Hypothetical Situation Thread
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation
Hypothetical Situation Thread
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,813
- And1: 512
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
- Location: Waiting for a superstar to awaken the city of Milwaukee
Hypothetical Situation Thread
I thought it would be fun to have a thread like this to debate the "what if's" in the final weeks of the season here. I will post the first one:
What if?
The Packers win out and end up 12-4...
The 49ers lose to NE and then win out and end up 11-4-1
The Falcons beat the Lions in 2 weeks but lose to the Giants and Buccaneers and end up at 12-4 like the Packers....
Who gets the #1 seed?
What if?
The Packers win out and end up 12-4...
The 49ers lose to NE and then win out and end up 11-4-1
The Falcons beat the Lions in 2 weeks but lose to the Giants and Buccaneers and end up at 12-4 like the Packers....
Who gets the #1 seed?
#DrainTheSwamp
Re: Hypothetical Situation Thread
- ReasonablySober
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 107,864
- And1: 42,162
- Joined: Dec 02, 2001
- Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
- Contact:
Re: Hypothetical Situation Thread
Green Bay would get the #1 seed.
Re: Hypothetical Situation Thread
- Kerb Hohl
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,599
- And1: 4,452
- Joined: Jun 17, 2005
- Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?
Re: Hypothetical Situation Thread
The Packers. San Fran is clearly behind with 11 wins and the Packers have the conference record tiebreaker over ATL.
Re: Hypothetical Situation Thread
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 13,477
- And1: 81
- Joined: Dec 16, 2006
- Location: Super Bowl I, II, XXXI, XLV Champions
Re: Hypothetical Situation Thread
I'd rather get the 2, and have the Giants out of the playoffs.
Re: Hypothetical Situation Thread
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,813
- And1: 512
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
- Location: Waiting for a superstar to awaken the city of Milwaukee
Re: Hypothetical Situation Thread
Yeah thats what I figured - it would be awesome to get the #1 seed and have a first round bye. Don't want to see the Giants as they seem to be the one team that owns us. However, facing them in Lambeau for redemption would be fun!!
#DrainTheSwamp
Re: Hypothetical Situation Thread
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 13,477
- And1: 81
- Joined: Dec 16, 2006
- Location: Super Bowl I, II, XXXI, XLV Champions
Re: Hypothetical Situation Thread
Also, on the topic of Hypothetical Situations.
What if I hypoethically married Aubrey Plaza.

hnnnnnggg
What if I hypoethically married Aubrey Plaza.

hnnnnnggg
Re: Hypothetical Situation Thread
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,813
- And1: 512
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
- Location: Waiting for a superstar to awaken the city of Milwaukee
Re: Hypothetical Situation Thread
Wilford Brimley wrote:Also, on the topic of Hypothetical Situations.
What if I hypoethically married Aubrey Plaza.
hnnnnnggg
I would be very happy for you - yet sad that I missed out...

#DrainTheSwamp
Re: Hypothetical Situation Thread
- WRau1
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,943
- And1: 5,154
- Joined: Apr 30, 2005
- Location: Milwaukee
-
Re: Hypothetical Situation Thread
Wilford Brimley wrote:Also, on the topic of Hypothetical Situations.
What if I hypoethically married Aubrey Plaza.
hnnnnnggg
That chick looks like the 8th seed in the East.
#FreeChuckDiesel
#FreeNowak008
#FreeNewz
#FreeNowak008
#FreeNewz
Re: Hypothetical Situation Thread
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 13,477
- And1: 81
- Joined: Dec 16, 2006
- Location: Super Bowl I, II, XXXI, XLV Champions
Re: Hypothetical Situation Thread
ReddRum wrote:Wilford Brimley wrote:Also, on the topic of Hypothetical Situations.
What if I hypoethically married Aubrey Plaza.
hnnnnnggg
I would be very happy for you - yet sad that I missed out...

Re: Hypothetical Situation Thread
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,796
- And1: 27,366
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: Hypothetical Situation Thread
WRau1 wrote:Wilford Brimley wrote:Also, on the topic of Hypothetical Situations.
What if I hypoethically married Aubrey Plaza.
hnnnnnggg
That chick looks like the 8th seed in the East.

stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Hypothetical Situation Thread
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 13,477
- And1: 81
- Joined: Dec 16, 2006
- Location: Super Bowl I, II, XXXI, XLV Champions
Re: Hypothetical Situation Thread
WRau1 wrote:Wilford Brimley wrote:Also, on the topic of Hypothetical Situations.
What if I hypoethically married Aubrey Plaza.
hnnnnnggg
That chick looks like the 8th seed in the East.
LOL no, she is a strong 8/10, maybe higher.

Re: Hypothetical Situation Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,135
- And1: 2,283
- Joined: Mar 03, 2006
-
Re: Hypothetical Situation Thread
Wilford Brimley wrote:Also, on the topic of Hypothetical Situations.
What if I hypoethically married Aubrey Plaza.
hnnnnnggg
Aren't you a little old?
Re: Hypothetical Situation Thread
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 13,477
- And1: 81
- Joined: Dec 16, 2006
- Location: Super Bowl I, II, XXXI, XLV Champions
Re: Hypothetical Situation Thread
xTitan wrote:Wilford Brimley wrote:Also, on the topic of Hypothetical Situations.
What if I hypoethically married Aubrey Plaza.
hnnnnnggg
Aren't you a little old?
I'm 24. How old did you all think I was?

