ImageImageImage

Game 7 | Cavs at Thunder | Nov 11th 2012 | 7:00 PM ET

Moderator: ijspeelman

Rise Against
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,184
And1: 73
Joined: May 21, 2006
 

Game 7 | Cavs at Thunder | Nov 11th 2012 | 7:00 PM ET 

Post#1 » by Rise Against » Sat Nov 10, 2012 12:45 pm

Hey guys, want to hear a cool fact?



Last season, the most pages we've had in a single game thread was 3. So far this season, after 6 games ... All of the game threads have 3 or more pages.








Want to hear another one?




4.5 PPG on 23% shooting (21% in 3s), no free throws attempts so far this season in 16 MPG. Guess whose stats are those? There can only be the one and only ..
















Image

Chucks Jumpers Miles
(Damn I hate you so much. So glad he has a team option next year..)






_______________________________________







...............................................Image vs. Image



_____ Image _____

Image ImageImageImageImageImage Image





Image ImageImageImageImageImage Image

_____ Image _____






_____________ Key Matchup ____________


Image vs. Image

Tough assignment for Kyrie.. How will he defend Westbrook?
Who will outscore who?







Our bench sucks did I tell you guys that? Probably the reason we are going to lose this one. (CJ Miles....) Get well soon Zeller.

What do you guys think of this one? Yay or nay?
B Mac
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 11,733
And1: 540
Joined: Aug 05, 2004
Location: North Canton, Ohio
Contact:
     

Re: Game 7 | Cavs at Thunder | Nov 11th 2012 | 7:00 PM ET 

Post#2 » by B Mac » Sat Nov 10, 2012 1:13 pm

Im betting CJ is out of the rotation.

Welcome back Casspi!
User avatar
DelontesLip
Junior
Posts: 309
And1: 9
Joined: Mar 15, 2012

Re: Game 7 | Cavs at Thunder | Nov 11th 2012 | 7:00 PM ET 

Post#3 » by DelontesLip » Sat Nov 10, 2012 3:54 pm

Casspi had a few ticks the other night and just looked lost out there. Unfortunately they both suck
IMHO
Junior
Posts: 397
And1: 24
Joined: Sep 05, 2012

Re: Game 7 | Cavs at Thunder | Nov 11th 2012 | 7:00 PM ET 

Post#4 » by IMHO » Sat Nov 10, 2012 9:42 pm

God I hate CJ
Gdd I hate Omri
Rise Against
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,184
And1: 73
Joined: May 21, 2006
 

Re: Game 7 | Cavs at Thunder | Nov 11th 2012 | 7:00 PM ET 

Post#5 » by Rise Against » Sat Nov 10, 2012 9:45 pm

Well, it is just a matter of who sucks less.
User avatar
SaiCLE
Rookie
Posts: 1,099
And1: 215
Joined: Jun 29, 2012
   

Re: Game 7 | Cavs at Thunder | Nov 11th 2012 | 7:00 PM ET 

Post#6 » by SaiCLE » Sat Nov 10, 2012 10:39 pm

Wow this is crazy. The link
http://blog.newsok.com/thunderrumblings/2012/11/10/practice-report-thunder-preparing-to-face-the-best-pick-and-roll-team-in-basketball/

The Thunder had a rare practice following a back-to-back today. It was a light session that included a film session on the Cavs in preparation for Sunday’s game. The theme today was defending the Cavs’ pick-and-roll.
Kendrick Perkins: “It kind of had me scared today in the film room the way the coaches were. I thought we were playing the damn Dream Team tomorrow.”


Perkins went on to say the Cavs “are the best pick-and-roll team in the league.” “You’ve got (Dion) Waiters and you got (Kyrie) Irving who can come off and pull up at the 3 at any time,” Perkins said. “I think Irving’s shooting 46 percent. Waiters is shooting 52 percent from the 3, and they both can split the pick-and-roll, get in the paint and cause havoc. So it’s a lot on the bigs. And you’ve got Varejao who’s going to set good screens. So it’s a good challenge for us.”

Scott Brooks also had high praise for the Irving-Waiters tandem. “They’re 20 years old and they’re doing things that most 20 year olds are not able to do,” Brooks said. “They read the game. They see the game at a very good pace. Their pick-and-roll game is some of the best in basketball, and they shoot the ball very well. Both guys are big time NBA 3-point shooters.”
User avatar
DelontesLip
Junior
Posts: 309
And1: 9
Joined: Mar 15, 2012

Re: Game 7 | Cavs at Thunder | Nov 11th 2012 | 7:00 PM ET 

Post#7 » by DelontesLip » Sat Nov 10, 2012 11:56 pm

SaiCLE wrote:Wow this is crazy. The link
http://blog.newsok.com/thunderrumblings/2012/11/10/practice-report-thunder-preparing-to-face-the-best-pick-and-roll-team-in-basketball/

The Thunder had a rare practice following a back-to-back today. It was a light session that included a film session on the Cavs in preparation for Sunday’s game. The theme today was defending the Cavs’ pick-and-roll.
Kendrick Perkins: “It kind of had me scared today in the film room the way the coaches were. I thought we were playing the damn Dream Team tomorrow.”


Perkins went on to say the Cavs “are the best pick-and-roll team in the league.” “You’ve got (Dion) Waiters and you got (Kyrie) Irving who can come off and pull up at the 3 at any time,” Perkins said. “I think Irving’s shooting 46 percent. Waiters is shooting 52 percent from the 3, and they both can split the pick-and-roll, get in the paint and cause havoc. So it’s a lot on the bigs. And you’ve got Varejao who’s going to set good screens. So it’s a good challenge for us.”

Scott Brooks also had high praise for the Irving-Waiters tandem. “They’re 20 years old and they’re doing things that most 20 year olds are not able to do,” Brooks said. “They read the game. They see the game at a very good pace. Their pick-and-roll game is some of the best in basketball, and they shoot the ball very well. Both guys are big time NBA 3-point shooters.”



I think OKC wants Andy pretty badly
jjtreyball
Senior
Posts: 529
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 12, 2011

Re: Game 7 | Cavs at Thunder | Nov 11th 2012 | 7:00 PM ET 

Post#8 » by jjtreyball » Sun Nov 11, 2012 1:32 am

DelontesLip wrote:
SaiCLE wrote:Wow this is crazy. The link
http://blog.newsok.com/thunderrumblings/2012/11/10/practice-report-thunder-preparing-to-face-the-best-pick-and-roll-team-in-basketball/

The Thunder had a rare practice following a back-to-back today. It was a light session that included a film session on the Cavs in preparation for Sunday’s game. The theme today was defending the Cavs’ pick-and-roll.
Kendrick Perkins: “It kind of had me scared today in the film room the way the coaches were. I thought we were playing the damn Dream Team tomorrow.”


Perkins went on to say the Cavs “are the best pick-and-roll team in the league.” “You’ve got (Dion) Waiters and you got (Kyrie) Irving who can come off and pull up at the 3 at any time,” Perkins said. “I think Irving’s shooting 46 percent. Waiters is shooting 52 percent from the 3, and they both can split the pick-and-roll, get in the paint and cause havoc. So it’s a lot on the bigs. And you’ve got Varejao who’s going to set good screens. So it’s a good challenge for us.”

Scott Brooks also had high praise for the Irving-Waiters tandem. “They’re 20 years old and they’re doing things that most 20 year olds are not able to do,” Brooks said. “They read the game. They see the game at a very good pace. Their pick-and-roll game is some of the best in basketball, and they shoot the ball very well. Both guys are big time NBA 3-point shooters.”



I think OKC wants Andy pretty badly
boom? http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=b5uw9yl
IMHO
Junior
Posts: 397
And1: 24
Joined: Sep 05, 2012

Re: Game 7 | Cavs at Thunder | Nov 11th 2012 | 7:00 PM ET 

Post#9 » by IMHO » Sun Nov 11, 2012 1:41 am

jjtreyball wrote:
DelontesLip wrote:
SaiCLE wrote:Wow this is crazy. The link
http://blog.newsok.com/thunderrumblings/2012/11/10/practice-report-thunder-preparing-to-face-the-best-pick-and-roll-team-in-basketball/

The Thunder had a rare practice following a back-to-back today. It was a light session that included a film session on the Cavs in preparation for Sunday’s game. The theme today was defending the Cavs’ pick-and-roll.
Kendrick Perkins: “It kind of had me scared today in the film room the way the coaches were. I thought we were playing the damn Dream Team tomorrow.”


