STARTING SF?
STARTING SF?
-
SacSanity
- Senior
- Posts: 572
- And1: 89
- Joined: Jan 30, 2012
-
STARTING SF?
Who do we start as SF? I much rather see JJ start then TrashCan Salmons.... What are your thoughts?
Re: STARTING SF?
-
KF10
- Forum Mod - Kings
- Posts: 25,434
- And1: 5,537
- Joined: Jul 28, 2006
-
Re: STARTING SF?
James Johnson is going to start.
Out of Salmons, Garcia & Outlaw, Johnson > all of them
Probably the best defender out of the bunch. And probably more productive too.
Still wanted to sign T-Will though.
Out of Salmons, Garcia & Outlaw, Johnson > all of them
Probably the best defender out of the bunch. And probably more productive too.
Still wanted to sign T-Will though.
Re: STARTING SF?
-
m1kenoff
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,268
- And1: 482
- Joined: Dec 15, 2007
Re: STARTING SF?
If JJ starts, your staff should find some offensive opportunities for him. It would be a waste if you didnt run plays for him (like what we did). Just because he is a great defensive player, does not mean you need to ignore him on the offensive end or just expect him to score 15ppg on put-backs. blah..
Re: STARTING SF?
-
RIPskaterdude
- RealGM
- Posts: 92,818
- And1: 37,039
- Joined: Jul 10, 2003
- Location: #MakeAmericaGreatAgain
-
Re: STARTING SF?
KF10 wrote:James Johnson is going to start.
Out of Salmons, Garcia & Outlaw, Johnson > all of them
Probably the best defender out of the bunch. And probably more productive too.
Still wanted to sign T-Will though.
Two words.
Zone defense.
Re: STARTING SF?
-
SacKingsPejaFan
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,627
- And1: 114
- Joined: May 27, 2010
- Location: New York, NY
Re: STARTING SF?
xx_skaterdude_xx wrote:KF10 wrote:James Johnson is going to start.
Out of Salmons, Garcia & Outlaw, Johnson > all of them
Probably the best defender out of the bunch. And probably more productive too.
Still wanted to sign T-Will though.
Two words.
Zone defense.
As long as we start Thomas and Thornton--both of whom can shoot the three--I think we'd be OK. Not swell, but definitely OK.
Re: STARTING SF?
-
blind prophet
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,574
- And1: 3,306
- Joined: Dec 08, 2011
-
Re: STARTING SF?
Johnson starts,
Salmons will we used when his ball handling will be needed, like if Evans is on the floor without IT.
Outlaw will get garbage mins when need a possible 3 point threat, end of quarters etc.
Garcia is odd man out now, one foot out the door.
Salmons will we used when his ball handling will be needed, like if Evans is on the floor without IT.
Outlaw will get garbage mins when need a possible 3 point threat, end of quarters etc.
Garcia is odd man out now, one foot out the door.
Re: STARTING SF?
-
SacKingZZZ
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,085
- And1: 1,084
- Joined: Feb 19, 2005
- Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."
Re: STARTING SF?
m1kenoff wrote:If JJ starts, your staff should find some offensive opportunities for him. It would be a waste if you didnt run plays for him (like what we did). Just because he is a great defensive player, does not mean you need to ignore him on the offensive end or just expect him to score 15ppg on put-backs. blah..
Takes a second and look at the Kings roster. Now, who gets left out here? We've been debating how to even spread the offense around as is, and the best argument for doing so already has Thomas Robinson getting 9 shots a game.
This franchise has major work to do. MAJOR.Re: STARTING SF?
-
SacKingZZZ
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,085
- And1: 1,084
- Joined: Feb 19, 2005
- Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."
Re: STARTING SF?
KF10 wrote:James Johnson is going to start.
Out of Salmons, Garcia & Outlaw, Johnson > all of them
Probably the best defender out of the bunch. And probably more productive too.
Still wanted to sign T-Will though.
This is what's strange, I'm guessing he's asking for too much money. That or the Kings are waiting it out and figure they can get him for the minimum.