ImageImage

Roy Hibbert - Indy says they will match/offer same terms.

Moderators: Moonbeam, DeBlazerRiddem

DaVoiceMaster
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 21,103
And1: 2,410
Joined: Sep 26, 2003
Contact:
   

Re: Roy Hibbert 

Post#61 » by DaVoiceMaster » Sun Jul 1, 2012 5:46 pm

I would think Indy would let West walk after his contract is up.
DaVoiceMaster
Senior Mod - Trail Blazers
12/27/2017 - 01/03/2018
Ripcity4life
Analyst
Posts: 3,062
And1: 219
Joined: Jul 09, 2006

Re: Roy Hibbert 

Post#62 » by Ripcity4life » Sun Jul 1, 2012 5:47 pm

I agree but if they give Roy a MAx deal that might hamper future deals that is my point. I am not debating IF Roy is a key piece to the Pacers cause he is. It's the same reason why Batum might be allowed to walk maybe a little different in terms of importence to team but still similar. Also Pacers had "dreams" like the Blazers to add another Starter type player to there Roster and giving Roy that deal plus with Hill might not allow that to happen.

I still think in the End Pacers will match but i think between Gordon and Roy the Pacers might be alittle more willing to let Roy walk then the Hornets lets Gordon walk.
User avatar
jhern87
Starter
Posts: 2,464
And1: 130
Joined: Jun 06, 2008
       

Re: Roy Hibbert 

Post#63 » by jhern87 » Sun Jul 1, 2012 5:48 pm

I like that Olshey is being aggressive but I think Indiana just waits until the last minute and matches (why wouldn't they tie up Portlands money for as long as possible").. That's not really that much for a center of his caliber..
Odens Kickstand
Ballboy
Posts: 39
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 12, 2012

Re: Roy Hibbert 

Post#64 » by Odens Kickstand » Sun Jul 1, 2012 6:07 pm

jhern87 wrote:I like that Olshey is being aggressive but I think Indiana just waits until the last minute and matches (why wouldn't they tie up Portlands money for as long as possible").. That's not really that much for a center of his caliber..


I like that Olshey is at least willing to take the shot. Better have a 10% chance of getting someone worthwhile than not taking the chance and getting the 'ability' to overpay a hawes/asik type guy.
User avatar
JustBlaze52
Senior
Posts: 698
And1: 6
Joined: Jan 17, 2009
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Roy Hibbert 

Post#65 » by JustBlaze52 » Sun Jul 1, 2012 6:15 pm

If Indiana doesn't end up matching, expect them to make a push for Greg Oden.
The NBA, where 5 on 8 happens.
User avatar
glide22
Sophomore
Posts: 208
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 07, 2002
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Roy Hibbert 

Post#66 » by glide22 » Sun Jul 1, 2012 6:20 pm

What are the consequences of matching Baum and signing hibbert? Are we talking impossible, Paul Allen paying a lot of taxes, or just a small tax consequence? Does it make Freeland /Claver prohibitive? I have no idea, but it looks like a few people on the board have this stuff down.
User avatar
PDXKnight
RealGM
Posts: 26,201
And1: 3,140
Joined: May 29, 2007
Location: Portland
   

Re: Roy Hibbert 

Post#67 » by PDXKnight » Sun Jul 1, 2012 6:32 pm

Ripcity4life wrote:I agree but if they give Roy a MAx deal that might hamper future deals that is my point. I am not debating IF Roy is a key piece to the Pacers cause he is. It's the same reason why Batum might be allowed to walk maybe a little different in terms of importence to team but still similar. Also Pacers had "dreams" like the Blazers to add another Starter type player to there Roster and giving Roy that deal plus with Hill might not allow that to happen.

I still think in the End Pacers will match but i think between Gordon and Roy the Pacers might be alittle more willing to let Roy walk then the Hornets lets Gordon walk.


You don't let your centerpiece walk away for nothing. Sure there are times where releasing salary is the better option but not when that salary is going to a franchise cornerstone.
User avatar
PDXKnight
RealGM
Posts: 26,201
And1: 3,140
Joined: May 29, 2007
Location: Portland
   

Re: Roy Hibbert 

Post#68 » by PDXKnight » Sun Jul 1, 2012 6:34 pm

glide22 wrote:What are the consequences of matching Baum and signing hibbert? Are we talking impossible, Paul Allen paying a lot of taxes, or just a small tax consequence? Does it make Freeland /Claver prohibitive? I have no idea, but it looks like a few people on the board have this stuff down.


We'd still be under the lux tax but we'd be dangerously close to it. I think it helps that Shawne's contract expires after this next season. Also I'd take it very lightly that Paul Allen wants to stay under the lux tax. He's proven that he's willing to spend money when the opportunity to build a contender arises and I don't think he's about to change his m.o. A frontcourt of Batum/LA/Hibbert would be freakishly good on defense.
Wizenheimer
RealGM
Posts: 36,375
And1: 8,080
Joined: May 28, 2007

Re: Roy Hibbert 

Post#69 » by Wizenheimer » Sun Jul 1, 2012 6:35 pm

JustBlaze52 wrote:If Indiana doesn't end up matching, expect them to make a push for Greg Oden.


they better not push him to hard....he'll break
Wizenheimer
RealGM
Posts: 36,375
And1: 8,080
Joined: May 28, 2007

Re: Roy Hibbert 

Post#70 » by Wizenheimer » Sun Jul 1, 2012 6:36 pm

Oden2 wrote:
glide22 wrote:What are the consequences of matching Baum and signing hibbert? Are we talking impossible, Paul Allen paying a lot of taxes, or just a small tax consequence? Does it make Freeland /Claver prohibitive? I have no idea, but it looks like a few people on the board have this stuff down.


