Why was it a big deal with the Heat and not with others?

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

User avatar
Joao Saraiva
RealGM
Posts: 13,457
And1: 6,223
Joined: Feb 09, 2011
   

Why was it a big deal with the Heat and not with others? 

Post#1 » by Joao Saraiva » Mon Nov 19, 2012 2:27 pm

I've read even this year many fans saying it's bad for the league that James, Wade and Bosh teamed up. I'm not going to rewrite what everyone has been saying since they got toghether but, why don't those same fans complain about:

- Lakers: so it's wrong for LBJ to join Wade cause they're both MVP candidate caliber players but it's right for Howard to join Kobe? If Bosh is the big difference, then how about a All-Star PF Pau Gasol and a great playmaker like Nash that won 2 MVP awards in the past?

- Boston: so KG joined Pierce and Allen and it was never a big deal. Why not? Cause they were older? They lasted 4 years... And could even still do it this year. Why didn't anyone complain?

- NYK join DPOY with all-star PF and Melo (for some a MVP candidate, I'd say he's a lock for top 10 players in the league). But no one seems to care. Why? Because they played below expectations?

So what? Was it just an excuse because people hate LeBron? Just another excuse to hate him? Specially with LAL, why don't the same fans complain about it? I mean, it's a super team and Howard acted the wrong way like no one else and yet he doesn't get any hate for it.

I really don't get the hate on the Heat and LeBron. And don't get me wrong, I love that LAL put that team toghether and I'm really interested to see how they perform and if they can go all the way.
“These guys have been criticized the last few years for not getting to where we’re going, but I’ve always said that the most important thing in sports is to keep trying. Let this be an example of what it means to say it’s never over.” - Jerry Sloan
Andre3822
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,304
And1: 509
Joined: Dec 14, 2010
 

Re: Why was it a big deal with the Heat and not with others? 

Post#2 » by Andre3822 » Mon Nov 19, 2012 2:31 pm

LeBron promised Cleveland a title.
LeBron didn't give Cleveland a heads-up - the team that had been his home for years.
LeBron had " The Decision " , which was a ridiculous media circus.

+ the way he has been in the media, he made himself an easy target. Imo there's much less hate now, he didn't talk **** last year and let his game do the talking, winning the title.

+ The 1# player in the NBA will always have criticizers and hate - it's how it is.
User avatar
TheKingOfVa360
General Manager
Posts: 8,326
And1: 1,663
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Location: Orange County, California
         

Re: Why was it a big deal with the Heat and not with others? 

Post#3 » by TheKingOfVa360 » Mon Nov 19, 2012 2:33 pm

He took a shortcut to a championship
Because he couldn't get over the hump
User avatar
Joao Saraiva
RealGM
Posts: 13,457
And1: 6,223
Joined: Feb 09, 2011
   

Re: Why was it a big deal with the Heat and not with others? 

Post#4 » by Joao Saraiva » Mon Nov 19, 2012 2:35 pm

Andre3822 wrote:LeBron promised Cleveland a title.
LeBron didn't give Cleveland a heads-up - the team that had been his home for years.
LeBron had " The Decision " , which was a ridiculous media circus.

+ the way he has been in the media, he made himself an easy target. Imo there's much less hate now, he didn't talk **** last year and let his game do the talking, winning the title.

+ The 1# player in the NBA will always have criticizers and hate - it's how it is.


I get LBJ didn't act 100% correct. But did Howard? I'm not even saying I didn't expect any hate towards LBJ. But I see no hate from anyone toward Howard.
“These guys have been criticized the last few years for not getting to where we’re going, but I’ve always said that the most important thing in sports is to keep trying. Let this be an example of what it means to say it’s never over.” - Jerry Sloan
User avatar
GameOver25
RealGM
Posts: 20,006
And1: 6,272
Joined: Aug 27, 2009
Location: Show ya hands!
     

Re: Why was it a big deal with the Heat and not with others? 

Post#5 » by GameOver25 » Mon Nov 19, 2012 2:37 pm

Joao Saraiva wrote:
Andre3822 wrote:LeBron promised Cleveland a title.
LeBron didn't give Cleveland a heads-up - the team that had been his home for years.
LeBron had " The Decision " , which was a ridiculous media circus.

+ the way he has been in the media, he made himself an easy target. Imo there's much less hate now, he didn't talk **** last year and let his game do the talking, winning the title.

+ The 1# player in the NBA will always have criticizers and hate - it's how it is.


I get LBJ didn't act 100% correct. But did Howard? I'm not even saying I didn't expect any hate towards LBJ. But I see no hate from anyone toward Howard.


Where have you been?
gottamakeit
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,805
And1: 1,694
Joined: Jan 08, 2012

Re: Why was it a big deal with the Heat and not with others? 

Post#6 » by gottamakeit » Mon Nov 19, 2012 2:38 pm

people hate howard
/thread
Psychotic. It didn’t make sense. I don’t know how you make it make sense
PetroNet
Banned User
Posts: 6,461
And1: 136
Joined: Feb 27, 2012

Re: Why was it a big deal with the Heat and not with others? 

Post#7 » by PetroNet » Mon Nov 19, 2012 2:42 pm

The situations you mentioned are all completely different then the miami heat situation.

Lakers - howard didn't sign there as a free agent. He was traded there, and he wanted to go to brooklyn. Gasol was also traded there, years ago, and the two didn't decide together to team up.

Celtics - again, ray allen didn't sign there, they traded jeff green for him. Kg didn't sign there, they trade al jefferson for him and kg didn't even want to be a celtic at first.

Knicks - lol, how is this even relevant? Chandler is far from a star player and knicks didn't make it out of the first round.
Dr Pepper
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,949
And1: 340
Joined: Jun 10, 2010

Re: Why was it a big deal with the Heat and not with others? 

Post#8 » by Dr Pepper » Mon Nov 19, 2012 2:47 pm

Because ESPN's NBA coverage revolves around LeBron James and 'The Decision' was something even Forrest Gump wouldn't do
Kobe vs MJ "Clone Wars" NBA.com video:

Frosty wrote:Funny this is called Clone Wars because Kobe is like the second installment of the Star Wars series. It looked like Star Wars but came up short. But it did appeal to the kiddies.
SuperflyKnick
Head Coach
Posts: 6,442
And1: 1,167
Joined: Feb 24, 2003

Re: Why was it a big deal with the Heat and not with others? 

Post#9 » by SuperflyKnick » Mon Nov 19, 2012 2:48 pm

Knicks - lol, how is this even relevant? Chandler is far from a star player and knicks didn't make it out of the first round.


Hahahahahahaha like The Nets have been anywhere but the basement. I take Tyson over Brook overrated Lopez any day of the week.
Mr Grant Hill
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,907
And1: 102
Joined: Jun 25, 2011
 

Re: Why was it a big deal with the Heat and not with others? 

Post#10 » by Mr Grant Hill » Mon Nov 19, 2012 2:50 pm

All those superstar teams are bad for the league.
I can accept that those players have no pride, they're just human. But it's hard to accept a league that throws 4/5 of its teams under the bus.
Wake up, girl. I wanna go surfing.
DanTown8587
RealGM
Posts: 37,583
And1: 9,333
Joined: Jan 06, 2008
Location: Chicago
     

Re: Why was it a big deal with the Heat and not with others? 

Post#11 » by DanTown8587 » Mon Nov 19, 2012 2:51 pm

First off, the Heat signed their team via unrestricted Free Agency while the Lakers, Celtics and Knicks all were build via trades.

Secondly, James was the best player in the league and after two spectacular flame outs in Cleveland, he left for Miami. In literally the worst way imaginable. I mean at no point before the Decision did anyone seriously believe James would throw black paint on his legacy and go to Miami.

Third, everyone and their mother is hating on Dwight Howard. People are just so done with saying "I hate Dwight Howard" because of how long the process was.

Fourth, the other teams you mentioned were not acquiring the best player in the peak of his NBA career. KG was already on the downslide (though gave Boston 1.5 more KG like years) in Boston, Gasol is clearly a #2 option on a title contender, the Knicks don't even bare mentioning until they're a playoff team and not a regular season team.
...
DanTown8587
RealGM
Posts: 37,583
And1: 9,333
Joined: Jan 06, 2008
Location: Chicago
     

Re: Why was it a big deal with the Heat and not with others? 

Post#12 » by DanTown8587 » Mon Nov 19, 2012 2:53 pm

Mr Grant Hill wrote:All those superstar teams are bad for the league.
I can accept that those players have no pride, they're just human. But it's hard to accept a league that throws 4/5 of its teams under the bus.


Yeah, the league only grew from second tier sports league to actual sports league in the 80s because of two superstar teams and every year since 2008, the league has experienced ratings growth for the Finals. And the league is about to become a $5 billion dollar league. Primarily because of super teams.
...
User avatar
Yungstar
Senior
Posts: 510
And1: 157
Joined: Aug 23, 2003
Location: T.O. (North York)
         

Re: Why was it a big deal with the Heat and not with others? 

Post#13 » by Yungstar » Mon Nov 19, 2012 2:56 pm

PetroNet wrote:The situations you mentioned are all completely different then the miami heat situation.

Lakers - howard didn't sign there as a free agent. He was traded there, and he wanted to go to brooklyn. Gasol was also traded there, years ago, and the two didn't decide together to team up.

Celtics - again, ray allen didn't sign there, they traded jeff green for him. Kg didn't sign there, they trade al jefferson for him and kg didn't even want to be a celtic at first.

Knicks - lol, how is this even relevant? Chandler is far from a star player and knicks didn't make it out of the first round.


QFT.
User avatar
Perdido/BR
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,597
And1: 36
Joined: May 17, 2007

Re: Why was it a big deal with the Heat and not with others? 

Post#14 » by Perdido/BR » Mon Nov 19, 2012 2:58 pm

DanTown8587 wrote:First off, the Heat signed their team via unrestricted Free Agency while the Lakers, Celtics and Knicks all were build via trades.

Secondly, James was the best player in the league and after two spectacular flame outs in Cleveland, he left for Miami. In literally the worst way imaginable. I mean at no point before the Decision did anyone seriously believe James would throw black paint on his legacy and go to Miami.

Third, everyone and their mother is hating on Dwight Howard. People are just so done with saying "I hate Dwight Howard" because of how long the process was.

Fourth, the other teams you mentioned were not acquiring the best player in the peak of his NBA career. KG was already on the downslide (though gave Boston 1.5 more KG like years) in Boston, Gasol is clearly a #2 option on a title contender, the Knicks don't even bear mentioning until they're a playoff team and not a regular season team.


/thread.

Best post of the thread. And, just to be clear, people hate the other super teams too. It´s just that people "hate" Lebron more. The Celtics did do it first, but people felt KG had already paid its dues to Minny. Not so with Lebron and Cleveland.
misterrunon
Senior
Posts: 605
And1: 63
Joined: Mar 10, 2011

Re: Why was it a big deal with the Heat and not with others? 

Post#15 » by misterrunon » Mon Nov 19, 2012 2:59 pm

for me, it was about wade and lebron joining forces - they were pretty much peers who played similar roles on their teams. that's why it was kind of like saying how it'd be strange if bird and magic teamed up.

kobe and dwight.. is just different, since they're completely different players.
Ratchet_Rio
Banned User
Posts: 1,657
And1: 417
Joined: May 10, 2012
   

Re: Why was it a big deal with the Heat and not with others? 

Post#16 » by Ratchet_Rio » Mon Nov 19, 2012 3:24 pm

Looking back, the comments people made after LeBron joined the Heat are hilarious.

"He's never going to be in the MVP discussion again"

"Now he can never be Michael Jordan!!"

"When you're the MVP they come to you!!!!"


And all he's done since joined the Heat is won a title, won an MVP, been in contention for another, and enhanced his basketball legacy.
User avatar
Side beard
Analyst
Posts: 3,600
And1: 2,301
Joined: Jan 16, 2010
 

Re: Why was it a big deal with the Heat and not with others? 

Post#17 » by Side beard » Mon Nov 19, 2012 3:32 pm

Lebron joined someone, not someone joined Lebron.
nykballa2k4
RealGM
Posts: 31,081
And1: 7,451
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: Kurt Rhombus is managing the defense...
       

Re: Why was it a big deal with the Heat and not with others? 

Post#18 » by nykballa2k4 » Mon Nov 19, 2012 3:43 pm

Joao Saraiva wrote:I've read even this year many fans saying it's bad for the league that James, Wade and Bosh teamed up. I'm not going to rewrite what everyone has been saying since they got toghether but, why don't those same fans complain about:

- Lakers: so it's wrong for LBJ to join Wade cause they're both MVP candidate caliber players but it's right for Howard to join Kobe? If Bosh is the big difference, then how about a All-Star PF Pau Gasol and a great playmaker like Nash that won 2 MVP awards in the past?

- Boston: so KG joined Pierce and Allen and it was never a big deal. Why not? Cause they were older? They lasted 4 years... And could even still do it this year. Why didn't anyone complain?

- NYK join DPOY with all-star PF and Melo (for some a MVP candidate, I'd say he's a lock for top 10 players in the league). But no one seems to care. Why? Because they played below expectations?

So what? Was it just an excuse because people hate LeBron? Just another excuse to hate him? Specially with LAL, why don't the same fans complain about it? I mean, it's a super team and Howard acted the wrong way like no one else and yet he doesn't get any hate for it.

I really don't get the hate on the Heat and LeBron. And don't get me wrong, I love that LAL put that team toghether and I'm really interested to see how they perform and if they can go all the way.


There are surely plenty of good answers in this thread, I might be re-stating them but...

Lakers are KOBE's team. Adding Howard, Nash, Gasol is not at all the same. Those guys all admitted defeat on winning a ring for THEIR team.

LeBron was supposed to be "the king" "best ever" and for him to leave a 60 win team to play with the #2 sg in the league and a top 5 overall player in Wade solidified that he wasn't who we were told he was.

Also, fans are used to the Jordan/Pippen, Shaq/Kobe, Duncan/Manu(then later Parker) model. The KG/Allen/Pierce combo was the original "expendables" scenario where all guys had their individual accolades completed and wanted to go for that ring in the twilight of their careers. Because what they did seemed like such an unfair advantage, it became the rule. You now needed a "big three". Notice Andrew Bynum was just a center until the notion of "big three" came about and Bynum was propelled into that 3rd star spotlight by media and Kobe's will/encouragement.

It is a big deal in Miami though ultimately for this reason: The Heat crippled two organizations to help their own. Cavaliers were in cap-hell due to surrounding LBJ with guys to help him get those 60+ wins/season. Likewise Raptors were also left without compensation for the young cornerstone of their franchise.

No one cared about Seattle/Minni for these reasons:
Seattle: Sonics were going to let Lewis walk anyway, it was time to rebuild and the compensation was actually quite generous. top 5 pick, 2 young talents for an old Ray Allen is a good deal!
Minni: KG from "da kid" to "the big ticket" was actually a beloved player to the league. His give-it-all attitude was greatly appreciated and after so many years of futility, no one faulted him for wanting one real run at a championship. Again, Wolves were well compensated with Gerald Green, Al Jefferson, draft picks and I believe a 3rd player who was supposed to evolve into something (some tweener forward whose name escapes me).
Numbers don't lie, people who use them do
Stand up to all hate
Stand up to Jewish hate
User avatar
inquisitive
RealGM
Posts: 17,095
And1: 2,867
Joined: Aug 27, 2010

Re: Why was it a big deal with the Heat and not with others? 

Post#19 » by inquisitive » Mon Nov 19, 2012 3:51 pm

i think the Heat is Lebron's team now...not Wade.
KARD "You n Me " Mnet Countdown
www.youtube.com/watch?v=77b3zg3OhgI
User avatar
Martin
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,872
And1: 48
Joined: Jan 28, 2004
         

Re: Why was it a big deal with the Heat and not with others? 

Post#20 » by Martin » Mon Nov 19, 2012 4:12 pm

It wasn't liked cause LeBron screwed Cleveland.
Also, in 2006 Heat got Walker,Posey and Williams for nothing in a trade. People thought that it was Pistons or Heat in the Finals but on the minds of people after the trade it was pretty clear the Heat would play in the Finals unless a injury hit Wade or O'Neal. After a trade like that the usual "Stern wants them to win" talks started, Mavericks lost in a controversial way to them in the Finals. The Heat weren't liked after 2006 by many.
Then they went downhill from there for years and by adding 2 All-stars in LeBron and Bosh they were relevant again out of thin air. So again a fairly new franchise compared to most of the teams lucked out again in a short period of time, it's easy to hate them.

People are used to seeing the Lakers in the playoffs and winning in trades.
Boston was a really poor historical team. Boston-LA rivalry is the biggest in the NBA history so people wanted to see it again. (cause it hadn't been really a rivalry for like 15 years)
Knicks haven't really done anything since adding Melo beside starting great this season and they gave up some good players and depth for Melo.

Return to The General Board