BAT 8.0 TRADE DISCUSSION (DRAFT IN OTHER THREAD) PART II

Subway Token · Post #1121 » by **Subway Token** » Sun Sep 2, 2012 4:52 pm

My team of rotation players is basically set.

WillyJakkz · Post #1122 » by **WillyJakkz** » Sun Sep 2, 2012 4:52 pm

LJ4pointplay wrote:
WillyJakkz wrote:Way back when I took over the team the previous GM didn't have 387 listed as the Nuggets pick but on pg 1 the Nuggets are listed as the owners of pick 387 so maybe he traded it but it wasn't listed?

nah check our e-mail correspondence that I posted above. The issue started there, I'm pretty sure. Unsure where you got the impression that I owned 387 from as I doubt it was in my signature because I had all my original picks at that time. Regardless, I should have double checked the pick so you can take 384 or whoever you traded the phantom 387 pick to can take 384. I'll just have 391.

I got the impression it was 387 cause backtracking it states you owned it via a trade you did w/ the Bucks.

I never traded "387" but also how is it that mecca and br7 own it as well, unless I made a typo.

(btw nm the pick I already owned comment, got confused about the draft board for a sec).

It doesn't matter I'll take whatever the pick may be, hell I'll even draft "391" Mr Irrelevant but good enough for my team if that's what it takes.

Fury · Post #1123 » by **Fury** » Sun Sep 2, 2012 4:52 pm

knicksfan, i could only offer picks for pachulia, interested?

LJ4pointplay · Post #1124 » by **LJ4pointplay** » Sun Sep 2, 2012 4:53 pm

only trade I made with Bucks was last night, 387 not involved. Unless Im missing something?

Knicksfan20 · Post #1125 » by **Knicksfan20** » Sun Sep 2, 2012 4:55 pm

Fury wrote:knicksfan, i could only offer picks for pachulia, interested?

Na man sorry.

Context · Post #1126 » by **Context** » Sun Sep 2, 2012 4:57 pm

OTC AT:

11:57am ---315
1:57pm---316
3:57pm---317
5:57pm---318

br7knicks · Post #1127 » by **br7knicks** » Sun Sep 2, 2012 4:57 pm

well thats the thing lj, i started with it, yet never traded it. think it may hve just been a typo somewhere

Smoke24 · Post #1128 » by **Smoke24** » Sun Sep 2, 2012 4:57 pm

315 OTC

LJ4pointplay · Post #1129 » by **LJ4pointplay** » Sun Sep 2, 2012 4:58 pm

br7knicks wrote:well thats the thing lj, i started with it, yet never traded it. think it may hve just been a typo somewhere

I say willy tkes 384, I take 391.. as for Mecca.. well, IDK.

Context · Post #1130 » by **Context** » Sun Sep 2, 2012 4:59 pm

br7knicks wrote:well thats the thing lj, i started with it, yet never traded it. think it may hve just been a typo somewhere

Started the process of confirming every trade in the original discussion thread. It will take time to do so. I can't complete the process till later tonight...

LJ4pointplay · Post #1131 » by **LJ4pointplay** » Sun Sep 2, 2012 5:01 pm

damn really want an upcoming pick. Jason Smith or Kwame available..

dont worry about it kneega.. thats too much work. Heck Mecca can take 382 if he wants, and Ill pick 391, and 392. Those picks are practically worthless.

br7knicks · Post #1132 » by **br7knicks** » Sun Sep 2, 2012 5:02 pm

im ok with whatever. ill keep looking soon but i made it to pg 175 on part 1. if someone can find where i traded it since i started with 387. i think as long as the rest all get some pick before fa its ok

Context · Post #1133 » by **Context** » Sun Sep 2, 2012 5:02 pm

kneega wrote:OTC AT:

11:57am ---315
1:57pm---316
3:57pm---317
5:57pm---318

WillyJakkz · Post #1134 » by **WillyJakkz** » Sun Sep 2, 2012 5:03 pm

LJ4pointplay wrote:only trade I made with Bucks was last night, 387 not involved. Unless Im missing something?

Well on pg 1 of the draft picks thread it states 387: Denver (via Bucks via Mavs) but again, I couldn't find the actual Bucks Mavs trade.

WillyJakkz · Post #1135 » by **WillyJakkz** » Sun Sep 2, 2012 5:06 pm

LJ4pointplay wrote:damn really want an upcoming pick. Jason Smith or Kwame available..

dont worry about it kneega.. thats too much work. Heck Mecca can take 382 if he wants, and Ill pick 391, and 392. Those picks are practically worthless.

Best I can do is 334 for Jason Smith

Context · Post #1136 » by **Context** » Sun Sep 2, 2012 5:07 pm

WillyJakkz wrote:
LJ4pointplay wrote:only trade I made with Bucks was last night, 387 not involved. Unless Im missing something?

Well on pg 1 of the draft picks thread it states 387: Denver (via Bucks via Mavs) but again, I couldn't find the actual Bucks Mavs trade.

and fyi, I only updated the last trade that included 387. Besides that trade I found it that way... My guess is it was a typo. I doubt that after I look through the entire thread at some point that I will find a "missed trade"....

LJ4pointplay · Post #1137 » by **LJ4pointplay** » Sun Sep 2, 2012 5:07 pm

WillyJakkz wrote:
LJ4pointplay wrote:only trade I made with Bucks was last night, 387 not involved. Unless Im missing something?

Well on pg 1 of the draft picks thread it states 387: Denver (via Bucks via Mavs) but again, I couldn't find the actual Bucks Mavs trade.

weird.. we never traded lol.. not that I remember. I bet it said Bucks before the trade between me and you was updated, and then it was edited from "387 Milwaukee" to "387 Denver (via Bucks via Mavs)" as a result of confusion from our trade post.

br7knicks · Post #1138 » by **br7knicks** » Sun Sep 2, 2012 5:07 pm

yeah i wouldnt worry too much about it kneega. i did check pages 175 to 240, so any pages in between ill chec later

LJ4pointplay · Post #1139 » by **LJ4pointplay** » Sun Sep 2, 2012 5:08 pm

WillyJakkz wrote:
LJ4pointplay wrote:damn really want an upcoming pick. Jason Smith or Kwame available..

dont worry about it kneega.. thats too much work. Heck Mecca can take 382 if he wants, and Ill pick 391, and 392. Those picks are practically worthless.

Best I can do is 334 for Jason Smith

nah I want a certain player.. moreso looking for 315, or 316.

Context · Post #1140 » by **Context** » Sun Sep 2, 2012 5:10 pm

br7knicks wrote:yeah i wouldnt worry too much about it kneega. i did check pages 175 to 240, so any pages in between ill chec later

ok cool and fyi, I checked from 1-29... so we just need to cover from 29-175 which im going to do at some point anyway...