ImageImageImageImageImage

Dissecting Lin

Moderators: HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi

qam
Ballboy
Posts: 20
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 06, 2010

Dissecting Lin 

Post#1 » by qam » Mon Jul 16, 2012 4:37 am

Just throwing it out there (since there have been so many arguments against Felton's stint in NY under D'Antoni, and how he only produced because of the 'system'):

Jeremy Lin under D'Antoni: 20.1 pts, 8.6 ast (18 gms)
Jeremy Lin under Woodson: 13.3 pts, 5.4 ast (7 gms)

Jeremy Lin playing with A'mare (Melo injured): 22.8 pts, 10.8 ast (4 gms)
Jeremy Lin playing with Carmelo (A'mare injured): 28 pts, 8 ast (1 gm)
Jeremy Lin (both A'mare and Carmelo injured): 27.0 pts, 8.3 ast (3 gms)
Jeremy Lin Playing with A'mare and Carmelo: 15.0 pts, 6.8 ast (17 gms)

Two things stand out:
1) His numbers may have been inflated under D'Antoni's system (sound familiar?)
2) His numbers don't look very impressive when both A'mare and Carmelo are on the court.

I know these are all small samples, but everything we know about Jeremy Lin is a small sample.
StyLeD
Pro Prospect
Posts: 924
And1: 17
Joined: Feb 11, 2012

Re: Dissecting Lin 

Post#2 » by StyLeD » Mon Jul 16, 2012 4:50 am

Still better than Felton.
SuperflyKnick
Head Coach
Posts: 6,442
And1: 1,167
Joined: Feb 24, 2003

Re: Dissecting Lin 

Post#3 » by SuperflyKnick » Mon Jul 16, 2012 4:53 am

maybe when he shows up more then 25 gms....
User avatar
NYchris
Senior
Posts: 518
And1: 49
Joined: Jan 22, 2009

Re: Dissecting Lin 

Post#4 » by NYchris » Mon Jul 16, 2012 4:55 am

If dolan is serious about being contenders he matches lin I have a feeling within my lifetime I wont see a knicks championship.
Image
User avatar
GettinitDone
Head Coach
Posts: 7,420
And1: 4,543
Joined: Feb 09, 2012

Re: Dissecting Lin 

Post#5 » by GettinitDone » Mon Jul 16, 2012 4:56 am

I should add those are rookie numbers.

Take his 2 worst numbers:
Jeremy Lin under Woodson: 13.3 pts, 5.4 ast (7 gms)
Jeremy Lin Playing with A'mare and Carmelo: 15.0 pts, 6.8 ast (17 gms)


I'd take a rookie who average those numbers. But what's not seen in the numbers are his composure, his juice to play in the clutch, his control of pace, his leadership, his character, his "I can follow as well as I can lead" style, his smart, his work ethic, his good head, his passion for game. He displayed all these as if he was a 5+ year veteran when he was playing under immense pressure of verge of being cut, pressure of world's biggest media and unforgiving sport fanbase, yet he met/ exceeded expectations time and time again.

Lin is the complete package of intangible qualities you could want from a player. He certainly wouldn't let stuff like women, over-partying, drugs, power, money, foods (like so many players fall into) stand between him and his love for the game. He is a true basketball junkie. If you stick around long enough doing something, you're bound to have success in that, so he's progressing toward basketball greatness. With no obstacles standing between him and greatness, I truly believe only injuries do like they do for all athletes.
knicksnyk
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,708
And1: 42
Joined: Jun 12, 2012

Re: Dissecting Lin 

Post#6 » by knicksnyk » Mon Jul 16, 2012 4:58 am

qam wrote:Just throwing it out there (since there have been so many arguments against Felton's stint in NY under D'Antoni, and how he only produced because of the 'system'):

Jeremy Lin under D'Antoni: 20.1 pts, 8.6 ast (18 gms)
Jeremy Lin under Woodson: 13.3 pts, 5.4 ast (7 gms)

Jeremy Lin playing with A'mare (Melo injured): 22.8 pts, 10.8 ast (4 gms)
Jeremy Lin playing with Carmelo (A'mare injured): 28 pts, 8 ast (1 gm)
Jeremy Lin (both A'mare and Carmelo injured): 27.0 pts, 8.3 ast (3 gms)
Jeremy Lin Playing with A'mare and Carmelo: 15.0 pts, 6.8 ast (17 gms)

Two things stand out:
1) His numbers may have been inflated under D'Antoni's system (sound familiar?)
2) His numbers don't look very impressive when both A'mare and Carmelo are on the court.

I know these are all small samples, but everything we know about Jeremy Lin is a small sample.


