting Trob and signing Eric Gordon

or drafting beal and signing Illysaova?


I'll take Door #2, Monte.
"A society that puts equality - in the sense of equality of outcome - ahead of freedom will end up with neither equality nor freedom. The use of force to achieve equality will destroy freedom" Milton Friedman, Free to Choose
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,203
And1: 8,002
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part V 

Post#556 » by Dat2U » Thu Jun 14, 2012 4:28 pm

Jay81 wrote:which is better

drafting Trob and signing Eric Gordon

or drafting beal and signing Illysaova?


I don't trust Gordon. It's a bad combination to be an undersized wing that relies heavily on athleticism & be injury prone. And he's coming off of a knee injury. There's just too much risk there.

Ilyasova was a top 10 PF last season. He's fairly young and has an ideal skill set to complement Wall. Add MKG or Beal and the Wizards have taken a significant step forward.
dobrojim
RealGM
Posts: 17,012
And1: 4,154
Joined: Sep 16, 2004

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part V 

Post#557 » by dobrojim » Thu Jun 14, 2012 4:52 pm

my ideal draft

3rd - Davis (both CHA and NOH have brain farts like the character in the Holy Grail
that gets asked his favorite color, red, no green, and gets cast into the chasm)

then anything else

more seriously -

3rd pick Beal
2nd rnd - Crowder or Green
2nd 2nd - Denmon

lineup
PG - Wall/Crawford/Mack
SG - Beal/Crawford/Denmon
SF - Chris Singleton (yeah I know almost everyone hates this)/ Crowder/Martin
PF - Nene/Vesely/Booker/JSingleton
C - Seraphin/Nene/Vesely

12 man roster
(starters)
Wall
Beal
CSing
Nene }
KSera } the bruise brothers

bench
Crawford
Mack
Denmon
Booker
Crowder
JSingleton
Vesely

extra player(s) on 15 man roster
CMartin

If we were able to sign Ilyasova, good. He squeezes someone off the active roster.
If we sign someone like D or G Green, someone else gets squeezed off the active roster.
A lot of what we call 'thought' is just mental activity

When you are accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression

Those who are convinced of absurdities, can be convinced to commit atrocities
fishercob
RealGM
Posts: 13,922
And1: 1,571
Joined: Apr 25, 2002
Location: Tenleytown, DC

2012 NBA Draft - Part V 

Post#558 » by fishercob » Thu Jun 14, 2012 4:56 pm

Are we not even having Barnes on for a workout? I haven't seen anything on workouts for top guys other than Beal, Mkg and Robinson.
"Some people have a way with words....some people....not have way."
— Steve Martin
mg
General Manager
Posts: 8,822
And1: 4,671
Joined: Jun 12, 2003

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part V 

Post#559 » by mg » Thu Jun 14, 2012 5:03 pm

I noticed this on twitter:

@GoodmanCBS
Harrison Barnes vs. Bradley Beal in Cleveland on Saturday, source told CBSSports. Should be interesting to see what happens in that one.
7-Day Dray
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,422
And1: 5
Joined: May 22, 2011
Location: DMV

Re: 2012 NBA Draft - Part V 

Post#560 » by 7-Day Dray » Thu Jun 14, 2012 5:19 pm

fishercob wrote:Are we not even having Barnes on for a workout? I haven't seen anything on workouts for top guys other than Beal, Mkg and Robinson.


A lot of the top prospects haven't worked out for teams yet. IDK why. I would hope that we schedule a workout for him though. And Drummond.

Return to Washington Wizards