ImageImageImage

True or False: Celtics would of been better off if......

Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts

Kefa461
RealGM
Posts: 12,530
And1: 430
Joined: Jul 03, 2003
Location: Member of Celtic Nation since '64
       

Re: True or False: Celtics would of been better off if...... 

Post#21 » by Kefa461 » Thu Nov 29, 2012 6:17 pm

Thinking Bradley coming back is gonna solve the problem of everybody understanding the defense being on the same page seems a bit short sighted to me. Maybe we have a lack of bbiq with these new guys.



8-)
WE ARE CELTIC NATION
17 TITLES, ON TO #18.
tfmiii
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,572
And1: 2,691
Joined: Dec 08, 2004
Location: home, home on the Front Range

Re: True or False: Celtics would of been better off if...... 

Post#22 » by tfmiii » Thu Nov 29, 2012 6:41 pm

agree we would have been better off at this point with option B

would we be better off down the road tho?

at this point it look like yes, but we will see

not a fan of green or lee

I think Ainge got caught up in trying to stock the roster for A. G. (After Garnett) hence the 4 year contracts for mediocre talent that right now seem just plain terrible (reminds me of when Red drafted 'the next larry bird' michael smith lol)
User avatar
702Celtics
Rookie
Posts: 1,119
And1: 20
Joined: Jun 29, 2012

Re: True or False: Celtics would of been better off if...... 

Post#23 » by 702Celtics » Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:17 pm

Maybe, those guys that you listed all play with heart (except Blatche, at times). I believe Lee has the motor and the fire to be competitive and play hard; as for Green, that's a different story. He's too passive and doesn't have that competitiveness he should. Hopefully Doc lights a fire under him with his most recent comments.

I guarantee by the All-Star break, if this team isn't where Ainge thinks it should be, he'll make a deal for someone. Just hope it doesn't involve Bradley.
MaxwellSmart
General Manager
Posts: 7,604
And1: 2,374
Joined: Jun 17, 2007

Re: True or False: Celtics would of been better off if...... 

Post#24 » by MaxwellSmart » Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:25 pm

TRUE.....but then again, we' would of been better off if Ainge had Drafted Marc Gasol...or even Deandre Jordan....he had a chance to---you ALWAYS need Bigs...and they went LATE in the draft.

I'm still shaking my head as to why they didn't take a flyer on Blatche though...Tons of talent right there for the taking---maybe KG hates the guy too much.
User avatar
ConnorHenry
Senior
Posts: 632
And1: 265
Joined: Feb 26, 2010

Re: True or False: Celtics would of been better off if...... 

Post#25 » by ConnorHenry » Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:37 pm

Most of us on this board (and heck the entire fan base and even the media) thought this would be a great team.

Give it time. They need to gel. However, I do wish they had pursued Blatche and do agree with the posts above stating that Ainge has blown several opportunities to get a good big when bypassed M. Gasol and Jordan.

If they are still playing like this come Jan. though I'll jump on the bandwagon that says Ainge's moves this summer were overrated.
My name's Henry Connor.
Conner Henry was a Celtic.
Hence the pun.
MaxwellSmart
General Manager
Posts: 7,604
And1: 2,374
Joined: Jun 17, 2007

Re: True or False: Celtics would of been better off if...... 

Post#26 » by MaxwellSmart » Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:37 pm

I think the Jeff Green Contract is ok really...Ainge needed to sign somebody to a huge contract---for future deals...If he had let Green walk--that salary slot would have VANISHED--and Could NOT have been used on another player....At least now, he can use Green's contract in a trade for someone...Kinda like the Wally Z and Theo Ratliff Contracts.
celtxman
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,861
And1: 1,998
Joined: Aug 21, 2004
   

Re: True or False: Celtics would of been better off if...... 

Post#27 » by celtxman » Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:44 pm

ddb wrote:I know we're only 15 games in but that's a big sample size. As of right now it's looking more and more like Danny Ainge failed miserably this offseason. He can redeem himself by acquiring a Gortat, Varejao, Smith or pretty much ANYONE over 6'10 who's skilled. Time will tell

when you sign Marbury and Sheed and leave. Blatche sitting there is unbelievable. This may wind. up being the worst whiff of the Ainge Era . I expect some type of damage control like '' we approach ed. their people but they wanted. to go another direction'' or some other falsehood. 17/13 off the bench squarely in our face. And he hasn't even taken many jumpers. Now we''ll be lucky to pay through the nose for anything similar.
I can live with Lee and Green for now - hard to get past Blatche. He could have been released just like. Milicic if it didn't work. Can you imagine if Blatche ended in Miami? Celts have to wait until at least December 15 for any trades - this will be so much harder than it had to be if it is possible at all
Brad Stevens on fans who want the Celtics to tank: "I don’t think they’ll like me all that much then."
ddb
RealGM
Posts: 11,573
And1: 11,900
Joined: May 10, 2007

Re: True or False: Celtics would of been better off if...... 

