ImageImageImageImageImage

Bradley Beal

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

hands11
Banned User
Posts: 31,171
And1: 2,444
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#741 » by hands11 » Wed Dec 26, 2012 6:55 pm

He is 19 and he started on a team with AJ Price as the starting PG

Rest of the starting line up.

Trevor A
Booker
Okafor

His next PG was Pargo then he got to play with

Trevor A
Singleton
Okafor

Give the kid a little more then 23 games for him to find his way. Sure the outside shooting on wide open shots is a concern. But I think that will get better with him. Hell, Rondo even improved his shot from the outside.

Right now Beal needs to play the complete game of a SG. He needs to drive which he has been doing more. That will get him FTAs. That will raise his TS%. A complete player a SG is a valuable thing to have on a team. If he ends up being more of a Wade type than a Ray Allen type, would anyone really be that upset ?

He is a smart kid. I think he will figure out what to do. In Dec he had several games with nice FTA numbers.
In 8 games leading up to his bad fall, he posted 4 games with 6 FTAs. In the 14 games before that he only post 2 games with more 6 or more FTAs

They throw Beal into the deep end of the pool with no floaty thing. I didn't agree with that approach but it is what they did. Having Crawford and Mack 2.0 at PG with Nene at PF and soon to return Trevor A to go with Webster at SF is going to help the kid.

Hopefully the days off gave him a chance to fully recover from hitting the floor so hard. Last game he said his back was still stiff. But if he is going to be more of a Wade type, he better get used to it. Wade has taken a beating over the years. Next summer he should get to put in a lot of work on his outside shot. That should save his body some. Look how long Ray Allen has been able to play. If he ends up being able to play both styles, he is going to be really good.

But 6-3 per EPSN NBA is a little short for a SG in todays NBA. But at 19. Do we even know if he as stopped growing ? He just turned 19 on draft day. He is kind of baby faced. i.e. No facial hair. That may just be the way he is but it still puts him in the running for having not completed growing all the way into full manhood.

Draft X had him 6' 3.25" w/o shoes.
User avatar
Dark Faze
Head Coach
Posts: 6,467
And1: 2,118
Joined: Dec 27, 2008

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#742 » by Dark Faze » Wed Dec 26, 2012 6:57 pm

That's helpful Pancakes. FT percentage does tend to show at least some evidence of overall shooting ability. That's the sort of example I was looking for to lend at least some hope that the kid can shoot it.
User avatar
Nivek
Head Coach
Posts: 7,406
And1: 959
Joined: Sep 29, 2010
Contact:
         

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#743 » by Nivek » Wed Dec 26, 2012 7:26 pm

College FT shooting is a better indicator of overall shooting ability than shooting from the field -- 2pt or 3pt range. Haven't done the research, but my guess is that FT percentage early in a player's career would also be a better indicator than his shooting from the field. The hardest number to predict from year to year throughout a player's NBA career is shooting percentage from the field.
"A lot of what we call talent is the desire to practice."
-- Malcolm Gladwell

Check out my blog about the Wizards, movies, writing, music, TV, sports, and whatever else comes to mind.
AFM
RealGM
Posts: 12,464
And1: 8,675
Joined: May 25, 2012
   

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#744 » by AFM » Wed Dec 26, 2012 7:49 pm

I love how some stations have him at 6'3 and some at 6'5". I think some places are reporting him w/o shoes when the convention is w/ shoes.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,176
And1: 22,594
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#745 » by nate33 » Wed Dec 26, 2012 9:18 pm

Nivek wrote:College FT shooting is a better indicator of overall shooting ability than shooting from the field -- 2pt or 3pt range. Haven't done the research, but my guess is that FT percentage early in a player's career would also be a better indicator than his shooting from the field. The hardest number to predict from year to year throughout a player's NBA career is shooting percentage from the field.

