Image Image Image Image

This team is worse than last year

treyZz
Banned User
Posts: 5,326
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 18, 2006

This team is worse than last year 

Post#1 » by treyZz » Sat May 26, 2007 5:58 am

How is that even remotely possible?

$300M wasn't enough for Hendry?
SportsWorld
RealGM
Posts: 51,601
And1: 133
Joined: Dec 03, 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:
       

 

Post#2 » by SportsWorld » Sat May 26, 2007 5:59 am

Alfonso is overpaid
The Bullpen Sucks
Howry Sucks especially
Jones Sucks
Triple_6_Mafia
Banned User
Posts: 747
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 27, 2007

 

Post#3 » by Triple_6_Mafia » Sat May 26, 2007 6:38 am

I told everyone that Alfonso was going too be overpaid.


Every year its going to be there "year", but some one gets hurt, or they sign some guy for way too much money and he didnt help them enough, or a fan catches a foul ball.
SportsWorld
RealGM
Posts: 51,601
And1: 133
Joined: Dec 03, 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:
       

 

Post#4 » by SportsWorld » Sat May 26, 2007 6:41 am

Triple_6_Mafia wrote:I told everyone that Alfonso was going too be overpaid.


Every year its going to be there "year", but some one gets hurt, or they sign some guy for way too much money and he didnt help them enough, or a fan catches a foul ball.

I'm sure you were the only one.
Flames24Rulz
Head Coach
Posts: 6,406
And1: 343
Joined: Dec 23, 2004
Location: Rockford, IL
       

 

Post#5 » by Flames24Rulz » Sat May 26, 2007 7:11 am

Hendry sucks
Lou sucks
The players suck

Any questions?
User avatar
PhilipNelsonFan
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 17,246
And1: 6
Joined: Oct 11, 2004

 

Post#6 » by PhilipNelsonFan » Sat May 26, 2007 9:01 am

Flames24Rulz wrote:Lou sucks


I must fight you now.

Lou Piniella does not suck. He is one of the best managers in the league.

However, I don't think he was mentally ready for this job and he probably should stay retired.
Tim Lehrbach wrote:I will break the Rose Garden.
User avatar
GYBE
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 9,000
And1: 358
Joined: Feb 14, 2005
Location: Kanada

 

Post#7 » by GYBE » Sat May 26, 2007 9:16 am

It's a worse team in a couple aspects, but at least this team's offense CAN get better. Last year a lot of it was a talent problem, now it's more talented players who just suck. I'm not sure which one is worse to watch though.

It's astonishing how poorly put together this team is. It's like Hendry is running a fantasy baseball team instead of trying to get players who fit a plan or system. Just one example is the Soriano signing. When your biggest problem last year was not getting on base enough, why would you overpay for a player whose OBP is his biggest weakness? Of course he then compound the problem by sticking him at the top of the order.

I'm to the point where I think all of us could stastically prove the Cubs would win more with very simple changes, and Hendry would throw us out for "voodoo magic" or something. Does he know stats are tracked in baseball? Does he know you should make decisions based on them?

8)
SportsWorld
RealGM
Posts: 51,601
And1: 133
Joined: Dec 03, 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:
       

 

Post#8 » by SportsWorld » Sat May 26, 2007 6:35 pm

Lou is not the reason why we are losing. As I said before, sure he does make a few mistakes but with very little options to go to in the bullpen he probably has the toughest job in the MLB. He has done a good job at containing his temper this year and that may be killing us. He needs to go out and pull a Jim Leyland and publicly criticize this team.

Remember when Leyland did this last year? His team was a few games below .500 and he called out his team saying they are much better than how they are playing. After this the Tigers finished 1st in the AL Central and went on to win the ALCS before losing to the Cardinals in the World Series.

Personally, I think we are better than that Tigers team last year.
Howling Mad
General Manager
Posts: 9,043
And1: 624
Joined: Jun 28, 2006

 

Post#9 » by Howling Mad » Sat May 26, 2007 8:13 pm

How can you say that 1/4 of the way into the season?

Cubs fan too long? ...me too. :(
treyZz
Banned User
Posts: 5,326
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 18, 2006

 

Post#10 » by treyZz » Sat May 26, 2007 8:22 pm

The Tigers were under .500 last year?

