Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard

Moderators: cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, ken6199, Domejandro, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid

rockynpolo
Junior
Posts: 316
And1: 4
Joined: Dec 11, 2011

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#121 » by rockynpolo » Fri Jul 6, 2012 9:18 pm

andremcosta wrote:They will a have a hell of a pressure to win. Not close to Lebron.

Nash-Kobe-Artest-Gasol-Howard, after all this drama.

And with everyone searching for a job in the next Jurassic Park movie, they have to win in 2013.


You think guys like kobe and nash gets bothered by pressure? They love that stuff. Its Dwight's emotional instability and Coach Brown that gets frazzled by pressure.
User avatar
spearsy23
RealGM
Posts: 19,360
And1: 7,570
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
   

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#122 » by spearsy23 » Fri Jul 6, 2012 9:18 pm

Kupchak9 wrote:
Thats cool and all but both teams ended up with the same result.

No they didn't. OKC ended up with a W and LA ended up with an L.
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
Kupchak9
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,802
And1: 2,492
Joined: Jan 21, 2012

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#123 » by Kupchak9 » Fri Jul 6, 2012 9:20 pm

spearsy23 wrote:
Kupchak9 wrote:
Thats cool and all but both teams ended up with the same result.

No they didn't. OKC ended up with a W and LA ended up with an L.


No chip :[. all that matters.
Dunham32
Junior
Posts: 356
And1: 173
Joined: Apr 05, 2012
       

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#124 » by Dunham32 » Fri Jul 6, 2012 9:32 pm

Has anyone actually confirmed this yet? i havent seen it anywhere else so it seems like a mute point right now
User avatar
druggas
Head Coach
Posts: 7,404
And1: 5,778
Joined: Dec 27, 2007

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#125 » by druggas » Fri Jul 6, 2012 9:32 pm

jaypo wrote:
druggas wrote:
Shaheen wrote:

Its not that uncommon. Kobe did the exact same thing and thats why Shaq was traded.

That's not true and you know it.

Shaq's mouth got him traded.


Actually, Kobe saying that if Shaq were there, he would sign with another team as a FA got Shaq traded.

Kobe straight up said that if Phil and Shaq were on the Lakers in 05, he wouldn't be because he was "tired of being a sidekick". From his own mouth. The Lakers, COINCIDENTLY decided not to resign Phil. Shaq found out on Sportcenter that Phil was let go, and he then asked to be traded because he saw the writing on the wall.

So did Kobe approach management and say "Trade Shaq"? No. But was Kobe responsible for Shaq being shipped out? Abso friggin' lutely.

This is to refute your post.

<<In response to the Times' story, Bryant, interviewed by Smith for a Philadelphia Inquirer column, said Buss "called a meeting with me after he spoke with Jim Gray [of ESPN] to talk with him about Shaq's future in the middle of the 2004 season.

"He met with me at the Four Seasons Hotel here [in Newport Beach, Calif.] across from Fashion Island, which is now the Island Hotel," Bryant told Smith. "I went up to his penthouse suite. [Buss] looks me dead in the face and says: 'Kobe, I am not going to re-sign Shaq. I am not about to pay him $30 million a year or $80 million over three years. No way in hell. I feel like he's getting older. His body is breaking down, and I don't want to pay that money to him when I can get value for him right now rather than wait.

"This is my decision. It's independent of you. My mind is made up. It doesn't matter to me what you do in free agency because I do not want to pay [Shaq], period.'"

"Dr. Buss said that," Bryant told Smith. "And I haven't said anything for years because I've always felt like folks were just looking to create controversy. Now I know. I realize what extent [the Lakers] will go to, to cover themselves."

Reached afterward, O'Neal told Smith that he believed his former teammate to be beyond reproach.

"I believe Kobe 100 percent," O'Neal said when reached in Los Angeles. "Absolutely. There's no doubt in my mind Kobe is telling the truth. I believe him a thousand percent.

