ImageImageImageImageImage

Who should we have taken at #32? (for the record)

Moderators: montestewart, LyricalRico, nate33

User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,088
And1: 22,492
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Who should we have taken at #32? (for the record) 

Post#1 » by nate33 » Fri Jun 29, 2012 2:50 pm

As an intellectual exercise, I'd like for everyone to chime in and state who they would have taken at #32 this year given the players that were on the board. A year or two from now, we can look back and see how much (if at all) EG blundered by taking the Euro draft-and-stash rather than "my guy".

For the record, I would have taken Quincy Miller.
User avatar
sfam
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,462
And1: 548
Joined: Aug 03, 2007
         

Re: Who should we have taken at #32? (for the record) 

Post#2 » by sfam » Fri Jun 29, 2012 2:52 pm

Quincy Miller as well. His upside was just too great to pass up. If he gets healthy, you have an elite athlete who potentially becomes a starter at SF for 8-10 years. Or, um, a Eurostash who needs to work on his offense and defense.
Severn Hoos
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,443
And1: 223
Joined: May 09, 2002

Re: Who should we have taken at #32? (for the record) 

Post#3 » by Severn Hoos » Fri Jun 29, 2012 2:56 pm

"And remember, this is for posterity so be honest. How do you feel?"


Given that Beal was the 1st rounder, I think I would have definitely gone with Crowder.

Doron Lamb would have been a close second.


And FWIW, I'm less upset now about giving away the 46th pick. Miller would have been nice, as would Denmon, but really, those were the only 2 guys from 46-60 that interest me. I hope the team can bring in Machado and/or Shurna, that would ease the frustration, and they have to see that backup pG and shooting are desperate needs, so the Wiz could be an attractive destination.


But I digress....
"A society that puts equality - in the sense of equality of outcome - ahead of freedom will end up with neither equality nor freedom. The use of force to achieve equality will destroy freedom" Milton Friedman, Free to Choose
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Who should we have taken at #32? (for the record) 

Post#4 » by Ruzious » Fri Jun 29, 2012 3:00 pm

Crowder.

If Crowder wasn't there, I'd have taken either Q Miller or Doron Lamb.
miller31time
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 27,575
And1: 2,141
Joined: Jul 25, 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
     

Re: Who should we have taken at #32? (for the record) 

Post#5 » by miller31time » Fri Jun 29, 2012 3:08 pm

Severn Hoos wrote:"And remember, this is for posterity so be honest. How do you feel?"


:lol:

Might just be my favorite movie of all time.
miller31time
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 27,575
And1: 2,141
Joined: Jul 25, 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
     

Re: Who should we have taken at #32? (for the record) 

Post#6 » by miller31time » Fri Jun 29, 2012 3:09 pm

I was looking at team need so my choice would have been Doron Lamb.
Zonkerbl
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 9,019
And1: 4,713
Joined: Mar 24, 2010
       

Re: Who should we have taken at #32? (for the record) 

Post#7 » by Zonkerbl » Fri Jun 29, 2012 3:22 pm

The only players I know anything about are the ones Kevin and ccj talked about, Jae Crowder, Will Barton, Marcus Denmon. I guess for EG to be wrong one of those three has to be better than Roger Mason, James Singleton, or Cartier Martin. Or Mo Evans. Given my rock solid faith in numbers over seeing people actually play, I'll go on record saying all three will contribute more in the NBA over the next year or two than Mo Evans.

Jae Crowder would have to beat out James Singleton. So I'll go on record saying Crowder will have more production over the next year or so then Singleton.

Will Barton and Marcus Denmon would have to beat out Roger Mason and Cartier Martin. I'll say that Marcus Denmon will produce more than Roger Mason and that Will Barton will producer more than Cartier Martin.

Going again purely by statistics, I'll say that EG will regret drafting Jae Crowder the most.
I've been taught all my life to value service to the weak and powerless.
dobrojim
RealGM
Posts: 16,812
And1: 4,043
Joined: Sep 16, 2004

Re: Who should we have taken at #32? (for the record) 

Post#8 » by dobrojim » Fri Jun 29, 2012 3:34 pm

I'll guess Jae Crowder out of respect for Nivek. And Yoda.
A lot of what we call 'thought' is just mental activity

When you are accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression

Those who are convinced of absurdities, can be convinced to commit atrocities
MDStar
Senior
Posts: 571
And1: 120
Joined: Oct 22, 2003
Location: Washington, DC

Re: Who should we have taken at #32? (for the record) 

Post#9 » by MDStar » Fri Jun 29, 2012 3:38 pm

I'll go on record and say that I like the pick. A PG/SG prospect who can be groomed for a year or so and come back ready to contribute once all of our kiddies have either grown up or shipped out.

http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/draft/re ... satoransky

Small excerpts from the page:

"June 25 Update: Satoransky is a super-talented wing who excels with the ball in his hands. He's not a great shooter but plays with a great motor, like Michael Kidd-Gilchrist, and can affect the game without scoring. He would be a nice stash pick for the Blazers at No. 41."


