OFFICIAL: Sam Dalembert to Milwaukee

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

Who won the trade?

Houston
10
29%
Milwaukee
10
29%
Both
12
35%
Neither
2
6%
 
Total votes: 34

User avatar
DusterBuster
RealGM
Posts: 35,835
And1: 21,508
Joined: Jan 31, 2010
   

OFFICIAL: Sam Dalembert to Milwaukee 

Post#1 » by DusterBuster » Wed Jun 27, 2012 7:30 pm

Per Woj

Houston has traded Sam Dalembert as part of a package to Milwaukee, league sources tell Y!

Read more: http://hoopshype.com/twitter/media.html#ixzz1z1XG5DzB
Mr Swagtastic
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 20,913
And1: 3,398
Joined: Dec 29, 2005
Location: Jurassic Park
         

Re: OFFICIAL: Sam Dalembert to Milwaukee 

Post#2 » by Mr Swagtastic » Wed Jun 27, 2012 7:32 pm

I would laugh if The Bucks just handed Houston #12 for Sammy D, I wonder if it's some sort of Sammy D and K-Mart for Ellis and Gooden type of deal
Lord Leoshes wrote:i personally would rather keep Chalmers over Lowry
Jow128
Junior
Posts: 288
And1: 13
Joined: Mar 22, 2010

Re: OFFICIAL: Sam Dalembert to Milwaukee 

Post#3 » by Jow128 » Wed Jun 27, 2012 7:33 pm

Please Jesus don't include Gooden back to Houston
User avatar
DusterBuster
RealGM
Posts: 35,835
And1: 21,508
Joined: Jan 31, 2010
   

Re: OFFICIAL: Sam Dalembert to Milwaukee 

Post#4 » by DusterBuster » Wed Jun 27, 2012 7:33 pm

Dalembert and the 14th pick go to the Bucks for the 12th pick, Jon Brockman, Jon Leurer and Brockman, sources tell Y!

Easier to read version....

Dally
14

for

12
Brockman
Leurer
Livingston (just added per woj)
Get ready to learn Chinese buddy... #YangBang
Mr Swagtastic
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 20,913
And1: 3,398
Joined: Dec 29, 2005
Location: Jurassic Park
         

Re: OFFICIAL: Sam Dalembert to Milwaukee 

Post#5 » by Mr Swagtastic » Wed Jun 27, 2012 7:39 pm

Seems like a steal for The Bucks, they got a defensive presence in Dally and moved up 2 spots all for Brockman who looks like journey man type who is a 10th man off the bench and Leuer who might be decent.

I think The Rockets are seriously putting a package together for Howard with their picks + Dally and K-Mart's expiring deals
Lord Leoshes wrote:i personally would rather keep Chalmers over Lowry
x-
Analyst
Posts: 3,511
And1: 133
Joined: Dec 06, 2005

Re: OFFICIAL: Sam Dalembert to Milwaukee 

Post#6 » by x- » Wed Jun 27, 2012 7:45 pm

From a Rockets POV Dalembert was going to be traded no matter what.

Really like this move for us. Leuer is a nice piece. #12 > #14. Dalembert was a goner as I said. Livingston is only $1M guaranteed and he actually might be a nice backup for a year. Brockman I imagine will be bought out or cut.
User avatar
lpbman
Starter
Posts: 2,173
And1: 43
Joined: Jul 02, 2001

Re: OFFICIAL: Sam Dalembert to Milwaukee 

Post#7 » by lpbman » Wed Jun 27, 2012 7:45 pm

Bucks move down, not up... and we won't be trading Dally to Orlando because we just traded him to Mil.


Are you high or something?
winter_mute_13
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,996
And1: 1,482
Joined: Oct 08, 2003
 

Re: OFFICIAL: Sam Dalembert to Milwaukee 

Post#8 » by winter_mute_13 » Wed Jun 27, 2012 7:46 pm

Not bad for the Bucks. Dalembert isn't the best but they badly needed a center. I'm assuming Bucks are keeping Daly.

For the Rockets, depends on what they do with the #12 pick. They just added additional cap (as compared to waiving Daly's partially guaranteed) for a bunch of players who probably won't play for them. I guess they'll be filler for the next trade? Or to fill out the roster if a bunch of guys go out in a big name trade.
winter_mute_13
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,996
And1: 1,482
Joined: Oct 08, 2003
 

Re: OFFICIAL: Sam Dalembert to Milwaukee 

Post#9 » by winter_mute_13 » Wed Jun 27, 2012 7:50 pm

x- wrote:From a Rockets POV Dalembert was going to be traded no matter what.

Really like this move for us. Leuer is a nice piece. #12 > #14. Dalembert was a goner as I said. Livingston is only $1M guaranteed and he actually might be a nice backup for a year. Brockman I imagine will be bought out or cut.


Missed that Livingston has only $1m guaranteed. So that's roughly $2.7m of guaranteed money incoming, and Daly's $1.5m guaranteed outgoing? Still a bit of a cap hit, but not much.
User avatar
BarbaGrizz
Analyst
Posts: 3,610
And1: 1,752
Joined: May 25, 2007
Location: Brazil
     

Re: OFFICIAL: Sam Dalembert to Milwaukee 

Post#10 » by BarbaGrizz » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:03 pm

so this means Bucks will not go after Leonards/Zeller?
Celtic Koala wrote:The only player from the 90s that would have been a top 10 player in the modern league would have been MJ and if you stretch it a bit Olajuwon

bstein14 wrote:Mikan is much worse than Luka Garza, who can't even make an NBA roster today
User avatar
Scoot McGroot
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,699
And1: 13,941
Joined: Feb 16, 2005
     

Re: OFFICIAL: Sam Dalembert to Milwaukee 

Post#11 » by Scoot McGroot » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:17 pm

winter_mute_13 wrote:
x- wrote:From a Rockets POV Dalembert was going to be traded no matter what.

