Image ImageImage Image

Rumors: Bobcats, Bulls, Kings three-team discussions

Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, Michael Jackson, dougthonus, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10

DanTown8587
RealGM
Posts: 37,583
And1: 9,333
Joined: Jan 06, 2008
Location: Chicago
     

Re: Rumors: Bobcats, Bulls, Kings three-team discussions 

Post#101 » by DanTown8587 » Thu Jan 17, 2013 11:47 pm

PistolP wrote:
BuffaloBull wrote:Yeah Tyreke would be nice, but I doubt he gets moved until after the sale... unless they really don't like him and know they don't want to resign him at all. I worry a bit about Tyreke on this current squad (he's not going to hit many threes for you) but his ability to attack would be nice.

I'd agree with that. Seems odd though that they'd be interested in Henderson, who is also going to be an RFA, unless they are looking at moving one of Evans or Thornton.


This trade makes a ton of sense for the Maloofs.

Let's say they are selling the team. To completely get rid of Thompson's contract is literally money going straight to them. No owner would say the team is worth less with Thompson off it, but the team would have less liabilities on the balance sheet.
...
BIGGIEsmalls 23
Banned User
Posts: 13,283
And1: 810
Joined: Jul 28, 2010
Location: REALITY
   

Re: Rumors: Bobcats, Bulls, Kings three-team discussions 

Post#102 » by BIGGIEsmalls 23 » Thu Jan 17, 2013 11:52 pm

Darius Miles Davis wrote:
The Force. wrote:Yeah, none of that is worth a potential #1 pick in a couple years.


This

Yep.

I thought that the goal was utilize assets (including the Bobcats pick) to obtain another star to lighten the load for Rose. These names in this thread are a bunch of back-up role players.
PistolP
Analyst
Posts: 3,266
And1: 387
Joined: Sep 13, 2011

Re: Rumors: Bobcats, Bulls, Kings three-team discussions 

Post#103 » by PistolP » Thu Jan 17, 2013 11:58 pm

DanTown8587 wrote:
PistolP wrote:I'd agree with that. Seems odd though that they'd be interested in Henderson, who is also going to be an RFA, unless they are looking at moving one of Evans or Thornton.


This trade makes a ton of sense for the Maloofs.

Let's say they are selling the team. To completely get rid of Thompson's contract is literally money going straight to them. No owner would say the team is worth less with Thompson off it, but the team would have less liabilities on the balance sheet.

If you are implying the Kings are just looking for a salary dump then we should just cut out the Bobcats and trade Rip+Nazr for Thompson and keep the pick. It sounded like they are interested in taking Henderson back, which is the part that does not make sense, considering Evans, Henderson and Thornton will all be paid like starters next season.
User avatar
Darius Miles Davis
Veteran
Posts: 2,618
And1: 452
Joined: Apr 02, 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ

Re: Rumors: Bobcats, Bulls, Kings three-team discussions 

Post#104 » by Darius Miles Davis » Thu Jan 17, 2013 11:59 pm

BIGGIEsmalls 23 wrote:
Darius Miles Davis wrote:
The Force. wrote:Yeah, none of that is worth a potential #1 pick in a couple years.


This

Yep.

I thought that the goal was utilize assets (including the Bobcats pick) to obtain another star to lighten the load for Rose. These names in this thread are a bunch of back-up role players.


The strength and future of the Bobcats' roster is at the 1 and at the 3. So we're not really good trading partners if we're getting their players. Thomson would help right now, but he's hardly a good enough reason to trade the very valuable Charlotte pick. In terms of other players on the Kings, I'd be interested in Tyreke Evans. I don't think Cousins is a great fit for the culture of the team. Otherwise, meh...

The Charlotte pick is potentially a huge asset. Charlotte knows this. That's why they want it back.
"Uh...we've always like ET. ET has big hands. His mother has big hands."
League Circles
RealGM
Posts: 35,662
And1: 10,107
Joined: Dec 04, 2001
       

Re: Rumors: Bobcats, Bulls, Kings three-team discussions 

Post#105 » by League Circles » Fri Jan 18, 2013 12:02 am

patryk7754 wrote:This draft isn't that bad especially at the top. If we draft McLemore or Muhammad why would we need 2014 cap? If it's to sign Mirotic then we can amnesty Boozer and/or trade Taj. With McLemore and Mirotic we won't need to sign someone who will get big money.


