L.A. OKs $1.2 billion football stadium

Moderator: bwgood77

User avatar
LittleOzzy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 35,033
And1: 4,198
Joined: Dec 19, 2005
       

L.A. OKs $1.2 billion football stadium 

Post#1 » by LittleOzzy » Fri Sep 28, 2012 11:41 pm

The Los Angeles City Council on Friday approved a $1.2 billion plan to build a downtown football stadium, moving the No. 2 U.S. city closer than it's been in years to having a professional football team.

Council members voted unanimously in favor of the Anschutz Entertainment Group's proposal to erect the 72,000-seat stadium in the city's downtown core, to be christened "Farmers Field". AEG, controlled by billionaire Phil Anschutz, is up for sale but an agreement with the city will require its new owners to take up the stadium project.

Hundreds of football fans in the yellow-and-blue jerseys of the Rams football team, ushers from sports arena Staples Center sporting "Farmers Field" T-shirts, and even carpenters' union members turned up at Friday's vote, jamming the meeting room and spilling into the hallways outside. NBA Hall of Famer and local celebrity Kareem Abdul-Jabbar arrived to raucous applause.

AEG executives say they plan to lure a National Football League team to anchor the envisioned stadium. The St. Louis Rams and Oakland Raiders are among teams expected to be contacted.

The city has been without professional football since 1994, when ironically the Rams, then playing in nearby Anaheim, as well as the Raiders, both left. Business and labor groups had spoken in favor of a plan that could create from 20,000 to 30,000 jobs and generate business downtown, while critics had protested about traffic congestion and costs to the city.


http://www.torontosun.com/2012/09/28/la ... ll-stadium
LakerFanMan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,658
And1: 16
Joined: Dec 22, 2006

Re: L.A. OKs $1.2 billion football stadium 

Post#2 » by LakerFanMan » Sat Sep 29, 2012 6:39 pm

Good to hear, it will be nice to have an NFL franchise in LA.
User avatar
Mr. E
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,291
And1: 6,510
Joined: Apr 15, 2006
Location: Defending Planet Earth with a Jet-Pack & a Ray-Gun!
       

Re: L.A. OKs $1.2 billion football stadium 

Post#3 » by Mr. E » Sun Oct 7, 2012 3:10 pm

While I like the idea of LA returning to the NFL scene I absolutely hate the idea of the fans of another team losing their football team due to relocation. It was a brutal thing to go through.
"A fanatic is one who can't change their mind and won't change the subject."
- Winston Churchill
DaveMeyers
Pro Prospect
Posts: 837
And1: 34
Joined: Nov 12, 2010
     

Re: L.A. OKs $1.2 billion football stadium 

Post#4 » by DaveMeyers » Mon Oct 8, 2012 2:52 am

Mr. E wrote:While I like the idea of LA returning to the NFL scene I absolutely hate the idea of the fans of another team losing their football team due to relocation. It was a brutal thing to go through.

What teams do you think could be potentially relocated?
TSE
Banned User
Posts: 3,405
And1: 9
Joined: Jul 20, 2009
Location: Detroit

Re: L.A. OKs $1.2 billion football stadium 

Post#5 » by TSE » Tue Oct 9, 2012 5:29 am

DaveMeyers wrote:
Mr. E wrote:While I like the idea of LA returning to the NFL scene I absolutely hate the idea of the fans of another team losing their football team due to relocation. It was a brutal thing to go through.

What teams do you think could be potentially relocated?


I wouldn't mind Jacksonville or Tampa Bay. Both aren't historically significant or very good, plus Florida has too many teams. Buffalo is not a big enough city for the NFL and they suck, so they could be in the mix. Cleveland is garbage, so they deserve to be plucked. I'm from Detroit so maybe I shouldn't suggest that as a fair reason! If not those teams maybe Tennessee for also sucking and not being historically significant, or maybe the Saints for cleaning up the team and penalizing the city for their negative drama, but I can't stand by that since I'm not privy to the evidence and only willing to investigate further before possibly annihilating them. In which case I would then support the city's lawsuit against the owner.

More importantly I wonder if they will do anything really cool or fabulous with the huge stadium investment, or is this going to be a colossal expenditure for another cookie-cutter stadium? If that's the case then I say screw LA and go tell them to suck an egg if they don't have the right ideas for building an awesome team, so their plans for everything all the way down to logo and uniform design need to be investigated first. Oh and I almost forgot Oakland since California has too many teams and they have sucked way too long like some of the other mentioned perennial losers.