"May 3 Update: Satoransky is one of the most talented young international players in the draft and is one of the very few players who could get a look in the first round. He's a great athlete and he's very, very active. He can play multiple positions, but needs to improve that jump shot."

"June 13, 2011 Update: Two years ago I wrote that Satoransky was my favorite player in the Eurocamp. He still is. Tough, physical, aggressive, driven and athletic, he's the type of scrappy wing that finds a way to contribute on every play. If he were a better shooter, he'd be a lock for the first round. But with his body improving and that restless game of his, I still think he's got a shot at the first."
Just let the young boys play! It's truly the only hope at this point.
jivelikenice
Analyst
Posts: 3,074
And1: 145
Joined: Jul 15, 2005

Re: Who should we have taken at #32? (for the record) 

Post#10 » by jivelikenice » Fri Jun 29, 2012 3:43 pm

I would have taken Lamb, but this pick is growing on me.
User avatar
doclinkin
RealGM
Posts: 14,961
And1: 6,731
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: .wizuds.

Re: Who should we have taken at #32? (for the record) 

Post#11 » by doclinkin » Fri Jun 29, 2012 3:45 pm

Kim English or Jae Crowder.
User avatar
MJG
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,403
And1: 151
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: Northern Virginia

Re: Who should we have taken at #32? (for the record) 

Post#12 » by MJG » Fri Jun 29, 2012 3:46 pm

Quincy Miller is the guy I was pulling for in the draft thread, so no reason to change my mind here.

I admit to knowing very little about most of the people in this range though, so that's based on about five minutes of actual research. Which is why I'm more "slightly disappointed" and less "outright livid" like a few others were about taking the mystery box.
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 16,287
And1: 7,382
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: Who should we have taken at #32? (for the record) 

Post#13 » by FAH1223 » Fri Jun 29, 2012 3:47 pm

Quincy Miller on my end.
Image
User avatar
willbcocks
Analyst
Posts: 3,629
And1: 278
Joined: Mar 17, 2003
Location: Wall-E has come to save Washington!

Re: Who should we have taken at #32? (for the record) 

Post#14 » by willbcocks » Fri Jun 29, 2012 3:54 pm

Quincy Miller. he seems like a 15-20 pick in most drafts and fits a need.
Halcyon
Veteran
Posts: 2,847
And1: 493
Joined: Jun 16, 2008
       

Re: Who should we have taken at #32? (for the record) 

Post#15 » by Halcyon » Fri Jun 29, 2012 3:54 pm

Quincy Miller
User avatar
20MexicanosIn1Van
Veteran
Posts: 2,985
And1: 321
Joined: May 15, 2004
 

Re: Who should we have taken at #32? (for the record) 

Post#16 » by 20MexicanosIn1Van » Fri Jun 29, 2012 4:01 pm

Quincy Miller / Crowder / Doron Lamb in that order.
User avatar
Rafael122
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 20,810
And1: 3,543
Joined: Oct 11, 2004
       

Re: Who should we have taken at #32? (for the record) 

Post#17 » by Rafael122 » Fri Jun 29, 2012 4:01 pm

Miller. I'm numb to Tomas at this point, he'll develop more on his Euro team's dime. If he can find a jumpshot, he wouldn't be the worse backup to have.
Bickerstaff: who's up for kickball?!!
Ed Wood: Only if it's the no-pants variety.
User avatar
Illuminaire
Veteran
Posts: 2,970
And1: 606
Joined: Jan 04, 2010
 

Re: Who should we have taken at #32? (for the record) 

Post#18 » by Illuminaire » Fri Jun 29, 2012 4:09 pm

Crowder. Who I expect to start some games for Dallas this coming season. I don't think they'll be able to keep him off the court.
User avatar
pineappleheadindc
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,118
And1: 3,479
Joined: Dec 17, 2001
Location: Cabin John, MD
       

Re: Who should we have taken at #32? (for the record) 

Post#19 » by pineappleheadindc » Fri Jun 29, 2012 4:11 pm

I'm with Nate - I would have drafted Quincy Miller.

I'm kind of irritated with Ernie's move because what the Wizards need is an influx of actual talent. I'm not just talking starters, but even back of rotation players. You don't need to mortgage your daughter's college fund for a second rounder. And I thought we were building via the draft (I'm saying I'm not confident Satoransky will make it here ever).

The way we waste second round picks, I've told Miller over FB that the Wizards ought to just auction them off. Like a vanity thing, to the highest bidder. Don't matter if you're a 60-year-old fat guy. Whoever comes with the most cash gets drafted. And we donate the proceeds to the Make a Wish Foundation. At least THAT would be productive.
"Wheresoever you go, go with all your heart."
--Confucius

"Try not. Do or do not. There is no try"
- Yoda
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,141
And1: 7,902
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Who should we have taken at #32? (for the record) 

Post#20 » by Dat2U » Fri Jun 29, 2012 4:19 pm

QMiller or Crowder. I'd be willing to bet that this won't be the last we here from either one.

I can't say I feel the same about the next Sun Yue (Satoransky).

Return to Washington Wizards


cron