Post#28 » by ddb » Thu Nov 29, 2012 8:15 pm

celtxman wrote:
ddb wrote:I know we're only 15 games in but that's a big sample size. As of right now it's looking more and more like Danny Ainge failed miserably this offseason. He can redeem himself by acquiring a Gortat, Varejao, Smith or pretty much ANYONE over 6'10 who's skilled. Time will tell

when you sign Marbury and Sheed and leave. Blatche sitting there is unbelievable. This may wind. up being the worst whiff of the Ainge Era . I expect some type of damage control like '' we approach ed. their people but they wanted. to go another direction'' or some other falsehood. 17/13 off the bench squarely in our face. And he hasn't even taken many jumpers. Now we''ll be lucky to pay through the nose for anything similar.
I can live with Lee and Green for now - hard to get past Blatche. He could have been released just like. Milicic if it didn't work. Can you imagine if Blatche ended in Miami? Celts have to wait until at least December 15 for any trades - this will be so much harder than it had to be if it is possible at all


Right on man. I agree entirely. What was the risk? Only answer I can deal with is if Blatche only wanted to play in Brooklyn. How can you pass on that type of talent?? Imagine KG working with this kid?
Marvel
RealGM
Posts: 26,160
And1: 14,711
Joined: Apr 23, 2010
 

Re: True or False: Celtics would of been better off if...... 

Post#29 » by Marvel » Thu Nov 29, 2012 8:38 pm

Should've re-signed Peaches. I always wanted him back here even after the Green contract as a fail-safe option. Also gives JG time to work his way back into game shape, I mean the expectations on Jeff were huge . Too much responsibility placed on a guy coming off of open heart surgery and missing an entire season don't you think.

Also, I was stunned Danny still remained complacent on one our biggest flaws, rebounding.
User avatar
The_Ghost_of_JB
RealGM
Posts: 22,617
And1: 18,713
Joined: Mar 04, 2010
Location: In a van down by the river.
   

Re: True or False: Celtics would of been better off if...... 

Post#30 » by The_Ghost_of_JB » Thu Nov 29, 2012 9:28 pm

Marvel wrote:Should've re-signed Peaches. I always wanted him back here even after the Green contract as a fail-safe option. Also gives JG time to work his way back into game shape, I mean the expectations on Jeff were huge . Too much responsibility placed on a guy coming off of open heart surgery and missing an entire season don't you think.

Also, I was stunned Danny still remained complacent on one our biggest flaws, rebounding.


I agree. Peaches could be bricking shots at a fraction of the cost the celtics pay Green to.
*Insert witty signature here.*
ddb
RealGM
Posts: 11,573
And1: 11,900
Joined: May 10, 2007

Re: True or False: Celtics would of been better off if...... 

Post#31 » by ddb » Thu Nov 29, 2012 9:48 pm

I just caught wind that Gortat to Boston could be a done deal shortly after December 15th.

I heard Lee, Sullinger, and an unprotected pick through 2014 is the package for Gortat. Ainge refuses to include Bradley the same way he refused to include Rondo in the KG trade. I love this! I was also told that Phoenix has already started phasing Gortat out...I looked at Box Scores following hearing this and it does seem like Gortat is getting less minutes and Jermaine O'Neal and the younger players are getting more and more mins.

This is super exciting!!! OMG. Gortat would be huge for the C's.
User avatar
CeltsfanSinceBirth
RealGM
Posts: 23,818
And1: 34,893
Joined: Jul 29, 2003
     

Re: True or False: Celtics would of been better off if...... 

Post#32 » by CeltsfanSinceBirth » Thu Nov 29, 2012 9:52 pm

ddb wrote:I just caught wind that Gortat to Boston could be a done deal shortly after December 15th.

I heard Lee, Sullinger, and an unprotected pick through 2014 is the package for Gortat. Ainge refuses to include Bradley the same way he refused to include Rondo in the KG trade. I love this! I was also told that Phoenix has already started phasing Gortat out...I looked at Box Scores following hearing this and it does seem like Gortat is getting less minutes and Jermaine O'Neal and the younger players are getting more and more mins.

This is super exciting!!! OMG. Gortat would be huge for the C's.


That would be a great trade for the Celtics.
ddb
RealGM
Posts: 11,573
And1: 11,900
Joined: May 10, 2007

Re: True or False: Celtics would of been better off if...... 

Post#33 » by ddb » Thu Nov 29, 2012 9:55 pm

User avatar
Turgon
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,764
And1: 4,607
Joined: Feb 01, 2006
       

Re: True or False: Celtics would of been better off if...... 

Post#34 » by Turgon » Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:20 pm

Well, Gortat could get his jersey 13 back here, so that's one point for us, I guess.

