#15 Highest Peak of All Time (Kobe '08 wins)

Moderators: Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier

therealbig3
RealGM
Posts: 29,375
And1: 15,903
Joined: Jul 31, 2010

Re: #15 Highest Peak of All Time (ends Mon 9:00 PM Pacific) 

Post#81 » by therealbig3 » Sat Sep 1, 2012 10:17 pm

Lightning25 wrote:I'm more than positive I've addressed the 05 Mavericks. They were not a very good defensive team and it seemed like just about every star would light them up. You can even check out Yao Ming's numbers in that 2005 series because they were abnormally amazing.


But dominating a team in the regular season isn't the same as dominating in the playoffs against a defense that gameplans for you. The other star to light them up was Nash in the next series.

T-Mac, Yao, Nash...these are all great players. Doesn't take too much away from T-Mac's play imo.

Lightning25 wrote:As for the 02 Hornets? I believe he flamed out in a lot of those 4th quarters. It was actually a winnable series for the Magic to be quite honest. Jamal Mashburn was out for the Hornets in that series but this is besides the point since Tmac's peak was clearly 03, and not 02 or 05.


But that's been addressed as well. 4th quarter scoring isn't any more important than 1st quarter scoring. It's the same criticisms that people tried to use against LeBron, and it didn't make any sense. Without him doing what he did in the 1st place, 4th quarter scoring would have been irrelevant. Look at the whole picture.

If McGrady is playing great, and the team ends up losing a winnable series, I'm not blaming McGrady.

And I'm just using 02 and 05 to show that McGrady played really well against two other good defensive teams.
therealbig3
RealGM
Posts: 29,375
And1: 15,903
Joined: Jul 31, 2010

Re: #15 Highest Peak of All Time (ends Mon 9:00 PM Pacific) 

Post#82 » by therealbig3 » Sat Sep 1, 2012 10:23 pm

And btw, when KG struggled with his offense and the team offense plummeted, he got a pass (imo, justifiably), because his supporting cast was piss poor. T-Mac should get that same pass...neither Wade nor Kobe ever played with a supporting cast like T-Mac had from 01-04.

For example, how much different would T-Mac's numbers have looked if Grant Hill was healthy those years? If defenses couldn't swarm him?
bastillon
Head Coach
Posts: 6,927
And1: 664
Joined: Feb 13, 2009
Location: Poland
   

Re: #15 Highest Peak of All Time (ends Mon 9:00 PM Pacific) 

Post#83 » by bastillon » Sat Sep 1, 2012 10:28 pm

Expert-Sizzle wrote:How was Shaq's performance as bad as Kobe's... I don't think I have ever heard a more ridiculous statement.
Also coming from someone who watched that series more then once saying Kobe was constantly triple teamed or that Detroit guarded Shaq exclusively with single coverage couldn't be farther from the truth.

Shaq dominated in 3/5 games and only had one "bad game" so I don't know why you are putting down his performance's. Outside of 1 game Detroit had little to no success slowing him down offensively.
They lost two games where he put up 34 / 11 on 80%TS and 36 / 20 on 76% shooting.

They did pressure Kobe and I agree they double/tripled him when he drove into the paint but that doesn't excuse his ridiculously poor shot selection and selfishness.
He frequently forced bad shots instead of feeding Shaq or passing out to an open man.
Big stars get heavy defensive attention... I don't understand how that you can use that as an excuse for poor play.
Do you think that Detroit in 03 didn't double/triple team T-Mac?


just as bad was a hyperbole on my part. but Shaq's finals were pretty poor. those numbers are meaningless since he was doing that vs single coverage which would be an insult to prime Shaq. you have a big man scorer of that caliber, at that age, it's simply unthinkable to guard this guy with one dude. Jazz 97 couldn't contain 34-year old Hakeem with Ostertag/Malone and help defense. Kareem was destroying the Celtics frontline at the age of 37/38 (85 finals). it was Pistons apparent strategy to let Shaq get his because he wasn't creating any offense for other players. his offensive value was severely diminished. what those numbers also overlook is how Pistons paced the games. they let Shaq score tons of pts early and then he would get tired because he was so out of shape and by the end of the game he wasn't a dominant threat anymore. MORE IMPORTANTLY, Shaq's defense is the major reason why they lost those finals. I remember Billups playing like 7-8 pick and rolls in a row at times. Billups was abominable in the ECFs. suddenly he was looking like Oscar Robertson. it wasn't because of Gary Payton.

