ImageImageImageImageImage

OT: Dream Team Documentary

Moderators: montestewart, LyricalRico, nate33

LyricalRico
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 30,561
And1: 853
Joined: May 23, 2002
Location: Back into the fray!
Contact:
       

Re: OT: Dream Team Documentary 

Post#21 » by LyricalRico » Mon Jun 18, 2012 6:12 pm

Ruzious wrote:Physically, today's players could probably match up with the Dream Team, but mentally, the Dream Team had such a swag factor advantage that I don't think a 7 game series would have even been close. By the 4th quarter of game 6, you'd see Jordan and Magic laughing on the bench watching young L8ner finally get some PT.


:nod:
fishercob
RealGM
Posts: 13,922
And1: 1,571
Joined: Apr 25, 2002
Location: Tenleytown, DC

Re: OT: Dream Team Documentary 

Post#22 » by fishercob » Mon Jun 18, 2012 6:36 pm

Ruzious wrote:Physically, today's players could probably match up with the Dream Team, but mentally, the Dream Team had such a swag factor advantage that I don't think a 7 game series would have even been close. By the 4th quarter of game 6, you'd see Jordan and Magic laughing on the bench watching young L8ner finally get some PT.



So Magic is going to use his mental powers to stay in front of Derrick Rose? Magic is one of the greatest ever -- maybe THE greatest PG ever. But the game as changed, and Magic at his age, would have been in real trouble defensively against the explosively athletic, high skilled guys like Rose, Williams and Westbrook (not even mentioning Paul).

They highlighted in the doc what success Bobby Hurley had against them in that first scrimmage and made specific mention about how their Achilles heel was small, quick guards. They didn't play against anyone within the stratosphere of Rose, et al.

Too bad they left Isiah off the team; he could have helped ;-)

Kidding aside, Magic would have been in real trouble defensively, as would have Stockton. And it's not like you could have switched MJ or Pippen on to the defensive point because they would have been toiling with some combo of Kobe, Wade, Lebron, Durant and Melo. Howard would have given Ewing fits. Barkley would have been physically over matched, if not dominated. Malone could certainly have been effective, but again, there's serious depth of athleticism and skill on the '12 squad.
"Some people have a way with words....some people....not have way."
— Steve Martin
fishercob
RealGM
Posts: 13,922
And1: 1,571
Joined: Apr 25, 2002
Location: Tenleytown, DC

Re: OT: Dream Team Documentary 

Post#23 » by fishercob » Mon Jun 18, 2012 6:43 pm

Just interesting side by side comparison for discussion purposes:

2008 team's stats are here

Scroll to the bottom of this link for the 92 team's stats.
"Some people have a way with words....some people....not have way."
— Steve Martin
Severn Hoos
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,443
And1: 223
Joined: May 09, 2002

Re: OT: Dream Team Documentary 

Post#24 » by Severn Hoos » Mon Jun 18, 2012 6:44 pm

To make it a fair comparison, you would have to saddle the current team with one upperclass college player with "pedigree" - i.e., not Anthony Davis, for example. If the '92 team had to go with Laettner instead of Shaq or Zo or Webber, the current team should have to go with, shall we say, Robinson?

;-)
"A society that puts equality - in the sense of equality of outcome - ahead of freedom will end up with neither equality nor freedom. The use of force to achieve equality will destroy freedom" Milton Friedman, Free to Choose
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: OT: Dream Team Documentary 

Post#25 » by Ruzious » Mon Jun 18, 2012 6:55 pm

fishercob wrote:
Ruzious wrote:Physically, today's players could probably match up with the Dream Team, but mentally, the Dream Team had such a swag factor advantage that I don't think a 7 game series would have even been close. By the 4th quarter of game 6, you'd see Jordan and Magic laughing on the bench watching young L8ner finally get some PT.



So Magic is going to use his mental powers to stay in front of Derrick Rose? Magic is one of the greatest ever -- maybe THE greatest PG ever. But the game as changed, and Magic at his age, would have been in real trouble defensively against the explosively athletic, high skilled guys like Rose, Williams and Westbrook (not even mentioning Paul).

They highlighted in the doc what success Bobby Hurley had against them in that first scrimmage and made specific mention about how their Achilles heel was small, quick guards. They didn't play against anyone within the stratosphere of Rose, et al.

Too bad they left Isiah off the team; he could have helped ;-)

Kidding aside, Magic would have been in real trouble defensively, as would have Stockton. And it's not like you could have switched MJ or Pippen on to the defensive point because they would have been toiling with some combo of Kobe, Wade, Lebron, Durant and Melo. Howard would have given Ewing fits. Barkley would have been physically over matched, if not dominated. Malone could certainly have been effective, but again, there's serious depth of athleticism and skill on the '12 squad.

