Falstaffxx wrote:21shumpshumpst wrote:Wolfgang wrote:If you honestly haven't watched the Rockets play this year, especially Lin since Knicks fans can't let him go, then don't comment on him. Then was then. Now is now. He's a better player now since last year, especially his defense. Numbers don't tell everything.
Positives for Lin
Very good at steals
very good at rebounding for his size
Suited for the up tempo game that the rockets play
Bad for lin
Horrible at turnovers
Horrible at the 3ball
Streaky as can be (reminds me of gallo, can have one really great game or quarter then stinkers to follow)
He is not awful nor is he this basketball god you guys make him out to be.
Harden is the reason that team goes. Then Parsons. Then Lin. Then Asik.
He's not "horrible at turnovers" - his turnovers are just a little high. He's also not particularly "streaky," except on the 3-point shot which you decided to make into a separate bullet point. He contributes even when his shot is off - he made nice contributions to several recent Rockets wins even when he didn't score a lot. His general good play is part of the reason why the Rockets have been winning.
It's funny that the only only positives you could find are steals, rebounding and being "suited" to up-tempo. No "good at getting to the rim," no "good play-maker," no "good at controlling the tempo," no "high-effort player," just "suited" to up-tempo, lol.
I was surprised he provided as much credit as he did, which was good to see.
I do agree with the order of importance as far as the players go...
Harden Parsons Lin Asik.
But I do wanna see what the entire team does against the West.
Of all the top teams in the West only one doesn't have a winning record in their conference by a wide margin.



