Detroit 03 never had the same type of team defense to make it hard for TMac. help defense is difficult to play and only the epic defenses will use it like the Pistons 04 did. TMac also had more offensive support than Kobe 04 (as weird as it may sound) when he was playing with the ball in his hands. DeClerq/Giricek/Armstrong could at least space the floor properly. Kobe's teammates - Medvedenko/hobbled Malone, trash Fox/George, Payton/hobbled Fisher - were no offensive threats, from anywhere really. Kobe had Shaq of course but Shaq wasn't making his life any easier this time, since Pistons managed to stay man to man without heavy double teaming and it was actually Kobe who was creating offense for Shaq, not the other way around.
Quotatious wrote: Bastillon is Hakeem. Combines style and substance.
Lightning25
Banned User
Posts: 1,309
And1: 29
Joined: Nov 09, 2011
Location: The Windy City

Re: #15 Highest Peak of All Time (ends Mon 9:00 PM Pacific) 

Post#84 » by Lightning25 » Sat Sep 1, 2012 10:29 pm

therealbig3 wrote:But dominating a team in the regular season isn't the same as dominating in the playoffs against a defense that gameplans for you. The other star to light them up was Nash in the next series.

T-Mac, Yao, Nash...these are all great players. Doesn't take too much away from T-Mac's play imo.
I was referring to star players constantly torching them in the post-season, not the regular season.

Here is the list...

'05 Tmac and Yao
'06 Duncan and Manu
'06 Diaw, Marion, and Nash
'06 Wade
'07 Baron
'08 CP3 and West
'09 Parker
'09 Melo and Billups

Check out all of their numbers vs. the Mavericks in the post-season. They all put up big numbers and much better numbers than their averages. It's not a coincidence especially when this happened for about 4-5 seasons.

But that's been addressed as well. 4th quarter scoring isn't any more important than 1st quarter scoring.

If you believe this then we don't just view this topic differently, but we view sports differently.

The later you perform and the less time the opposition has to recover the more likely you are to win. So I want the guy who can get it done when I give him the ball late.

4th quarter scoring doesn't mean everything but it does hold meaning and it does weigh a little more than 1st, 2nd, or 3rd quarter scoring.

therealbig3 wrote: T-Mac should get that same pass...neither Wade nor Kobe ever played with a supporting cast like T-Mac had from 01-04.

Wade 2009 and 2010
Kobe 2006 and 2007

You could argue McGrady's worse but they are incredibly similar. This doesn't even include the fact that McGrady's competition was far weaker too.
User avatar
LikeABosh
RealGM
Posts: 19,066
And1: 8,802
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
     

Re: #15 Highest Peak of All Time (ends Mon 9:00 PM Pacific) 

Post#85 » by LikeABosh » Sun Sep 2, 2012 12:36 am

drza wrote:I threw out 1991 as a potential peak year for DRob, but that didn't get much traction and upon further review I can get behind that. The Spurs had the best defensive ratings in the league around that time in the regular season, but in the playoffs they didn't seem to be a huge impediment to opponent team ORtgs. And I'm always an advocate for the box score not necessarily fully reflecting individual defensive impact, so in the absence of any good impact stats it is a bit concerning that we didn't see more of a team defensive effect in the postseason for early 90s Spurs.