Re: Hypothetical Situation Thread
- MartyConlonOnTheRun
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,473
- And1: 13,292
- Joined: Jun 27, 2006
- Location: Section 212 - Raising havoc in Squad 6
Re: Hypothetical Situation Thread
She's a type that is 9 a bar, but I wouldn't put her high up on the celebs list, though. I do like her personality and edge that sets her apart.
OT: How's this for a hypothetical situation. Bears miss the playoffs due to the Seahawks sneaking in. After all that fuss on how the scab refs could screw the Packers, when it actually screws the Bears.
OT: How's this for a hypothetical situation. Bears miss the playoffs due to the Seahawks sneaking in. After all that fuss on how the scab refs could screw the Packers, when it actually screws the Bears.
Re: Hypothetical Situation Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,135
- And1: 2,283
- Joined: Mar 03, 2006
-
Re: Hypothetical Situation Thread
Wilford Brimley wrote:xTitan wrote:Wilford Brimley wrote:Also, on the topic of Hypothetical Situations.
What if I hypoethically married Aubrey Plaza.
hnnnnnggg
Aren't you a little old?
I'm 24. How old did you all think I was?
Here I thought you were the real Wilford Brimley
Re: Hypothetical Situation Thread
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 13,477
- And1: 81
- Joined: Dec 16, 2006
- Location: Super Bowl I, II, XXXI, XLV Champions
Re: Hypothetical Situation Thread
MartyConlonOnTheRun wrote:She's a type that is 9 a bar, but I wouldn't put her high up on the celebs list, though. I do like her personality and edge that sets her apart.
OT: How's this for a hypothetical situation. Bears miss the playoffs due to the Seahawks sneaking in. After all that fuss on how the scab refs could screw the Packers, when it actually screws the Bears.
Id love get another shot at Seattle.
Re: Hypothetical Situation Thread
- chuckleslove
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,566
- And1: 1,128
- Joined: Nov 17, 2009
- Location: In an RV down by the river
- Contact:
-
Re: Hypothetical Situation Thread
I would absolutely love if the Bears lost out to the Seahawks for the last playoff spot due to that debacle, especially if we still manage to get a bye. I went to high school in Chicago and have family down there and so many of them were non stop after that game and refused to even admit that the refs messed up(much like they did after they stole a game with the Megatron "non processed" touchdown a couple of years ago). It would be very schadenfreude for me if they missed the playoffs due to that bad call.
I'm dealing with cancer, it sucks, can follow along for updates if that's your thing: Chuck's cancer Go Fund Me page
Re: Hypothetical Situation Thread
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 5,142
- And1: 163
- Joined: Jul 20, 2006
Re: Hypothetical Situation Thread
MartyConlonOnTheRun wrote:How's this for a hypothetical situation. Bears miss the playoffs due to the Seahawks sneaking in. After all that fuss on how the scab refs could screw the Packers, when it actually screws the Bears.
That potential outcome is fun just imagining.
How about this one, I feel like its the mother of all hypotheticals because it could lead to a complete and total realgm packer forum meltdown. It's not even totally implausible that it could happen either:
Lets say that the 49ers lose to the pats but beat the Seahawks the following week, the packers win the next two weeks against the bears and titans, the bears lose their next two against the packers and cards, the vikings win their next two against st louis and then against a houston team possibly pulling back the reigns after having locked up the #1 seed, the giants lose their next two against the falcons and ravens, the redskins win their next two games but the cowboys lose their next two, and the Seahawks beat buffalo next week (but lose to SF like I mentioned before).
This would mean that going into the last week of the season the bears and cowboys would essentially be out of playoff contention and the redskins would have already clinched the division (because they would have a one game lead over the giants and would also own the tiebreaker over the giants even if they lost to the cowboys and the giants won), and therefore the giants only playoff avenue would be as a wildcard. They would also be one game behind the Seahawks and and Minnesota for the last wildcard spot, and considering the Seahawks play the rams IN SEATTLE in their final game I would say that the giants playoff hopes (assuming they beat philly in their last game) would come down to the Vikings losing to the packers (in that scenario the giants will have a better conference record and will therefore win the wildcard tiebreaker over the Vikings). At the same time, the packers would hold a half game lead over the 49ers for the 2 seed and the bye going into the final week, and considering that the niners play the cards for their final game and should win easily, the packers getting or not getting the 2 seed and a bye would be completely dependant on beating the Vikings in Minnesota.
That would mean a packer victory in that game would secure the 2 seed and a bye and also allow the giants into the playoffs, and a packer loss would give the packers the 3 seed, no bye, but would also knock the giants out of the playoffs!!!! In that scenario played out leading up to the packers-Vikings game in week 17 even I wouldn't be 100% what to hope for! I suspect I would still want the bye because if the giants did make it in they would be the 6 seed and therefore even if they did win their first playoff game they would go to Atlanta in the division round, but then again that would mean we could end up facing the niners at lambeau and then, if we won, the giants at lambeau in the NFC championship game if they went on to beat the falcons (somewhat of a nightmare scenario for packer fans).
If it came down to beating the vikings and getting the bye or losing and knocking the giants out of the playoffs which would u guys root for? Winning/getting the bye? Or would u want the packers to rest starters and basically intentionally lose to the Vikings to knock out the giants?
Re: Hypothetical Situation Thread
- PkrsBcksGphsMqt
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,827
- And1: 1,417
- Joined: Oct 27, 2005
- Location: Madison
-
Re: Hypothetical Situation Thread
I'd take the bye
Chuck, how long did it take you to figure out that scenario? Haha
Chuck, how long did it take you to figure out that scenario? Haha
BucksRuleAll22 wrote:Calvin Johnson is horrible and not a top WR.
Re: Hypothetical Situation Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,726
- And1: 8,135
- Joined: Feb 06, 2006
-
Re: Hypothetical Situation Thread
Bye.
Don't fear the Giants. Relish the opportunity for retribution. Mans game.
Don't fear the Giants. Relish the opportunity for retribution. Mans game.
Do it for Chuck