Considering that these were his numbers after about 19 starts in the NBA I find that quite impressive. Also remember in these games we were blowing out teams that our starters were playing reduced minutes. The offense was running less through Lin and more through Melo so less opportunity for Lin's starts to be higher. What do those numbers matter when he was helping us win games by managing and directing the offense. This is a highly myopic view of things to just look at numbers in an effort to dissect him. Also, melo was in his shooting slump then so Lin's assists figures could have been higher. But once again we were winning games so who cares about individual numbers when he was a big part of the reason as to why we were winning.
spaceballer
Head Coach
Posts: 6,581
And1: 2,707
Joined: Mar 05, 2012

Re: Dissecting Lin 

Post#7 » by spaceballer » Mon Jul 16, 2012 5:01 am

You forgot to account for minutes played. D'Antoni rode him for crazy overload minutes. His minutes were reduced under Woodson, often because the starters didn't play as much due to blowouts. When you normalize the numbers for minutes played as well as change in usage, they didn't suffer such a bad drop off under Woodson. His efficiency might even have been higher under Woodson.
User avatar
GONYK
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 66,862
And1: 45,466
Joined: Jun 27, 2003
Location: Brunson Gang
   

Re: Dissecting Lin 

Post#8 » by GONYK » Mon Jul 16, 2012 5:01 am

Are we going to ignore that Lin only played like 29 mins a game under Woodson because we were beating teams by 20 points every night, and he was sitting out the 4th qtr?
drekwins
Head Coach
Posts: 7,286
And1: 4,689
Joined: Jun 05, 2008
     

Re: Dissecting Lin 

Post#9 » by drekwins » Mon Jul 16, 2012 5:03 am

If his range, in a best and worst case scenario, is between 13.3-28.8 points per game and 5.4-10.8 assists per game, then that's pretty good. That implies, that at worst, he is a 23 year old already worthy of a starting position. At best, he is at or near the level of the best PG's in the game. Listen, I'm not a diehard Lin fan but with so much turnover in the NBA, why not sign him and worry about it later? It's still a dollar for dollar tax this season. By the time year 3 comes around, we will have draft picks and a ton of expirings. If we are still worried 2 years from now, just unload some salary. We'll have the pieces to do so.
jzmagik
Banned User
Posts: 5,528
And1: 0
Joined: May 06, 2005
Location: NYC

Re: Dissecting Lin 

Post#10 » by jzmagik » Mon Jul 16, 2012 5:03 am

GONYK wrote:Are we going to ignore that Lin only played like 29 mins a game under Woodson because we were beating teams by 20 points every night, and he was sitting out the 4th qtr?


Lin should be grateful that he was even playing in those games, it was Melo carrying his sorry-ass throughout the season
User avatar
Sideline Story
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,852
And1: 9
Joined: Aug 12, 2010
 

Re: Dissecting Lin 

Post#11 » by Sideline Story » Mon Jul 16, 2012 5:05 am

GONYK wrote:Are we going to ignore that Lin only played like 29 mins a game under Woodson because we were beating teams by 20 points every night, and he was sitting out the 4th qtr?


Of course. That's just how we do it here on RGM!
User avatar
Bravery
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,920
And1: 8
Joined: Jun 30, 2002
Location: NYC. No longer a Rated [R] Superstar
     

Re: Dissecting Lin 

Post#12 » by Bravery » Mon Jul 16, 2012 5:06 am

GONYK wrote:Are we going to ignore that Lin only played like 29 mins a game under Woodson because we were beating teams by 20 points every night, and he was sitting out the 4th qtr?
BayareaKnicks
Junior
Posts: 388
And1: 1
Joined: Mar 05, 2012

Re: Dissecting Lin 

Post#13 » by BayareaKnicks » Mon Jul 16, 2012 5:09 am

GettinitDone wrote:I should add those are rookie numbers.

Take his 2 worst numbers:
Jeremy Lin under Woodson: 13.3 pts, 5.4 ast (7 gms)
Jeremy Lin Playing with A'mare and Carmelo: 15.0 pts, 6.8 ast (17 gms)


I'd take a rookie who average those numbers. But what's not seen in the numbers are his composure, his juice to play in the clutch, his control of pace, his leadership, his character, his "I can follow as well as I can lead" style, his smart, his work ethic, his good head, his passion for game. He displayed all these as if he was a 5+ year veteran when he was playing under immense pressure of verge of being cut, pressure of world's biggest media and unforgiving sport fanbase, yet he met/ exceeded expectations time and time again.

Lin is the complete package of intangible qualities you could want from a player. He certainly wouldn't let stuff like women, over-partying, drugs, power, money, foods (like so many players fall into) stand between him and his love for the game. He is a true basketball junkie. If you stick around long enough doing something, you're bound to have success in that, so he's progressing toward basketball greatness. With no obstacles standing between him and greatness, I truly believe only injuries do like they do for all athletes.



well said.
This kid has that it factor. He doesn't shy away from the moment. He thrives in the fourth quarter.
Honestly, I think this kid ran out of gas after playing so many minutes towards the latter part of the season. Those sick 7 first starts were not a fluke. He is the real deal. Hope Dolan realizes this.
LINearity Wins
Ballboy
Posts: 48
And1: 11
Joined: Feb 13, 2012

Re: Dissecting Lin 

Post#14 » by LINearity Wins » Mon Jul 16, 2012 5:13 am

"Lin should be grateful that he was even playing in those games, it was Melo carrying his sorry-ass throughout the season" :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Before Linsanity : Melo's FG <40% average less than 20pts per game
And Knicks recorded 8-15 , on the bottom of east conference
Who carried whom?