Yeah, I saw your post and I took a look at the 91 season. It's very comparable to the 94 season since the end results were identical: 55 wins and a 1st round exit. Both the 91 series against the warriors and the 94 series against the jazz exposed flaws in DRob's game. The warriors weren't slowed down by Robinson's #1 led defense and the Jazz pushed the scoring champ's offense off a cliff.
User avatar
Father Time
Head Coach
Posts: 6,305
And1: 467
Joined: Dec 12, 2009
Location: Portland, OR
 

Re: #15 Highest Peak of All Time (ends Mon 9:00 PM Pacific) 

Post#86 » by Father Time » Sun Sep 2, 2012 1:18 am

IMO people give Odom too much credit for the 06 and 07 seasons. He's an uber talented player but talent does not equal production. In many, many games he was overly passive, and hardly what I would call a star second option. 15/10/4 is nice, but nothing more than fantastic role player numbers IMO. Drew Gooden and Big Z are also capable of averaging 15/10, it's really not anything special. Yeah, Lamar was important to the team and had moments of brilliance, but was ultimately a disappointment during those down years. I loved him during the repeat, but the dude is mentally fragile and was a long ways from a consistent secondary threat for those Lakers teams.
"There's nothing else I can do for them. I can give them some bulls---, and act like I'm a coach or something, but it's on them." - Popovich

Secret secrets are no fun. Secret secrets hurt someone.
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 52,695
And1: 21,642
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: #15 Highest Peak of All Time (ends Mon 9:00 PM Pacific) 

Post#87 » by Doctor MJ » Sun Sep 2, 2012 2:05 am

Adding this for the away JB:


JordansBulls wrote:What Wade did against Detroit and Dallas in 2006 is what makes me pick him that year over any other year.

Between these guys for me

--------- RS PER, WS48, --------- PER, WS48 playoffs
Moses Malone 1983: 25.1, 0.248 -----25.7, 0.260 (13 playoff games, title)
Dwyane Wade 2006: 27.6, 0.239-------26.9, 0.240 (23 playoff games, title)




http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/playoffs/ ... ormances-1

2006 WADE'S STATS
Points per game: 34.7
Boards per game: 7.8
Steals per game: 2.7
PER: 33.8


http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/playoffs2 ... nces-11-20

MOSES MALONE FINALS STATS
Points per game: 25.8
Boards per game: 18.0
Blocks per game: 1.5
PER: 26.0



VOTE: Dwyane Wade 2006. This guy carried the Heat this season and his production was clearly superior to any of his teammates this season and then to top it off had a historic Conference Finals (27/5/5 on 61% FG) and NBA Finals.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
Lightning25
Banned User
Posts: 1,309
And1: 29
Joined: Nov 09, 2011
Location: The Windy City

Re: #15 Highest Peak of All Time (ends Mon 9:00 PM Pacific) 

Post#88 » by Lightning25 » Sun Sep 2, 2012 2:14 am

therealbig3 wrote:And btw, when KG struggled with his offense and the team offense plummeted, he got a pass (imo, justifiably), because his supporting cast was piss poor. T-Mac should get that same pass...neither Wade nor Kobe ever played with a supporting cast like T-Mac had from 01-04

I say this is a little different considering how KG's main/best attribute is not scoring while for McGrady it is.

It is why I don't understand why people try to dismiss or discredit KG's post-season play when scoring isn't even his best attribute. He did happen to put up 22-26 ppg during his prime in the RS but it's not like he was known to be this dominant scorer and this dominant post-presence because he wasn't.

Players should be judged on what their best attribute is. KG's best attribute was defense, rebounding, and his passing, and he always spectacular in it whether it was the regular season or post-season.

I'm not really sure if I would personally have KG's peak higher than either Wade's or Kobe's to be honest. They're certainly in the same tier, same with Duncan.
User avatar
thizznation
Starter
Posts: 2,066
And1: 778
Joined: Aug 10, 2012

Re: #15 Highest Peak of All Time (ends Mon 9:00 PM Pacific) 

Post#89 » by thizznation » Sun Sep 2, 2012 2:18 am

bastillion wrote:there is no amount of stats to convince me that Curry was a good defender. I have Pistons 03 entire postseason run on my PC, Curry was playing terrible defense against TMac.


Not saying Curry is a good defender, but this is pretty unfair to judge him on, Curry was 34 years old in '03 and having to defend a Prime Mcgrady on top of that is a pretty tough situation...
ardee
RealGM
Posts: 15,320
And1: 5,397
Joined: Nov 16, 2011

Re: #15 Highest Peak of All Time (ends Mon 9:00 PM Pacific) 

Post#90 » by ardee » Sun Sep 2, 2012 5:50 am

Vote: 2008 Kobe Bryant

Some great discussion between therealbig3, Lightning25 and bastillion.

