Magic Under Fire For Donation Which Opposes Gay Marriage

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

BigMarketFan
Banned User
Posts: 29
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 08, 2012

Re: Magic Under Fire For Donation Which Opposes Gay Marriage 

Post#261 » by BigMarketFan » Tue Aug 7, 2012 5:18 am

bertrob wrote:
BigMarketFan wrote:not a coincidence that most pedophiles are gay,

STOP SPEWING BS

pedophiles more likely to rape males which makes them gay. It's the facts, take it up with them
jaze89
Banned User
Posts: 787
And1: 59
Joined: Jan 24, 2009

Re: Magic Under Fire For Donation Which Opposes Gay Marriage 

Post#262 » by jaze89 » Tue Aug 7, 2012 5:18 am

lovethewire wrote:@jazze89 nope, because I choose to be attracted to women


That doesn't make any sense. Attraction isn't something you can choose. Name me a moment where you CHOSE to be attracted to someone or something where there was no attraction before.
MannyRam99
Banned User
Posts: 3,321
And1: 33
Joined: Apr 28, 2012

Re: Magic Under Fire For Donation Which Opposes Gay Marriage 

Post#263 » by MannyRam99 » Tue Aug 7, 2012 5:18 am

@ jaze89

im just arguing its a choice, im not in the group who discriminates against homosexuality. We really have nothing to discuss because I agree with your points for the most part.
qm22
General Manager
Posts: 8,317
And1: 1,902
Joined: Dec 29, 2009

Re: Magic Under Fire For Donation Which Opposes Gay Marriage 

Post#264 » by qm22 » Tue Aug 7, 2012 5:18 am

I'm seriously actually hurt by this post, I didn't think this was even possible.

lakerz12 wrote:"Nine-tenths of the talk of evolutionists is sheer nonsense, not founded on observation and wholly unsupported by facts. This museum is full of proofs of the utter falsity of their views. In all this great museum, there is not a particle of evidence of the transmutation of species." (Dr. Etheridge, Paleontologist of the British Museum)


Moronic, someone like that would not be a "Dr" in 99% of modern biology Ph.D. programs. Or you can disprove evolution with the contents of a the palentology section of a Museum. ... Like, if it isn't in the museum it means that it isn't true? Nice.
"I reject evolution because I deem it obsolete; because the knowledge, hard won since 1830, of anatomy, histology, cytology, and embryology, cannot be made to accord with its basic idea. The foundationless, fantastic edifice of the evolution doctrine would long ago have met with its long- deserved fate were it not that the love of fairy tales is so deep-rooted in the hearts of man." (Dr. Albert Fleischmann, University of Erlangen)


You said many scientists are going away from evolution and found someone long dead who was alive during the early stages of evolutionary theory... <FILL IN BLANK.>
"By the late 1970s, debates on university campuses throughout the free world were being held on the subject of origins with increasing frequency. Hundreds of scientists, who once accepted the theory of evolution as fact, were abandoning ship and claiming that the scientific evidence was in total support of the theory of creation. Well-known evolutionists, such as Isaac Asimov and Stephen Jay Gould, were stating that, since the creationist scientists had won all of the more than one hundred debates, the evolutionists should not debate them." (Luther Sunderland, "Darwin's Enigma", p.10)


More archaic crap, biologically speaking, and built on something which references debates in a more ignorant time period which were judged under unknown criteria and has no information regarding evolution.
"The more one studies paleontology, the more certain one becomes that evolution is based on faith alone; exactly the same sort of faith which is necessary to have when one encounters the great mysteries of religion... The only alternative is the doctrine of special creation, which may be true, but is irrational." (Dr. L.T. More)


Wow, another one from the previous century. Scientists are surely defeated by the wave of dissent from guys who would not be qualified as Doctors academically in the modern world.
"I have come to the conclusion that Darwinism is not a testable scientific theory, but a metaphysical research programme... (Dr. Karl Popper, German-born philosopher of science, called by Nobel Prize-winner Peter Medawar, "incomparably the greatest philosopher of science who has ever lived.")