If we can get Gortat for that package Danny needs to do it ASAP. He can give us some physical presence in the paint and he is a skilled finisher, whose numbers will only improve with Rondo running the show.
User avatar
702Celtics
Rookie
Posts: 1,119
And1: 20
Joined: Jun 29, 2012

Re: True or False: Celtics would of been better off if...... 

Post#35 » by 702Celtics » Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:22 pm

ddb wrote:I just caught wind that Gortat to Boston could be a done deal shortly after December 15th.

I heard Lee, Sullinger, and an unprotected pick through 2014 is the package for Gortat. Ainge refuses to include Bradley the same way he refused to include Rondo in the KG trade. I love this! I was also told that Phoenix has already started phasing Gortat out...I looked at Box Scores following hearing this and it does seem like Gortat is getting less minutes and Jermaine O'Neal and the younger players are getting more and more mins.

This is super exciting!!! OMG. Gortat would be huge for the C's.


Where are you hearing this from? If true, pretty good trade for the Celtics. I think Gortat would play well under Doc's system and with KG/Rondo.
User avatar
klemen4
Head Coach
Posts: 7,327
And1: 1,927
Joined: Feb 27, 2005

Re: True or False: Celtics would of been better off if...... 

Post#36 » by klemen4 » Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:43 pm

If I remember correct ddb you have some inside sources, right?

Well, the trade proposal looks realistic from BOS side, but doubt it is good enough for PHO. Of course I agree no way to include Bradley.

rondo/barbosa
bradley/terry
pierce/green
kg/bass

gortat/wilcox

Thats strong 8 man rotation+ spot minutes depending matchups for Barbosa and Wilcox. Exactly the way I imagine Rivers would play.
“The only important statistic is the final score.” — Bill Russell
ddb
RealGM
Posts: 11,573
And1: 11,900
Joined: May 10, 2007

Re: True or False: Celtics would of been better off if...... 

Post#37 » by ddb » Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:49 pm

I know some folks in bball ops that work directly with this type of stuff (trades, player personel, etc) I always caution my fellow posters on here that it's not always 100% accurate. But what I like to do is at least share concrete info if and when I hear it.
This Gortat stuff has already been mentioned in some Polish website which is why the last time I spoke with my buddy in bball ops I asked him if he heard anything about Gortat to Boston.

He said that there are a few teams interested in Gortat, Boston being 1 of them. He said Gortat would love to play in Boston and respects Doc, Rondo, KG, PP, JET. He wants to win and thinks Boston is the place to do that. This is info the bball ops guys have heard from fellow exec's and players.

I then asked if he heard anything about who could potentially be involved and he said Green is out. He's not getting dealt for various reasons. A. can't be dealt until Jan 15. and B. Ainge doesn't want to deal late in the season. C. contract isn't great. and D. phoenix doesn't want him. Phoenix also isn't interested in Bass. They prefer the upside and rookie contracts and Sully + Melo and they also like Bradley. He then said Lee is the only guy available who could make salaries match. So even though Phoenix doesn't love Lee they think he's tradeable moving forward. So to me it sounded like my contact was piecing things together rather then hearing an actual deal that'll be on paper.

So based on that it looks like if Gortat is indeed getting dealt then Boston is shipping out Lee, Sully, Melo and at least 1 1st round pick.

Boston will lose out on this deal if someone swoops in and agrees to take back Channing Frye as well.
Marvel
RealGM
Posts: 26,160
And1: 14,711
Joined: Apr 23, 2010
 

Re: True or False: Celtics would of been better off if...... 

Post#38 » by Marvel » Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:52 pm

The_Ghost_of_JB wrote:
Marvel wrote:Should've re-signed Peaches. I always wanted him back here even after the Green contract as a fail-safe option. Also gives JG time to work his way back into game shape, I mean the expectations on Jeff were huge . Too much responsibility placed on a guy coming off of open heart surgery and missing an entire season don't you think.

Also, I was stunned Danny still remained complacent on one our biggest flaws, rebounding.


I agree. Peaches could be bricking shots at a fraction of the cost the celtics pay Green to.


Better defender, rebounder, energy, hustle, and yes much cheaper.
ddb
RealGM
Posts: 11,573
And1: 11,900
Joined: May 10, 2007

Re: True or False: Celtics would of been better off if...... 

Post#39 » by ddb » Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:53 pm

The same contact is who told me about KG right after the Oden/Durant draft. He told me about Marbury, Rasheed and a few others as well. BUT..... he also told me Shawn Marion was coming to Boston once and that never happened....so take it for what it's worth. It's strickly NBA Basketball operations Executives. so from a source perspective it's legit... but in terms of it actually happening??? well I think we all know more deals fall through then actually happen
User avatar
ermocrate
General Manager
Posts: 9,622
And1: 1,623
Joined: Apr 19, 2001
Location: Roma
Contact:
   

Re: True or False: Celtics would of been better off if...... 

Post#40 » by ermocrate » Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:55 pm

False
"Negativity in this town sucks"

Return to Boston Celtics