Interesting. When you say, "is a better indicator of overall shooting ability", what exactly do you mean? Are you saying college FT shooting is a better indicator than college 3-point shooting of a player's ability to hit a high percentage of pro 3-pointers?
User avatar
TGW
RealGM
Posts: 13,346
And1: 6,718
Joined: Oct 22, 2010

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#746 » by TGW » Thu Dec 27, 2012 4:11 am

Painful that we passed up Harden. No offense to Beal, but he's not in the same stratosphere as JH.
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
jivelikenice
Analyst
Posts: 3,074
And1: 145
Joined: Jul 15, 2005

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#747 » by jivelikenice » Thu Dec 27, 2012 4:31 am

Agreed....He's just a guy IMO. No elite potential here..
DMVleGeND
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,833
And1: 194
Joined: Sep 06, 2010
Location: PG County, MD
   

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#748 » by DMVleGeND » Thu Dec 27, 2012 1:33 pm

TGW wrote:Painful that we passed up Harden. No offense to Beal, but he's not in the same stratosphere as JH.


Or Drummond for that matter. Another great game last night for him: 16 pts, 12 rebs, 2 stls, 1 blk. People said he was a huge project that would take yrs to start contributing, yet he's contributing now.
Formerly known as 7-day Dray
User avatar
Dark Faze
Head Coach
Posts: 6,467
And1: 2,118
Joined: Dec 27, 2008

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#749 » by Dark Faze » Thu Dec 27, 2012 2:28 pm

2 point night

dude plays 40 minutes one night and like 15 the next

wtf is coach doin and why can't Beal shoot
DCZards
RealGM
Posts: 11,139
And1: 4,986
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#750 » by DCZards » Thu Dec 27, 2012 3:37 pm

DMVleGeND wrote:Or Drummond for that matter. Another great game last night for him: 16 pts, 12 rebs, 2 stls, 1 blk. People said he was a huge project that would take yrs to start contributing, yet he's contributing now.


Drummond has the potential to be scary good. He is already an awesome physical specimen/presence and he's only a kid. I would not be surprised if Drummond turns out to be the best player in his draft class...even better than Anthony Davis.

(Drummond does need to learn how to make free throws, however.)
User avatar
Nivek
Head Coach
Posts: 7,406
And1: 959
Joined: Sep 29, 2010
Contact:
         

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#751 » by Nivek » Thu Dec 27, 2012 4:08 pm

nate33 wrote:
Nivek wrote:College FT shooting is a better indicator of overall shooting ability than shooting from the field -- 2pt or 3pt range. Haven't done the research, but my guess is that FT percentage early in a player's career would also be a better indicator than his shooting from the field. The hardest number to predict from year to year throughout a player's NBA career is shooting percentage from the field.

Interesting. When you say, "is a better indicator of overall shooting ability", what exactly do you mean? Are you saying college FT shooting is a better indicator than college 3-point shooting of a player's ability to hit a high percentage of pro 3-pointers?


This research was done by Ed Weiland (I think -- it might've been Pelton). Anyway, the basic conclusion was that free throw shooting in college was a better indicator of a player's jump shooting ability (3pt%) in the NBA than his college 3pt percentage. Kinda weird finding, but it makes some sense. Free throw shooting is probably the best measure we have of "foundation" shooting ability. It's what a guy can do without defensive interference.
"A lot of what we call talent is the desire to practice."
-- Malcolm Gladwell

Check out my blog about the Wizards, movies, writing, music, TV, sports, and whatever else comes to mind.
User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 54,616
And1: 10,338
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#752 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Thu Dec 27, 2012 4:17 pm

I have a theory that if for shooting practice, all that player did was shoot hundreds of FTs, that player would automatically improve their 3pt shooting and their midrange shooting. The jump shooting motion is just a variant of the same form one uses in free throw shooting. The arc's a bit different, the knee bend deeper, and the jump thrusts a person upward; but despite that release point on a jump shot is the same as on a free throw.

I believe players who are already good to great collegiate FT shooters probably should project to become among he good to great NBA 3 point shooters. It makes sense to me. The shot comes from the soles of your feet to your release point. Good FT shooters know that. They have their elbow up. They keep the palm off the ball and use fingertips on the release. They use their guide hand properly and their wrists doesn't recoil or snap back in a way to throw the shot off.

