Rumor: Jazz & SAC
Moderators: Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe
Rumor: Jazz & SAC
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,121
- And1: 31
- Joined: May 17, 2005
Rumor: Jazz & SAC
Yep you guessed it.
Rumor out of Salt Lake City is that Jazz are in serious discussion with SAC. The rumor is:
Watson, cash, and possibly the GS pick for Jimmer.
Here is a tease tweet by Spence Checkett, radio host of the Jazz's station.
https://twitter.com/1280Spence/status/2 ... 4050199552
They are talking about it on 1280AM. Sorry no other links at this time since I am at work.
Rumor out of Salt Lake City is that Jazz are in serious discussion with SAC. The rumor is:
Watson, cash, and possibly the GS pick for Jimmer.
Here is a tease tweet by Spence Checkett, radio host of the Jazz's station.
https://twitter.com/1280Spence/status/2 ... 4050199552
They are talking about it on 1280AM. Sorry no other links at this time since I am at work.
Re: Rumor: Jazz & SAC
- samuraix
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,870
- And1: 1,726
- Joined: Jul 22, 2010
-
Re: Rumor: Jazz & SAC
Possibly for Jimmer? Or Jimmer+
Re: Rumor: Jazz & SAC
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,121
- And1: 31
- Joined: May 17, 2005
Re: Rumor: Jazz & SAC
Sounds like for just the man, the myth, and the legend... Jimmer.
Re: Rumor: Jazz & SAC
- Jazzy13
- Starter
- Posts: 2,392
- And1: 1,200
- Joined: Feb 23, 2006
- Location: Lakerland, CA
-
Re: Rumor: Jazz & SAC
I'll take Jimmer for that package.
Re: Rumor: Jazz & SAC
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 20,906
- And1: 3,396
- Joined: Dec 29, 2005
- Location: Jurassic Park
-
Re: Rumor: Jazz & SAC
If I was The Kings I would take this and run. Jimmer isn't that good he's basically Matt Carroll. Let him go back home to Utah and live off his collage fame. That Warriors pick could be worth it's weight in gold the way that team is run. I mean they have no direction and a bunch of guys who can't stay healthy.
Lord Leoshes wrote:i personally would rather keep Chalmers over Lowry
Re: Rumor: Jazz & SAC
- CAE15
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,141
- And1: 699
- Joined: Jul 16, 2006
- Location: Udoka Azubuike Central
-
Re: Rumor: Jazz & SAC
Gs pick for jimmer? Aye aye aye. Reke is what we should be looking at.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk 2
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk 2

Re: Rumor: Jazz & SAC
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,047
- And1: 7,845
- Joined: Nov 24, 2006
Re: Rumor: Jazz & SAC
CAE15 wrote:Gs pick for jimmer? Aye aye aye. Reke is what we should be looking at.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk 2
It would take a hell of a lot more than the GS pick to snag Evans. In this scenario the GS pick is arguably the top asset, but in an Evans trade it would have to be 2nd best (maybe 3rd).
Re: Rumor: Jazz & SAC
- vincecarter4pres
- RealGM
- Posts: 51,064
- And1: 3,840
- Joined: May 30, 2005
- Location: New Jeruz
- Contact:
-
Re: Rumor: Jazz & SAC
rpa wrote:It would take a hell of a lot more than the GS pick to snag Evans.
Would it?

Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
Re: Rumor: Jazz & SAC
- City of Trees
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 15,851
- And1: 5,511
- Joined: Dec 23, 2009
- Location: Roseville, CA
-
Re: Rumor: Jazz & SAC
vincecarter4pres wrote:rpa wrote:It would take a hell of a lot more than the GS pick to snag Evans.
Would it?
Dude,

Re: Rumor: Jazz & SAC
-
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 45,496
- And1: 26,048
- Joined: Jun 29, 2006
-
Re: Rumor: Jazz & SAC
I tend to think little of "rumours"...I don't know what the accuracy rate is, but I'm sure it's not high!
In any case, I can see a Jimmer trade happening, but I wouldn't give up that Warriors' pick for him. There's still a decent chance that's a lottery pick, and I wouldn't swap it for a guy who has mostly disappointed since Day 1. If it were closer to the deadline and I had a better sense of where the pick would land and what prospects might be there, then maybe. Until then I'd rather stay flexible.
In any case, I can see a Jimmer trade happening, but I wouldn't give up that Warriors' pick for him. There's still a decent chance that's a lottery pick, and I wouldn't swap it for a guy who has mostly disappointed since Day 1. If it were closer to the deadline and I had a better sense of where the pick would land and what prospects might be there, then maybe. Until then I'd rather stay flexible.
Re: Rumor: Jazz & SAC
- vincecarter4pres
- RealGM
- Posts: 51,064
- And1: 3,840
- Joined: May 30, 2005
- Location: New Jeruz
- Contact:
-
Re: Rumor: Jazz & SAC
Evans Is King wrote:vincecarter4pres wrote:rpa wrote:It would take a hell of a lot more than the GS pick to snag Evans.
Would it?
Dude,![]()
Yes?

Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
Re: Rumor: Jazz & SAC
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 1,736
- And1: 1,004
- Joined: Apr 02, 2011
Re: Rumor: Jazz & SAC
Utah already mismanaged that pick last year. If they proceed to throw it in the trash now, I am going to burn down the ESA.
Re: Rumor: Jazz & SAC
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,169
- And1: 571
- Joined: Oct 30, 2009
-
Re: Rumor: Jazz & SAC
Amish Mafioso wrote:Utah already mismanaged that pick last year. If they proceed to throw it in the trash now, I am going to burn down the ESA.
I knew there had to be a reason why the Warriors tanked so hard. How did Utah cause them to lose games?
Heat3Peat wrote:See this is why it's nice being a LeBron fan, no super hard allegiance to a team so there is no up and down emotions with me during a time like this.
Re: Rumor: Jazz & SAC
- City of Trees
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 15,851
- And1: 5,511
- Joined: Dec 23, 2009
- Location: Roseville, CA
-
Re: Rumor: Jazz & SAC
vincecarter4pres wrote:Evans Is King wrote:vincecarter4pres wrote:Would it?
Dude,![]()
Yes?
It would take more
Re: Rumor: Jazz & SAC
- vincecarter4pres
- RealGM
- Posts: 51,064
- And1: 3,840
- Joined: May 30, 2005
- Location: New Jeruz
- Contact:
-
Re: Rumor: Jazz & SAC
Evans Is King wrote:It would take more
Possibly, but it's not an insulting offer by any means.

Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
Re: Rumor: Jazz & SAC
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,649
- And1: 1,342
- Joined: Oct 02, 2005
Re: Rumor: Jazz & SAC
LOL.
The pick (was protected to 7, not sure where after this year) is right in the same range as Jimmer went at 10.
The act is, beyond the obvious marketing bonanza that Jimmer is for Utah, the book really is still out on him. He had no SL, no real camp and a shortened season with a coaching change for a rookie year. Add to that the fact thatheshould flourish in a system like the one runin Utah and this looks not just even, butpossiblya big win for Utah.
The pick (was protected to 7, not sure where after this year) is right in the same range as Jimmer went at 10.
The act is, beyond the obvious marketing bonanza that Jimmer is for Utah, the book really is still out on him. He had no SL, no real camp and a shortened season with a coaching change for a rookie year. Add to that the fact thatheshould flourish in a system like the one runin Utah and this looks not just even, butpossiblya big win for Utah.
Re: Rumor: Jazz & SAC
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,093
- And1: 70
- Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Re: Rumor: Jazz & SAC
Lol, Kings take that and run so hard, Petrie might be able to suit up for the Kings after such a workout.
Re: Rumor: Jazz & SAC
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,978
- And1: 68
- Joined: Jun 10, 2004
-
Re: Rumor: Jazz & SAC
Gilles wrote:Lol, Kings take that and run so hard, Petrie might be able to suit up for the Kings after such a workout.

Re: Rumor: Jazz & SAC
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 1,736
- And1: 1,004
- Joined: Apr 02, 2011
Re: Rumor: Jazz & SAC
BossHoggin wrote:Amish Mafioso wrote:Utah already mismanaged that pick last year. If they proceed to throw it in the trash now, I am going to burn down the ESA.
I knew there had to be a reason why the Warriors tanked so hard. How did Utah cause them to lose games?
Gee, I dunno...Maybe by beating them? Utah lost both the GS pick and their own by a matter of a couple games. Obviously, there would have been no guarantees, but trading Al at the deadline likely results in Utah keeping both picks. Instead, the FO decided to chase after a royal asskicking in the first round, just so they could put a playoff label on the team. If the goal is to sell tickets, then they did just fine. However, if the goal is to build a team capable of making a run at a championship, not trading Al at the deadline was probably a crucial mistake.
If they were serious about building a contender, they would have accepted one more year of rebuilding. Sometimes the timing of a trade is more important than the trade itself, and yes, I believe Utah dropped the ball on their rebuild last year. We'll have to wait until we see what happens with the draft next year, unless they do something stupid like trade that pick for Jimmer. Then we'll pretty much know they screwed the pooch.
Re: Rumor: Jazz & SAC
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,047
- And1: 7,845
- Joined: Nov 24, 2006
Re: Rumor: Jazz & SAC
vincecarter4pres wrote:rpa wrote:It would take a hell of a lot more than the GS pick to snag Evans.
Would it?
We all know of your unhealthy hate for Evans, but can you at least try to be realistic here? I mean, the mere fact that the rumor is that that pick can snag Jimmer (whose value is miles short of Evans') should show you how naive your post is.
Return to Trades and Transactions