21shumpshumpst wrote:knicksnyk wrote:21shumpshumpst wrote:
No the point is he had good games vs bad teams.
He was awful vs good teams.
I don't need him being good vs bad teams. I can get any monkey to do that. I need him to be good vs good teams which will be in the playoffs.
He has not proven he can do that at all. If he can't do it in the regular seaosn what makes you think he will do it in the playoffs.?
In 13 games against above-.500 teams last season (Jazz 36-30, Lakers 41-25, Mavs 36-30, Hawks 40-26, Miami 46-20, Celtics 39-27, Spurs 50-16, 76ers 35-31, Bulls 50-16, Pacers 42-24, combined record 415-245), Lin in 35 mpg averaged 18.9 points, 6.7 assists, 2.1 steals, 4.5 turnovers, on 42.3% fg, 35.1% 3pt, and 83.0% ft.
I would take this anyday from a 24 year old pg getting his first chance at starters minutes who was in his sophmore year
He scored on bad percentages. He had a bad assist to TO ratio.
He did get 2 steals which is good and he had a good ft%. Plus those numbers are skewed by two games during linsanity. The one vs lakers and the one vs the mavs. Take those out and what do you get?
lmao why should i take out his two games LOL why? was he not scouted during those two games cause he sure as hell was. unless tyson chandler was a liar & the lakers coach lies as well right I should take out those two games because it doesn't prove your point lmao. u have no argument.















