ImageImage

#12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis

xTitan
RealGM
Posts: 17,135
And1: 2,283
Joined: Mar 03, 2006
     

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#921 » by xTitan » Thu Jun 28, 2012 9:12 pm

EDIT: Do you have a link to the audio for that interview? I'd be curious to give it a listen.


I don't but you could go to 1250 WSSP and find it there, it was on the morning show.
User avatar
Badgerlander
RealGM
Posts: 27,064
And1: 7,488
Joined: Jun 29, 2007
     

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#922 » by Badgerlander » Thu Jun 28, 2012 9:26 pm

I think Dalembert is a good man defensive guy. He can man up and hold his guy down most often times. I think he's much less effective as a help defender aside from the shotblocking threat. I don't think we can funnel penetrating players towards him like we did with Bogut. Offensively he's pretty limited too. He's an ok screener and a decent roll man, occasional jumper, mostly just a garbage put back dunker. McHale runs the flex and you need skilled bigs that can play away from the basket in order to run the flex offense effectively. Thats not Daly.
User avatar
beyond_the_arc
Starter
Posts: 2,153
And1: 55
Joined: Jul 10, 2005

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#923 » by beyond_the_arc » Thu Jun 28, 2012 9:49 pm

paulpressey25 wrote:Listening to Woelfel this morning on WSSP just confirmed my fears. He said they have such an investment in Gooden that by acquiring Dalembert this allows them to move Gooden back to PF and makes it much easier to now give Ersan sort of a take it or leave it offer.


Image
User avatar
wichmae
RealGM
Posts: 16,762
And1: 1,060
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: Milwaukee

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#924 » by wichmae » Thu Jun 28, 2012 10:18 pm

We also got the buyout amount from HOU (1.5) and a future second rounder. Not sure if its their 2013 or what though.
User avatar
thomchatt3rton
Head Coach
Posts: 6,405
And1: 2,236
Joined: Jun 11, 2009
 

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#925 » by thomchatt3rton » Thu Jun 28, 2012 11:16 pm

If JLamb slips and goes 12th or 13th I'm going to be very, very unhappy.
Ayt
RealGM
Posts: 59,168
And1: 15,034
Joined: Jun 27, 2005

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#926 » by Ayt » Fri Jun 29, 2012 12:26 am

msiris wrote:
jakecronus8 wrote:Forgive me if I sound like a pessimist dick with all these posts, it's just so GD hard to have any faith in any John Hammond move after the last 4 years.
You are justified. A lot of us feel that way. This trade is not a killer, but its not going to change anything either.


I think the trade obviously makes us better. We add Dalembert and give up nothing basically when it comes to the contributions of the guys we sent out. Moving back 2 spots in the draft isn't a big deal.

Since we are all about making the playoffs, this move clearly helps.
UWM_Brew_Buck
Analyst
Posts: 3,129
And1: 898
Joined: Jan 26, 2009
Location: Not in the EMS Building
     

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#927 » by UWM_Brew_Buck » Fri Jun 29, 2012 12:44 am

Knowing that we could have had Lamb this trade just got a whole lot worse.
User avatar
BUCKnation
RealGM
Posts: 19,728
And1: 4,322
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
       

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#928 » by BUCKnation » Fri Jun 29, 2012 12:46 am

Well this trade sucks now.
User avatar
europa
RealGM
Posts: 44,919
And1: 471
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
Location: Right Behind You

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer for #14, Dalembert 

Post#929 » by europa » Fri Jun 29, 2012 12:54 am

europa wrote:
Yup. I like Leuer but this doesn't suck as long as the Bucks turn 14 into something valuable.


Umm so yeah. It was fun wishing while it lasted.
midranger
RealGM
Posts: 39,585
And1: 11,352
Joined: May 12, 2002

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#930 » by midranger » Fri Jun 29, 2012 1:01 am

No risk, all reward.
msiris
RealGM
Posts: 10,997
And1: 2,255
Joined: Jul 25, 2005
Location: Central Wisconsin

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#931 » by msiris » Fri Jun 29, 2012 1:03 am

Now I view this trade as garbage. Liked Lamb at 12. Now we got a center who will play 25 minutes a game and Larry Sanders part 3. :cry:
Serge28
RealGM
Posts: 16,283
And1: 1,926
Joined: Apr 30, 2002
Location: San Diego
 

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#932 » by Serge28 » Fri Jun 29, 2012 1:26 am

I can **** believe Lamb was still there at 12! Fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck!
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,767
And1: 6,966
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#933 » by LUKE23 » Fri Jun 29, 2012 1:37 am

Yep. This trade is now awful.
User avatar
SkilesTheLimit
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,780
And1: 1,795
Joined: Oct 23, 2010
Location: Pop Up Zone
     

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#934 » by SkilesTheLimit » Fri Jun 29, 2012 3:46 am

It won't matter too much. Hammond will be long gone as GM of the Bucks when Henson ever ends up getting meaningful minutes where we can tell how good he will or won't be.
User avatar
Jez2983
RealGM
Posts: 18,095
And1: 8,196
Joined: Dec 10, 2006
Location: #team56.4%eFG
   

Re: #12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert 

Post#935 » by Jez2983 » Fri Jun 29, 2012 3:47 am

This is great. I totally forgot this draft was on, and went to ESPN excitedly to see how the draft went. And that Ross went early, and Leonard.

Then I saw Lamb went at 12. Then I saw we were picking at 14.

Then I came here. Bad times.

Return to Milwaukee Bucks