Really like this move for us. Leuer is a nice piece. #12 > #14. Dalembert was a goner as I said. Livingston is only $1M guaranteed and he actually might be a nice backup for a year. Brockman I imagine will be bought out or cut.


Missed that Livingston has only $1m guaranteed. So that's roughly $2.7m of guaranteed money incoming, and Daly's $1.5m guaranteed outgoing? Still a bit of a cap hit, but not much.


Leuer is un-guaranteed. Livingston only has $1 million guaranteed, or is $3.5 million if kept. Brockman is guaranteed $1 million (his entire contract). Dalembert had $1.5 million guaranteed, but $6.7 million if kept.

Thus, if all players are waived, Houston essentially payed $.5 million to move up 2 spots. Not bad. If they think Brockman could fill Dalembert's spot, and that Houston would have been forced to keep Dalembert, then they just saved a great sum of money. If they think Livingston can be a solid backup PG to Dragic, and they intend to trade Lowry, they have just filled needs as well.

Lots of options for Houston. Solid value trade for Milwaukee. Dalembert instantly becomes their starting center, at a very affordable price, and forms a nice little tandem at center with Udoh. All for only trading down 2 spots.
User avatar
Rockazoids
Head Coach
Posts: 6,487
And1: 2,223
Joined: Jun 05, 2008
Location: Cincinnati
     

Re: OFFICIAL: Sam Dalembert to Milwaukee 

Post#12 » by Rockazoids » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:20 pm

HOU GM must be having a great time playing with the Trade Checker.
Follow the science not some internet physician & get your shots.
Kerrsed wrote:Just thinking of this deal makes my ass hurt!

turk3d wrote: you're about to make me go old rem on you

GoNYK1288 wrote:You better clench your butt cheeks because the GB is about to have at you.
User avatar
DusterBuster
RealGM
Posts: 35,835
And1: 21,508
Joined: Jan 31, 2010
   

Re: OFFICIAL: Sam Dalembert to Milwaukee 

Post#13 » by DusterBuster » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:21 pm

Darrell Morey is fat.
Get ready to learn Chinese buddy... #YangBang
skflives
Banned User
Posts: 3,531
And1: 281
Joined: Feb 14, 2009

Re: OFFICIAL: Sam Dalembert to Milwaukee 

Post#14 » by skflives » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:34 pm

Love this trade for the Bucks. Dalembert isn't great but he's better than what they had at center now plus they only needed to drop down two spots.
winter_mute_13
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,996
And1: 1,482
Joined: Oct 08, 2003
 

Re: OFFICIAL: Sam Dalembert to Milwaukee 

Post#15 » by winter_mute_13 » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:39 pm

Scoot McGroot wrote:
Leuer is un-guaranteed. Livingston only has $1 million guaranteed, or is $3.5 million if kept. Brockman is guaranteed $1 million (his entire contract). Dalembert had $1.5 million guaranteed, but $6.7 million if kept.

Thus, if all players are waived, Houston essentially payed $.5 million to move up 2 spots. Not bad. If they think Brockman could fill Dalembert's spot, and that Houston would have been forced to keep Dalembert, then they just saved a great sum of money. If they think Livingston can be a solid backup PG to Dragic, and they intend to trade Lowry, they have just filled needs as well.


Thanks Scoot. It does seem to be win win.
User avatar
Dr Positivity
RealGM
Posts: 62,592
And1: 16,344
Joined: Apr 29, 2009
       

Re: OFFICIAL: Sam Dalembert to Milwaukee 

Post#16 » by Dr Positivity » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:56 pm

Houston stealing Leuer is going to be one of the most relevant parts of this deal. Leuer had the 6th highest PER this year among 500 MP+ rookies and you just know Houston is a place where a stretch big man will be used right. I would say he has the value of a top 25 pick. So MIL basically gave up 12 and a late 1st to move down 2 spots and take Dalembert's contract. Hammond gonna Hammond
Liberate The Zoomers
x-
Analyst
Posts: 3,511
And1: 133
Joined: Dec 06, 2005

Re: OFFICIAL: Sam Dalembert to Milwaukee 

Post#17 » by x- » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:56 pm

I actually think the Bucks did OK here, too.

Giving up Leuer sucks, but if they're gonna re-sign Iyasova, they were going to have one or two bigs too many anyway.

Dalembert isn't any great, but he does the job for the most part.

I also like this move because for whatever reason I enjoy watching the Bucks play and if for nothing else, this move should help them improve if ever so slightly in the short term.
Case2012
Head Coach
Posts: 6,005
And1: 2,095
Joined: Jan 03, 2012
 

Re: OFFICIAL: Sam Dalembert to Milwaukee 

Post#18 » by Case2012 » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:58 pm

This is all out takes to move up 2 spots? Lol at every pick swap thread on this board. Just goes to show how delusional fans are with picks.
Image
Instagram: @casetwelve
Bentley1225
RealGM
Posts: 13,623
And1: 1,639
Joined: Jan 10, 2007

Re: OFFICIAL: Sam Dalembert to Milwaukee 

Post#19 » by Bentley1225 » Wed Jun 27, 2012 9:13 pm

So is the next move for Houston #14 and #18 for #10 and #46?
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: OFFICIAL: Sam Dalembert to Milwaukee 

Post#20 » by Ruzious » Wed Jun 27, 2012 9:30 pm

Nice little trade by Milwaukee. Leuer could be useful, but you gotta consider there was probably a reason Skiles stopped playing him. I think the reason begins with the letter D.

So, Houston now has who at center? Have they done away with the center position?
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams

Return to Trades and Transactions