ImageImageImageImageImage

2012-2013 do Wizards tank or go for the win?

Moderators: montestewart, LyricalRico, nate33

MikeTheKid
Head Coach
Posts: 6,825
And1: 4,354
Joined: Jan 24, 2012
Location: DC/MD/VA
         

Re: 2012-2013 do Wizards tank or go for the win? 

Post#21 » by MikeTheKid » Mon Jul 9, 2012 3:32 pm

Why tank when next year's draft only has Nerlens Noel, Shabazz Muhammad and Cody Zeller
User avatar
Rafael122
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 20,810
And1: 3,543
Joined: Oct 11, 2004
       

Re: 2012-2013 do Wizards tank or go for the win? 

Post#22 » by Rafael122 » Mon Jul 9, 2012 6:28 pm

If Indiana doesn't match Hibbert's contract, if Dwight goes to Brooklyn, Atlanta's rebuilding is underway, that's 3 potential playoff spots opening up. And Wizards would outright be the 2nd best team in the Southeast Division and probably make the playoffs.

6th seed isn't out of the realm of possibility, wouldn't be surprised if its a 5th seed.
Bickerstaff: who's up for kickball?!!
Ed Wood: Only if it's the no-pants variety.
REDardWIZskin
Senior
Posts: 716
And1: 2
Joined: Jul 21, 2009
Location: DC

Re: 2012-2013 do Wizards tank or go for the win? 

Post#23 » by REDardWIZskin » Mon Jul 9, 2012 8:52 pm

Rafael122 wrote:If Indiana doesn't match Hibbert's contract, if Dwight goes to Brooklyn, Atlanta's rebuilding is underway, that's 3 potential playoff spots opening up. And Wizards would outright be the 2nd best team in the Southeast Division and probably make the playoffs.

6th seed isn't out of the realm of possibility, wouldn't be surprised if its a 5th seed.


It depends on Johns "leap", how good Beals is out of the gate and how he progresses during the season, whether or not JC can be an effective offensive boost on a structured team, if the complementary Ariza from LA will show up. BUT most importantly the general health of the team. In other words, a lot would have to happen but I agree Raf.
User avatar
mohammed10
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,857
And1: 155
Joined: May 26, 2007
Location: Playoffs? Playoffs? Yes, playoffs dammit
 

Re: 2012-2013 do Wizards tank or go for the win? 

Post#24 » by mohammed10 » Mon Jul 9, 2012 9:52 pm

Rafael122 wrote:If Indiana doesn't match Hibbert's contract, if Dwight goes to Brooklyn, Atlanta's rebuilding is underway, that's 3 potential playoff spots opening up. And Wizards would outright be the 2nd best team in the Southeast Division and probably make the playoffs.

6th seed isn't out of the realm of possibility, wouldn't be surprised if its a 5th seed.


Indiana's reported to be matching. Dwight moving to Brooklyn is a wash (Orlando out, NJ in the playoffs). So really, only ONE playoff spot may be available from that scenario...
If you can fill the unforgiving minute
With sixty seconds’ worth of distance run,
Yours is the Earth and everything that’s in it,
And—which is more—you’ll be a Man, my son!

'If' - by Rudyard Kipling
montestewart
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 14,798
And1: 7,924
Joined: Feb 25, 2009

Re: 2012-2013 do Wizards tank or go for the win? 

Post#25 » by montestewart » Mon Jul 9, 2012 11:27 pm

MikeTheKid wrote:Why tank when next year's draft only has Nerlens Noel, Shabazz Muhammad and Cody Zeller

The Wizards have to many passable-to-decent players, with the young players having another year of experience and a proper offseason and training camp. I can't see them pulling off a credible tank.

As for the depth of the draft, it's kind of early to write it off. I'll wait to hear from Dat2U, CCJ, and some of the others before I go calling it a three person draft.
User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 54,523
And1: 10,291
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: 2012-2013 do Wizards tank or go for the win? 

Post#26 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Mon Jul 9, 2012 11:57 pm

veji1 wrote:teh Wiz are done tanking. At some point a team has to play and do its best. This is competitive sport god damn it! The trades done + the state of the roster indicate that they will play to win. Sure it might not come up to much, they might not reach the POs, but you have to try, endless tanking can only do so much good.


Thirty-five wins is the mason dixon line of success vs failure as far as I am concerned for all that EG/Ted have done this offseason. If they can win 35 games that should be good for at least 10th, but probably 9th in the east. I am an easy grader, despite my bitter rants. I am pretty forgiving. If this group manages 35 wins that means they've been competitive most nights and won their share of games.