I'll say more in a while, just submitting my vote for now.
Expert-Sizzle
Banned User
Posts: 125
And1: 2
Joined: Aug 30, 2012

Re: #15 Highest Peak of All Time (ends Mon 9:00 PM Pacific) 

Post#91 » by Expert-Sizzle » Sun Sep 2, 2012 6:16 am

bastillon wrote:just as bad was a hyperbole on my part. but Shaq's finals were pretty poor. those numbers are meaningless since he was doing that vs single coverage which would be an insult to prime Shaq. you have a big man scorer of that caliber, at that age, it's simply unthinkable to guard this guy with one dude. Jazz 97 couldn't contain 34-year old Hakeem with Ostertag/Malone and help defense. Kareem was destroying the Celtics frontline at the age of 37/38 (85 finals). it was Pistons apparent strategy to let Shaq get his because he wasn't creating any offense for other players. his offensive value was severely diminished. what those numbers also overlook is how Pistons paced the games. they let Shaq score tons of pts early and then he would get tired because he was so out of shape and by the end of the game he wasn't a dominant threat anymore. MORE IMPORTANTLY, Shaq's defense is the major reason why they lost those finals. I remember Billups playing like 7-8 pick and rolls in a row at times. Billups was abominable in the ECFs. suddenly he was looking like Oscar Robertson. it wasn't because of Gary Payton.

Detroit 03 never had the same type of team defense to make it hard for TMac. help defense is difficult to play and only the epic defenses will use it like the Pistons 04 did. TMac also had more offensive support than Kobe 04 (as weird as it may sound) when he was playing with the ball in his hands. DeClerq/Giricek/Armstrong could at least space the floor properly. Kobe's teammates - Medvedenko/hobbled Malone, trash Fox/George, Payton/hobbled Fisher - were no offensive threats, from anywhere really. Kobe had Shaq of course but Shaq wasn't making his life any easier this time, since Pistons managed to stay man to man without heavy double teaming and it was actually Kobe who was creating offense for Shaq, not the other way around.

I really disagree with your view of that series.

Shaq was in excellent shape that year and had no issues with his stamina or conditioning.
He had made a huge effort to get back in top shape after the 03 season ended in failure.

He also was an absolute monster defensively during that playoff run and he played excellent defense against Detroit.

Prior to the Finals he had been averaging 3.5 blocks per game.

His post defense was good and he did consistently step out and show on picks.
He nullifyed Ben + Sheed in the post for the most part with his post defense.
Ben (throught 4 games) : 9ppg on 42% shooting / 40%TS
Sheed : 13ppg on 45% shooting

It seems like the classic cop-out to blame Shaq for whenever opposing guards get off and like in most of those other cases he had nothing to do with it.
Not to mention Detroit ran probably the largest % of their PnR with Sheed who was not even Shaq's man.

Offensively Shaq did dominate... extensively.
-34pts on 80+% shooting.
-29pts / 3ast on 55+% TS.
-36pts on 76+% shooting.
-20pts on 54+% shooting.

Why would he try to create for others when he is in a position to score himself?
Shaq was one of the best passing bigs ever he obviously could create for others.
Also his scoring was balanced throughout games he did not just score in the first half
(not that 2nd half points are more valuable then 1st half points anyway).

I don't see how you can blame Shaq for simply taking what the defense gave him.
Should he be blamed for Kobe's poor play? Detroit simply found a strategy that worked.
Shut down Shaq's teammates and let him get his.
He got his... the blame falls on his teammates not him.

I thought he had a mostly excellent series.
He was very good in 3/5 games and "decent enough" in 4/5 games.

Could he have been better in that series?
Sure. He probably could have hit the boards harder and he had a game or two where he didn't dominate to his usual standards.
However he was by far... and I mean "by far" the best player for LAL in that series and it wasn't close.
I also thought he was the best overall player in that series on either team.
therealbig3
RealGM
Posts: 29,375
And1: 15,903
Joined: Jul 31, 2010

Re: #15 Highest Peak of All Time (ends Mon 9:00 PM Pacific) 

Post#92 » by therealbig3 » Sun Sep 2, 2012 10:03 am

Lightning25 wrote:I say this is a little different considering how KG's main/best attribute is not scoring while for McGrady it is.