If we were talking about trading for one of those guys instead of trading for a lower pick that would have a very low chance to get one of them, I'd agree. However, to get somebody like Muhammad, you're going to have to give up Noah+. I'm quite sure the Bobcats are looking to give us the Portland pick. Makes zero sense for them to give us their pick.
https://august-shop.com/ - sneakers and streetwear
VolumePoster
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,084
And1: 2,068
Joined: Oct 02, 2009

Re: Rumors: Bobcats, Bulls, Kings three-team discussions 

Post#106 » by VolumePoster » Fri Jan 18, 2013 12:07 am

Gar Paxdorf wrote:
patryk7754 wrote:This draft isn't that bad especially at the top. If we draft McLemore or Muhammad why would we need 2014 cap? If it's to sign Mirotic then we can amnesty Boozer and/or trade Taj. With McLemore and Mirotic we won't need to sign someone who will get big money.


If we were talking about trading for one of those guys instead of trading for a lower pick that would have a very low chance to get one of them, I'd agree. However, to get somebody like Muhammad, you're going to have to give up Noah+. I'm quite sure the Bobcats are looking to give us the Portland pick. Makes zero sense for them to give us their pick.


Agreed.
patryk7754
General Manager
Posts: 9,150
And1: 1,631
Joined: Jan 22, 2012

Re: Rumors: Bobcats, Bulls, Kings three-team discussions 

Post#107 » by patryk7754 » Fri Jan 18, 2013 12:08 am

Darius Miles Davis wrote:
The Force. wrote:Yeah, none of that is worth a potential #1 pick in a couple years.


This

The 2013 pick is more likely to be the #1 than the 2016 pick
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,778
And1: 9,250
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: Rumors: Bobcats, Bulls, Kings three-team discussions 

Post#108 » by Chi town » Fri Jan 18, 2013 12:11 am

1. Bulls can't afford more than a 1st rounder or vet min backup C. Thompson at 6M per is laughable and highly lux taxable.

2. Bulls won't unload the CHA pick unless they are getting the best player in the trade. This is their chip to bring Rose his deputy either in a trade for a great player like Love in a bigger package or for a very high pick.
patryk7754
General Manager
Posts: 9,150
And1: 1,631
Joined: Jan 22, 2012

Re: Rumors: Bobcats, Bulls, Kings three-team discussions 

Post#109 » by patryk7754 » Fri Jan 18, 2013 12:11 am

Gar Paxdorf wrote:
patryk7754 wrote:This draft isn't that bad especially at the top. If we draft McLemore or Muhammad why would we need 2014 cap? If it's to sign Mirotic then we can amnesty Boozer and/or trade Taj. With McLemore and Mirotic we won't need to sign someone who will get big money.


If we were talking about trading for one of those guys instead of trading for a lower pick that would have a very low chance to get one of them, I'd agree. However, to get somebody like Muhammad, you're going to have to give up Noah+. I'm quite sure the Bobcats are looking to give us the Portland pick. Makes zero sense for them to give us their pick.

I'd rather have our Cats pick over the Blazer''s pick but if we can get this years cats pick, which is said to be possible, the I do the trade.
League Circles
RealGM
Posts: 35,662
And1: 10,107
Joined: Dec 04, 2001
       

Re: Rumors: Bobcats, Bulls, Kings three-team discussions 

Post#110 » by League Circles » Fri Jan 18, 2013 12:17 am

patryk7754 wrote:I'd rather have our Cats pick over the Blazer''s pick but if we can get this years cats pick, which is said to be possible, the I do the trade.


I don't know what is "said", but I do know that the Bobcats trading us a top 2 pick in this years draft just so they can keep their picks going forward after that is not believable to me. And if the bobcats do want to trade their pick this year, they can get a whole hell of a lot more for it than their protected pick back from us. They could probably get a young all-star caliber prospect easily. My understanding based on what I've heard is that Muhammad is as good of a prospect since maybe Lebron, though that's just my perception, I know nothing.
https://august-shop.com/ - sneakers and streetwear
User avatar
Quinarvy
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,444
And1: 134
Joined: Oct 16, 2010

Re: Rumors: Bobcats, Bulls, Kings three-team discussions 

Post#111 » by Quinarvy » Fri Jan 18, 2013 12:17 am

If it's the 2013 Bobcats pick and not the Blazers pick do it immediately and run away before Charlotte changes their mind.

Thompson, Fredette, and a possible Top 5 pick this year for Rip and the Charlotte pick? Done deal.