Perkins went on to say the Cavs “are the best pick-and-roll team in the league.” “You’ve got (Dion) Waiters and you got (Kyrie) Irving who can come off and pull up at the 3 at any time,” Perkins said. “I think Irving’s shooting 46 percent. Waiters is shooting 52 percent from the 3, and they both can split the pick-and-roll, get in the paint and cause havoc. So it’s a lot on the bigs. And you’ve got Varejao who’s going to set good screens. So it’s a good challenge for us.”

Scott Brooks also had high praise for the Irving-Waiters tandem. “They’re 20 years old and they’re doing things that most 20 year olds are not able to do,” Brooks said. “They read the game. They see the game at a very good pace. Their pick-and-roll game is some of the best in basketball, and they shoot the ball very well. Both guys are big time NBA 3-point shooters.”



I think OKC wants Andy pretty badly
boom? http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=b5uw9yl



in a second
User avatar
DelontesLip
Junior
Posts: 309
And1: 9
Joined: Mar 15, 2012

Re: Game 7 | Cavs at Thunder | Nov 11th 2012 | 7:00 PM ET 

Post#10 » by DelontesLip » Sun Nov 11, 2012 2:28 am

jjtreyball wrote:
DelontesLip wrote:
SaiCLE wrote:Wow this is crazy. The link
http://blog.newsok.com/thunderrumblings/2012/11/10/practice-report-thunder-preparing-to-face-the-best-pick-and-roll-team-in-basketball/

The Thunder had a rare practice following a back-to-back today. It was a light session that included a film session on the Cavs in preparation for Sunday’s game. The theme today was defending the Cavs’ pick-and-roll.
Kendrick Perkins: “It kind of had me scared today in the film room the way the coaches were. I thought we were playing the damn Dream Team tomorrow.”


Perkins went on to say the Cavs “are the best pick-and-roll team in the league.” “You’ve got (Dion) Waiters and you got (Kyrie) Irving who can come off and pull up at the 3 at any time,” Perkins said. “I think Irving’s shooting 46 percent. Waiters is shooting 52 percent from the 3, and they both can split the pick-and-roll, get in the paint and cause havoc. So it’s a lot on the bigs. And you’ve got Varejao who’s going to set good screens. So it’s a good challenge for us.”

Scott Brooks also had high praise for the Irving-Waiters tandem. “They’re 20 years old and they’re doing things that most 20 year olds are not able to do,” Brooks said. “They read the game. They see the game at a very good pace. Their pick-and-roll game is some of the best in basketball, and they shoot the ball very well. Both guys are big time NBA 3-point shooters.”



I think OKC wants Andy pretty badly
boom? http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=b5uw9yl



Yeah I'd do it but I think I'd rather make a run at that Toronto lotto pick than Lamb
Rise Against
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,184
And1: 73
Joined: May 21, 2006
 

Re: Game 7 | Cavs at Thunder | Nov 11th 2012 | 7:00 PM ET 

Post#11 » by Rise Against » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:15 am

I bet the Cavs will stay relatively close in this game but once the bench comes in, the game will be a double digit lead.. Or maybe a blowout.
Yunsen
Senior
Posts: 583
And1: 263
Joined: Jul 10, 2012
   

Re: Game 7 | Cavs at Thunder | Nov 11th 2012 | 7:00 PM ET 

Post#12 » by Yunsen » Sun Nov 11, 2012 7:24 am

jjtreyball wrote:
DelontesLip wrote:
SaiCLE wrote:Wow this is crazy. The link
http://blog.newsok.com/thunderrumblings/2012/11/10/practice-report-thunder-preparing-to-face-the-best-pick-and-roll-team-in-basketball/

The Thunder had a rare practice following a back-to-back today. It was a light session that included a film session on the Cavs in preparation for Sunday’s game. The theme today was defending the Cavs’ pick-and-roll.
Kendrick Perkins: “It kind of had me scared today in the film room the way the coaches were. I thought we were playing the damn Dream Team tomorrow.”