"I would have respected Dr. Buss more as a man if he would have told me that himself, because I know he said it. But he didn't [tell me]. He never said a damn word to me."
User avatar
Ronito
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,921
And1: 101
Joined: Feb 14, 2011

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#126 » by Ronito » Fri Jul 6, 2012 9:34 pm

Image
World Peace
Banned User
Posts: 1,578
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 29, 2011
Location: San Antonio, TX

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#127 » by World Peace » Fri Jul 6, 2012 9:36 pm

The Brooklyn Nets and Orlando Magic continue to discuss a Dwight Howard trade. They're looking for a third team

Source: Alex Kennedy
User avatar
Mamba Venom
RealGM
Posts: 17,979
And1: 582
Joined: Sep 07, 2005
Location: California
Contact:

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#128 » by Mamba Venom » Fri Jul 6, 2012 9:36 pm

GoldenKnight wrote:Image

Mitch Kup-check
Learn from the master Jerry West (check)
Trade Shaq for calling out the owner(check) that was a gut check
Get Gasol for nothing (check)
Get Ariza for nothing (check)
Win championship (check)
Don't let Ariza punk us for mo $ and get Artest when Ariza won't make up his mind (check)
Win championship (check)
Trade Luke Walton for Sessions (check)
Trade Odom before "poor me" impLOsion (check)
Don't let Sessions punk us for mo $ and get Nash when Sessions won't make up his mind (check)
---
Lakers are 22-3 in OT last 6 seasons:Kobe best OT closer!
User avatar
ShowTimeERA
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,790
And1: 208
Joined: Feb 15, 2012
 

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#129 » by ShowTimeERA » Fri Jul 6, 2012 9:38 pm

jaypo wrote:
Actually, Kobe saying that if Shaq were there, he would sign with another team as a FA got Shaq traded.

Kobe straight up said that if Phil and Shaq were on the Lakers in 05, he wouldn't be because he was "tired of being a sidekick". From his own mouth. The Lakers, COINCIDENTLY decided not to resign Phil. Shaq found out on Sportcenter that Phil was let go, and he then asked to be traded because he saw the writing on the wall.

So did Kobe approach management and say "Trade Shaq"? No. But was Kobe responsible for Shaq being shipped out? Abso friggin' lutely.


Jaypo, make this clear to me. Your saying Kobe's unwillingness to be a "sidekick" is what ultimately got Shaq ran out of town...Correct? But on the other hand you and many others have "bashed" and "discredit" Kobe's first three rings because of just that being a "sidekick"

So from what I gather is Kobe cannot win in either situation. He was selfish for getting Shaq traded but then if he would had been a model citizen and kept quiet and continued to win rings, they wouldn't have counted because he rode Shaq's coattail...Its a lose-lose situation...
User avatar
Ronito
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,921
And1: 101
Joined: Feb 14, 2011

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#130 » by Ronito » Fri Jul 6, 2012 9:39 pm

World Peace wrote:
The Brooklyn Nets and Orlando Magic continue to discuss a Dwight Howard trade. They're looking for a third team

Source: Alex Kennedy

Nothing new.
Image
User avatar
druggas
Head Coach
Posts: 7,404
And1: 5,778
Joined: Dec 27, 2007

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#131 » by druggas » Fri Jul 6, 2012 9:39 pm

Mamba Venom wrote:
GoldenKnight wrote:Image

Mitch Kup-check
Learn from the master Jerry West (check)
Trade Shaq for calling out the owner(check) that was a gut check
Get Gasol for nothing (check)
Get Ariza for nothing (check)
Win championship (check)
Don't let Ariza punk us for mo $ and get Artest when Ariza won't make up his mind (check)
Win championship (check)
Trade Luke Walton for Sessions (check)
Trade Odom before "poor me" impLOsion (check)
Don't let Sessions punk us for mo $ and get Nash when Sessions won't make up his mind (check)
---

This is exactly correct and I'm NOT a Cupcake fan.
shortodom
Veteran
Posts: 2,671
And1: 57
Joined: Dec 06, 2004

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#132 » by shortodom » Fri Jul 6, 2012 9:39 pm

Ronito wrote:Almost found the third team.

https://twitter.com/JRudolphSports/stat ... 6174601217


Could be just trying to scare the Lakers into taking the bad contract they don't want.
Image
User avatar
ShowTimeERA
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,790
And1: 208
Joined: Feb 15, 2012
 

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#133 » by ShowTimeERA » Fri Jul 6, 2012 9:41 pm

shortodom wrote:
Ronito wrote:Almost found the third team.

https://twitter.com/JRudolphSports/stat ... 6174601217


Could be just trying to scare the Lakers into taking the bad contract they don't want.