Nice, persuasive. Karl Popper who was famous for the concept of predicting the future? His century old opinion concluded the argument before my birth.
"The fact of evolution is the backbone of biology, and biology is thus in the peculiar position of being a science founded on an unproved theory -- is it then a science or faith? Belief in the theory of evolution is thus exactly parallel to belief in special creation..." (Dr. L. Harrison Matthews, in the introduction to the 1971 edition of Darwin's "Origin of Species")


LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL.

Uninformed ignoramus. Gravity is also only a "theory". The validity of evolution has reached the maximum possible level barring omniscience. The last quote is, upon googling, someone born in 1901, not surprisingly.

Go to pubmed.com or google scholar and try finding an active scientist with a modern degree in modern Biology rather than those who write about science to the public at the middle school level. You won't find one that slightly supports you.

You seem to think you are being open minded when you've been convinced by propaganda grade evidence. It's fine if you do not mind being slightly informed about science and want to be somewhere in the 6,973,000,000th or so in the world in your education and comprehension level. If you honestly don't mind, it's OK.
User avatar
AVolumeScorer
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,929
And1: 18
Joined: Jun 24, 2012
Location: New York

Re: Magic Under Fire For Donation Which Opposes Gay Marriage 

Post#265 » by AVolumeScorer » Tue Aug 7, 2012 5:19 am

BigMarketFan wrote:
bertrob wrote:
BigMarketFan wrote:not a coincidence that most pedophiles are gay,

STOP SPEWING BS

pedophiles more likely to **** males which makes them gay. It's the facts, take it up with them

Are you more likely to r@pe someone if you're black?
albo23 wrote:"Why did the Magic..."

The answer is always who the F knows.
User avatar
Bertrob
RealGM
Posts: 27,394
And1: 8,823
Joined: Sep 08, 2011
Location: Boognish

Re: Magic Under Fire For Donation Which Opposes Gay Marriage 

Post#266 » by Bertrob » Tue Aug 7, 2012 5:19 am

BigMarketFan wrote:
bertrob wrote:
BigMarketFan wrote:not a coincidence that most pedophiles are gay,

STOP SPEWING BS

pedophiles more likely to **** males which makes them gay. It's the facts, take it up with them

I was holding out for the possibility you were being sarcastic but it looks like theres no saving you
There is NO evidence that most pedophiles are gay
I don't know how you came across the opinion that most of them are, but I'm sorry you need to do some thinking or something because what you are saying is completely false
Curtie
Junior
Posts: 348
And1: 11
Joined: Dec 22, 2011

Re: Magic Under Fire For Donation Which Opposes Gay Marriage 

Post#267 » by Curtie » Tue Aug 7, 2012 5:20 am

I'm impressed that this thread actually made it 18 pages long.

Continue on.

Image
User avatar
Bertrob
RealGM
Posts: 27,394
And1: 8,823
Joined: Sep 08, 2011
Location: Boognish

Re: Magic Under Fire For Donation Which Opposes Gay Marriage 

Post#268 » by Bertrob » Tue Aug 7, 2012 5:20 am

peja drobnjak wrote:anime avatar defends pedophilia, typical

:evil: :wink:
+1 for making me laugh :lol:
User avatar
Grumpy Heat Fan
General Manager
Posts: 8,667
And1: 9,179
Joined: Dec 09, 2011
Location: Miami, Florida
     

Re: Magic Under Fire For Donation Which Opposes Gay Marriage 

Post#269 » by Grumpy Heat Fan » Tue Aug 7, 2012 5:21 am

Ayt wrote:So if I get off on a girl jacking me, sucking me, or letting me do her in the ass, there is something wrong with me? None of those things have anything to do with procreation.

But you would want to have sex. The sexual drive is a biological fact. That sexual drive is what evolved, not a mental "I want to have kids" gene.

and you would clearly have a sexual drive for women. Working as intended.