I can't expect too much more from Okafor (6 total playoff games played, career) and Ariza (declining stats and Okafor's teammate the last 2-3 years). They come from losing situations just like Foye and Miller. This time, instead of getting UFAs the Wizards get big contracts for two seasons. The deals are trade-able, perhaps. They got defenders and a rebounder. The team can use Okafor's rebounding if it returns to form. Okafor can finish inside.

Honestly, I EXPECT the team will win 42 or so games. Okafor at C with Nene at PF should be solid most nights. Ariza will perhaps find his range and hopefully be like he was with the Lakers. John Wall can go from 3% to 30%+ on threes. Brad Beal is going to be a stud … eventually. I think there is reason to expect big improvements.

The problem is other teams got better and are still better on the wings and at PG.
Tre Johnson is the future of the Wizards.
hands11
Banned User
Posts: 31,171
And1: 2,444
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: 2012-2013 do Wizards tank or go for the win? 

Post#27 » by hands11 » Sat Jul 14, 2012 7:45 pm

They should defiantly tank again.

All they have to do is send Wall, Beal, Nene, Booker, Ves, Kevin, and Okafor to the DL

Just run with this roster and they can do it.

Mack
Crawford
Trevor A/Martin
C Singleton
Dray

Just play a 6 man line up the entire year.
Send Randy down to the D League with them and let Sam coach.
User avatar
mohammed10
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,857
And1: 155
Joined: May 26, 2007
Location: Playoffs? Playoffs? Yes, playoffs dammit
 

Re: 2012-2013 do Wizards tank or go for the win? 

Post#28 » by mohammed10 » Sun Jul 15, 2012 2:06 pm

hands11 wrote:They should defiantly tank again.

All they have to do is send Wall, Beal, Nene, Booker, Ves, Kevin, and Okafor to the DL

Just run with this roster and they can do it.

Mack
Crawford
Trevor A/Martin
C Singleton
Dray

Just play a 6 man line up the entire year.
Send Randy down to the D League with them and let Sam coach.


Just have them all report to the team physician...

Problem solved!
If you can fill the unforgiving minute
With sixty seconds’ worth of distance run,
Yours is the Earth and everything that’s in it,
And—which is more—you’ll be a Man, my son!

'If' - by Rudyard Kipling
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: 2012-2013 do Wizards tank or go for the win? 

Post#29 » by Ruzious » Sun Jul 15, 2012 2:39 pm

Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:
veji1 wrote:teh Wiz are done tanking. At some point a team has to play and do its best. This is competitive sport god damn it! The trades done + the state of the roster indicate that they will play to win. Sure it might not come up to much, they might not reach the POs, but you have to try, endless tanking can only do so much good.


Thirty-five wins is the mason dixon line of success vs failure as far as I am concerned for all that EG/Ted have done this offseason. If they can win 35 games that should be good for at least 10th, but probably 9th in the east. I am an easy grader, despite my bitter rants. I am pretty forgiving. If this group manages 35 wins that means they've been competitive most nights and won their share of games.

I can't expect too much more from Okafor (6 total playoff games played, career) and Ariza (declining stats and Okafor's teammate the last 2-3 years). They come from losing situations just like Foye and Miller. This time, instead of getting UFAs the Wizards get big contracts for two seasons. The deals are trade-able, perhaps. They got defenders and a rebounder. The team can use Okafor's rebounding if it returns to form. Okafor can finish inside.

Honestly, I EXPECT the team will win 42 or so games. Okafor at C with Nene at PF should be solid most nights. Ariza will perhaps find his range and hopefully be like he was with the Lakers. John Wall can go from 3% to 30%+ on threes. Brad Beal is going to be a stud … eventually. I think there is reason to expect big improvements.

The problem is other teams got better and are still better on the wings and at PG.

35 wins is not a legitimate goal. That's failure - especially when the owner has said rebuilding is over, and they've acquired 2 13 mil a year bigs.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
Ashburn Dave
Ballboy
Posts: 3
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 29, 2012

Re: 2012-2013 do Wizards tank or go for the win? 

Post#30 » by Ashburn Dave » Sun Jul 15, 2012 2:49 pm

The tank is empty. Our OKC model is complete (at least on paper). We have our number 1 pick in Wall, 3 in Beal and 6 in Ves.

Time for the Wiz (Bullets) to get back into the game.
User avatar
mohammed10
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,857
And1: 155
Joined: May 26, 2007
Location: Playoffs? Playoffs? Yes, playoffs dammit
 

Re: 2012-2013 do Wizards tank or go for the win? 