I thought they got off to a great start - played mediocre for a stretch and then took off again.
SportsWorld
RealGM
Posts: 51,601
And1: 133
Joined: Dec 03, 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:
       

 

Post#11 » by SportsWorld » Sat May 26, 2007 8:27 pm

I think he made his comments when they were 7-7 after a loss to Oakland.
http://www.baseball-almanac.com/teamsta ... 2006&t=DET
User avatar
Demon2
Junior
Posts: 393
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 03, 2006
Location: Chicago, IL

 

Post#12 » by Demon2 » Mon May 28, 2007 12:40 am

The Tigers were under .500 last year?

I thought they got off to a great start - played mediocre for a stretch and then took off again.


Please do not compare the Cubs to the Tigers. The Cubs would get buried in the AL Central... last year OR this year.

But... since its the NL Central, optimism shouldn't waiver just yet. The Brewers are leveling out and the division is horrible.
Chicago 2016 Image
Image
SportsWorld
RealGM
Posts: 51,601
And1: 133
Joined: Dec 03, 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:
       

 

Post#13 » by SportsWorld » Mon May 28, 2007 1:09 am

Demon2 wrote:
The Tigers were under .500 last year?

I thought they got off to a great start - played mediocre for a stretch and then took off again.


Please do not compare the Cubs to the Tigers. The Cubs would get buried in the AL Central... last year OR this year.

But... since its the NL Central, optimism shouldn't waiver just yet. The Brewers are leveling out and the division is horrible.

How bout dem Devil Rays?
Howling Mad
General Manager
Posts: 9,043
And1: 624
Joined: Jun 28, 2006

 

Post#14 » by Howling Mad » Mon May 28, 2007 6:12 pm

Although 90 games is only half the season, its about that time you can seperate the contenders from the pretenders. You will always have your surprise, like the Astros a couple years back, but most of the real teams show up half way through.

Not too worried about the Cubs because their starting pictching has been pretty good and the baseball that has been played is pretty smart. They look different from the Dusty days.

Jacque Jones for a reliever, then I'll be confident, well only if the reliever does well obvoiusly.
User avatar
IlliniNRG
Rookie
Posts: 1,229
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 10, 2002
Location: Lincoln Square

 

Post#15 » by IlliniNRG » Tue May 29, 2007 4:07 am

Demon2 wrote:
The Tigers were under .500 last year?

I thought they got off to a great start - played mediocre for a stretch and then took off again.


Please do not compare the Cubs to the Tigers. The Cubs would get buried in the AL Central... last year OR this year.

But... since its the NL Central, optimism shouldn't waiver just yet. The Brewers are leveling out and the division is horrible.


how 'bout that 2006 world series?

the '06 tigers actually isn't a bad comparison, on paper. the 06 tigers just tremendously overachieved, and the 07 cubs are badly underachieving at this point. which is of course nothing new, since wrigley field has always been where careers come to die. the reverse-cardinals effect, it seems like.
SportsWorld
RealGM
Posts: 51,601
And1: 133
Joined: Dec 03, 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:
       

 

Post#16 » by SportsWorld » Tue May 29, 2007 4:10 am

The Cubs have scored more runs than they have given up which means they should be winning ballgames. It all doesn't make sense.
User avatar
Posey H8er
RealGM
Posts: 20,095
And1: 64
Joined: Jan 07, 2007

 

Post#17 » by Posey H8er » Tue May 29, 2007 5:03 am

That's why they are the Cubs.
SportsWorld
RealGM
Posts: 51,601
And1: 133
Joined: Dec 03, 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:
       

 

Post#18 » by SportsWorld » Tue May 29, 2007 5:07 am

Quoted from todays Bleed Cubbie Blue recap:
Just after Aramis Ramirez, representing the winning run, struck out to end another frustrating Cub loss, 5-3 to the Marlins, I said, to no one in particular:

"Well, at least they made it a game."

Dave spoke first: "That's Cub talk!"

Meaning, of course, we should NOT settle for "making a game of it".
User avatar
2poor
RealGM
Posts: 11,684
And1: 1
Joined: Dec 17, 2006
Location: I'm from the city in the midwest best city in the whole wide wide world

 

Post#19 » by 2poor » Tue May 29, 2007 4:38 pm

They're still due for a good 10-15 game win streak, don't fear. :P
treyZz
Banned User
Posts: 5,326
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 18, 2006

 

Post#20 » by treyZz » Wed May 30, 2007 2:40 am

"We're going to win here. And that's all there is to it." - Lou

Really? When?

Return to Chicago Cubs