We'd still be under the lux tax but we'd be dangerously close to it. I think it helps that Shawne's contract expires after this season.


I don't think being about 12 million under the tax is dangerously close to it
Run PDX
Pro Prospect
Posts: 967
And1: 452
Joined: Jun 20, 2012
   

Re: Roy Hibbert 

Post#71 » by Run PDX » Sun Jul 1, 2012 6:43 pm

It sounds like Hibbert has verbally agreed to terms with Portland today. Which means he wont be talking to anyone but Portland and Indiana from here on out...
User avatar
JustBlaze52
Senior
Posts: 698
And1: 6
Joined: Jan 17, 2009
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Roy Hibbert 

Post#72 » by JustBlaze52 » Sun Jul 1, 2012 6:48 pm

I think Bird would have let Hibbert go at that price but with Pritchard it is a mystery. It would be nice to get some exact numbers on where the Pacers would be sitting cap wise if they match.
The NBA, where 5 on 8 happens.
Blazinaway
General Manager
Posts: 8,852
And1: 1,616
Joined: Jan 27, 2009

Re: Roy Hibbert 

Post#73 » by Blazinaway » Sun Jul 1, 2012 6:52 pm

indy is talking to Asik so who knows, maybe they won't match?
Run PDX
Pro Prospect
Posts: 967
And1: 452
Joined: Jun 20, 2012
   

Re: Roy Hibbert 

Post#74 » by Run PDX » Sun Jul 1, 2012 6:53 pm

I think Pritchard will act swiftly. He has no animosity for the Blazer fans - as he has tweeted time and time again - and, he's good friends with Chad Buchanan and Mike Born. I bet he either signs the offer sheet or defers it immediately...
Wizenheimer
RealGM
Posts: 36,375
And1: 8,080
Joined: May 28, 2007

Re: Roy Hibbert 

Post#75 » by Wizenheimer » Sun Jul 1, 2012 6:55 pm

JustBlaze52 wrote:I think Bird would have let Hibbert go at that price but with Pritchard it is a mystery. It would be nice to get some exact numbers on where the Pacers would be sitting cap wise if they match.


they only have 36 million in committed salaries. Matching the offer would leave them at about 49 million which is still 9-11 million below the cap

They extended the QO to Hill, but you'd have to think he won't be getting giant offers. Generically, the Pacers would be fine after matching


the hitch is that, reportedly, the Pacers are not in great financial shape. Still, the mandated minimum team salary doesn't offer Indiana much chance to save money by slashing payroll
User avatar
JustBlaze52
Senior
Posts: 698
And1: 6
Joined: Jan 17, 2009
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Roy Hibbert 

Post#76 » by JustBlaze52 » Sun Jul 1, 2012 6:58 pm

Wizenheimer wrote:
JustBlaze52 wrote:I think Bird would have let Hibbert go at that price but with Pritchard it is a mystery. It would be nice to get some exact numbers on where the Pacers would be sitting cap wise if they match.


they only have 36 million in committed salaries. Matching the offer would leave them at about 49 million which is still 9-11 million below the cap

They extended the QO to Hill, but you'd have to think he won't be getting giant offers. Generically, the Pacers would be fine after matching


the hitch is that, reportedly, the Pacers are not in great financial shape. Still, the mandated minimum team salary doesn't offer Indiana much chance to save money by slashing payroll


Apparently they're making a push for Eric Gordon, so I could see them using that space on him and taking a cheaper route to fill the center position (Asik, Oden, Haywood etc.).
User avatar
PDXKnight
RealGM
Posts: 26,201
And1: 3,140
Joined: May 29, 2007
Location: Portland
   

Re: Roy Hibbert 

Post#77 » by PDXKnight » Sun Jul 1, 2012 7:01 pm

Run PDX wrote:I think Pritchard will act swiftly. He has no animosity for the Blazer fans - as he has tweeted time and time again - and, he's good friends with Chad Buchanan and Mike Born. I bet he either signs the offer sheet or defers it immediately...


Taking one's time with a RFA is a tactical move that could keep Portland from pursuing other options in free agency. Considering that Indy has some cap space it could be a smart move to wait it out.
crazylegshayes
Banned User
Posts: 439
And1: 3
Joined: Jun 01, 2009

Re: Roy Hibbert 

Post#78 » by crazylegshayes » Sun Jul 1, 2012 7:02 pm

Wizenheimer wrote:
JustBlaze52 wrote:If Indiana doesn't end up matching, expect them to make a push for Greg Oden.


they better not push him to hard....he'll break


:clap:
User avatar
PDXKnight
RealGM
Posts: 26,201
And1: 3,140
Joined: May 29, 2007
Location: Portland
   

Re: Roy Hibbert 

Post#79 » by PDXKnight » Sun Jul 1, 2012 7:03 pm

Wizenheimer wrote:
Oden2 wrote:
glide22 wrote:What are the consequences of matching Baum and signing hibbert? Are we talking impossible, Paul Allen paying a lot of taxes, or just a small tax consequence? Does it make Freeland /Claver prohibitive? I have no idea, but it looks like a few people on the board have this stuff down.


We'd still be under the lux tax but we'd be dangerously close to it. I think it helps that Shawne's contract expires after this season.


I don't think being about 12 million under the tax is dangerously close to it


By the time we use the MLE and LLE we will be pretty darn close.
kdawg32086
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 10,929
And1: 1,091
Joined: Jun 12, 2004
Location: Clark County, Washington
         

Re: Roy Hibbert 

Post#80 » by kdawg32086 » Sun Jul 1, 2012 7:08 pm

I might be wrong but I don't think you get an MLE if you're under the cap.
Image
Thank you triplemke23 for the sig.

Return to Portland Trail Blazers