I think the great FT shooters are almost automatically pretty good three point shooters.
Tre Johnson is the future of the Wizards.
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,149
And1: 7,912
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#753 » by Dat2U » Thu Dec 27, 2012 6:07 pm

I'd be open to trading Beal. It's never too early to try to correct a mistake. I think he'll be okay in time. But that's just it. He'll be okay, but will he be an elite perimeter player? I just don't see it. Unless his shooting becomes an elite level skill.

And he hasn't shot well since HS. It's become obvious that having a pretty looking stroke doesn't guarantee consistent shot making.

Not saying lets give him away, but at this point, we'd be fools to make anyone untouchable.

Too bad we didn't make that Harden deal.
TheBigThree
Starter
Posts: 2,133
And1: 124
Joined: Mar 20, 2008

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#754 » by TheBigThree » Thu Dec 27, 2012 6:38 pm

Beal takes his guide hand off the ball way too early on his shot, leading to inaccuracy. Should be a fairly easy issue to correct, but based on the fact that Wall's form hasn't improved one iota, I'd say they don't have anyone working with him on it.
jivelikenice
Analyst
Posts: 3,074
And1: 145
Joined: Jul 15, 2005

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#755 » by jivelikenice » Thu Dec 27, 2012 7:18 pm

Dark Faze wrote:2 point night

dude plays 40 minutes one night and like 15 the next

wtf is coach doin and why can't Beal shoot


I don't have an issue with what Wittman did yesterday. Beal was a total non-factor and looked indifferent on offense.
hands11
Banned User
Posts: 31,171
And1: 2,444
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#756 » by hands11 » Thu Dec 27, 2012 8:20 pm

jivelikenice wrote:
Dark Faze wrote:2 point night

dude plays 40 minutes one night and like 15 the next

wtf is coach doin and why can't Beal shoot


I don't have an issue with what Wittman did yesterday. Beal was a total non-factor and looked indifferent on offense.


Not only do I not have an issue with it. I applaud it.

That well may have been Randys best accountability coaching game this year. Beal has been coddled enough. Randy has sat Ves and Singleton for lack of production. This is the NBA. You want to start, play like a starter. You want minutes, earn them.

I like that Beal is a good kid, but he needs some SWAG.
Jay81
Veteran
Posts: 2,601
And1: 568
Joined: Nov 10, 2010

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#757 » by Jay81 » Fri Dec 28, 2012 2:56 am

when your 2-39 or whatever we are....you dont sit a rookie
User avatar
TheKingOfVa360
General Manager
Posts: 8,326
And1: 1,663
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Location: Orange County, California
         

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#758 » by TheKingOfVa360 » Fri Dec 28, 2012 5:31 am

Jay81 wrote:when your 2-39 or whatever we are....you dont sit a rookie


I agree, it was just Whitman trying to save his job. The whole point of our season is to develop the young players.
User avatar
mohammed10
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,857
And1: 155
Joined: May 26, 2007
Location: Playoffs? Playoffs? Yes, playoffs dammit
 

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#759 » by mohammed10 » Fri Dec 28, 2012 6:12 am

TheKingOfVa360 wrote:
Jay81 wrote:when your 2-39 or whatever we are....you dont sit a rookie


I agree, it was just Whitman trying to save his job. The whole point of our season is to develop the young players.


Hasn't that been the point of EVERY Wizards season since 1987???
If you can fill the unforgiving minute
With sixty seconds’ worth of distance run,
Yours is the Earth and everything that’s in it,
And—which is more—you’ll be a Man, my son!

'If' - by Rudyard Kipling
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 16,288
And1: 7,382
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: Bradley Beal 

Post#760 » by FAH1223 » Fri Dec 28, 2012 6:37 am

TheKingOfVa360 wrote:
Jay81 wrote:when your 2-39 or whatever we are....you dont sit a rookie


I agree, it was just Whitman trying to save his job. The whole point of our season is to develop the young players.

:lol: :lol: :lol:
Image

Return to Washington Wizards