Correct me if I'm right, but... having Pippen and Jordan on the perimeter backed by The Admiral/Ewing at center... I'm prably going to be ok on defense even if I had Ramon Sessions at the point and Troy F Murphy at PF.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
Severn Hoos
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,443
And1: 223
Joined: May 09, 2002

Re: OT: Dream Team Documentary 

Post#26 » by Severn Hoos » Mon Jun 18, 2012 6:56 pm

Actually, the more I think about it, the more I realize that it's asking the wrong question.

For example, if one were to make the statement this way: "The current Olympic team is a greater collection of talent than the '92 Dream Team" then I think it would be absolutely false. I think that we will never see a poem as lovely as.... I mean we will never see a "collection of talent" like that team. Sorry, but Derrick Rose will never be the level of player that Magic was, and you could go down the list one-by-one, and the '92 team would take it hands down - maybe even in a sweep.

So - if the question is - "Would the '12 team beat the '92 team if each played at the level they were playing at their respective Olympics?" Then I think it's more plausible that the current team would win. But you might also have been able to put together a team of younger players in '92 (NBA and college) who might have beat the actual Dream Team in real time. Starting with Isiah at point, adding younger guys like Shaq, Webber, Mourning, Gary Payton, Larry Johnson, Glen Rice, Mitch Richmond - you just might have won a game on the physical aspects alone.

The comparable team today to the '92 team would include Duncan, Kobe, Vince, Brand - guys who were given their spots for a lifetime body of work, not for how they were playing at that moment.

So yeah, LeBron and Wade and Rose and the rest might win a game against MJ and the Geezers. But they will never approach the greatness that was on that single squad.
"A society that puts equality - in the sense of equality of outcome - ahead of freedom will end up with neither equality nor freedom. The use of force to achieve equality will destroy freedom" Milton Friedman, Free to Choose
fishercob
RealGM
Posts: 13,922
And1: 1,571
Joined: Apr 25, 2002
Location: Tenleytown, DC

Re: OT: Dream Team Documentary 

Post#27 » by fishercob » Mon Jun 18, 2012 7:09 pm

Severn Hoos wrote:Actually, the more I think about it, the more I realize that it's asking the wrong question.

For example, if one were to make the statement this way: "The current Olympic team is a greater collection of talent than the '92 Dream Team" then I think it would be absolutely false. I think that we will never see a poem as lovely as.... I mean we will never see a "collection of talent" like that team. Sorry, but Derrick Rose will never be the level of player that Magic was, and you could go down the list one-by-one, and the '92 team would take it hands down - maybe even in a sweep.

So - if the question is - "Would the '12 team beat the '92 team if each played at the level they were playing at their respective Olympics?" Then I think it's more plausible that the current team would win. But you might also have been able to put together a team of younger players in '92 (NBA and college) who might have beat the actual Dream Team in real time. Starting with Isiah at point, adding younger guys like Shaq, Webber, Mourning, Gary Payton, Larry Johnson, Glen Rice, Mitch Richmond - you just might have won a game on the physical aspects alone.

The comparable team today to the '92 team would include Duncan, Kobe, Vince, Brand - guys who were given their spots for a lifetime body of work, not for how they were playing at that moment.

So yeah, LeBron and Wade and Rose and the rest might win a game against MJ and the Geezers. But they will never approach the greatness that was on that single squad.


We're enough in to hypotheticals about team vs. team. I'm not thinking or talking about what if the Dream Team had been constructed differently. It wasn't. And if it's the greatest team ever on any level, why on earth would anyone want to construct it differently?

I think most favoring the DT are extremely caught up in nostalgia and entirely ignoring level of competition. The silver medal Croatia team had Petrovic, Kukoc, Dino Radja and a bunch of nobodies. They'd get worked by today's Brazil, Greece, Argentina, or France. Spain would beat them by 30.

