bigmoe1952 wrote:cb1115 wrote:bigmoe1952 wrote:So you're saying it's not possible, given the history? K
No.
Then you are in serious denial and I am glad you play no role in the decision. Injured in 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2011. But no chance, huh? Look, I have no desire to belabor the point or argue about it. He has a strong history of injury and he will command a heavy contract. If injury strikes him we are severely screwed. I do not happen to think we can take that chance. We agree to disagree. But it perplexes me when there are some who want Bynum so bad that they will ignore a strong possibility of further injury problems. If not for that, and his attitude, I would be in the "get Bynum column."
Some people just want to believe Bynum will magically stay healthy, although he been injured for the past few years. He was healthy last year, but remember, he just had a knee operation over the summer.
Reading through some of the posts yesterday, I had a good laugh. I saw some people talked about how "smart" he is compared to Howard, lmfao. Get the f out with that shish. I don't care if he's Stephen Hawking off the court, just watch his game; there's no way he play smarter than Howard on the court, where, you know, it matters. I know hating on Howard is the thing right now, many can argue that it's justifiable, but he's still miles ahead of Bynum. I rather take the Houston package than an injury-prone big man from the Lakers, without shedding much salaries and zero draft picks, even if he's the 2nd best center in the league.
...IMO his agent didn't care if he got traded to another team as long as he got to BK Nets in 2012 off season (D12 and his camp had this plan mapped out). But ultimately, Dwight thought different as he believed in our management again, that's why he mentioned "loyalty". 