Post#31 » by mohammed10 » Sun Jul 15, 2012 3:26 pm

Ashburn Dave wrote:The tank is empty. Our KC model is complete (at least on paper). We have our number 1 pick in Wall, 3 in Beal and 6 in Ves.

Time for the Wiz (Bullets) to get back into the game.


Well I guess that means:

John Wall = Nate Archibald (or Phil Ford)
Brad Beal = Otis Birdsong
Jan Vesely = Reggie King?

JK - I suspect you meant to say OKC model, after the Thunder. Personally, I think we are a long way from that, but we're trending in the right direction
If you can fill the unforgiving minute
With sixty seconds’ worth of distance run,
Yours is the Earth and everything that’s in it,
And—which is more—you’ll be a Man, my son!

'If' - by Rudyard Kipling
User avatar
zardsfan
Pro Prospect
Posts: 840
And1: 7
Joined: Jul 20, 2005
Location: Chambersburg, Pa
Contact:

Re: 2012-2013 do Wizards tank or go for the win? 

Post#32 » by zardsfan » Sun Jul 15, 2012 4:01 pm

Time to park the tank and get on the bus... free cool-aid served in the rear.
Knuckleheads need not apply!
montestewart
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 14,798
And1: 7,924
Joined: Feb 25, 2009

Re: 2012-2013 do Wizards tank or go for the win? 

Post#33 » by montestewart » Sun Jul 15, 2012 5:49 pm

Ruzious wrote:35 wins is not a legitimate goal. That's failure - especially when the owner has said rebuilding is over, and they've acquired 2 13 mil a year bigs.

It would have depended on Wall and Vesely working on their jump shots during the offseason and some success in the draft (2 or 3 picks, not one), but 35 wins or so seemed a reasonable expectation before the trade with New Orleans. That trade should put us closer to .500, or it's not living up to its hype. 42 wins seems to be closer to CCJ's reasonable expectation.
User avatar
TheKingOfVa360
General Manager
Posts: 8,326
And1: 1,663
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Location: Orange County, California
         

Re: 2012-2013 do Wizards tank or go for the win? 

Post#34 » by TheKingOfVa360 » Sun Jul 15, 2012 7:16 pm

The tank is over, it's time to make a playoff push. We have a real solid starting line up. We need Wall to take that 3rd year leap that Drose and Westbrook took. He has to have a decent jump shot this season and extend his range to the 3 point line. We also need Vesely to improve his shot (it looks a lot better in SL). If we can have some luck with health we can win 42 games, that should be enough to make the playoffs.
hands11
Banned User
Posts: 31,171
And1: 2,444
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: 2012-2013 do Wizards tank or go for the win? 

Post#35 » by hands11 » Mon Jul 16, 2012 1:57 am

Ruzious wrote:
Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:
veji1 wrote:teh Wiz are done tanking. At some point a team has to play and do its best. This is competitive sport god damn it! The trades done + the state of the roster indicate that they will play to win. Sure it might not come up to much, they might not reach the POs, but you have to try, endless tanking can only do so much good.


Thirty-five wins is the mason dixon line of success vs failure as far as I am concerned for all that EG/Ted have done this offseason. If they can win 35 games that should be good for at least 10th, but probably 9th in the east. I am an easy grader, despite my bitter rants. I am pretty forgiving. If this group manages 35 wins that means they've been competitive most nights and won their share of games.

I can't expect too much more from Okafor (6 total playoff games played, career) and Ariza (declining stats and Okafor's teammate the last 2-3 years). They come from losing situations just like Foye and Miller. This time, instead of getting UFAs the Wizards get big contracts for two seasons. The deals are trade-able, perhaps. They got defenders and a rebounder. The team can use Okafor's rebounding if it returns to form. Okafor can finish inside.

Honestly, I EXPECT the team will win 42 or so games. Okafor at C with Nene at PF should be solid most nights. Ariza will perhaps find his range and hopefully be like he was with the Lakers. John Wall can go from 3% to 30%+ on threes. Brad Beal is going to be a stud … eventually. I think there is reason to expect big improvements.

The problem is other teams got better and are still better on the wings and at PG.

35 wins is not a legitimate goal. That's failure - especially when the owner has said rebuilding is over, and they've acquired 2 13 mil a year bigs.


Yeah. They will win at least 36.

Unless they go for the tanks again.

But seriously. A lot is riding on Wall shoulders this year. Unless they get a vet back up or Beal and Crawford can man some back PG. If Wall goes down, who is the PG. Mack ? Please.

But I think they will get that back up PG thing taken care of and do what I have been saying, MAKE THE PLAYOFFS

Return to Washington Wizards