Adrian_05 wrote:hyper316 wrote:seriously, what's so good about sanchez.
go big or go home. we need top of the rotation arms. no more happ-like trades plz.
im still upset that Rogers were too cheap to get Darvish. he just cost money, no prospects needed. and he's a goldmine..
The way I look at it as, Sanchez would be better than nothing and he's only 28 years old.
Exactly, aside from Morrow, or a "Mentally" healthy Romero, Sanchez is much better than anyone else in our pitching rotation.
Also Rogers was cheap, but we still could have gotten Cespedes(who is now a centerpiece for Oakland) for a relatively cheap deal( vs say Fielder money), or Jorge Soler this past year. Both seem like they will be fantastic players and we got neither.