ImageImageImage

We are no longer in need of a PG

Moderators: KingDavid, heat4life, MettaWorldPanda, Wiltside, IggieCC, BFRESH44, QUIZ

User avatar
Vampire Diaries
Sophomore
Posts: 138
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 10, 2012

We are no longer in need of a PG 

Post#1 » by Vampire Diaries » Fri Jun 22, 2012 3:30 am

I am thrilled with what we have in Mario Chalmers and Norris Cole. Let's focus on the Big man/Center now, because Chalmers and Cole are going to be just fine
Image
User avatar
DefenseWins
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 39,525
And1: 13,554
Joined: Apr 30, 2011
       

Re: We are no longer in need of a PG 

Post#2 » by DefenseWins » Fri Jun 22, 2012 3:39 am

I always wanted a Center rather than a PG. I always thought Wade and LBJ were just our PG's. I was fine with that.

Needing a PG was never really a problem.

but yes, Rio is now a legit threat and just makes us better

Cole off the bench next year is going to be so good. He hit a rookie wall but his speed man, will help us. WIth practice and a training camp and whatnot, he will be better.
User avatar
Vampire Diaries
Sophomore
Posts: 138
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 10, 2012

Re: We are no longer in need of a PG 

Post#3 » by Vampire Diaries » Fri Jun 22, 2012 5:26 am

They are both the bravest most aggressive players u could want. With our Big 3, this is EXACTLY what we need next to them. Chalmers is a perfect fit and Cole's speed makes the sky the limit for this kid
Image
sisibilio
Head Coach
Posts: 7,254
And1: 1,397
Joined: Nov 18, 2009

Re: We are no longer in need of a PG 

Post#4 » by sisibilio » Fri Jun 22, 2012 5:45 am

I agree to an extent, now if Nash becomes available you just can't say no.
If you want to try to measure the elements of basketball that are supposedly unmeasurable, spend a game just watching Marc Gasol.
@MikePradaSBN

Wembanyama was created to end all LeBron vs Jordan debates
SweetTouch
RealGM
Posts: 20,381
And1: 3,247
Joined: Mar 29, 2010
Location: Fl

Re: We are no longer in need of a PG 

Post#5 » by SweetTouch » Fri Jun 22, 2012 5:47 am

Still need a center and more athletic bench players

Bosh & Lebron will only get better (plus our young PG's)
Stop being so disrespectful.
User avatar
Vampire Diaries
Sophomore
Posts: 138
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 10, 2012

Re: We are no longer in need of a PG 

Post#6 » by Vampire Diaries » Fri Jun 22, 2012 5:29 pm

Yes I wouldnt turn down Nash if he wanted to sign, but i dont believe we should get rid of cole or chalmers to make it happen
Image
diablerouge
Analyst
Posts: 3,222
And1: 260
Joined: Dec 18, 2010

Re: We are no longer in need of a PG 

Post#7 » by diablerouge » Fri Jun 22, 2012 7:03 pm

a big man is the priority unless nash wants to join. i have a feeling ray allen want to hop on board too.
User avatar
GetMoney
Analyst
Posts: 3,312
And1: 1,035
Joined: Dec 14, 2006

Re: We are no longer in need of a PG 

Post#8 » by GetMoney » Fri Jun 22, 2012 7:17 pm

god knows what cole is up to right now
hopefully he resurfaces before next season begins
ImageImage. . . AND STILL
The Infamous1 wrote:It's only so long Weak teams can pretend
User avatar
LikeABosh
RealGM
Posts: 19,103
And1: 8,843
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
     

Re: We are no longer in need of a PG 

Post#9 » by LikeABosh » Fri Jun 22, 2012 7:28 pm

You don't need an elite point guard to win a championship. Our passing during this series was very good. Just very fluid.
Woolyy
Senior
Posts: 515
And1: 116
Joined: Dec 17, 2011
   

Re: We are no longer in need of a PG 

Post#10 » by Woolyy » Fri Jun 22, 2012 7:36 pm

We're lucky because Rio thinks he's the best player on the team, plus him/Cole aren't afraid to take big shots.
EscapoTHB
Suspended
Posts: 7,222
And1: 1,249
Joined: Nov 26, 2011

Re: We are no longer in need of a PG 

Post#11 » by EscapoTHB » Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:06 pm

That said, if Nash wants to come here, he's the number 1 free agent to get.

Especially since we now know we have Chris Bosh who is a dominant NBA center(who knew?).

Nash
Wade
Battier
Lebron
Bosh

Bench:
Rio
UD
Mike or JJ

That's a nice 8 man rotation. With the opportunity during the season to continue to develop Pittman, whatever Rookie we draft, Harris, and Cole. Good mix of young and old.
Pimpwerx
Banned User
Posts: 8,836
And1: 78
Joined: Jul 19, 2010

Re: We are no longer in need of a PG 

Post#12 » by Pimpwerx » Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:17 pm

I'd still take Nash. We should be jettisoning Juwan, one of Pittman/Turiaf/Curry and possibly Miller. We'll have roster slots open, and it would be nice to have Cole and Rio backup a HoFer.

However, I agree with the OP. We're in great shape with Rio and Cole as our PG rotation. PEACE.
User avatar
RexBoyWonder
RealGM
Posts: 17,907
And1: 35,780
Joined: Mar 03, 2011

Re: We are no longer in need of a PG 

Post#13 » by RexBoyWonder » Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:13 pm

I think we can all agree that a PG is not our top priority with Mario improving like he has, but if we can get a real proven guy to play some minutes at PG it would'nt hurt.

only 2 guys i would really take are Nash and Jason Terry, and Terry doesnt even have to be a starter, he'll back up both Wade and Rio.