Well Lin REALLY should be grateful because under there is no hope situation, then he could play so long time in a game
User avatar
JohnStockton
Senior
Posts: 569
And1: 877
Joined: Feb 21, 2012
   

Re: Dissecting Lin 

Post#15 » by JohnStockton » Mon Jul 16, 2012 5:14 am

I know some of you are mad at Jeremy Lin right now but it's no cause to try to kill and harvest his organs.
On October 31, 2009, against the Kings, a bat descended onto the court causing a stoppage of play. As the bat flew past, GinĂ³bili swatted the bat to the ground with his hand. He then carried the creature off the court, earning the applause of the crowd.
User avatar
ibraheim718
RealGM
Posts: 41,720
And1: 15,269
Joined: Jul 01, 2010

Re: Dissecting Lin 

Post#16 » by ibraheim718 » Mon Jul 16, 2012 5:15 am

GONYK wrote:Are we going to ignore that Lin only played like 29 mins a game under Woodson because we were beating teams by 20 points every night, and he was sitting out the 4th qtr?


His job also was to play his position and lead the team to wins firstly and get the scorers involved. But he can carry a team through a stretch in a game or games.
polarbears815
Junior
Posts: 373
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 05, 2012

Re: Dissecting Lin 

Post#17 » by polarbears815 » Mon Jul 16, 2012 5:15 am

Jeremy Lin may regress a bit in the coming weeks, but his early numbers indicate that he is much more than one week wonder.

A look at just how good Lin has been shows just how the Knicks have been able to turn their season around. In his first four starts, Lin has scored 27.3 points per game. No player has scored more points in their first four games as a starter since the NBA-ABA merger in 1976.

Here are the top four scorers in their first four NBA starts...

Jeremy Lin - 27.3 points per game
Allen Iverson - 25.3 ppg
Shaquille O'Neal - 25.0 ppg
Michael Jordan - 24.8 ppg


Read more: http://articles.businessinsider.com/201 ... z20l971DHJ


But yeah. I'm sure he's just a fluke. :roll:

In all seriousness though, Lin may never ever be as good as Iverson, O'Neal, or Jordan. But he's definitely not the scrub some people think he is either. Most likely it is in-between. Still, that's good company to be in. Those numbers just don't happen by accident.
spaceballer
Head Coach
Posts: 6,581
And1: 2,707
Joined: Mar 05, 2012

Re: Dissecting Lin 

Post#18 » by spaceballer » Mon Jul 16, 2012 5:25 am

They analyzed his numbers with a look at the historical record. The conclusion is that he's no fluke

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.co ... -no-fluke/

Notice that Jeremy Lin makes the cut-off, but one-hit wonders and real flukes like Flip Murray don't make the list. Lin is no fluke.

And Fat Felton is nowhere to be found. So Fatton's stretch of supposedly good play is nowhere comparable to the numbers analyzed in the database. He's not even in the same ballpark as that list.
Greenie
RealGM
Posts: 58,966
And1: 30,697
Joined: Feb 25, 2010

Re: Dissecting Lin 

Post#19 » by Greenie » Mon Jul 16, 2012 5:30 am

GettinitDone wrote:I should add those are rookie numbers.

Take his 2 worst numbers:
Jeremy Lin under Woodson: 13.3 pts, 5.4 ast (7 gms)
Jeremy Lin Playing with A'mare and Carmelo: 15.0 pts, 6.8 ast (17 gms)


I'd take a rookie who average those numbers. But what's not seen in the numbers are his composure, his juice to play in the clutch, his control of pace, his leadership, his character, his "I can follow as well as I can lead" style, his smart, his work ethic, his good head, his passion for game. He displayed all these as if he was a 5+ year veteran when he was playing under immense pressure of verge of being cut, pressure of world's biggest media and unforgiving sport fanbase, yet he met/ exceeded expectations time and time again.

Lin is the complete package of intangible qualities you could want from a player. He certainly wouldn't let stuff like women, over-partying, drugs, power, money, foods (like so many players fall into) stand between him and his love for the game. He is a true basketball junkie. If you stick around long enough doing something, you're bound to have success in that, so he's progressing toward basketball greatness. With no obstacles standing between him and greatness, I truly believe only injuries do like they do for all athletes.

Lin ain't no rookie.
User avatar
CoolKids
RealGM
Posts: 14,447
And1: 2,650
Joined: Feb 17, 2009
Location: The Bronx
     

Re: Dissecting Lin 

Post#20 » by CoolKids » Mon Jul 16, 2012 5:52 am

JohnStockton wrote:I know some of you are mad at Jeremy Lin right now but it's no cause to try to kill and harvest his organs.

:lol: :lol: :lol:

I like this guy

Return to New York Knicks