BigAlymphoma wrote:I don't mean to be a downer, but I don't think we should put too much stock in this win.
The Lakers are garbage right now.
Hell, we lost to the Kings and Hornets on the road. So whatya gonna do
Moderators: Inigo Montoya, FJS
BigAlymphoma wrote:I don't mean to be a downer, but I don't think we should put too much stock in this win.
The Lakers are garbage right now.
Spottieottie wrote:BigAlymphoma wrote:I don't mean to be a downer, but I don't think we should put too much stock in this win.
The Lakers are garbage right now.
Hell, we lost to the Kings and Hornets on the road. So whatya gonna do
Matt007b wrote:way way waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay over the cap Laker team losing to the Jazz at home and continue to lose..![]()
Lakers are in trouble.. future in real trouble.
And I'm loving itgreat game to watch. Kanter played great and it was nice to see the team ball instead of the focus on Jefferson.
KqWIN wrote:Why are we talking about Middleton, Harris, and Porter?
The real decision the Jazz FO is making is between Continuity, Cap Flexibility, and Cash Considerations.
SoCalJazzFan wrote:Since I live in LA, I was able to watch the feed with the Lakers commentators. They bemoaned the Lakers defense and had high praise for the Jazz. They mentioned repeatedly that the Lakers had no answer for Kanter.
I thought that Al, Mo, Sap and Marvin were solid, but that Kanter and Carrol were the keys to winning the game. I was surprised to see the +/- for Hayward as I thought he was a weak link (along with Foye) last night.
Hard to say if the Jazz were really good, or the Lakers made them look good, but I like the way the Jazz played.