Now Lets get some Bigs..
Chalm Downs wrote:his nickname is boywonder ffs
Miamis3rdRing
Banned User
Posts: 10,050
And1: 131
Joined: Apr 08, 2010
Location: L.A.

Re: We are no longer in need of a PG 

Post#14 » by Miamis3rdRing » Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:22 pm

Even though this is a younger team than what we had post-2006, Riley and company should not hesitate to improve the team. Having guys that are up there in age and are hungry/desperate to win is a good thing.

If a guy like Nash wants to come, you bring him in ASAP.

Chalmers/Cole is solid. If we come back with those two at PG next season I'll be alright with that. Cole will come back a better player next season. Getting Nash will put him back seat only for a year.
Miami316
Banned User
Posts: 410
And1: 6
Joined: Jun 08, 2012

Re: We are no longer in need of a PG 

Post#15 » by Miami316 » Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:54 pm

The way Rio played in the playoffs I would only take CP3 Rose or DWill over him he's moved into an upper echelon tier of point guards. I would rate him higher than Rondo for a team like this, he's more clutch and quite honestly came through in the clutch when he was needed to. Better jump shooter and more confidence as someone posted he feels hes the best on the team...you need to feel that way if you're going to be the QB of this team. All this talk about Nash is unwarranted unless he wants to sign on as the 7th man (its pretty much a lock that Ray Allen is coming to town as the 6th man), DO NOT REPLACE RIO...EXTEND HIM!!!!
cb1
RealGM
Posts: 10,316
And1: 1,214
Joined: Apr 01, 2012

Re: We are no longer in need of a PG 

Post#16 » by cb1 » Sat Jun 23, 2012 12:29 am

I like the different dynamic that Rio and Cole give us. They both do something different and the sky is the limit for them. I think the C should be prority #1.
SweetTouch
RealGM
Posts: 20,381
And1: 3,247
Joined: Mar 29, 2010
Location: Fl

Re: We are no longer in need of a PG 

Post#17 » by SweetTouch » Sat Jun 23, 2012 12:48 am

Yeah, Center is still the position we need most help in.

We all know Bosh doesn't like guarding true centers

Then again, there are only like 2-5 true centers left in this league
Stop being so disrespectful.
User avatar
ReturnofFlash
Rookie
Posts: 1,207
And1: 262
Joined: Oct 02, 2010

Re: We are no longer in need of a PG 

Post#18 » by ReturnofFlash » Sat Jun 23, 2012 1:05 am

Is it possible to get 2 people? I personally would want Dalembert with Terry or Allen, more of Allen but I doubt he takes that little money. Also add in Tmac or Vince Carter if he takes like vet or something? He aint bad to get a few points when Battier and Miller playing bad.
LeMVP
Rookie
Posts: 1,086
And1: 4
Joined: May 04, 2012

Re: We are no longer in need of a PG 

Post#19 » by LeMVP » Sat Jun 23, 2012 1:26 am

I don't understand how this is still a discussion. I've never seen a clearer situation than this for a team. Let me break it down one last time (from my point of view):

What do we need?

- PG: Do we need one? No, Chalmers/Cole/LeBron/Wade can get the job down without a problem. Would Nash be a big acquisition? Is this even a question? Nash is still playing like a Top3 PG and would be a huge boost for this team. He could come from the bench and anchor the whole game with LBJ out, he could be on the floor on crunch time, he could play the PnR with Bosh/LeBron, he could learn Chalmers/Cole a thousand things, etc. Yes, if we can get him take him, but we don't need any other new ball handler.

- Position 2-3: all depends on the future of Miller/Jones. If one or both retire we absolutely need to replace him/them. Nice acquisitions would be Terry and Allen or any other good spot-up 3pt shooter. If none of both retires, we should still try to get Allen. He's the GOAT-3pt shooter and Miller is injured at all time.

- Position 4: no need for backups.

- C: Do we have any average center on this team? No. Curry isn't an option and will probably never be one and Turiaf is at best a backup center. Joel shall (and will) remain on this team, he can bring a lot defensively and is a rather quick C. He got some nice post moves in the last months too. Pittman is a work in progress, if we get a new center he should take Turiaf's spot. If there is one position where we really need an upgrade it's this one. We should go after a massiv center (weight), who is a good defender and has good hands. He can't be our weak point on defense and has to be able to catch passes (unlike Joel).

Coach: Spo needs to / and will remain headcoach. Said it all season long and will continue to say it: he's a great coach. He needs to improve his in-game adjustments, play call out of TO and clutch-situations. For the rest he's an absolute beast at his age/experience and has proven to be the right coach beside egos like Wade/James.

Other: Juwan Howard. This guy has to remain on this team. I don't care as what (assistant, 14th man, Gatorade-boy, ...). His an anchor point, a coach-player, the co-badass on this team along with Haslem. KEEP THIS MAN!
User avatar
DayofMourning
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 37,318
And1: 91,668
Joined: Jan 03, 2006
       

Re: We are no longer in need of a PG 

Post#20 » by DayofMourning » Sat Jun 23, 2012 3:18 am

I just don't see the need for Nash. We have two very capable ball handlers in Wade/James, and Chalmers/Cole are much, much better defenders than Nash is.

We play a defensive game, that creates opportunities for fast breaks. At what stage is Nash going to be able to play Heat defense??? Nash isn't a Heat guy. If he were 30 and not 38, then we might be having a different conversation. Adding him, and trying to integrate him, while postponing Cole's development wouldn't make a lot of sense.

Return to Miami Heat