cmw17 wrote:Phystic wrote:You make it sound so easy. I'm sure they tried to do better than Warrick and Childress. Not to mention obviously the free agent crop was different, and our cap situation was different. Sarver has definitely made issues and so has our Front Office at any given time but our team had enough talent at different times. We just didn't get it done(and had some unfortunate luck)
Sure Nash left but the Suns didn't want him back.
The bottom line is the Suns were never this aggressive in bringing in talent while Nash was here, which is why he left. The second he leaves, they go full force. It's BS, very difficult to like them after they did this. Feels like they back stabbed Steve, not the other way around like some are saying here.
That is your bottom line. Neither you nor I have knowledge about what was going on in the Suns front office. The Suns chased a championship all the way up to the time Amare left. They were aggressive in bringing in talent - sometimes good sometimes not and eventually like most teams that do that their window closes and whatever talent left dissipates. If it makes you feel better, you certainly can rant all you want about the front office, but I think it makes you look juvenile and ignorant.