ImageImage

ATL: Week 10

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,797
And1: 27,366
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: ATL: Week 10 

Post#101 » by trwi7 » Mon Nov 12, 2012 4:54 am

DrugBust wrote:Didn't pay attention to the NFL this week, so I have no idea what kind of hype went into this game, but was anyone talking about how the Bears had only beaten one winning team, and it was a rookie in his first game? I only bring this up because what little I saw last week was a comparison between this team and the '85 squad that made me want to do murder.


I brought that up on the general board a couple weeks ago. Bears fans and Icness basically told me I was wrong for thinking the Bears were overrated because of their schedule.

Here it is: viewtopic.php?f=139&t=1208560&start=225
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Flames24Rulz
Head Coach
Posts: 6,406
And1: 343
Joined: Dec 23, 2004
Location: Rockford, IL
       

Re: ATL: Week 10 

Post#102 » by Flames24Rulz » Mon Nov 12, 2012 4:58 am

bcl20 wrote:Bears fans are fun when they lose. I'm a Chicago sports fan in all pro sports but this one so being on this fun of the Chicago sports fan meltdown is really fun.


I know exactly how you feel :)
User avatar
RiotPunch
RealGM
Posts: 27,692
And1: 18,075
Joined: Jul 05, 2009
Location: LA
     

Re: ATL: Week 10 

Post#103 » by RiotPunch » Mon Nov 12, 2012 5:05 am

Mags FTW wrote:The Score is a delight to listen to right now.


It really is. :lol:
#FreeChuckDiesel
Bucksmaniac wrote:I'm sorry, but I'm starting to sour on Giannis
whatthe_buck!?
Banned User
Posts: 5,142
And1: 163
Joined: Jul 20, 2006

Re: ATL: Week 10 

Post#104 » by whatthe_buck!? » Mon Nov 12, 2012 5:05 am

DrugBust wrote:Didn't pay attention to the NFL this week, so I have no idea what kind of hype went into this game, but was anyone talking about how the Bears had only beaten one winning team, and it was a rookie in his first game? I only bring this up because what little I saw last week was a comparison between this team and the '85 squad that made me want to do murder.

Nope, no national media that I know was saying anything of the sort. I put 1000$ on the packers to win the division on Friday and I know I'm jinxing it right now as I say this but after what happened today I'm already counting that as money in the bank lol...
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 107,864
And1: 42,162
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: ATL: Week 10 

Post#105 » by ReasonablySober » Mon Nov 12, 2012 6:13 am

trwi7 wrote:
DrugBust wrote:Didn't pay attention to the NFL this week, so I have no idea what kind of hype went into this game, but was anyone talking about how the Bears had only beaten one winning team, and it was a rookie in his first game? I only bring this up because what little I saw last week was a comparison between this team and the '85 squad that made me want to do murder.


I brought that up on the general board a couple weeks ago. Bears fans and Icness basically told me I was wrong for thinking the Bears were overrated because of their schedule.

Here it is: viewtopic.php?f=139&t=1208560&start=225


Amazing thread.
User avatar
CousinOfDeath
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,066
And1: 1,260
Joined: Jul 02, 2006

Re: ATL: Week 10 

Post#106 » by CousinOfDeath » Mon Nov 12, 2012 6:24 am

What a beautiful week. Bears lose, Giants lose, Falcons lose, and Niners tie.
suckfish wrote:Reminder: NBA players are stupid.
User avatar
Bernman
RealGM
Posts: 27,902
And1: 8,404
Joined: Aug 05, 2004
     

Re: ATL: Week 10 

Post#107 » by Bernman » Mon Nov 12, 2012 5:55 pm

CousinOfDeath wrote:What a beautiful week. Bears lose, Giants lose, Falcons lose, and Niners tie.


Yeah, a lot of good homefield did for our pass happy offense last playoffs.

Bears lose - good, because they have a tough schedule the rest of the way, and reasonably could fall back far enough giving us another way to make the playoffs beyond the wild card. Also, whether we play in Green Bay or Chicago in January, it's going to be frigid.

Giants lose - good, because they could fall completely out of the playoffs at 6-4 and w/ a tough-ish schedule, which makes it more likely we qualify and as a bonus don't have to play them. Also, if we play in New York or Green Bay in January, either way it's going to be cold.

Niners tie - meh, I'm torn. There's an outside chance they could lose 4 more looking at their schedule and be on the outside looking in, but I doubt it happens. And I think I'd rather play in San Fran than GB in January.