I hope that clears things up for you.
"As for me personally, I don't truly care how much I make these days, my main focus is on playing for a winner." - Dirk Nowitzki, July 2016
jaze89
Banned User
Posts: 787
And1: 59
Joined: Jan 24, 2009

Re: Magic Under Fire For Donation Which Opposes Gay Marriage 

Post#270 » by jaze89 » Tue Aug 7, 2012 5:21 am

MannyRam99 wrote:@ jaze89

im just arguing its a choice, im not in the group who discriminates against homosexuality. We really have nothing to discuss because I agree with your points for the most part.


Well part of my argument is that it isn't a choice. I can honestly say I can't force myself to be attracted to something. I can't force myself to be attracted to a female I don't find attractive but someone else might find beauty there.
User avatar
Grumpy Heat Fan
General Manager
Posts: 8,667
And1: 9,179
Joined: Dec 09, 2011
Location: Miami, Florida
     

Re: Magic Under Fire For Donation Which Opposes Gay Marriage 

Post#271 » by Grumpy Heat Fan » Tue Aug 7, 2012 5:24 am

I believe that gays are born that way..... a genetic defect/malfunction, same as any other in the long list of defects a person can be born with.

I can't force myself to be attracted to a male. When I look at a beautiful woman though.....oh I get happy and just want to shack up with her and make lots of babies. This is programmed into me, by evolution.


So, it would be logical to say that homosexuals sex drive is not working correctly.
"As for me personally, I don't truly care how much I make these days, my main focus is on playing for a winner." - Dirk Nowitzki, July 2016
MannyRam99
Banned User
Posts: 3,321
And1: 33
Joined: Apr 28, 2012

Re: Magic Under Fire For Donation Which Opposes Gay Marriage 

Post#272 » by MannyRam99 » Tue Aug 7, 2012 5:26 am

jaze89 wrote:
MannyRam99 wrote:@ jaze89

im just arguing its a choice, im not in the group who discriminates against homosexuality. We really have nothing to discuss because I agree with your points for the most part.


Well part of my argument is that it isn't a choice. I can honestly say I can't force myself to be attracted to something. I can't force myself to be attracted to a female I don't find attractive but someone else might find beauty there.

but for arguments sake, lets say you screwed females all your life but one day you found your soul mate, who also happens to be a guy and you decided that is who you want to spend the rest of your life with. Have you not then made a conscious decision, in terms of sexual preference ? (male bisexuals are still homosexuals btw)

Legend:

decided = choice

decision = choice

preference = choice
User avatar
Bertrob
RealGM
Posts: 27,394
And1: 8,823
Joined: Sep 08, 2011
Location: Boognish

Re: Magic Under Fire For Donation Which Opposes Gay Marriage 

Post#273 » by Bertrob » Tue Aug 7, 2012 5:26 am

how is being gay a "defect"?
Doesnt defect mean a shortcoming or a fault? How does being gay make that person any lesser than the others around him?
jaze89
Banned User
Posts: 787
And1: 59
Joined: Jan 24, 2009

Re: Magic Under Fire For Donation Which Opposes Gay Marriage 

Post#274 » by jaze89 » Tue Aug 7, 2012 5:27 am

StrengthNHonor wrote:I believe that gays are born that way..... a genetic defect/malfunction, same as any other in the long list of defects a person can be born with.

I can't force myself to be attracted to a male. When I look at a beautiful woman though.....oh I get happy and just want to shack up with her and make lots of babies. This is programmed into me, by evolution.


So, it would be logical to say that homosexuals sex drive is not working correctly.


I agree with what your saying but calling someone a birth defect would undoubtedly offend people.
peja drobnjak
Starter
Posts: 2,485
And1: 46
Joined: Dec 03, 2011

Re: Magic Under Fire For Donation Which Opposes Gay Marriage 

Post#275 » by peja drobnjak » Tue Aug 7, 2012 5:27 am

StrengthNHonor wrote:I believe that gays are born that way..... a genetic defect/malfunction, same as any other in the long list of defects a person can be born with.

I can't force myself to be attracted to a male. When I look at a beautiful woman though.....oh I get happy and just want to shack up with her and make lots of babies. This is programmed into me, by evolution.


