One thing people fail to realize is that Martin is 29 and only going to be declining, whereas Harden can keep improving at such a young age. I don't like trading a young player for an older one unless the older one is the better player.
I don't think the dropoff from Harden to Martin is very sizable to be honest, so its not a terrible trade for the Thunder, but their core won't quite have the youth advantage it once had.'
I do think the Rockets did get the worse end of the deal, becauser Harden's not really worth the cap space. With a core of Asik, Lin, and Harden, can the rockets really be contenders? This move sounds like it makes them a perenial low playoff seed year after year.
therealbig3 wrote:BrooklynBulls wrote:Truly amazing that taking a 44% TS% shot from 18 feet more often than the other guy is now considered a strength, particularly for a guy that's playing off 2 guys with midrange games.
Hurrah! Kevin Martin can shoot those long 2's with the best of em!
LOL, exactly.
Seems so weird that people are going to criticize Harden for not taking the most inefficient shot in the game, while he takes and makes a ton of 3s and FTs, which are the most efficient shots in the game.
And all of the people criticizing Harden for this...seriously, how is what Manu does any different? Do you feel the same way about Manu as you do about Harden?
Manu is clutch in the finals, and steps up for his team. Harden in the finals played like ****. BIG difference. If you put Manu Ginobli instead of James Harden coming off the bench in the finals last year, you could likely say the thunder are now the champions, or at the very least it would have come down to a game 6 or 7 even if Miami still won.