ImageImageImageImageImage

Bradley Beal

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

TheBigThree
Starter
Posts: 2,133
And1: 124
Joined: Mar 20, 2008

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#201 » by TheBigThree » Wed Jul 11, 2012 4:04 am

Those workouts have to be pretty old. He looks noticeably less built and doesn't have the tats he has now on his right arm. Might be from before his Freshman year (which, granted wasn't that long ago)?

That said, I can't wait to see Beal in action. If you watch his High School highlights you'll see him take it to the rack hard. There is a reason he compares that part of his game to DWade. At Florida I just don't think he was used properly playing a lot at SF and it certainly didn't showcase his ability to get to the basket.
fishercob
RealGM
Posts: 13,922
And1: 1,571
Joined: Apr 25, 2002
Location: Tenleytown, DC

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#202 » by fishercob » Wed Jul 11, 2012 12:55 pm

I love it.

I get more hyped seeing Bradley work than his college highlights. The talent is clearly there; what is most exciting is that he seems to want to put the work in, that 's got his head on straight, and that he's smart.

It will take a little bit of time, but this guy is going to be special.
"Some people have a way with words....some people....not have way."
— Steve Martin
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 16,288
And1: 7,382
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#203 » by FAH1223 » Wed Jul 11, 2012 2:22 pm

Met Beal briefly at the Verizon Center Open House last night, kid still has that "man, is this happening look?" on his face.
Image
The Consiglieri
Veteran
Posts: 2,824
And1: 1,013
Joined: May 09, 2007

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#204 » by The Consiglieri » Wed Jul 11, 2012 6:52 pm

What would the starting lineup look like at the halfway point in early February? I don't have a major issue with Crawford starting because I figure he'll lose the job eventually, and if he puts up a strong fight for it, it will simply means that like the rest of the kids, he's actually growing as a player instead of simply stagnant.

My question though is what would our starting lineup be at the halfway point next year? What do we expect to see?

My guess is:

PG: Wall
SG: Beal
SF: Ariza
PF: Nene/Booker/Ves
C: Seraphin/Nene/Okafor

If that holds up, it looks like a 34-48 to 36-46 team to me.
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 20,276
And1: 5,042
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#205 » by tontoz » Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:00 pm

The Consiglieri wrote:What would the starting lineup look like at the halfway point in early February? I don't have a major issue with Crawford starting because I figure he'll lose the job eventually, and if he puts up a strong fight for it, it will simply means that like the rest of the kids, he's actually growing as a player instead of simply stagnant.

My question though is what would our starting lineup be at the halfway point next year? What do we expect to see?

My guess is:

PG: Wall
SG: Beal
SF: Ariza
PF: Nene/Booker/Ves
C: Seraphin/Nene/Okafor

If that holds up, it looks like a 34-48 to 36-46 team to me.



Assuming no other roster upgrades the lack of offense at the 3 will be a major problem and make it tough to get over 40 wins. Their defense should be top 10 though. 35 wins sounds about right.
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,142
And1: 22,571
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#206 » by nate33 » Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:17 pm

The Consiglieri wrote:What would the starting lineup look like at the halfway point in early February? I don't have a major issue with Crawford starting because I figure he'll lose the job eventually, and if he puts up a strong fight for it, it will simply means that like the rest of the kids, he's actually growing as a player instead of simply stagnant.

My question though is what would our starting lineup be at the halfway point next year? What do we expect to see?

My guess is:

PG: Wall
SG: Beal
SF: Ariza
PF: Nene/Booker/Ves
C: Seraphin/Nene/Okafor

If that holds up, it looks like a 34-48 to 36-46 team to me.

I think Seraphin's confidence will be hurt by the presence of Okafor, resulting in him regressing a bit. My guess is that Okafor will be the starter at C during the middle of the season unless there are injuries.
queridiculo
RealGM
Posts: 17,930
And1: 9,312
Joined: Mar 29, 2005
Location: So long Wizturdz.
   

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#207 » by queridiculo » Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:46 pm

Assuming that the team does indeed envision Nene as a PF, I'd expect the team to start Okafor alongside him from day one.

I don't really see how that should leave Seraphin with a lack of confidence though. Both Nene and Okafor have been averaging just around 30mpg, leaving plenty of time for Seraphin.

What I'm more worried about is how Booker and Vesely will factor into things going forward.

Vesely may well be the odd man out if Booker doesn't end up getting dealt.
DCZards
RealGM
Posts: 11,133
And1: 4,980
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#208 » by DCZards » Wed Jul 11, 2012 10:07 pm

I'm also not worried about Seraphin's confidence. If Kevin plays well, he'll earn and get decent minutes. If he struggles due to lack of confidence, he's in the wrong profession.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,142
And1: 22,571
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#209 » by nate33 » Wed Jul 11, 2012 11:03 pm

DCZards wrote:I'm also not worried about Seraphin's confidence. If Kevin plays well, he'll earn and get decent minutes. If he struggles due to lack of confidence, he's in the wrong profession.

I don't think it's that simple. It's hard to play when you're looking over your shoulder at the coach who is ready to yank you for any small mistake. Having the confidence of knowing you're going to get at least 25 minutes each night allows you to play loose and not stress about making mistakes.
closg00
RealGM
Posts: 24,474
And1: 4,461
Joined: Nov 21, 2004

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#210 » by closg00 » Thu Jul 12, 2012 12:09 am

nate33 wrote:
DCZards wrote:I'm also not worried about Seraphin's confidence. If Kevin plays well, he'll earn and get decent minutes. If he struggles due to lack of confidence, he's in the wrong profession.