The DT ran people to death and and exploiting a huge athletic advantage they had over their competition. They couldn't do that against a healthy USA12 team. In fact, they'd be at a pretty clear disadvantage athletically IMO.
"Some people have a way with words....some people....not have way."
— Steve Martin
dlts20
RealGM
Posts: 12,454
And1: 6,195
Joined: Dec 14, 2006

Re: OT: Dream Team Documentary 

Post#28 » by dlts20 » Mon Jun 18, 2012 8:48 pm

Fish, you also cant look at things one way. Hurley did some things but it was clear that the Dream Team just didnt play well together at that point. They killed them the 2nd time. Moreso, while Magic has no chance of staying with Rose, you tell me what chance Rose has of defending a 6'8 PG with size & handles like Magic? It would be even harder for Rose and the others to guard him
Severn Hoos
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,443
And1: 223
Joined: May 09, 2002

Re: OT: Dream Team Documentary 

Post#29 » by Severn Hoos » Mon Jun 18, 2012 9:32 pm

fish, I'm not disagreeing with you - I tend to think hat this year's team would beat the '92 team. (Although I think MJ and Scottie would have something to say about the final outcome.) It's just that I think that statement sounds more impressive than it actually is - which was the point I was clumsily trying to make by saying that you might have been able to beat them with the "second team" from contemporary players, due to the advanced age of Magic/Bird/etc.

But beyond that, there's an existential question involved. Would Ty Cobb bat .300 against today's pitching, let alone .400? Could Babe Ruth hit 60 home runs? Would Bob Cousy be a Steve Nash clone, or would he be simply overmatched physically against today's players? Guys like Gale Sayers, Fran Tarkenton, and Crazy legs Hirsch would all look anemic next to their modern day counterparts.

So do we judge players and teams relative to their times? If so, the Dream Team will still be the best team ever, unless another team regularly wins games by the half-century mark. But I also think it's at least plausible that the current version would beat the 92 team head-to-head.

How's that for straddling the fence with a both-and response?
"A society that puts equality - in the sense of equality of outcome - ahead of freedom will end up with neither equality nor freedom. The use of force to achieve equality will destroy freedom" Milton Friedman, Free to Choose
fishercob
RealGM
Posts: 13,922
And1: 1,571
Joined: Apr 25, 2002
Location: Tenleytown, DC

Re: OT: Dream Team Documentary 

Post#30 » by fishercob » Mon Jun 18, 2012 9:45 pm

Severn Hoos wrote:fish, I'm not disagreeing with you - I tend to think hat this year's team would beat the '92 team. (Although I think MJ and Scottie would have something to say about the final outcome.) It's just that I think that statement sounds more impressive than it actually is - which was the point I was clumsily trying to make by saying that you might have been able to beat them with the "second team" from contemporary players, due to the advanced age of Magic/Bird/etc.

But beyond that, there's an existential question involved. Would Ty Cobb bat .300 against today's pitching, let alone .400? Could Babe Ruth hit 60 home runs? Would Bob Cousy be a Steve Nash clone, or would he be simply overmatched physically against today's players? Guys like Gale Sayers, Fran Tarkenton, and Crazy legs Hirsch would all look anemic next to their modern day counterparts.

So do we judge players and teams relative to their times? If so, the Dream Team will still be the best team ever, unless another team regularly wins games by the half-century mark. But I also think it's at least plausible that the current version would beat the 92 team head-to-head.

How's that for straddling the fence with a both-and response?

It's a good post and I appreciate the clarification.

And yet, we're talking about a 20 year spread -- not about Ty Cobb vs modern pitching. The NBA already had gone through an athletic renaissance. So it's a little easier to imagine how the teams would match up.

Relative to their "times." Hmm. Times? Do you mean relative to their competition? The DT obviously obliterated their competition, but we can all agree that they had none relative to today's team USA.
Obviously that wasn't the DT's fault, and as the doc explains, the DT is actually responsible for all the competition our guys face today.

I am looking forward to rooting for them this summer.
"Some people have a way with words....some people....not have way."
— Steve Martin
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: OT: Dream Team Documentary 

Post#31 » by Ruzious » Mon Jun 18, 2012 10:00 pm

Another thing the documentary captured was what the Olympics meant... back then. It transcended sports. I can't put into words what it meant, but it was the whole world getting together in the spirit of competition and respect. It just doesn't have that feeling anymore, at least not on the level it used to - whether it's from politics getting in the way (Jimmy Carter boycotting), violence (Israeli athletes being attacked), too much professionalism... it's just not the same.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
mhd
General Manager
Posts: 9,624
And1: 1,672
Joined: Mar 25, 2004

Re: OT: Dream Team Documentary 

Post#32 » by mhd » Tue Jun 19, 2012 2:28 am

The Dream team had 3 trancendent defenders in Jordan, Pippen and Robinson all in their primes. They could defend ANYONE. Mullen is a better shooter than anyone on the current dream team. Chris Bosh and Tyson Chandler, and a currently injured Dwight ARE NOT stopping Barkley and Malone on the low block. Both were in their primes. Both ALWAYS rebounded against bigger guys. Jordan and Pippen could defend CP3 (who is not nearly as quick as he used to be) or Rose (injured). Westbrook would be the most trouble, but Jordan is on par as an athlete. The only player on the current dream team equal in terms of an intellectual perspective is Kobe.
User avatar
Kanyewest
RealGM
Posts: 10,344
And1: 2,719
Joined: Jul 05, 2004