Perkins went on to say the Cavs “are the best pick-and-roll team in the league.” “You’ve got (Dion) Waiters and you got (Kyrie) Irving who can come off and pull up at the 3 at any time,” Perkins said. “I think Irving’s shooting 46 percent. Waiters is shooting 52 percent from the 3, and they both can split the pick-and-roll, get in the paint and cause havoc. So it’s a lot on the bigs. And you’ve got Varejao who’s going to set good screens. So it’s a good challenge for us.”

Scott Brooks also had high praise for the Irving-Waiters tandem. “They’re 20 years old and they’re doing things that most 20 year olds are not able to do,” Brooks said. “They read the game. They see the game at a very good pace. Their pick-and-roll game is some of the best in basketball, and they shoot the ball very well. Both guys are big time NBA 3-point shooters.”



I think OKC wants Andy pretty badly
boom? http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=b5uw9yl


Don't think we'd give up PJIII and we don't need another expiring SG. I think a more likely trade would be Perkins and Lamb for Varejao and a first round pick with some type of protection.
BossHoggin
General Manager
Posts: 8,169
And1: 571
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
 

Re: Game 7 | Cavs at Thunder | Nov 11th 2012 | 7:00 PM ET 

Post#13 » by BossHoggin » Sun Nov 11, 2012 8:00 am

DerekRD wrote:
jjtreyball wrote:
DelontesLip wrote:I think OKC wants Andy pretty badly
boom? http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=b5uw9yl


Don't think we'd give up PJIII and we don't need another expiring SG. I think a more likely trade would be Perkins and Lamb for Varejao and a first round pick with some type of protection.

:lol:
Heat3Peat wrote:See this is why it's nice being a LeBron fan, no super hard allegiance to a team so there is no up and down emotions with me during a time like this.
Yunsen
Senior
Posts: 583
And1: 263
Joined: Jul 10, 2012
   

Re: Game 7 | Cavs at Thunder | Nov 11th 2012 | 7:00 PM ET 

Post#14 » by Yunsen » Sun Nov 11, 2012 8:07 am

You think a heavily protected pick is too much? Varejao is obviously much better than Perkins, but Lamb is lottery talent and assuming the Cavs keep improving, we'll probably get a low 20's pick in a few years. There's 0 chance we'd give up PJIII because we have no back up SF (Thabo is basically playing it right now), and there's 0 reason for us taking Gibson.
IMHO
Junior
Posts: 397
And1: 24
Joined: Sep 05, 2012

Re: Game 7 | Cavs at Thunder | Nov 11th 2012 | 7:00 PM ET 

Post#15 » by IMHO » Sun Nov 11, 2012 10:43 am

DerekRD wrote:You think a heavily protected pick is too much? Varejao is obviously much better than Perkins, but Lamb is lottery talent and assuming the Cavs keep improving, we'll probably get a low 20's pick in a few years. There's 0 chance we'd give up PJIII because we have no back up SF (Thabo is basically playing it right now), and there's 0 reason for us taking Gibson.

ha

and there's a reason for us taking Perkins?

this is how trades work man.

Anyway, Boobie's expiring, thats why, but we'll gladly give up Luke Walton (also expiring) if you need a SF.
Yunsen
Senior
Posts: 583
And1: 263
Joined: Jul 10, 2012
   

Re: Game 7 | Cavs at Thunder | Nov 11th 2012 | 7:00 PM ET 

Post#16 » by Yunsen » Sun Nov 11, 2012 11:36 am

IMHO wrote:
DerekRD wrote:You think a heavily protected pick is too much? Varejao is obviously much better than Perkins, but Lamb is lottery talent and assuming the Cavs keep improving, we'll probably get a low 20's pick in a few years. There's 0 chance we'd give up PJIII because we have no back up SF (Thabo is basically playing it right now), and there's 0 reason for us taking Gibson.

ha

and there's a reason for us taking Perkins?

this is how trades work man.

