#12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert

The Wet Whistle · Post #261 » by **The Wet Whistle** » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:32 pm

Leuer really isnt anything special. I'm guessing everyone flipped **** about him because he played for Wisconsin.

buckaroo · Post #262 » by **buckaroo** » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:32 pm

xTitan wrote:
europa wrote:
LUKE23 wrote:I'm wondering if we demanded 14 to stay in front of Philly for T. Jones. He's my guess at our pick right now. Either him or Ross.

If Ross is there I think he'll be the guy. Otherwise my money's on Jones.

I fear you are correct...about Jones, I would love to get Ross at this point.

John Canzano ‏@JohnCanzanoBFT
The more I talk with NBA people about Terrance Ross, (G, Washington) the more I wonder about Portland nabbing him at No.

Bucksfans1and2 · Post #263 » by **Bucksfans1and2** » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:32 pm

xTitan wrote:I think some on this board like Larry Sanders much more than the coaching staff does.....Udoh will get much more run next year then sanders will.

That's would mean a lot more if we were talking about any other coaching staff.

Sanders has pretty damn awesome advanced stats.

Newz · Post #264 » by **Newz** » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:32 pm

I wouldn't even be upset if we took Quincy Miller at 14. He's not a value at that spot, but I think he has a pretty huge upside.

xTitan · Post #265 » by **xTitan** » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:33 pm

Leuer is far superior offensively to Sanders and Udoh, they are far superior defesively......that probably won't change....none of them rebound well at this point.

Newz · Post #266 » by **Newz** » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:33 pm

The Wet Whistle wrote:Leuer really isnt anything special. I'm guessing everyone flipped **** about him because he played for Wisconsin.

I liked Leuer because I thought he could become a decent bench big. He has some nice offensive skills.

But man, was that guy abysmal on the glass and defensively. He made Drew Gooden look good in those areas.

xTitan · Post #267 » by **xTitan** » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:34 pm

Newz wrote:I wouldn't even be upset if we took Quincy Miller at 14. He's not a value at that spot, but I think he has a pretty huge upside.

raferfenix · Post #268 » by **raferfenix** » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:34 pm

Again, I could see the Bucks really valuing Dalembert and trying to keep him.

Him being in a free agent year certainly gives him maximum incentive to go all out.

We know he's passed the "play well in front of Herb Kohl' test continually with flying colors, and if his goal is to get paid as much as he can for his final contract, we'd be a great team to target to do so.

Bfinkish · Post #269 » by **Bfinkish** » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:35 pm

Cooleyo47 wrote:Sullinger should be available, but it would be interesting to know if he could still be in play for the Bucks.

I'd def take a risk on him. he stay's healthy he could end up becoming a top 3 player in this draft.

europa · Post #270 » by **europa** » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:35 pm

Newz wrote:
The Wet Whistle wrote:Leuer really isnt anything special. I'm guessing everyone flipped **** about him because he played for Wisconsin.

I liked Leuer because I thought he could become a decent bench big. He has some nice offensive skills.

But man, was that guy abysmal on the glass and defensively. He made Drew Gooden look good in those areas.

I questioned his strength and defense before the draft. He definitely needs to get stronger in order to improve defensively and on the boards. But his skill set offensively is impressive for a big.

The Wet Whistle · Post #271 » by **The Wet Whistle** » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:35 pm

Newz wrote:
The Wet Whistle wrote:Leuer really isnt anything special. I'm guessing everyone flipped **** about him because he played for Wisconsin.

I liked Leuer because I thought he could become a decent bench big. He has some nice offensive skills.

But man, was that guy abysmal on the glass and defensively. He made Drew Gooden look good in those areas.

I agree with this assessment of him.

xTitan · Post #272 » by **xTitan** » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:35 pm

Chad Ford‏@chadfordinsider

Don't merge the Rockets trade & Pau Gasol trade stories together. Rockets not pursuing Pau Gasol according to a source

Nebula1 · Post #273 » by **Nebula1** » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:36 pm

I am very happy Brockman is off the team.

JoeHova · Post #274 » by **JoeHova** » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:36 pm

LUKE23 wrote:I have to seriously question anyone who says Leuer is a better prospect than Sanders.

Well, considering that Leuer played better than Sanders did last season, I'm not sure what's flipping your wig about that assertion. Plus, Leuer is even a year younger than Sanders.

WEFFPIM · Post #275 » by **WEFFPIM** » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:36 pm

What happens to the Brockman Burger?

pe_it72 · Post #276 » by **pe_it72** » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:37 pm

As a fanbase i think we are all on the same page that the organization is goin for "win now".

Would you be opposed to

Gooden/Beno

For

Pau gasol

Jennings/Monta
Monta/Dunleavy/Ross
LRMAM/Harris
Gasol/Udoh
Dalembert/Sanders

Sanders and Udoh are not starters, but good backups

europa · Post #277 » by **europa** » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:37 pm

Nebula1 wrote:I am very happy Brockman is off the team.

Say this about Hammond but he does remove his mistakes rather quickly.

Unfortunately, he's had a lot of practice with that.

VinBakersDozen · Post #278 » by **VinBakersDozen** » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:37 pm

JoeHova wrote:
LUKE23 wrote:I have to seriously question anyone who says Leuer is a better prospect than Sanders.

Well, considering that Leuer played better than Sanders did last season, I'm not sure what's flipping your wig about that assertion. Plus, Leuer is even a year younger than Sanders.

You realize Leuer was/is abysmal at defense, right?

raysbookclub · Post #279 » by **raysbookclub** » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:37 pm

Newz wrote:I liked Leuer because I thought he could become a decent bench big. He has some nice offensive skills.

But man, was that guy abysmal on the glass and defensively. He made Drew Gooden look good in those areas.

Yep. And not much of a paint defender. I liked him too, but he was what he was: the 12th or 13th man on the Bucks roster.

JimmyTheKid · Post #280 » by **JimmyTheKid** » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:38 pm

msiris wrote:My point being I think his conditioning is the problem.

Thats my concern. He looked fat last year. Still like the trade. Just hope he doesn't get any fatter.