So, it would be logical to say that homosexuals sex drive is not working correctly.

why is your method correct when the reproductive drive isn't held to be the fundamental motivator for the vast majority of people's lives?
Image Turbo Zone
Don Draper
General Manager
Posts: 8,677
And1: 506
Joined: Mar 09, 2008
Location: schönes Wetter

Re: Magic Under Fire For Donation Which Opposes Gay Marriage 

Post#276 » by Don Draper » Tue Aug 7, 2012 5:28 am

Stunnaboy2K11 wrote:My dad came from a polygamist family (in Africa)

He has siblings he does not talk to or has seen in years. It is not an ideal situation to raise a child in.


My mom came from one as well. It's also ideal not to raise a child in a home where there's a 50% chance their parents will divorce. Marriage is a religious institution. Separation of church and state, etc.
soda wrote:I will never, ever, ever vote for a socialist. I'd vote for a member of the KKK first. I'd vote for Hitler first, because the Nazis have less blood on their hands

This is the state of modern day political discourse.
lovethewire
Banned User
Posts: 1,859
And1: 2
Joined: Sep 29, 2011

Re: Magic Under Fire For Donation Which Opposes Gay Marriage 

Post#277 » by lovethewire » Tue Aug 7, 2012 5:28 am

jaze89 wrote:
lovethewire wrote:@jazze89 nope, because I choose to be attracted to women


That doesn't make any sense. Attraction isn't something you can choose. Name me a moment where you CHOSE to be attracted to someone or something where there was no attraction before.

Sure, when I was in high-school, I got hooked up with a chick that from a friend, I got to know her before we met, she had an excellent personality, when I met her, I wasn't attracted to her at all, however after time being with her on a regular basis, I chose to find attractive things about her and thus became attracted to her.
Ayt
RealGM
Posts: 59,317
And1: 15,128
Joined: Jun 27, 2005

Re: Magic Under Fire For Donation Which Opposes Gay Marriage 

Post#278 » by Ayt » Tue Aug 7, 2012 5:30 am

lovethewire wrote:People are not born gay, its a choice, so if you choose to.live that life, deal with the consequences, you don't deserve all the rights as everyone else, same with felons not going able to vote, if you choose to break the law you don't deserve the privileges of everyone else


So you could choose to get completely turned on by sucking me off?
User avatar
Grumpy Heat Fan
General Manager
Posts: 8,667
And1: 9,179
Joined: Dec 09, 2011
Location: Miami, Florida
     

Re: Magic Under Fire For Donation Which Opposes Gay Marriage 

Post#279 » by Grumpy Heat Fan » Tue Aug 7, 2012 5:30 am

bertrob wrote:how is being gay a "defect"?
Doesnt defect mean a shortcoming or a fault? How does being gay make that person any lesser than the others around him?


Do you think people in wheelchairs are "lesser" than you? No, I don't think any of us do. I don't think homosexuals are "lesser" than anyone else.

But they are born with a genetic defect. Males are biologically evolved/created to mate with females. Fact. That is what our reproductive systems are for. If a male wants to behave like a woman, and is attracted to things that a woman is attracted to (males), then that man's sexual drive developed incorrectly, malfunctioned, genetic defect.

If a person is born with 3 arms, are they not suffering from a genetic malfunction? Is their condition not a genetic defect?

Are you so politically correct that you can't call a spade, a spade?
"As for me personally, I don't truly care how much I make these days, my main focus is on playing for a winner." - Dirk Nowitzki, July 2016
Doo Doo_Brown
Junior
Posts: 277
And1: 0
Joined: May 08, 2009

Re: Magic Under Fire For Donation Which Opposes Gay Marriage 

Post#280 » by Doo Doo_Brown » Tue Aug 7, 2012 5:30 am

StrengthNHonor wrote:
Many things.

Some of which you won't understand or agree with.

But a more palatable reason for you, would be health complications and dangers.


lol, first you went from homosexuality is a genetic defect. But then genetic defects are natural (ergo, homosexuality is natural). Then you said its "not good," but can't really explain why it's "not good."

So finally you're at health complications and dangers. Care to explain any proven health complications and dangers? Smoking is causes cancer, do we stop smokers from getting married?

Return to The General Board