Anyway, Boobie's expiring, thats why, but we'll gladly give up Luke Walton (also expiring) if you need a SF.


Someone else suggested a trade to start with, but I'm not sure what player they wanted the most. Either way there's no chance of use giving up PJIII or taking another expiring.
B Mac
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 11,733
And1: 540
Joined: Aug 05, 2004
Location: North Canton, Ohio
Contact:
     

Re: Game 7 | Cavs at Thunder | Nov 11th 2012 | 7:00 PM ET 

Post#17 » by B Mac » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:11 pm

I wouldnt say there's no chance.

The reason why you guys getting Gibson makes sense is for two reasons. First of all, he has tons of playoff experience and has ice water in his veins when you need him to hit a big three. More importantly though, is you guys get an expiring contract, which despite what you said, you dont have any other good sized ones aside from Martin. For a team that has been so openly concerned about their salary situation, I would think getting another expiring would make sense.

I personally think the most logical trade is this:

Varejao
Gibson

for

Perkins
PJ3
Tor pick

Perkins has an awful contract and will be a financial hindrence for years. OKC would have to give up a 1st rounder just to get some team to accept his contract. PJ3 was the 28th pick in the draft. So basically what the trade boils down to is Varejao for the 28th pick and whatever pick Toronto ends up getting, which will likely be around 8-10. Plus OKC gets out of Perk's contract and gets a veteran sharpshooter who is expiring out of it.

Anyways, this isnt the trade thread so I hate to derail it too much, but I wanted to dispell the notion that the Cavs would be giving up a 1st in any Varejao deal.
User avatar
DelontesLip
Junior
Posts: 309
And1: 9
Joined: Mar 15, 2012

Re: Game 7 | Cavs at Thunder | Nov 11th 2012 | 7:00 PM ET 

Post#18 » by DelontesLip » Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:39 pm

B Mac wrote:I wouldnt say there's no chance.

The reason why you guys getting Gibson makes sense is for two reasons. First of all, he has tons of playoff experience and has ice water in his veins when you need him to hit a big three. More importantly though, is you guys get an expiring contract, which despite what you said, you dont have any other good sized ones aside from Martin. For a team that has been so openly concerned about their salary situation, I would think getting another expiring would make sense.

I personally think the most logical trade is this:

Varejao
Gibson

for

Perkins
PJ3
Tor pick

Perkins has an awful contract and will be a financial hindrence for years. OKC would have to give up a 1st rounder just to get some team to accept his contract. PJ3 was the 28th pick in the draft. So basically what the trade boils down to is Varejao for the 28th pick and whatever pick Toronto ends up getting, which will likely be around 8-10. Plus OKC gets out of Perk's contract and gets a veteran sharpshooter who is expiring out of it.

Anyways, this isnt the trade thread so I hate to derail it too much, but I wanted to dispell the notion that the Cavs would be giving up a 1st in any Varejao deal.



This right here sums up everything perfectly. Couldn't have said it better myself
User avatar
fart
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,310
And1: 1,769
Joined: May 21, 2011

Re: Game 7 | Cavs at Thunder | Nov 11th 2012 | 7:00 PM ET 

Post#19 » by fart » Sun Nov 11, 2012 5:48 pm

Is Zeller playing tonight? I want to see him play after his great game against the Clippers.
SargentBargs101 wrote:
CB-Blazer wrote:what the heck is an Ebanks?

The remote delivery of new and traditional banking products and services through electronic delivery channels. There you go bud :D
User avatar
LoveThemCavs
Analyst
Posts: 3,724
And1: 143
Joined: Nov 27, 2004
Location: Ohio

Re: Game 7 | Cavs at Thunder | Nov 11th 2012 | 7:00 PM ET 

Post#20 » by LoveThemCavs » Sun Nov 11, 2012 6:27 pm

fart wrote:Is Zeller playing tonight? I want to see him play after his great game against the Clippers.


According to the Plain Dealer, Zeller will not be playing against OKC.

Return to Cleveland Cavaliers