Goldtop wrote:Those who don't like Knight because of his TOs will love Bledsoe, lol.
Hes a 4 TO per game PG PER 36 for his career. Plus while I do like him as a player, and think he's a scrappy defender, he's still only 6-1 and would be a defensive liability against most full sized PGs. Whereas Knight is proving to be a great defender this year against PGs of any size.
I think Bledsoe is a good young PG and I'm sure LAC values him, but ppl saying they wouldn't trade him for Knight are being a little ridiculous.
While he's a good young PG, he's still only actually putting up 6 pts and 3 asts per game in his career so far. He's got potential, but until he actually proves it as a starter, instead of CP3s backup, you don't trade your recent 8th pick for a guy avg 6/3 on 28% 3FG. And imo LAC wouldn't even think twice if we offered Knight for Bledsoe. It would be a done deal. Knight has more value than Bledsoe and would be foolish to trade him for that deal. If we were to trade Knight we should be able to get a lot better package back than that.
While this is much closer to the truth, this the general consensus is what have you done for me now kind of attitude. i can see how bledsoe can be seen as having higher value being that he's supposedly "reached his potential" , however i see knight's ceiling much higher and more suited for the PG position