So how is this backcourt thing going to work? Ellis and Jennings are not only an odd couple in the backcourt, but could be at cross purposes as both look to get paid this summer. Jennings will be a restricted free agent, most likely, while Ellis has an opt-out that I'd say he's at least 50 percent likely to exercise.
Yet the biggest question with both is at the other end; each is undersized and Ellis in particular has shown little inclination to expend much effort defensively. Which gets to the real crux of the problem: Ellis is a sixth man masquerading as a go-to guy, and unfortunately the Bucks reinforced this by playing him 40+ minutes many nights after the trade.
Of course, for the Bucks this is an issue more in theory than in practice, as they don't have a starting 2 anyway. They don't have any wing defenders either, with the glaring exception of Luc Richard Mbah a Moute, but his inability to shoot creates substantial problems in its own right -- and is why the Bucks have often used him as a 4 in recent seasons. That won't be an option with the top-heavy frontcourt, and it may be that the Bucks look to trade from their surplus to fill in the backcourt more ably. In particular, dealing Gooden for a starting 2 that can shoot and defend would solve several of these problems at once.
In the meantime, keep an eye on Harris, who will be the backup small forward and could emerge as the go-to guy for the second unit. (If it isn't Ellis, that is). Milwaukee will again have an extremely strong bench; in fact, as Gooden is one of the best No. 3 bigs in basketball, backup center Ekpe Udoh is an outstanding defender, reserve guards Beno Udrih and Dunleavy are very solid players, and even fifth big Larry Sanders is a crazy shot-blocker with some upside.
The bench strength guarantees that the Bucks can survive the regular-season grind in decent shape, but the bigger question is whether there's sufficient star power and defensive gravitas to push them above the East's lottery flotsam. That's particularly true given that Skiles may be at the end of his road here, as his track record is that he burns out after a few years in one city; this is now in his fifth in Brewtown, and Year 4 wasn't pretty.
It wouldn't shock me to see Milwaukee return to the postseason, especially if the Bucks can make another roster tweak or two. But the more likely scenario is that they challenge for the playoffs again -- and once again fall short. The Bucks either need a defensive renaissance or a breakout season from one of the guards to exceed that projection; either is possible, but neither is particularly likely.
Hollinger: Bucks 9th in East, 38-44
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
Hollinger: Bucks 9th in East, 38-44
- LUKE23
- RealGM
- Posts: 72,294
- And1: 6,241
- Joined: May 26, 2005
- Location: Stunville
Hollinger: Bucks 9th in East, 38-44
http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/preview2 ... ks-outlook
Re: Hollinger: Bucks 9th in East, 38-44
- paulpressey25
- Senior Mod - Bucks
- Posts: 60,955
- And1: 26,067
- Joined: Oct 27, 2002
Re: Hollinger: Bucks 9th in East, 38-44
Hollinger continues to drink the Kool aid on Drew Gooden.
If he's as valuable as John thinks, we should have no problem dealing him even up for Wes Matthews or the like.
If he's as valuable as John thinks, we should have no problem dealing him even up for Wes Matthews or the like.
Re: Hollinger: Bucks 9th in East, 38-44
- LUKE23
- RealGM
- Posts: 72,294
- And1: 6,241
- Joined: May 26, 2005
- Location: Stunville
Re: Hollinger: Bucks 9th in East, 38-44
I don't really disagree with anything he said outside of Gooden being a trade asset. We're deep but we have no star power. Depth will keep you in games, but depth doesn't move the needle in terms of the standings.
An all-star needs to emerge. It would also help a lot to move Ellis and one of our surplus bigs for a more efficient, bigger long-term wing if possible. Don't know that guy is out there. We need to try and maximize that trade asset to whatever value it has though. Ellis will be opting out in all likelihood.
An all-star needs to emerge. It would also help a lot to move Ellis and one of our surplus bigs for a more efficient, bigger long-term wing if possible. Don't know that guy is out there. We need to try and maximize that trade asset to whatever value it has though. Ellis will be opting out in all likelihood.
Re: Hollinger: Bucks 9th in East, 38-44
- JimmyTheKid
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,894
- And1: 5,144
- Joined: Feb 10, 2009
Re: Hollinger: Bucks 9th in East, 38-44
That won't be an option with the top-heavy frontcourt, and it may be that the Bucks look to trade from their surplus to fill in the backcourt more ably. In particular, dealing Gooden for a starting 2 that can shoot and defend would solve several of these problems at once.
Great idea Hollinger! While we're at it, how about Tobes/Ellis/Pryz for Lebron James and Mbah a Moute/Udrih/Dalembert for Dwight Howard. Eh? Eh? Eh?