It is why I don't understand why people try to dismiss or discredit KG's post-season play when scoring isn't even his best attribute. He did happen to put up 22-26 ppg during his prime in the RS but it's not like he was known to be this dominant scorer and this dominant post-presence because he wasn't.

Players should be judged on what their best attribute is. KG's best attribute was defense, rebounding, and his passing, and he always spectacular in it whether it was the regular season or post-season.

I'm not really sure if I would personally have KG's peak higher than either Wade's or Kobe's to be honest. They're certainly in the same tier, same with Duncan.


Not talking about scoring, I'm talking about offense in general. KG is considered to be a super peak player because he's not only one of the greatest defensively, but he was great offensively. But the team offenses he led in Minnesota fell apart in the playoffs more often than not, and he had great spacing on his teams too.

Again, I'm not even knocking him for this, because his supporting casts did suck, so I do think it's fair to cut him some slack...but the same benefit of the doubt isn't being given to McGrady for some reason.

BTW, I was re-watching games 1 and 2 from the 03 Pistons-Magic series...and Curry actually wasn't playing poor defense, he was getting caught up on screens, and in fact, everyone guarding McGrady was getting caught up on screens. He was an exceptional off-ball player, very underrated aspect of his game.

McGrady in 03 against top 10 defensive teams, per 36:

28.6 ppg, 6.2 rpg, 4.9 apg, 2.3 TOpg, 54.7% TS (+2.8%)

If you limit it only to top 5:

28.1 ppg, 7.5 rpg, 5.0 apg, 2.8 TOpg, 52.1% TS (+0.2%)


He was still excellent against top defenses, so I'm not sure where this idea of him consistently getting shut down against top defenses comes from. We have one 3 game sample size of him at his peak against Tayshaun Prince and the 03 Pistons defense. We also know he struggled against Artest and the Pacers...but EVERYONE struggled against Artest. Kobe was shut down by Artest that year too. I actually don't know of any perimeter star that you could actually say was "successful" against Artest.

Against Bowen and the Spurs, T-Mac in 2 games averaged 32.5 ppg, 8.5 rpg, 4.5 apg, 1.5 TOpg, 49.3% TS. Yes, he was inefficient (mainly because he didn't get to the line much at all, only 9 FTA in 2 games), but he also took great care of the ball and only had 3 TOs through both games. The Magic in those 2 games had an overall ORating of 116.8 (+17.1).

He destroyed the Kings and the Nets, who were the 2 best defensive teams in the league that year, and they had elite perimeter defenders like Christie and Kidd (and I know the Nets had a host of very solid perimeter defenders outside of Kidd, and K-Mart was like a mini-KG, in that he could also defend 3-4 positions if he needed to).

So I can't really agree with the viewpoint that T-Mac was consistently slowed down by top defenses...in fact, it seems that he played really well against top defenses, which is even more impressive when you consider how much pressure was on him to score and create and carry the offense. When Kobe had a similar offensive burden in 06 and 07, he got to face the Phoenix Suns defense. And T-Mac didn't play with anyone as good as Odom.
therealbig3
RealGM
Posts: 29,375
And1: 15,903
Joined: Jul 31, 2010

Re: #15 Highest Peak of All Time (ends Mon 9:00 PM Pacific) 

Post#93 » by therealbig3 » Sun Sep 2, 2012 10:26 am

Prime T-Mac led offenses in the playoffs:

01: +3.3
02: -2.1
03: -0.4
05: +7.6

So when he gets halfway decent offensive help in 05 in the form of Yao, the team offense in the playoffs is awesome. And the team offense even does really well in 01 against the Bucks (who were a crap defensive team).

The Magic seemed to struggle offensively in 02 and 03.

