ImageImageImageImageImage

Bledsoe

Moderators: og15, TrueLAfan

Nyce_1
RealGM
Posts: 12,968
And1: 6,114
Joined: Jun 29, 2009
Location: Tampa
 

Bledsoe 

Post#1 » by Nyce_1 » Fri Jul 6, 2012 12:37 pm

Hey guys,

Just curious to know how much value you put on Bledsoe and what you think your FO would seek in a trade for him.

Thanks.
User avatar
LOJ
Banned User
Posts: 5,514
And1: 7
Joined: Feb 03, 2011
Location: Santo Domingo, Rep

Re: Bledsoe 

Post#2 » by LOJ » Fri Jul 6, 2012 1:06 pm

He's not going anywhere. Bledsoe is highly valued by the Clippers.
scoobs07
Veteran
Posts: 2,504
And1: 98
Joined: Apr 19, 2001

Re: Bledsoe 

Post#3 » by scoobs07 » Fri Jul 6, 2012 5:44 pm

He is highly valued by the Clippers, but I wouldn't say he's not going any where. The Clippers are fortunate to have some other guards (Billups/Crawford) that are capable of handling the back up PG duties. If the right deal came along, Bledsoe could be part of the package. The kid is 21 years old, has a freakish wingspan and a good defender, crazy athletic, could be the fastest player in the league. He came through bif time in the playoffs, made a lot of shots. Honestly, I think he could end up being a Russell Westbrook type player. I could see him averaging 18ppg,8apg,5rpg and 2.5spg. He's a potential first team all NBA defender, he gets a lot of steals and shuts down opposing guards. Due to his athleticism and wingspan, he could guard twos and even threes. Sky's the limit for this kid.
SacSanity
Senior
Posts: 572
And1: 89
Joined: Jan 30, 2012
     

Re: Bledsoe 

Post#4 » by SacSanity » Fri Jul 6, 2012 7:15 pm

I'm unsure why Clippers fans hold Bledsoe to such a high standard. IMO very overrated. If you can package him for an improvement why not do it.
og15
Forum Mod - Clippers
Forum Mod - Clippers
Posts: 50,749
And1: 33,546
Joined: Jun 23, 2004
Location: NBA Fan
 

Re: Bledsoe 

Post#5 » by og15 » Fri Jul 6, 2012 7:22 pm

When you have high paid players, all the good cheap players you have are valuable because not everyone wants to pay luxury tax.
mkwest
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,910
And1: 5,728
Joined: Dec 18, 2005
   

Re: Bledsoe 

Post#6 » by mkwest » Fri Jul 6, 2012 7:30 pm

SacTown916 wrote:I'm unsure why Clippers fans hold Bledsoe to such a high standard. IMO very overrated. If you can package him for an improvement why not do it.


You may not be a fan of him and his game, which is fine. We recognize the holes and shortcomings in his game. He has to show if he'll ever become starter worthy or if he is just a quality player to provide a spark off of the bench.

The fact of the matter is that he is the only young and cheap prospect of value that we have remaining. We're not going to just toss him into a deal for marginal improvement. We have 2 more seasons out of him on an inexpensive contract and to be mentored by the likes of Paul and Billups. He's already shown himself to be our best perimeter defender and has improved as a passer. If he can learn anything from either of those 2 pg's, then his value increases even higher to both the team and on the market.

There has to be something that simply blows the FO away to make a deal at the present time, anything else would be foolish.
User avatar
mj_shoefanatic
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,113
And1: 104
Joined: Dec 23, 2007
Location: Lob Angeles
       

Re: Bledsoe 

Post#7 » by mj_shoefanatic » Sat Jul 7, 2012 12:44 am

Bledsoe is far from untouchable but with the departure of Mo and possibly Foye I find it hard to think he can be considered expendable. There is a reason why he wasn't included in the CP3/New Orleans player swap. I'm sure glad he's on our team that's for sure.
Method28
Junior
Posts: 499
And1: 356
Joined: Feb 17, 2012

Re: Bledsoe 

Post#8 » by Method28 » Sat Jul 7, 2012 4:52 am

Imo Bledsoe could be just as good as Rondo. Rondo has the ups in his passing ability and vision, but Bledsoe has the ups on D (which is saying a lot.) Bledsoe has the ability to block shots and is a great help defender.

I wouldn't move Bledsoe if i'm the Clips unless it's for a HUGE improvement at the Center or SF positions.

http://twitter.com/ESPNSteinLine/status/204440789688926208

Marc Stein: AND Clips pumped up Eric Bledsoe's trade value even higher than it was. "Everybody wants an athletic PG like that," said one admiring GM
All-Fav Team
PG: Chris Paul, Steve Nash, Ricky Rubio
SG: Marcus Thornton, Tony Allen
SF: Nick Batum, Luol Deng, Danillo Gallinari
PF: LaMarcus Aldridge, Blake Griffin
C: Demarcus Cousins, DeAndre Jordan
Cheerleader: Ryan Gomes
azncorruptedo17
Starter
Posts: 2,221
And1: 222
Joined: Dec 08, 2009
Location: North Hills, CA
         

Re: Bledsoe 

Post#9 » by azncorruptedo17 » Mon Jul 9, 2012 5:31 pm

i can see bledsoe have a boost in mins, especially end game since crawford doesn't play a lick of defense. lol

cp3/bledsoe defensive combo is better than most backcourts can handle, and if eb improves his spot up shooting [remember he shot 60% in college on catch and shoot situations from the 3] then it won't be an issue at all. he's just short, but makes up with his quickness and strength i think.
Clipper fan since '95!!
RiversideClips
Rookie
Posts: 1,093
And1: 72
Joined: Jul 29, 2009