I usually don't mind Hollinger, but really? To get any player with any sort of above average skill set for Drew Gooden is a ridiculous pipe dream.
Re: Hollinger: Bucks 9th in East, 38-44
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,705
- And1: 8,009
- Joined: Jan 21, 2007
- Location: NC
Re: Hollinger: Bucks 9th in East, 38-44
his comments on gooden pretty much nullify his opinion here.
Re: Hollinger: Bucks 9th in East, 38-44
- LUKE23
- RealGM
- Posts: 72,294
- And1: 6,241
- Joined: May 26, 2005
- Location: Stunville
Re: Hollinger: Bucks 9th in East, 38-44
GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:his comments on gooden pretty much nullify his opinion here.
Not really. Pretty much everything he said is true.
1. Ellis/Jennings is a poor fit as a backcourt.
2. We have a lot of depth but no stars, and stars are what win a relevant amount of games.
Re: Hollinger: Bucks 9th in East, 38-44
- emunney
- RealGM
- Posts: 60,219
- And1: 36,744
- Joined: Feb 22, 2005
- Location: where takes go to be pampered
Re: Hollinger: Bucks 9th in East, 38-44
I agree with GoS. The idea that Gooden is one of the best bench bigs in basketball is a window into the disposable quantitative methodology that informs ALL his opinions. It doesn't mean he's always going to be wrong, but it does mean it's not worth parsing. Throw it all out.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
Re: Hollinger: Bucks 9th in East, 38-44
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,712
- And1: 4,490
- Joined: Jan 31, 2006
- Contact:
Re: Hollinger: Bucks 9th in East, 38-44
Marquis Daniels will be a better wing defender than some give him credit for.
Re: Hollinger: Bucks 9th in East, 38-44
- LUKE23
- RealGM
- Posts: 72,294
- And1: 6,241
- Joined: May 26, 2005
- Location: Stunville
Re: Hollinger: Bucks 9th in East, 38-44
I think it's perfectly viable to disagree with what PER represents but also agree with his basketball opinions. For one, his draft rater to me has been very good. He obviously also watches all teams quite a bit and has a fundamental understanding of advanced stats. Do I like PER? No, I hate it, but that doesn't mean he doesn't know the game.
Personally, looking at his summary, I don't really disagree with any of it. Poor backcourt pairing, lack of wing defenders sans Moute, depth but very little difference between starters and bench players, likes Harris' potential, etc.
Personally, looking at his summary, I don't really disagree with any of it. Poor backcourt pairing, lack of wing defenders sans Moute, depth but very little difference between starters and bench players, likes Harris' potential, etc.
Re: Hollinger: Bucks 9th in East, 38-44
- LUKE23
- RealGM
- Posts: 72,294
- And1: 6,241
- Joined: May 26, 2005
- Location: Stunville
Re: Hollinger: Bucks 9th in East, 38-44
EastSideBucksFan wrote:Marquis Daniels will be a better wing defender than some give him credit for.
If he's playing any kind of substantial minutes we have some problems though.
Re: Hollinger: Bucks 9th in East, 38-44
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 2,017
- And1: 113
- Joined: Apr 06, 2012
Re: Hollinger: Bucks 9th in East, 38-44
This guy is one of the most over-rated analysts out there. As mentioned- the comments on Gooden pretty much nullify the rest. The rest of what he says is pretty obvious casual fan talk. Nothing really of substance.
Re: Hollinger: Bucks 9th in East, 38-44
- ReasonablySober
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 98,662
- And1: 35,063
- Joined: Dec 02, 2001
- Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
- Contact:
Re: Hollinger: Bucks 9th in East, 38-44
Basketball Prospectus also has the Bucks at 38-44. FWIW, here is what they said about Gooden this season:
We are entering year three of the five-year deal the Bucks gave Drew Gooden in 2010. If he can continue to perform as well as he did in 2011-12, the contract isn’t going to be “mind-numbingly bad,” as we wrote in this space last December. Gooden upped his value by markedly improving his assist rate for the second straight season. Going into his first year in Milwaukee, our skill ratings had Gooden rated as a -3 passer; as you can see, he’s now at +3. He’s also made small strides to improve his efficiency-killing midrange game, taking 55 threes last year, more than double his previous career high. Gooden still gives up way too much on the defensive end to be a full-time player. Last year, the Bucks’ Defensive Rating was 12.8 points worse with him on the floor. That was only the most glaring example of a preexisting trend. With so many frontcourt options, the Bucks can use Gooden in an instant offense role. One note: His leap at age 30 marks him as a Fluke Rule candidate according to the definition of ESPN’s John Hollinger. Indeed, SCHOENE is forecasting a merciless regression.
