BAT 8.0 TRADE DISCUSSION (DRAFT STARTED IN OTHER THREAD)

br7knicks · Post #2841 » by **br7knicks** » Sun Aug 26, 2012 10:58 pm

Melothegreat wrote:
Wait, Blair has no chance vs love? Conley has no chance vs cp3? Wilson has no chance vs Hayward?

chandler would destroy hayward.

ezmoney707 · Post #2842 » by **ezmoney707** » Sun Aug 26, 2012 10:59 pm

Smoke24 wrote:
ezmoney707 wrote:Yay 28 more picks

I just got done with waiting for 75 picks to go by. I have no sympathy for you.

i have a 96 pick wait between my last pick which was at 99. Please show some sympathy. Glad i only have 28 to go :lol:

br7knicks · Post #2843 » by **br7knicks** » Sun Aug 26, 2012 10:59 pm

i wanted crawford but knew he wouldn't drop to 174

Smoke24 · Post #2844 » by **Smoke24** » Sun Aug 26, 2012 11:02 pm

br7knicks wrote:i wanted crawford but knew he wouldn't drop to 174

My whole draft board wen to sh*t in like the last 20 picks lol. I had to get someone competent...

Smoke24 · Post #2845 » by **Smoke24** » Sun Aug 26, 2012 11:03 pm

ezmoney707 wrote:
Smoke24 wrote:
ezmoney707 wrote:Yay 28 more picks

I just got done with waiting for 75 picks to go by. I have no sympathy for you.

i have a 96 pick wait between my last pick which was at 99. Please show some sympathy. Glad i only have 28 to go

Damn, 96, ok i give you some sympathy

Jose7 · Post #2846 » by **Jose7** » Sun Aug 26, 2012 11:03 pm

I wanna pick already damnit

WillyJakkz · Post #2847 » by **WillyJakkz** » Sun Aug 26, 2012 11:04 pm

swisscheeseD wrote:I love that you are continuing the Thugget vision, Willy...though I'm not a fan of Stephen Jackson at this point in his career. I originally planned on dealing #97 for depth in the 5th and 6th, and because I wasn't around, I needed to take the player who would net me a nice return (Hayward). Thought you could have got a little more for Hayward from Fury, but I wanted to see more of a guy like JR Smith who is much younger and more athletic than Capt. Jack.

Good luck the rest of the way...

Well, considering the guys who were taken and who was left on the board I feel Jackson is much more effective on the defensive side than JR Smith etc and I really ain't that high on Stack 5 either but the reality is he is still a decent player and great bridge between Rondo and Melo, especially for what I envision in this team which I will let you know soon.

swisscheeseD · Post #2848 » by **swisscheeseD** » Sun Aug 26, 2012 11:04 pm

Meloisgreat...I wouldn't rip anyone else about their basketball acumen, considering you are arguing that a guy who has created nothing but drama and said himself he can't run or even be ready to play by the beginning of this season, is going to lead a bunch of 2nd rate (being kind) players to the top tier in this BAT...and this is coming from the biggest Mike Conley fan.

I liked the Lamb pick, and think the kid is going to have a Rudy Gay-like impact in this league (in terms of being a top tier NON-superstar at his position). It doesn't mean that you are any closer to contention because you have a few decent players. Blair couldn't even see time down the stretch last season and is too undersized to defend his position.

Even with a few decent names, you need to look at the poor fit in the front court...Blair as a role player off the bench makes a little more sense. Look at the success of the Magic. A stretch 4, or at least a guy who can knock down the 15ft jumper on a regular basis, is a much better fit next to the guy who is going to clog the lane to begin with...but one who can actually reap the rewards from exposing those who choose to double him.

Fury · Post #2849 » by **Fury** » Sun Aug 26, 2012 11:06 pm

mpharris36 wrote:
Fury wrote:
swisscheeseD wrote:Fury, you just got a steal!

Thanks

LET ME STATE THAT I AM JOKING!

now that that has been astablished....your front court is mad racist!

Utah Jazz bitch

Fury · Post #2850 » by **Fury** » Sun Aug 26, 2012 11:09 pm

swisscheeseD wrote:
Fury wrote:Courtney Lee, 244 available for picks in the 170-210 range

Why you looking to deal Courtney Lee? You looking for depth? Guy is perfect for your lineup. Your perimeter defense is one of the best with CP3-Lee-Hayward, plus the guys is a solid shooter who CP3 will find plenty spotting up from behind the arc.

You just need to get you a Varejao somehow and you're good to go.

Yeah for depth.

Context · Post #2851 » by **Context** » Sun Aug 26, 2012 11:10 pm

Jose7© wrote:I wanna pick already damnit

u never replied bro

Fury · Post #2852 » by **Fury** » Sun Aug 26, 2012 11:12 pm

288 and 294 for a 230ish pick!

ctorres · Post #2853 » by **ctorres** » Sun Aug 26, 2012 11:14 pm

Fury wrote:288 and 294 for a 230ish pick!

I would do 288, 294, 297 for 242, 379, 389

I'd be very surprised if anyone gave you a better offer than this!

Jsmoove · Post #2854 » by **Jsmoove** » Sun Aug 26, 2012 11:14 pm

thoughts on my team?

ctorres · Post #2855 » by **ctorres** » Sun Aug 26, 2012 11:17 pm

Jsmoove wrote:thoughts on my team?

I don't like Kenyon Martin as your starting PF at all. Also, I don't know if Miller is the type of point guard you want next to Kobe. You're much better off with a point guard that Kobe could kick it out to. Deng and Lopez I do like with Kobe though, but that's about it.

CANiLIVE · Post #2856 » by **CANiLIVE** » Sun Aug 26, 2012 11:17 pm

Jsmoove wrote:thoughts on my team?

I think Wilson will look nice in your starting 5.

Fury · Post #2857 » by **Fury** » Sun Aug 26, 2012 11:21 pm

ctorres wrote:
Fury wrote:288 and 294 for a 230ish pick!

I would do 288, 294, 297 for 242, 379, 389

288 and 294 for 242 and 332

ctorres · Post #2858 » by **ctorres** » Sun Aug 26, 2012 11:26 pm

Fury wrote:
ctorres wrote:
Fury wrote:288 and 294 for a 230ish pick!

I would do 288, 294, 297 for 242, 379, 389

288 and 294 for 242 and 332

No deal!

46 spots means you're moving up an entire round and a half on a pick and I know you own the #244 pick so you get to pick two rotation players very close in value. Going from 332 to 294 would be like going from eating dog crap off an old piece of white bread to eating dog crap off of a freshly baked piece of focaccia bread, i'm still eating dog crap!

Fury · Post #2859 » by **Fury** » Sun Aug 26, 2012 11:28 pm

ctorres wrote:
No deal!

46 spots means you're moving up an entire round and a half on a pick and I know you own the #244 pick so you get to pick two rotation players very close in value. Wow, I'd get to jump from 332 to 294, whoopie!

The 288 and 297 for 242 and 379

ctorres · Post #2860 » by **ctorres** » Sun Aug 26, 2012 11:29 pm

Fury wrote:
ctorres wrote:
No deal!

46 spots means you're moving up an entire round and a half on a pick and I know you own the #244 pick so you get to pick two rotation players very close in value. Wow, I'd get to jump from 332 to 294, whoopie!

The 288 and 297 for 242 and 379

There is no negotiation to be made here. Either I get the picks I asked for or you can see if anyone else will give you a pick any better than mine. You need the #242 more than I do! :lol: