1/4 Wizards vs. Nets
Moderators: montestewart, LyricalRico, nate33
Re: 1/4 Wizards vs. Nets
- dangermouse
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,628
- And1: 814
- Joined: Dec 08, 2009
Re: 1/4 Wizards vs. Nets
That was the most fun loss ive ever watched. Apart from some absolutely shocking refereeing by that one bloke (not Danny).

long suffrin' boulez fan wrote:NatP4 wrote:but why would the pacers want Mahinmi's contract
Well, in fairness, we took Mike Pence off their hands. Taking back Mahinmi is the least they can do.
Re: 1/4 Wizards vs. Nets
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,924
- And1: 642
- Joined: Jul 07, 2008
- Location: tanking
-
Re: 1/4 Wizards vs. Nets
Floater wrote:There is no such thing as a heartbreaking loss anymore. When expectations are so low, you feel nothing when they lose. You can only be surprised at wins.
Good point you made there.
You Shouldn't Play For Money, But You Should Play Because You Have A Passion For It -- Bradley Beal
Re: 1/4 Wizards vs. Nets
- Mickstix
- Junior
- Posts: 418
- And1: 27
- Joined: Jan 03, 2012
- Location: Debary, Fl.
-
Re: 1/4 Wizards vs. Nets
Just baffling how fast they can fold up completely collapse.. It'd be all good if we thought they'd do anything "right" with a lotto pick, but as long as the front office stays the same, they might as well start winning games.. Looking forward to Wall's return.. Hopefully they'll be good enough to watch regularly, but still bad enough to get EG fired before he hobbles the team any further.. (A man can hope can't he?) 

Mick
Re: 1/4 Wizards vs. Nets
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,924
- And1: 9,309
- Joined: Mar 29, 2005
- Location: So long Wizturdz.
-
Re: 1/4 Wizards vs. Nets
Dat2U wrote:Floater wrote:There is no such thing as a heartbreaking loss anymore. When expectations are so low, you feel nothing when they lose. You can only be surprised at wins.
QFT. I felt nothing at this loss. In fact I might have even smiled.
+1
Re: 1/4 Wizards vs. Nets
- nate33
- Forum Mod - Wizards
- Posts: 70,088
- And1: 22,492
- Joined: Oct 28, 2002
Re: 1/4 Wizards vs. Nets
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 27,575
- And1: 2,141
- Joined: Jul 25, 2005
- Location: Baltimore, MD
-
Re: 1/4 Wizards vs. Nets
Another day, another game I had no idea was on.
Re: 1/4 Wizards vs. Nets
-
- Forum Mod - Wizards
- Posts: 14,798
- And1: 7,924
- Joined: Feb 25, 2009
Re: 1/4 Wizards vs. Nets
Dat2U wrote:Floater wrote:There is no such thing as a heartbreaking loss anymore. When expectations are so low, you feel nothing when they lose. You can only be surprised at wins.
QFT. I felt nothing at this loss. In fact I might have even smiled.
After not renewing my tickets, I felt myself drifting away, and didn't think I'd watch a lot of Wizards this year. Turns out my father-in-law still wants to watch every game, and likes for me to be there to remind him what teams are playing and what the score is. So I've seen most of every game this year (usually at full blast!) and I've come to really appreciate his mantra, "They just can't make a shot!"
That wasn't a bad game to watch. Beal looked pretty good. So did Blatche.
Re: 1/4 Wizards vs. Nets
- Knighthonor
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,865
- And1: 98
- Joined: Feb 15, 2012
Re: 1/4 Wizards vs. Nets
MAN WAY TO GO TO BEAL,CRAWFORD, AND NENE!!!!!
OH YEAH AND OKAFOR!!!
I was at this game tonight. and the problem I had with it was, that Wittman didnt play OKAFOR in the 4thQ next to Nene like they did at the beginning of the game when they were doing well on defense and offense. seem bad lineup at the end.
And Jordan was getting tired. He was the main man tonight.
OH YEAH AND OKAFOR!!!
I was at this game tonight. and the problem I had with it was, that Wittman didnt play OKAFOR in the 4thQ next to Nene like they did at the beginning of the game when they were doing well on defense and offense. seem bad lineup at the end.
And Jordan was getting tired. He was the main man tonight.
Could the issue with the Wizards be mainly do to Lineup?
- Knighthonor
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,865
- And1: 98
- Joined: Feb 15, 2012
Could the issue with the Wizards be mainly do to Lineup?
I notice that in yesterday's game against the Nets, the Wizards didnt keep to the lineup that was working in the first half.
Okafor had little game time in the 4th Q, and came into overtime as a sub for Nene.
Why was this, when he was playing pretty good early on?
Is this part of the tanking plan? I notice Jan played as well. Nothing wrong that I guess.
But again, the lineup just seem strange way of being designed throughout the game.
is there purpose to this? tanking intended perhaps? if so, very clever.
Okafor had little game time in the 4th Q, and came into overtime as a sub for Nene.
Why was this, when he was playing pretty good early on?
Is this part of the tanking plan? I notice Jan played as well. Nothing wrong that I guess.
But again, the lineup just seem strange way of being designed throughout the game.
is there purpose to this? tanking intended perhaps? if so, very clever.
Re: Could the issue with the Wizards be mainly do to Lineup?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,440
- And1: 4,438
- Joined: Nov 21, 2004
Re: Could the issue with the Wizards be mainly do to Lineup?
Knighthonor wrote:I notice that in yesterday's game against the Nets, the Wizards didnt keep to the lineup that was working in the first half.
Okafor had little game time in the 4th Q, and came into overtime as a sub for Nene.
Why was this, when he was playing pretty good early on?
Is this part of the tanking plan? I notice Jan played as well. Nothing wrong that I guess.
But again, the lineup just seem strange way of being designed throughout the game.
is there purpose to this? tanking intended perhaps? if so, very clever.
Hands, this is your Que

Re: Could the issue with the Wizards be mainly do to Lineup?
- nate33
- Forum Mod - Wizards
- Posts: 70,088
- And1: 22,492
- Joined: Oct 28, 2002
Re: Could the issue with the Wizards be mainly do to Lineup?
closg00 wrote:Knighthonor wrote:I notice that in yesterday's game against the Nets, the Wizards didnt keep to the lineup that was working in the first half.
Okafor had little game time in the 4th Q, and came into overtime as a sub for Nene.
Why was this, when he was playing pretty good early on?
Is this part of the tanking plan? I notice Jan played as well. Nothing wrong that I guess.
But again, the lineup just seem strange way of being designed throughout the game.
is there purpose to this? tanking intended perhaps? if so, very clever.
Hands, this is your Que
Yeah, Knighthonor actually started a new thread with that post but I moved it here. I knew hands11 would flip out if he saw another thread discussing player rotations.