Against the Hornets in 02, you can maybe blame T-Mac for the one point loss in game 1, because he shot very poorly. But he redeems himself in game 2 with a monster game in an Orlando win. Game 3, the Magic get outscored in OT by 10 points and lose. It makes no sense to me to point to T-Mac in this game as the reason why they lost, when the Hornets bench outscores the Magic bench 36-11 (and the main guy off the bench for Orlando, Troy Hudson, went 3-13 for 9 points and 3 TOs in 29 minutes).

T-Mac in the 4th quarter goes 3-5 from the field (including one 3 pointer) and 3-4 from the line for 10 points in the 4th. T-Mac doesn't even take a shot in the OT, while Troy Hudson goes 0-3 for 2 points and 1 TO.

Game 4 ends up being blown open in the 4th by the Hornets, when they outscore the Magic by 11 (they won by 17). In the 4th, T-Mac keeps them within striking distance as best he could...he goes 2-3 from the field and 4-6 from the line for 8 points, until he gets pulled with 2.5 minutes left after Charlotte built a 16 point lead.

We've already discussed the Pistons series, and at the end of the day, I think it's pretty impressive that he led the Magic to break about even against a good defensive team like the Pistons.
therealbig3
RealGM
Posts: 29,375
And1: 15,903
Joined: Jul 31, 2010

Re: #15 Highest Peak of All Time (ends Mon 9:00 PM Pacific) 

Post#94 » by therealbig3 » Sun Sep 2, 2012 11:29 am

Found this of 03 T-Mac against the Nets. They tried Scalabrine on McGrady (6:26), and even he couldn't stop him. :D

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9eX7PQYdrkU[/youtube]
bastillon
Head Coach
Posts: 6,927
And1: 664
Joined: Feb 13, 2009
Location: Poland
   

Re: #15 Highest Peak of All Time (ends Mon 9:00 PM Pacific) 

Post#95 » by bastillon » Sun Sep 2, 2012 11:53 am

I don't think you understand how poor TMac was once they made Prince guard him. TMac was no longer making offensive impact, pretty much.

game 5: Orl 83 ORTG, TMac -25 +/-
game 6: Orl 93 ORTG, TMac -13
game 7: Orl 110 ORTG, TMac -18

all 3 games were blowouts. it wasn't a typical 3-1 lead. usually the team with that lead would at least compete in close games later. Magic collapsed. 3 blowout losses. TMac struggled mightily with Prince on him. you can stat-track those games with Prince on TMac, I seriously doubt he shot better than 35-37% vs Tay.
Quotatious wrote: Bastillon is Hakeem. Combines style and substance.
MisterWestside
Starter
Posts: 2,449
And1: 596
Joined: May 25, 2012

Re: #15 Highest Peak of All Time (ends Mon 9:00 PM Pacific) 

Post#96 » by MisterWestside » Sun Sep 2, 2012 1:37 pm

However he was by far... and I mean "by far" the best player for LAL in that series and it wasn't close.
I also thought he was the best overall player in that series on either team.


I'm telling you -- bastillion must've been watching a different Finals, because Shaq was the lone bright spot for the Lakers in that series. Kobe was "creating" for Shaq? [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUNwbSgKZuE[/youtube]

The dude mauled the Pistons down low. Detroit had defenders shading towards O'Neal in the post every time he touched the ball and he lit them up, and made plenty of nice passes to teammates. Kobe "created" shots all right -- they all clanked off the back rim. The Lakers would often put up scoring droughts because they (and I mean Kobe) wasted possessions instead of running the offense more through Shaq.
drza
Analyst
Posts: 3,518
And1: 1,859
Joined: May 22, 2001

Re: #15 Highest Peak of All Time (ends Mon 9:00 PM Pacific) 

Post#97 » by drza » Sun Sep 2, 2012 2:21 pm

MisterWestside wrote:
However he was by far... and I mean "by far" the best player for LAL in that series and it wasn't close.
I also thought he was the best overall player in that series on either team.


I'm telling you -- bastillion must've been watching a different Finals, because Shaq was the lone bright spot for the Lakers in that series. Kobe was "creating" for Shaq? [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUNwbSgKZuE[/youtube]

The dude mauled the Pistons down low. Detroit had defenders shading towards O'Neal in the post every time he touched the ball and he lit them up, and made plenty of nice passes to teammates. Kobe "created" shots all right -- they all clanked off the back rim. The Lakers would often put up scoring droughts because they (and I mean Kobe) wasted possessions instead of running the offense more through Shaq.