So perhaps in no particular order:

TB
JAX
BUF
CLE
TEN
OAK

I think all 6 should move to new towns personally. I'd like to send one of them to China even and rather see more international exposure than letting these 6 towns continue to run teams in a disrespectful way. And when these 6 get killed, then we can analyze which other towns no longer deserve teams after that. What's fair is fair, but this should be a high level game for professionals, and I don't tolerate anything less. These teams and towns clearly don't make the grade and should get lost. Detroit shouldn't feel safe for the next round if they don't get their act together, but they are also a much more storied franchise and important cog in the nation plus they have CJ for a little extra leeway since he is so special and should count as a trump card. ;)
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,689
And1: 27,271
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: L.A. OKs $1.2 billion football stadium 

Post#6 » by trwi7 » Tue Oct 9, 2012 8:19 pm

Yeah, send a team to China. For a self proclaimed genius, you sure are stupid.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
TSE
Banned User
Posts: 3,405
And1: 9
Joined: Jul 20, 2009
Location: Detroit

Re: L.A. OKs $1.2 billion football stadium 

Post#7 » by TSE » Tue Oct 9, 2012 9:51 pm

trwi7 wrote:Yeah, send a team to China. For a self proclaimed genius, you sure are stupid.


The NFL has been tinkering with the idea of opening the market in China long before I made this post. It's a business decision for the NFL to make potentially a lot more money, it's not my idea. Besides I'm not actually suggesting moving a team immediately to China, that wouldn't even make sense, especially considering LA is already halfway set up now. It's somewhat a facetious comment that should be obvious, yet with serious overtones about the future of the game as it becomes more international which is inevitable. The NFL is more interested in making money than growing their sport in accordance with what trwi7 thinks is stupid or not.

I disagree that I'm stupid, and think that your comment is the only thing stupid on this page that has my name near it. But then again you didn't really offer any reasoning to back up your opinion in order to be taken too seriously.
sunshinekids99
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,745
And1: 229
Joined: Apr 10, 2001

Re: L.A. OKs $1.2 billion football stadium 

Post#8 » by sunshinekids99 » Thu Oct 11, 2012 4:57 pm

I think the Jags make the most sense. If the Bills are going to move I would expect to be Toronto and not LA.
Image
User avatar
JaxMagic
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 5,446
And1: 325
Joined: Apr 11, 2003
   

Re: L.A. OKs $1.2 billion football stadium 

Post#9 » by JaxMagic » Fri Oct 12, 2012 1:34 am

Just curious as to why the Jags make the most sense, be sure to use facts and figures to back up your claim. Go!
TSE
Banned User
Posts: 3,405
And1: 9
Joined: Jul 20, 2009
Location: Detroit

Re: L.A. OKs $1.2 billion football stadium 

Post#10 » by TSE » Fri Oct 12, 2012 1:45 am

JaxMagic wrote:Just curious as to why the Jags make the most sense, be sure to use facts and figures to back up your claim. Go!


Well for me, I had 6 teams listed, 4 of which are long storied franchises, of which TEN and JAX are the 2 newest teams. I like to give some more benefit of the doubt to those with history just for one side reason. JAX also came into the league more recently with no baggage or veteran liabilities and had the great privilege of building their team from scratch how they see fit, and they blew it. They haven't won any conference titles and have had less appearances in the playoffs than TEN and haven't gone as deep into the playoffs. There is no excuse for their .500 record so far and they just aren't capitalizing on their opportunity or showing much potential. Florida already has a ton of teams and this team should have done something by special by now if they feel like they should have the right to stick around.
LAKESHOW
RealGM
Posts: 18,040
And1: 4,468
Joined: Mar 14, 2002
Location: HOME OF THE 17 TIME WORLD CHAMPIONS!

Re: L.A. OKs $1.2 billion football stadium 

Post#11 » by LAKESHOW » Fri Oct 12, 2012 5:20 am

CHARGERS
Home of the 17 Time World Champions
Icness
NFL Analyst
Posts: 16,964
And1: 129
Joined: Apr 30, 2001
Location: Back in the 616
Contact:
   

Re: L.A. OKs $1.2 billion football stadium 

Post#12 » by Icness » Fri Oct 12, 2012 1:10 pm

JaxMagic wrote:Just curious as to why the Jags make the most sense, be sure to use facts and figures to back up your claim. Go!


New owner bought in high, has no chance to recoup his investment in that city. He paid $200M over what the estimated value was. He did not do that to stick in Jacksonville with the tarp covering all those seats and ranking no higher than 30th in merchandise at any time in the last 8 years. I happen to think they're headed to London though, by 2015, and they move to the AFC East with Miami going to the AFC South.

San Diego is the most likely candidate for LA.
It's not whether you win or lose, it's how good you look playing the game
TSE
Banned User
Posts: 3,405
And1: 9
Joined: Jul 20, 2009
Location: Detroit

Re: L.A. OKs $1.2 billion football stadium 

Post#13 » by TSE » Fri Oct 12, 2012 6:10 pm

A team in London by 2015 would be awesome, I can't wait for this game to go international.

Return to The General NFL Board