I don't think it's that simple. It's hard to play when you're looking over your shoulder at the coach who is ready to yank you for any small mistake. Having the confidence of knowing you're going to get at least 25 minutes each night allows you to play loose and not stress about making mistakes.


+1 Remember even Dray playing with joy and freedom after AJ got traded?
DCZards
RealGM
Posts: 11,133
And1: 4,980
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#211 » by DCZards » Thu Jul 12, 2012 2:24 am

nate33 wrote:
I don't think it's that simple. It's hard to play when you're looking over your shoulder at the coach who is ready to yank you for any small mistake. Having the confidence of knowing you're going to get at least 25 minutes each night allows you to play loose and not stress about making mistakes.


Do we know that Wittman is the kind of coach who will yank a player (Seraphin in this case) for any small mistake? Or are we making an assumption?
DCZards
RealGM
Posts: 11,133
And1: 4,980
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#212 » by DCZards » Thu Jul 12, 2012 2:28 am

closg00 wrote:
+1 Remember even Dray playing with joy and freedom after AJ got traded?


Yeah, and how did that turn out in the long run? Maybe Dray should have had less "joy and freedom" and more competition for minutes. :D
fishercob
RealGM
Posts: 13,922
And1: 1,571
Joined: Apr 25, 2002
Location: Tenleytown, DC

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#213 » by fishercob » Thu Jul 12, 2012 1:03 pm

DCZards wrote:
nate33 wrote:
I don't think it's that simple. It's hard to play when you're looking over your shoulder at the coach who is ready to yank you for any small mistake. Having the confidence of knowing you're going to get at least 25 minutes each night allows you to play loose and not stress about making mistakes.


Do we know that Wittman is the kind of coach who will yank a player (Seraphin in this case) for any small mistake? Or are we making an assumption?


It's an assumption. My own assumption is that Wittman's marching orders are to win games AND develop the young players. Not easy stuff by any stretch, I know. BUt I think while Oak and Nene are going to start together, Randy is going to do his best to keep one of them on the floor for much of the game. I do not that we'll see -- at least initially -- long stretches with two of the young bigs together, unless they have made big strides on the boards and/or in defensive awareness.
"Some people have a way with words....some people....not have way."
— Steve Martin
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,142
And1: 22,571
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#214 » by nate33 » Thu Jul 12, 2012 3:34 pm

DCZards wrote:
nate33 wrote:
I don't think it's that simple. It's hard to play when you're looking over your shoulder at the coach who is ready to yank you for any small mistake. Having the confidence of knowing you're going to get at least 25 minutes each night allows you to play loose and not stress about making mistakes.


Do we know that Wittman is the kind of coach who will yank a player (Seraphin in this case) for any small mistake? Or are we making an assumption?

We know that Seraphin played much better once McGee was gone.
User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 54,567
And1: 10,322
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#215 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Thu Jul 12, 2012 3:50 pm

nate33 wrote:We know that Seraphin played much better once McGee was gone.


And now they have Okafor. How will they impact Seraphin's play?
User avatar
Shorty
Ballboy
Posts: 49
And1: 2
Joined: Oct 22, 2011

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#216 » by Shorty » Thu Jul 12, 2012 5:40 pm

Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:
nate33 wrote:We know that Seraphin played much better once McGee was gone.


And now they have Okafor. How will they impact Seraphin's play?


I would expect that Seraphin's efficiency will continue to improve because of better depth at center: he'll either get to play more with Nene, or he'll get more favorable matchups against the opposition's reserves. Also, foul trouble should be less of a concern.

By the way, Beal rocks.
go'stags
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,601
And1: 29
Joined: Aug 01, 2004

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#217 » by go'stags » Thu Jul 12, 2012 11:45 pm

nate33 wrote:
DCZards wrote:
nate33 wrote:
I don't think it's that simple. It's hard to play when you're looking over your shoulder at the coach who is ready to yank you for any small mistake. Having the confidence of knowing you're going to get at least 25 minutes each night allows you to play loose and not stress about making mistakes.


Do we know that Wittman is the kind of coach who will yank a player (Seraphin in this case) for any small mistake? Or are we making an assumption?

We know that Seraphin played much better once McGee was gone.


Yes, but that was also before Seraphin showed how effective he could be. Wittman knows what he saw last year, and didn't Seraphin give Wittman all type of credit for developing him last year?

I still gotta think a trade is coming.
LyricalRico wrote:
Speaking of giant penises, what's up with Bobby Simmons?.
User avatar
MJG
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,403
And1: 151
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: Northern Virginia

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#218 » by MJG » Thu Jul 12, 2012 11:57 pm

Shorty wrote:
Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:
nate33 wrote:We know that Seraphin played much better once McGee was gone.


And now they have Okafor. How will they impact Seraphin's play?


I would expect that Seraphin's efficiency will continue to improve because of better depth at center: he'll either get to play more with Nene, or he'll get more favorable matchups against the opposition's reserves. Also, foul trouble should be less of a concern.

By the way, Beal rocks.

Let's not get off topic; Beal talk goes here.
King d
Banned User
Posts: 1,212
And1: 40
Joined: Sep 16, 2010

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#219 » by King d » Fri Jul 13, 2012 3:03 am

MJG wrote:Let's not get off topic; Beal talk goes here.


:lol: :lol: :lol:
theboomking
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,597
And1: 20
Joined: Jan 10, 2011

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#220 » by theboomking » Fri Jul 13, 2012 10:59 pm

I didn't get to watch the game today, and obviously, it is only summer league, but Beal was very efficient today, putting up 22 points on only 14 shots, with only 2 turnovers. He also surprised me was how athletic he looked in highlights.

Return to Washington Wizards