Pure Speculation where do you think we would be if 100%
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
Pure Speculation where do you think we would be if 100%
-
- Forum Mod - Timberwolves
- Posts: 50,236
- And1: 17,158
- Joined: Mar 29, 2006
-
Pure Speculation where do you think we would be if 100%
Right now what do you think our record would be if we had everybody from day one. Also, seeing how we are playing now, where would you put us at the end of the season with a full roster from the start.
When luck shuts the door skill comes in through the window.
Re: Pure Speculation where do you think we would be if 100%
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,656
- And1: 469
- Joined: Jun 26, 2009
Re: Pure Speculation where do you think we would be if 100%
Honestly I think we would be 7-0,the only game we look bad in and were beaten pretty good was the Raptors one.Which I think wouldn't have happend with Love and Rubio in the line up.
I also feel if everyone was mostly heathly this season we would have been a top five team in the West,could still be but will be a lot harder without Love,Rubio for the next month or so and now Buddy for three months.
I also feel if everyone was mostly heathly this season we would have been a top five team in the West,could still be but will be a lot harder without Love,Rubio for the next month or so and now Buddy for three months.
Re: Pure Speculation where do you think we would be if 100%
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,834
- And1: 1,126
- Joined: Apr 10, 2008
- Location: sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
-
Re: Pure Speculation where do you think we would be if 100%
5-2 current record
What if...
7-0 minnesota healthy ... opponents still not healthy
sacramento, toronto, and orlando are arguably lottery teams, so those are probably wins. losing wallace, granger, rose, and dirk/marion is just too much for the remaining teams.
5.5-1.5 minnesota healthy ... opponents healthy
i'm a cheater
What if...
7-0 minnesota healthy ... opponents still not healthy
sacramento, toronto, and orlando are arguably lottery teams, so those are probably wins. losing wallace, granger, rose, and dirk/marion is just too much for the remaining teams.
5.5-1.5 minnesota healthy ... opponents healthy
i'm a cheater

sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
Re: Pure Speculation where do you think we would be if 100%
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 30,827
- And1: 8,857
- Joined: Nov 02, 2007
Re: Pure Speculation where do you think we would be if 100%
- [RCG]
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,047
- And1: 135
- Joined: May 24, 2010
- Location: Saint Paul
Re: Pure Speculation where do you think we would be if 100%
Dang. A healthy Wolves team...
Rubio/Barea/Ridnour
Roy/Shved/Lee
Kirilenko/Budinger
Love/Williams/Cunningham
Pekovic/Stiemsma
That's an awfully good and deep team. Let's hope we can end the season and begin the playoffs with everyone healthy
Rubio/Barea/Ridnour
Roy/Shved/Lee
Kirilenko/Budinger
Love/Williams/Cunningham
Pekovic/Stiemsma
That's an awfully good and deep team. Let's hope we can end the season and begin the playoffs with everyone healthy

Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt
Re: Pure Speculation where do you think we would be if 100%
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 68,819
- And1: 22,403
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: Pure Speculation where do you think we would be if 100%
C.lupus wrote:6-1
Yup. I think we still would've lost in Toronto like we always do.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: Pure Speculation where do you think we would be if 100%
- southern wolf
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,854
- And1: 2,163
- Joined: Aug 02, 2008
- Location: Australia
-
Re: Pure Speculation where do you think we would be if 100%
Klomp wrote:C.lupus wrote:6-1
Yup. I think we still would've lost in Toronto like we always do.
We beat the Magic and Mavs who we've always lost to in the past. I'd say 6-1 with a loss to the Bulls.
Re: Pure Speculation where do you think we would be if 100%
- nc21tarheels
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,291
- And1: 0
- Joined: Nov 23, 2005
- Location: Asheville, NC
Re: Pure Speculation where do you think we would be if 100%
would be 82-0 already, barely missing the playoffs.
Here's My Tribute to KG...
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 9879863077
Gone.....but NEVER forgotten!
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 9879863077
Gone.....but NEVER forgotten!
Re: Pure Speculation where do you think we would be if 100%
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 68,819
- And1: 22,403
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: Pure Speculation where do you think we would be if 100%
southern wolf wrote:Klomp wrote:C.lupus wrote:6-1
Yup. I think we still would've lost in Toronto like we always do.
We beat the Magic and Mavs who we've always lost to in the past. I'd say 6-1 with a loss to the Bulls.
Magic are missing a big black guy in the middle. Mavs we started to beat last year.
We were close against the Bulls, but blown out by the Raptors. That's why I think we'd lose in Toronto.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: Pure Speculation where do you think we would be if 100%
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,741
- And1: 1,177
- Joined: Jan 02, 2008
- Location: St. Paul
Re: Pure Speculation where do you think we would be if 100%
5-2
Lattimer wrote:Cracks me up that people still think that Wiggins will be involved in the trade for Love. Wolves are out of their mind if they think they are getting Wiggins for Love.
Re: Pure Speculation where do you think we would be if 100%
-
- Ballboy
- Posts: 16
- And1: 0
- Joined: Nov 06, 2012
Re: Pure Speculation where do you think we would be if 100%
Yeah, 6-1. That Toronto game was brutal, mostly because everyone had a case of the turnover bug and Lowry was doing his thing. For how good Rubio was for half a year, he wasn't exactly protective of the rock. Really, the whole team, even when healthy, seem to have games where they're just really careless. I only saw part of the Chicago game but it seems like an easy victory if the roster is healthy. Their D is solid but with a healthy team the Wolves' offense is even better.
If they were healthy the whole season I honestly think the Wolves go 56-26 and challenge for the 4-5 seed. This team is playing at a high level without four of their five best players. As it is now, assuming everyone's timetable is accurate, 48-34 and challenging for the 8th seed.
If they were healthy the whole season I honestly think the Wolves go 56-26 and challenge for the 4-5 seed. This team is playing at a high level without four of their five best players. As it is now, assuming everyone's timetable is accurate, 48-34 and challenging for the 8th seed.
Gob: The real problem is that she keeps saying that God is going to show me a sign. The... something of my ways. Wisdom?
Michael: It's probably wisdom.
Michael: It's probably wisdom.
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves