FFL - 2012-13 - Voting on Rule Change - draft order posted

Post #1441 » by **sly** » Fri Nov 23, 2012 2:38 am

I wouldn't say they were huge risks as at the time of the draft but by TC's that risk was pretty clear. it's hard to compete in this league when one of your top guys go down, let alone my first 3 picks. JKidd has been playing like a top pick but nobody else on my squad is playing well above their draft position.

writersblock · Post #1442 » by **writersblock** » Mon Nov 26, 2012 2:17 pm

For making a few lame trades, I'm pleasantly surprised that I'm in 4th.

Post #1443 » by **floppymoose** » Mon Nov 26, 2012 8:01 pm

You are at a highwater mark after playing my team with no Irving.

writersblock · Post #1444 » by **writersblock** » Mon Nov 26, 2012 10:03 pm

floppymoose wrote:You are at a highwater mark after playing my team with no Irving.

I had no Aldridge for a game. That counts for something.

Post #1445 » by **jazzfan1971** » Thu Nov 29, 2012 8:16 pm

Whoever is SA Sugarkids, I've had an offer on your table for about 5 days now. I'd appreciate an accept, reject, or counter offer.

I'll be canceling the offer soon enough, but, would prefer some feedback instead.

bww78 · Post #1446 » by **bww78** » Thu Nov 29, 2012 8:36 pm

That's Sabonis.

tkunit · Post #1447 » by **tkunit** » Fri Nov 30, 2012 12:31 am

jazzfan1971 wrote:Whoever is SA Sugarkids, I've had an offer on your table for about 5 days now. I'd appreciate an accept, reject, or counter offer.

I'll be canceling the offer soon enough, but, would prefer some feedback instead.

My trade with bww was on the table for a week before he bothered to do anything

sabonis · Post #1448 » by **sabonis** » Fri Nov 30, 2012 2:23 am

jazzfan1971 wrote:Whoever is SA Sugarkids, I've had an offer on your table for about 5 days now. I'd appreciate an accept, reject, or counter offer.

I'll be canceling the offer soon enough, but, would prefer some feedback instead.

oh I'm sorry, I looked it up on my phone and then totally forgot to respond.

I know I posted I needed a SG on Yahoo but I noticed that I actually need a SG/SF, instead of a SG-only player

theman · Post #1449 » by **theman** » Fri Nov 30, 2012 2:21 pm

Offer sent.

bww78 · Post #1450 » by **bww78** » Fri Nov 30, 2012 5:50 pm

tkunit wrote:
jazzfan1971 wrote:Whoever is SA Sugarkids, I've had an offer on your table for about 5 days now. I'd appreciate an accept, reject, or counter offer.

I'll be canceling the offer soon enough, but, would prefer some feedback instead.

My trade with bww was on the table for a week before he bothered to do anything

Did you expect like 24 hour turnaround or something?

tkunit · Post #1451 » by **tkunit** » Sun Dec 2, 2012 5:43 pm

bww78 wrote:
tkunit wrote:
jazzfan1971 wrote:Whoever is SA Sugarkids, I've had an offer on your table for about 5 days now. I'd appreciate an accept, reject, or counter offer.

I'll be canceling the offer soon enough, but, would prefer some feedback instead.

My trade with bww was on the table for a week before he bothered to do anything

Did you expect like 24 hour turnaround or something?

Now that you mention it...

So if anyone is open to dealing I am looking for a SF to balance out my roster.

writersblock · Post #1452 » by **writersblock** » Mon Dec 3, 2012 9:15 am

I'd like to take this moment to revel in my first place standing. Partly because I know it will be brief, but also because I need to take advantage of the moment to tell all the naysayers about my apparently disadvantageous trades during the draft and early season. So, I will now enjoy being atop the standings, even if it only lasts a week. 8-)

sabonis · Post #1453 » by **sabonis** » Mon Dec 3, 2012 10:09 pm

do you guys think a dwight for marc gasol deal is vetoable in a H2H league?

Post #1454 » by **floppymoose** » Tue Dec 4, 2012 6:56 pm

^ I don't think so. Marc is #11 so far in 9cat. Dwight is #162 but is #3 if you tank ft%. Seems like it's all about team fit.

Post #1455 » by **jazzfan1971** » Tue Dec 4, 2012 7:05 pm

I'd only veto for collusion, clerical error, or gross incompetence. (like someone who should be kicked out of the league immediately)

So, no, not even close for me.

sabonis · Post #1456 » by **sabonis** » Tue Dec 4, 2012 7:10 pm

one is round 1 value for sure, the other is playing his butt of and barely has round 1 value. that's why it's tempting to veto, but I guess I won't do it.

bww78 · Post #1457 » by **bww78** » Fri Dec 7, 2012 6:45 pm

sly wrote:I wouldn't say they were huge risks as at the time of the draft but by TC's that risk was pretty clear. it's hard to compete in this league when one of your top guys go down, let alone my first 3 picks. JKidd has been playing like a top pick but nobody else on my squad is playing well above their draft position.

You wouldn't say it was a huge risk to draft Eric Gordon? Even though he missed all of last year?

Post #1458 » by **floppymoose** » Sun Dec 9, 2012 9:25 pm

floppymoose wrote:
floppymoose wrote:I think I have to take that bet simply because it's so creative. Well done.
Last year was Camby #116, Randolph #275. Clearly AR has his work cut out for him.

The early results... we were both right to doubt the other guy's player.

So far this bet is totally spastic. AR is ranked #370 and Camby is #390, but really if either of them has even one decent game they will be in front.

Post #1459 » by **jazzfan1971** » Sun Dec 9, 2012 11:04 pm

Wow, I didn't realize Camby was taht close.

bww78 · Post #1460 » by **bww78** » Mon Dec 10, 2012 7:08 pm

Had a good week this week. If I had gone head to head with every other team, I would have beaten everyone but Fran, whom I would have tied.