Moderators: fatlever, JDR720, Diop, BigSlam, yosemiteben
CHA_77_Bobcats wrote:MountBiyombo wrote:Considering that there are states with multiple teams I doubt if that matters much.
California's bigger than the Carolinas, Virginia, and DC combined and has a population several times that.
Rich4114 wrote:Wasn't Norfolk in the running to get the Hornets way back when? I think it was Norfolk, Louisville, and NOLA if I recall. All mainly dumb places for a pro sports team compared to the other open markets out there.
The Kings should absolutely be going to Seattle. It's Stern's chance to give back because they were ***** and pillaged by the NBA. It's like "build a new stadium tomorrow or we're moving it". "What? You have to talk about it and plan??? That's it we're moving to a short term small market who has a shiny new building tomorrow"
Seattle should get their Sonics back or KC should get their Kings back.
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.
CHA_77_Bobcats wrote:For what it's worth, if the Kings were to move to Virginia, one team from the East would have to move to the Western Conference. The Eastern Conference team that is located farthest west is... the Chicago Bulls.
Can you imagine the craziness in the West if that happened? As if there aren't already about 11 teams in the west worthy of making the playoffs if they were in the East.
Walt Cronkite wrote:I'd cream jean if Raleigh got an NBA franchise (even the Kings), but that'll never happen.