Official trade thread 2012-13
Moderators: Kilroy, TyCobb, Danny Darko
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
- Jajwanda
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,611
- And1: 105
- Joined: Jun 01, 2007
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
Kenyon Martin would be a good signing. He can defend most backup Cs in the NBA, run the P and R, and blocks shots an average pace, and he's a decent rebounder.
For an uptempo team he'd be a good third big man.
Clark, Martin, and Howard would be your three guys every night.
For an uptempo team he'd be a good third big man.
Clark, Martin, and Howard would be your three guys every night.
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
- nashill
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,876
- And1: 20
- Joined: Dec 28, 2007
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
any chance of signing/trading for a back up small forward/guard ? meeks should stay in the bench in my opinion.
he has no defense. if he cant shoot those 3's consistently, he better stay in the bench.
he has no defense. if he cant shoot those 3's consistently, he better stay in the bench.
Spurs.Grizzlies.Hawks.Bulls.Wizards.
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 1,456
- And1: 12
- Joined: Nov 12, 2012
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
Why haven't we signed Qrich?We need a sf and he can't suck any worse than Ebanks.
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
- politm
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 898
- And1: 366
- Joined: Jan 01, 2013
- Location: Romania
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
Cashin out wrote:We need a sf and he can't suck any worse than Ebanks.
We could have kept Barnes but Mike Brown thought Ebanks is the new KD...
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
- EArl
- RealGM
- Posts: 49,776
- And1: 13,235
- Joined: Mar 14, 2012
- Location: Columbus
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
I dont like Pierce and while he is better than MWP he is way older and his defense isnt as good as MWPs.
Why do you guys want to get older and slower. Might as well sign Derek Fisher so we can be the geriatric squad.
Why do you guys want to get older and slower. Might as well sign Derek Fisher so we can be the geriatric squad.
Deep into that darkness peering, long I stood there wondering, fearing, Doubting, dreaming dreams no mortal ever dared to dream before;
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
- Jajwanda
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,611
- And1: 105
- Joined: Jun 01, 2007
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
Perhaps a trade with the Wizards for pure role players? Pau for Ariza or Webster, Okafor, and Jordan Crawford as our sixth man/spark.
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,243
- And1: 449
- Joined: Mar 31, 2010
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
Jajwanda wrote:Perhaps a trade with the Wizards for pure role players? Pau for Ariza or Webster, Okafor, and Jordan Crawford as our sixth man/spark.
I agree. But I doubt Wizards would do that.
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
- Jajwanda
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,611
- And1: 105
- Joined: Jun 01, 2007
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
No their fans seem to be fine with various parts of it. Crawford isn't going to be re-signed, Ariza/Webster are not long-term players, and Okafor isn't suitable to play next to Nene.
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
- Doormatt
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,438
- And1: 2,013
- Joined: Mar 07, 2011
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
Cashin out wrote:Why haven't we signed Qrich?We need a sf and he can't suck any worse than Ebanks.
probably because he sucks and offers literally nothing we dont have (inconsistent shooting and no defense).
ebanks isnt that bad, he just hasnt and probably wont get playing time now that clark has somewhat emerged as a viable option at backup sf/pf.
#doorgek
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
- Tetlak
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,107
- And1: 2,134
- Joined: Aug 16, 2010
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
Hey guys, one of our Bulls insiders allegedly is hearing that the Bulls and Lakers are talking. Names thrown out there include Teague, Rip, Jamison, Morris, Clark.
Any of this possibly make sense to you guys? Maybe like a Rip for Morris and Jamison?
Any of this possibly make sense to you guys? Maybe like a Rip for Morris and Jamison?
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
-
- Forum Mod - Lakers
- Posts: 21,522
- And1: 12,222
- Joined: Jul 10, 2006
- Location: The Motel 9 in Vegas
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
Tetlak wrote:Hey guys, one of our Bulls insiders allegedly is hearing that the Bulls and Lakers are talking. Names thrown out there include Teague, Rip, Jamison, Morris, Clark.
Any of this possibly make sense to you guys? Maybe like a Rip for Morris and Jamison?
Yeah, I think this board would implode if we traded Clark who's been one of the few bright spots this season.
Could be Rip/Teague for Jamison/Morris/Blake
And I'm sure Boozer/Rip/Teague for Pau/Morris/Jamison, or some derivative has been discussed but I don't see us trading Pau for Boozer.
Never have rice at Hanzo's house...
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
- Doormatt
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,438
- And1: 2,013
- Joined: Mar 07, 2011
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
idk why anyone would want to trade for morris/jamison, could just pick up d-league players and it would be the same.
#doorgek
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
-
- Forum Mod - Lakers
- Posts: 21,522
- And1: 12,222
- Joined: Jul 10, 2006
- Location: The Motel 9 in Vegas
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
Doormatt wrote:idk why anyone would want to trade for morris/jamison, could just pick up d-league players and it would be the same.
Me neither... I could only see them involved as filler for something bigger... Which led me to Boozer. But I don't see us doing that.
Never have rice at Hanzo's house...
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 60,811
- And1: 33,455
- Joined: Oct 15, 2006
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
Boozer has actually been playing pretty decently this season, he will be decent pick and pop big man with Nash and his defensive deficiencies, which basically are rebounding and post defense will be masked if he plays alongside a full time center, like he's doing right now with Noah.
The PF I want from the Bulls is actually Taj Gibson. He's a pretty perfect fit for us.
The PF I want from the Bulls is actually Taj Gibson. He's a pretty perfect fit for us.
+ =
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
-
- Forum Mod - Lakers
- Posts: 38,039
- And1: 9,821
- Joined: Apr 17, 2005
- Location: Pitcher's Mound
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
I'd love to get Marquis Teague.
Read more, learn more, change your posts.
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
- Tetlak
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,107
- And1: 2,134
- Joined: Aug 16, 2010
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
Kilroy wrote:Doormatt wrote:idk why anyone would want to trade for morris/jamison, could just pick up d-league players and it would be the same.
Me neither... I could only see them involved as filler for something bigger... Which led me to Boozer. But I don't see us doing that.
Well quite honestly the Bulls would love to salary dump Rip to stay under the tax. Can you guys tell me about Morris? He seems like he could develop into a nice playmaking combo. Is that wrong?
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
- Doormatt
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,438
- And1: 2,013
- Joined: Mar 07, 2011
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
play making? he can barely dribble the ball. he is a solid spot up shooter and plays defense with a lot of effort, but isnt particularly good. other than that hes awful.
#doorgek
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
- Tetlak
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,107
- And1: 2,134
- Joined: Aug 16, 2010
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
Doormatt wrote:play making? he can barely dribble the ball. he is a solid spot up shooter and plays defense with a lot of effort, but isnt particularly good. other than that hes awful.
Crazy how thats the complete opposite of his scouting report. =\
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 60,811
- And1: 33,455
- Joined: Oct 15, 2006
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
Tetlak wrote:Doormatt wrote:play making? he can barely dribble the ball. he is a solid spot up shooter and plays defense with a lot of effort, but isnt particularly good. other than that hes awful.
Crazy how thats the complete opposite of his scouting report. =\
Isn't it? He was marketed as the point guard with the best court vision in the draft, yet he's nowhere near the scouting report in terms of making simple passes at this level. I don't even remember him running a simple pick and roll set without turning the ball over.
He makes Jordan Farmar seem like Derrick Rose.
+ =
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
- Doormatt
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,438
- And1: 2,013
- Joined: Mar 07, 2011
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
well the problem is he cant finish near the rim to save his life. his ball handling has gotten better, but he often makes wild drives and he has to be worse than fisher at finishing in transition, which is hilarious. he has no vision and not the highest bbiq so most of his play making consists of him driving to the rim and kicking it out to a shooter who may or may not be open. i will give him this, his shooting is solid. he can knock down open shots if he gets them. also people like his effort defensively. i dont care for it because i think he fouls too much (or rather just stupid fouls) and over plays the ball a lot. either way hes pretty poor defensively.
#doorgek