MoMM wrote:KingRobb02 wrote:Hakeem only had Drexler for the second title.
You are right, but that was a weird year, if Jordan hadn't retired, Bulls would have won that title, because we all know that a Knicks team with only Ewing wouldnt win a 7 games series against Jordan and Pippen, just like they almost won against the Rockets.
Can't judge a season on what ifs though. People in Chicago still think that if Rose doesn't get hurt, they win the title this year, and Laker fans think that if Bynum stays healthy, they win 3 straight.
Not trying to argue, but I kinda disagree with your 2 star thing. Aside from the weird Pistons year, I think it just comes down to one transcendent star. With the way Wade played in most of the playoffs, I wouldn't have even voted him as an all-star this year, but Lebron was on another level. Last year, Dirk went super saiyan on everyone for about 20 games. Hakeem in those two years was beast mode as well. When you have that one great guy and your team is winning, people start looking for other guys to label as stars. Remember that year, we had to pretend the Magic had 3 all-stars just because we were destroying teams? Remember Wally Szczerbiak being an all-star when KG was dominant? Or how KG got Sam Cassel his first all-star nod at age 58? I think that if Lebron isn't around, we are reading stories about how Wade is washed up right now. If KG, doesn't have a MVP type year in Boston, we are still saying that Rondo can't win a title unless he learns to shoot and that you can't build a contender overnight by combining 3 all-stars.
At the end of the day, we need a mega-star to even be in the discussion. I only think there are 5 heading into this season. Lebron, Durant, Dwight (when motivated), Wade (when healthy and not just jacking shots), Chris Paul. If any of those guys puts together a run with an above average cast around them, they are automatically in the discussion. Any move where you go from one of them to someone who is not one of them is a serious step back.