Falcons lose - that's a bad result for us. Most importantly it allows the streaking Saints, who won 13 games last year, to remain in the playoff race with us. In addition, the Packers' chances of winning in ATL in January are much better than winning in GB. We've won the last 2 games at ATL, 2 comfortably, and it would be 3 straight if Brandon Jackson weren't our running back. Rodgers has played well all 3 games. That's going to be the primary determinant in whether we win or lose a game. We don't want winning or losing to boil down to a running slop fest with an occasional easy, controlled play action pass down field. Atlanta would be better at that.

I look at it as more of a negative week for us result-wise because Seattle, New Orleans, Tampa Bay, Dallas, and Minnesota (although their schedule is awfully tough) won. Those are the biggest threats to us getting into the playoffs or not.

I know some people would like to go to a playoff game in person, or want to finish as high in the regular standings as possible for machismo reasons, but from a pragmatic standpoint beating out top teams doesn't really matter, or maybe wouldn't even benefit us in the end. We are a high potential, warm weather team, in a cold weather stadium, and when fans finally accept that they'll know more what to root for ATL.
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 35,599
And1: 4,452
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

Re: ATL: Week 10 

Post#108 » by Kerb Hohl » Mon Nov 12, 2012 6:37 pm

Bernman wrote:
CousinOfDeath wrote:What a beautiful week. Bears lose, Giants lose, Falcons lose, and Niners tie.


Yeah, a lot of good homefield did for our pass happy offense last playoffs.


Holy small sample, Batman.

I have always kind of joked/considered that we may actually prefer to play some of our playoff games on the road, but I don't know why you are so certain that we should want the Packers to play away playoff games. Eli threw for 330 in the cold in that game. Brady has won plenty of cold playoff games.

In this one particular loss to the Giants, fumbles were issue #1, drops a close second. You could say the weather caused that, but I think it was just a bad game.

If I had to play an away game, I'd love it to be in Atlanta. I think there is a bit of a home playoff trend for the Packers lately that doesn't look great, but I still would rather play at home. I surely wouldn't go off on a long post telling somebody that they are misguided for hoping for home field advantage.

I do agree though that I'd breathe a bit easier if Nawlins, the Bucs, Seattle, and the Queens would drift off.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,797
And1: 27,366
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: ATL: Week 10 

Post#109 » by trwi7 » Mon Nov 12, 2012 10:06 pm

stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 107,864
And1: 42,162
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: ATL: Week 10 

Post#110 » by ReasonablySober » Mon Nov 12, 2012 10:14 pm

Yea, just finished that. Nothing new in there and if you're a Deadspin reader you already know ESPN is the worst. I can't see ESPN going back to the non=trolling days, but man would it be nice if they ****-canned Jamele Hill, Stephen A and Bayless.
User avatar
BUCKnation
RealGM
Posts: 19,617
And1: 4,255
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
       

Re: ATL: Week 10 

Post#111 » by BUCKnation » Tue Nov 13, 2012 12:08 am

Nowadays, I pretty much watch ESPN for the live sports, sometimes sportscenter, and the occaciossional mid day talk show like ATH or PTI.
User avatar
MikeIsGood
RealGM
Posts: 35,774
And1: 11,658
Joined: Jul 10, 2003
Location: Vamos Rafa
     

Re: ATL: Week 10 

Post#112 » by MikeIsGood » Tue Nov 13, 2012 1:07 am

Image
User avatar
PkrsBcksGphsMqt
RealGM
Posts: 18,827
And1: 1,417
Joined: Oct 27, 2005
Location: Madison
   

Re: ATL: Week 10 

Post#113 » by PkrsBcksGphsMqt » Tue Nov 13, 2012 2:09 am

Love it.
BucksRuleAll22 wrote:Calvin Johnson is horrible and not a top WR.
User avatar
Run-MKE 311
Senior
Posts: 553
And1: 9
Joined: Oct 22, 2012
Location: Left coast and the midwest

Re: ATL: Week 10 

Post#114 » by Run-MKE 311 » Mon Nov 19, 2012 10:29 pm

So Belichick knocks Gronk out for the year while having him in late in the game on a freakin' extra point protection!? Interesting.

Pittsburgh is done unless Big Ben makes it back, that was a sorry game last night. Tonight could be even worse, should be a brutal affair between the Bears and Niners. The Bears will continue their self-destruction, the division is ours once we get the tie-breaker after tonight.
Ball so hard.

Return to Green Bay Packers