Re: OT: Dream Team Documentary 

Post#33 » by Kanyewest » Tue Jun 19, 2012 4:14 am

It would be an interesting matchup. Pippen and Jordan are great defenders but they can't guard all 4 of the positions including Kobe, LeBron, Durant, Anthony, and whoever they put out there at point guard or center. Williams, CP3, or LeBron, especially if they wanted to match him up on Magic Johnson.

There also some intriguing players that could be on the 2012. The tryout factors also probably improve the team.

I would still favor the dream team but I think it would be close and exciting and frankly wouldn't be shocked if the 2012 London team came up on top.
hands11
Banned User
Posts: 31,171
And1: 2,444
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: OT: Dream Team Documentary 

Post#34 » by hands11 » Tue Jun 19, 2012 4:25 am

Ruzious wrote:Very well done. It was interesting to see how much attention Barkley got and how little Stockton got - and seeing the contrasts between good Barkley and bad Barkley. Magic - there will never be anyone remotely like him, imo. Jordan was easily the best player and a freak of nature, but Magic made that group magic.


Personality is an underated skill. So are other mental attributes of which there are many. Creativity. Acuity. Communication skills. Hell, even ones facial expressions and body language can communicate powerful messages to teammates an opponents. Magic was a master of the non verbal communication and misdirection. That is why he was Magic. He was a magician out there.

But he was also the most likable guy in the room as well. But also a ferrous competitor.

He was the total package.
hands11
Banned User
Posts: 31,171
And1: 2,444
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: OT: Dream Team Documentary 

Post#35 » by hands11 » Tue Jun 19, 2012 5:18 am

Severn Hoos wrote:Actually, the more I think about it, the more I realize that it's asking the wrong question.

For example, if one were to make the statement this way: "The current Olympic team is a greater collection of talent than the '92 Dream Team" then I think it would be absolutely false. I think that we will never see a poem as lovely as.... I mean we will never see a "collection of talent" like that team. Sorry, but Derrick Rose will never be the level of player that Magic was, and you could go down the list one-by-one, and the '92 team would take it hands down - maybe even in a sweep.

So - if the question is - "Would the '12 team beat the '92 team if each played at the level they were playing at their respective Olympics?" Then I think it's more plausible that the current team would win. But you might also have been able to put together a team of younger players in '92 (NBA and college) who might have beat the actual Dream Team in real time. Starting with Isiah at point, adding younger guys like Shaq, Webber, Mourning, Gary Payton, Larry Johnson, Glen Rice, Mitch Richmond - you just might have won a game on the physical aspects alone.

The comparable team today to the '92 team would include Duncan, Kobe, Vince, Brand - guys who were given their spots for a lifetime body of work, not for how they were playing at that moment.

So yeah, LeBron and Wade and Rose and the rest might win a game against MJ and the Geezers. But they will never approach the greatness that was on that single squad.


True. So what would that team look like You starter it. So what would be the 12.

Nash, Jason Kidd
Kobe, Ray Allen, Manu
Peirce,
KG, Dirk
Duncan

Here is a far as I could figure out. I guess we need that younger players. How old was MJ and Pippen. Would LeBron be on this team ? I know a lot of people hate him but he is getting a lot less hatable.
User avatar
pancakes3
General Manager
Posts: 9,581
And1: 3,013
Joined: Jul 27, 2003
Location: Virginia
Contact:

Re: OT: Dream Team Documentary 

Post#36 » by pancakes3 » Tue Jun 19, 2012 6:54 am

you mean, ignoring the fact that 3 of the 10 guys you want are foreign nationals?

i honestly think that

Wade
Kobe
Durant
Lebron
Howard

each playing selflessly, with intensity, and sacrificed personal style at the benefit of the team (Lebron hitting the boards and posting up, wade being a true pg which he is fully capable of, kobe feeding the post first and then making cuts off-ball) then yes they'll have a chance. i still say it's a slim one because for all the chemistry that this hypothetical squad is capable of, it came more natural for the '92 dream team. in fact, i think the only way that the '12 squad takes it is if everyone save howard concurrently has an unbelievably hot shooting night from beyond the arc.
Bullets -> Wizards

Return to Washington Wizards