This is my memory of the series as well. Bastillon wondered how Shaq could "only" average 30-something points on ridiculous efficiency? The prevailing sentiment at the time was that the Pistons didn't stop Shaq...that the only person on the planet that could stop Shaq from scoring in that series was Kobe, and that he was pretty effective at it.
Creator of the Hoops Lab: tinyurl.com/mpo2brj
Contributor to NylonCalculusDOTcom
Contributor to TYTSports: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLTbFEVCpx9shKEsZl7FcRHzpGO1dPoimk
Follow on Twitter: @ProfessorDrz
lorak
Head Coach
Posts: 6,317
And1: 2,237
Joined: Nov 23, 2009

Re: #15 Highest Peak of All Time (ends Mon 9:00 PM Pacific) 

Post#98 » by lorak » Sun Sep 2, 2012 3:09 pm

"great" Tay's defense on TMac (8:37)

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3wDZQvdMLsc&t=8m37s[/youtube]
drza
Analyst
Posts: 3,518
And1: 1,859
Joined: May 22, 2001

Re: #15 Highest Peak of All Time (ends Mon 9:00 PM Pacific) 

Post#99 » by drza » Sun Sep 2, 2012 3:20 pm

RE: Robinson's peak

The more I look into it, the more I'm feeling 1995 over 1994 for David Robinson. The primary place where I see an advantage for '94 Robinson would be a larger offensive role in the regular season, where he was shooting more and had more passing responsibilities as well (leading to career highs in assists and assist percentage). However, after looking at Robinson's entire career, the argument that has surfaced is that he is not an ideal offense initiator in the postseason as his offense can be severely attenuated in impact. We even see this in '94, where Robinson was severely hampered in the postseason against Malone and Utah (to the tune of -10 ppg and -10 TS% points with an accompanied decrease in assists and assist/TO ratio). Instead, the ideal usage of Robinson is as a dominant defender with high efficiency/good volume scoring as more of a finisher. So those regular season inflated offensive numbers for 1994 over 1995 aren't hugely impressive to me.

What's more impressive to me? That Robinson produced better individual defensive numbers over the regular and postseason in '95 than '94, that the team also produced better defensive ratings in the regular and postseason in '95 than '94, and that Robinson himself was a higher efficiency scorer in both the regular and postseason in '95 than '94. His usage went down slightly, but his scoring efficiency went up. While the '94 Jazz torched the Spurs, the '95 Spurs almost tied for the league lead in postseason defensive rating and did the best job of slowing down the white-hot Rockets of any team that Houston faced that postseason (even with the narrative that Hakeem personally beat down Robinson). Again, THESE are the areas (defense and efficient scoring) where I think optimal Robinson is at his best.

'95 Robinson is the one that I'm most comfortable pitting against the dominant wings (West/TMac/Kobe/Wade/King?) that have been discussed here. '95 Robinson is also the one that I'd feel most comfortable putting against the other more offensive bigs like Barkley, Dirk or Moses. Interestingly, one of the players that would give me the most pause against peak Robinson (based in large part on their head-to-head matchups in that time period) is Karl Malone...who still hasn't gotten any relevant ink in this project. All of the perimeter players have sponsor(s), as does Dirk and now DRob. Someone really should tackle Karl and Barkley. Where is Kaima when you need him?
Creator of the Hoops Lab: tinyurl.com/mpo2brj
Contributor to NylonCalculusDOTcom
Contributor to TYTSports: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLTbFEVCpx9shKEsZl7FcRHzpGO1dPoimk
Follow on Twitter: @ProfessorDrz
lorak
Head Coach
Posts: 6,317
And1: 2,237
Joined: Nov 23, 2009

Re: #15 Highest Peak of All Time (ends Mon 9:00 PM Pacific) 

Post#100 » by lorak » Sun Sep 2, 2012 3:41 pm

I'm leaning towards DRob, but don't know which year should I chose: '90, '91, '95 or '96?

Return to Player Comparisons