Re: Bledsoe 

Post#10 » by RiversideClips » Tue Jul 10, 2012 1:17 pm

What arethe Clippers doing w/ Bledsoe & Travis Leslie? We don't need any more Guards, we need BIGS!
Leslie, after Summer ball should be running the show in BField along w/ Trey and the be evaluated (value) at the All Star Break. Bledsoe needs to play to improve, he was great the last 1/3 of the season in the 2nd half.
Why do we want or need the cat fromthe Nets, if we have Crawford? We need Bigs!!
og15
Forum Mod - Clippers
Forum Mod - Clippers
Posts: 50,749
And1: 33,546
Joined: Jun 23, 2004
Location: NBA Fan
 

Re: Bledsoe 

Post#11 » by og15 » Tue Jul 10, 2012 3:51 pm

Still need a backup SF, Caron is not the SF of the future, and Billups might only have one year left on him. In a years time, Brooks can fill in as a backup SG and SF who is on a rookie contract. In two years time, he could be a cheap starter at SF. One can't just think short term, have to look big picture.

Also, he is an asset that can be used to get a big in the future. Let's say Odom doesn't work out. Next off-season, one can look to package Brooks for a guy like Channing Frye (not a real scenario, just saying). There's never anything wrong with having fairly young assets.

Trading for Brooks isn't counter-productive to getting a big man. I hope the Clippers are looking well at Mahinmi as his talents seem to fit well with the players in the team. The BAE should be used on him,mans one can call it an off-season.
User avatar
LOJ
Banned User
Posts: 5,514
And1: 7
Joined: Feb 03, 2011
Location: Santo Domingo, Rep

Re: Bledsoe 

Post#12 » by LOJ » Tue Jul 10, 2012 4:05 pm

Thing is, Brooks isn't a SF, guy is wayyyyyyyy too skinny
og15
Forum Mod - Clippers
Forum Mod - Clippers
Posts: 50,749
And1: 33,546
Joined: Jun 23, 2004
Location: NBA Fan
 

Re: Bledsoe 

Post#13 » by og15 » Tue Jul 10, 2012 4:26 pm

He can at least be a backup SF though, I mean as of now, if not Odom, what's the plan, play Crawford as backup SF, or give Gomes minutes? Is he significantly skinnier than Young (of course he's shorter and doesn't have as much length)?

It depends on the interest in him arounnd the league, but I see him as a guy in can possibly use to move a player that doesn't work out. For example let's say Caron Butler still plays poorly this season, sending a team Brooks to take on Butler's last year could work for them.

Butler's last season production wouldn't be hard to replace considering that Matt Barnes produced better than him and made $6 million less. So in a scenario like that, he's pretty good to have.

He makes $1.2M, that is less than the vet minimum for guys that have been around for a while, which is about $1.3M. He has team options for the next two seasons after this, maxing out at $2.3M. Send a top 20 protected pick, since he was the 25th pick, and that seems reasonable.
User avatar
mj_shoefanatic
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,113
And1: 104
Joined: Dec 23, 2007
Location: Lob Angeles
       

Re: Bledsoe 

Post#14 » by mj_shoefanatic » Tue Jul 10, 2012 11:15 pm

LOJ wrote:Thing is, Brooks isn't a SF, guy is wayyyyyyyy too skinny


Ronnie Brewer isn't skinny. I sure wish we could add Brooks, Brewer and (Nazr)Mohammed to replace Young, Foye and Martin's minutes.
awaywehappened
Freshman
Posts: 56
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 10, 2012

Re: Bledsoe 

Post#15 » by awaywehappened » Tue Jul 10, 2012 11:21 pm

Brooks is actually longer than Swaggy but he just doesn't try on defense.
Could actually be a beast if he just had the effort :/
og15
Forum Mod - Clippers
Forum Mod - Clippers
Posts: 50,749
And1: 33,546
Joined: Jun 23, 2004
Location: NBA Fan
 

Re: Bledsoe 

Post#16 » by og15 » Tue Jul 10, 2012 11:46 pm

mj_shoefanatic wrote:
LOJ wrote:Thing is, Brooks isn't a SF, guy is wayyyyyyyy too skinny


Ronnie Brewer isn't skinny. I sure wish we could add Brooks, Brewer and (Nazr)Mohammed to replace Young, Foye and Martin's minutes.

Well can't add all three, there are barely enough minutes for another wing player on this team.

Currently when everyone is healthy, between PG/SG/SF, there are 144 minutes and Paul, Billups, Crawford, Bledsoe, Caron, 5 players at the positions.

Paul (35) / Bledsoe (13)
Billups (26) / Crawford (22)
Butler (27) / Other wing (17) / Crawford (4)

Total:
Paul (35)
Butler (27)
Billups (26)
Crawford (26)
Other Wing (17)
Bledsoe (13)

That's about the best case scenario one can figure out to make everyone happy, and Bledsoe probably isn't playing enough in that situation, but there are only so many minutes available. The team can't add two wings and no big, just can't add two wings in general.

If no other wing is added, then there are 17 minutes to go around which will mean Odom playing some 3, Crawford playing some more 3 in a 3 guard lineup, and less minutes at the 2, and Bledsoe getting some more minutes at the 2.

Return to Los Angeles Clippers