ImageImageImage

90's Hypothetical

Moderators: KingDavid, heat4life, MettaWorldPanda, Wiltside, IggieCC, BFRESH44, QUIZ

FlashKing
Banned User
Posts: 2,857
And1: 26
Joined: Feb 23, 2012

90's Hypothetical 

Post#1 » by FlashKing » Sat Jan 5, 2013 12:28 am

Rice doesn't get shipped away to Charlotte and we acquire Zo and later on Timmy from Golden State. How good would we have been?
User avatar
Moggs24
Senior
Posts: 635
And1: 84
Joined: Aug 27, 2008
   

Re: 90's Hypothetical 

Post#2 » by Moggs24 » Sat Jan 5, 2013 6:01 pm

We only got Zo b/c we traded Rice. And if you want to say how do we do with Rice and Hardaway instead of Zo, then I say much worse
FlashKing
Banned User
Posts: 2,857
And1: 26
Joined: Feb 23, 2012

Re: 90's Hypothetical 

Post#3 » by FlashKing » Sun Jan 6, 2013 3:18 am

Moggs24 wrote:We only got Zo b/c we traded Rice. And if you want to say how do we do with Rice and Hardaway instead of Zo, then I say much worse


The thread title reads "Hypothetical 90's" for a reason. I'm well aware of the trade for Zo because I was watching the Heat back then. Just want your opinions on how good we would have been if we had all 3.
User avatar
Moggs24
Senior
Posts: 635
And1: 84
Joined: Aug 27, 2008
   

Re: 90's Hypothetical 

Post#4 » by Moggs24 » Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:59 am

Well to answer that question we lose to the bulls in 96 and then 97 - 00 would likely be much more successful. I have to assume we get past the knicks more than they get past us which means we are likely to go to at least 1 or 2 NBA finals.

I don't know how Rice fits with this team but obviously you imagine having an elite scorer on the court would be beneficial in those 65 - 65 games against the knicks.

Return to Miami Heat