Re: Hollinger: Bucks 9th in East, 38-44
-
- Junior
- Posts: 491
- And1: 112
- Joined: Jul 17, 2009
Re: Hollinger: Bucks 9th in East, 38-44
He's trying to help us trade Gooden SHHHHHHHHHHHHHhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!
Yeah Gooden is great.
Yeah Gooden is great.
Blame Rasho wrote:It is the same circle jerk fans like always going on and on and the sad part is that they don't even realize how pathetic they sound to a neutral fan.
Re: Hollinger: Bucks 9th in East, 38-44
- KingCammo
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,668
- And1: 50
- Joined: May 29, 2005
Re: Hollinger: Bucks 9th in East, 38-44
I think we should keep Gooden...for the lolz.
Re: Hollinger: Bucks 9th in East, 38-44
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,712
- And1: 4,490
- Joined: Jan 31, 2006
- Contact:
Re: Hollinger: Bucks 9th in East, 38-44
Oh sweet....Gooden is a +3 passer now.....I'm sure we can move him for Wade now.
Re: Hollinger: Bucks 9th in East, 38-44
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,294
- And1: 4,668
- Joined: Jul 04, 2007
- Location: Heelville
Re: Hollinger: Bucks 9th in East, 38-44
*We don't have any wing defenders.
*We should trade Gooden for a starting 2 guard that can shoot & Defend.
*Gooden is one of the best backup bigs in basketball.
*Harris will be the backup Small Forward
I see Hollinger just pulled up the Bucks roster and wrote this article without really paying much attention to this team since the draft.
*We should trade Gooden for a starting 2 guard that can shoot & Defend.
*Gooden is one of the best backup bigs in basketball.
*Harris will be the backup Small Forward
I see Hollinger just pulled up the Bucks roster and wrote this article without really paying much attention to this team since the draft.
Vice President of Parker-Nation.
#Jabariunleashed
#OwnTheFuture
Maxtradamus
#Jabariunleashed
#OwnTheFuture
Maxtradamus
Re: Hollinger: Bucks 9th in East, 38-44
- LUKE23
- RealGM
- Posts: 72,294
- And1: 6,241
- Joined: May 26, 2005
- Location: Stunville
Re: Hollinger: Bucks 9th in East, 38-44
He said no wing defenders sans Moute. Which is true. Daniels' D is getting massively overrated.
Harris would have been the backup SF if Moute was healthy. Hollinger should know Moute is hurt though, admittedly.
The overall gist of what he's saying is accurate though. Ellis/Jennings is a bad fit, and we're deep but don't have star power.
Harris would have been the backup SF if Moute was healthy. Hollinger should know Moute is hurt though, admittedly.
The overall gist of what he's saying is accurate though. Ellis/Jennings is a bad fit, and we're deep but don't have star power.
Re: Hollinger: Bucks 9th in East, 38-44
- InsideOut
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,757
- And1: 534
- Joined: Aug 22, 2006
Re: Hollinger: Bucks 9th in East, 38-44
Not sure why one comment disqualifies all his comments. By that logic nobody on the face of the earth has a qualified comment.
As far as the Gooden comment goes...didn't he say he was a good #3 big backup? Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't he saying Gooden isn't a good starter, isn't even a good back-up but as a #3 option he is good. I don't see how saying a guy is a good third string guy is a complement.
As far as the Gooden comment goes...didn't he say he was a good #3 big backup? Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't he saying Gooden isn't a good starter, isn't even a good back-up but as a #3 option he is good. I don't see how saying a guy is a good third string guy is a complement.
Re: Hollinger: Bucks 9th in East, 38-44
- ReasonablySober
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 98,662
- And1: 35,063
- Joined: Dec 02, 2001
- Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
- Contact:
Re: Hollinger: Bucks 9th in East, 38-44
If you play him strictly at PF in a limited role, Gooden isn't going to kill you.
Re: Hollinger: Bucks 9th in East, 38-44
- SupremeHustle
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,186
- And1: 28,489
- Joined: Feb 11, 2005
- Location: Cloud 9
Re: Hollinger: Bucks 9th in East, 38-44
What is the Gooden effect, really? With him we're looking at the 9th or 10th seed, without the 7th or 8th seed? In that sense, I think he's actually helping.
jschligs wrote:Am I the only one who doesn't know who the **** SupremeHustle is?