For LA's sake, its in the best interest for reports to surface favoring a BK-ORL trade.
Image
User avatar
J-Mezzy
RealGM
Posts: 22,051
And1: 3,762
Joined: Jan 21, 2004
Location: Orlando

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#134 » by J-Mezzy » Fri Jul 6, 2012 9:41 pm

I hope we trade him to LA and not satisfy him and trade him to BK
JC Client Services
Home Renovations and Remodeling
jc-clientservices.com
User avatar
Ronito
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,921
And1: 101
Joined: Feb 14, 2011

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#135 » by Ronito » Fri Jul 6, 2012 9:41 pm

shortodom wrote:
Ronito wrote:Almost found the third team.

https://twitter.com/JRudolphSports/stat ... 6174601217


Could be just trying to scare the Lakers into taking the bad contract they don't want.

Could be. Could also be the Nets getting closer to a deal.
Image
chubby_1_kenobi
Starter
Posts: 2,159
And1: 20
Joined: Aug 21, 2008

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#136 » by chubby_1_kenobi » Fri Jul 6, 2012 9:51 pm

Nets looking for a third team to do what exactly?

Give up multiple first round draft picks for Marshon Brooks and Humphries?
User avatar
inquisitive
RealGM
Posts: 17,095
And1: 2,867
Joined: Aug 27, 2010

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#137 » by inquisitive » Fri Jul 6, 2012 9:52 pm

T-mac_1_175 wrote:
Zona Zoo wrote:
SheedsWeed wrote:I would be surprised if the Magic are interested in the Net's offer. They would be better off letting Dwight walk.


Exactly, any picks of their own the Net's have to offer are worthless if they have Dwight, any players they can get back from the nets are crap (won't get you playoffs, won't help you tank), the Nets are just.... meh here without a 3rd team.

And this is coming from somebody that wants to see Dwight on the Nets, purely for the crosstown rivalry and it's implications in the atlantic division and potentially a credible rival with the Heat


So has Daryl Morey done enough to please the magic with the Lowry trade?
Seems like he will offer the pick from the Raptors, 1st rounder from Dallas, I expect another future first? Kev Martins expiring deal, and a selection of young players aquired Lamb, White, Jones, Montijunas, Patterson?? I doubt it happens but as far as youth and picks are concerned it's an ok deal and Magic get rid of Hedos fat deal without taking on significant capspace.


Not sure if the Rockets will take on Hedo, but more likely JRich or Duhon instead. I think Montie is off the table, but not sure what Morey thinks..they're still looking to see what they can get for Scola, so i doubt they have proposed anything to the Magic yet
KARD "You n Me " Mnet Countdown
www.youtube.com/watch?v=77b3zg3OhgI
User avatar
Ronito
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,921
And1: 101
Joined: Feb 14, 2011

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#138 » by Ronito » Fri Jul 6, 2012 9:54 pm

chubby_1_kenobi wrote:Nets looking for a third team to do what exactly?

Give up multiple first round draft picks for Marshon Brooks and Humphries?

Take on Dan Fegan's client, Kris Humphries.
Image
OOO
Banned User
Posts: 1,554
And1: 22
Joined: Apr 04, 2012

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#139 » by OOO » Fri Jul 6, 2012 9:56 pm

They're trying to scare the Lakers into taking a bad contract.
User avatar
ShowTimeERA
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,790
And1: 208
Joined: Feb 15, 2012
 

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#140 » by ShowTimeERA » Fri Jul 6, 2012 9:57 pm

Ronito wrote:
chubby_1_kenobi wrote:Nets looking for a third team to do what exactly?

Give up multiple first round draft picks for Marshon Brooks and Humphries?

Take on Dan Fegan's client, Kris Humphries.


Explain to me how exactly BK is absorbing 30M in salary with Dwight and Hedo?

Return to The General Board