We get Noah's backup.

Belli gets to start, Hinrich and Butler backup the two.

Fredette and Cook are good 3 point shooters to have, though that's about it.

Then the shot at McLemore or Shabazz? Either one of those could be the star you can put next to Rose. And if the pick is just short, trade the pick and the Bulls own pick to move up a spot or two. If it's not to low, see if you can trade Thompson + Bulls 2nd + Cash for a future second and draft Withey or a defensive big on a rookie contract with the Bulls pick.

But if it's the Portland pick, this whole thing is moot.
D-ROSE. BIGGER. STRONGER. FASTER THAN YOU CHRIS PAUL.


- Stacey King
patryk7754
General Manager
Posts: 9,150
And1: 1,631
Joined: Jan 22, 2012

Re: Rumors: Bobcats, Bulls, Kings three-team discussions 

Post#112 » by patryk7754 » Fri Jan 18, 2013 12:21 am

Gar Paxdorf wrote:
patryk7754 wrote:I'd rather have our Cats pick over the Blazer''s pick but if we can get this years cats pick, which is said to be possible, the I do the trade.


I don't know what is "said", but I do know that the Bobcats trading us a top 2 pick in this years draft just so they can keep their picks going forward after that is not believable to me. And if the bobcats do want to trade their pick this year, they can get a whole hell of a lot more for it than their protected pick back from us. They could probably get a young all-star caliber prospect easily. My understanding based on what I've heard is that Muhammad is as good of a prospect since maybe Lebron, though that's just my perception, I know nothing.

Talks are described as early, and a lot of different ideas are being tossed around. Along with Thompson, Kings guard Jimmer Fredette and a 2013 first round pick coming from Charlotte are on the table. The Bulls are being offered a combination of Thompson, Fredette and a 2013 first round pick from Charlotte. Bobcats swingman Jeffrey Taylor could also be substituted for Fredette in another scenario.

This is from the first page. If we get all that and all we give up is Rip and Muhammad and a future pick how do you not do that
Reverse Dribble
Ballboy
Posts: 14
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 08, 2011

Re: Rumors: Bobcats, Bulls, Kings three-team discussions 

Post#113 » by Reverse Dribble » Fri Jan 18, 2013 12:24 am

I'm not 100% sure, but doesn't our holding their "PROTECTED" draft pick restrict them from making any trades involving their own picks with any other team until we have collected. I believe the fact that you have to make a selection in atleast every other draft is what causes this.

That may be a huge reason why Charlotte would be willing to trade this year's pick. It would allow them the flexibility to do trades with other teams in the immediate future. Our holding the 2016 protected pick sort or handcuffs them...

I agree that they'd want to give up the Portland pick, but we hold a lot of leverage when dealing with Charlotte in particular, more than any other team when it comes to the protected pick.
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,778
And1: 9,250
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: Rumors: Bobcats, Bulls, Kings three-team discussions 

Post#114 » by Chi town » Fri Jan 18, 2013 12:26 am

Its gotta be the POR pick which will end up being 13-15. There the Bulls would have to give Teague to get inside the top ten and get Goodwin. McLemore will be long gone.

Oladipo would probably be around at the pick though.
League Circles
RealGM
Posts: 35,662
And1: 10,107
Joined: Dec 04, 2001
       

Re: Rumors: Bobcats, Bulls, Kings three-team discussions 

Post#115 » by League Circles » Fri Jan 18, 2013 12:28 am

patryk7754 wrote:
Gar Paxdorf wrote:
patryk7754 wrote:I'd rather have our Cats pick over the Blazer''s pick but if we can get this years cats pick, which is said to be possible, the I do the trade.


I don't know what is "said", but I do know that the Bobcats trading us a top 2 pick in this years draft just so they can keep their picks going forward after that is not believable to me. And if the bobcats do want to trade their pick this year, they can get a whole hell of a lot more for it than their protected pick back from us. They could probably get a young all-star caliber prospect easily. My understanding based on what I've heard is that Muhammad is as good of a prospect since maybe Lebron, though that's just my perception, I know nothing.

Talks are described as early, and a lot of different ideas are being tossed around. Along with Thompson, Kings guard Jimmer Fredette and a 2013 first round pick coming from Charlotte are on the table. The Bulls are being offered a combination of Thompson, Fredette and a 2013 first round pick from Charlotte. Bobcats swingman Jeffrey Taylor could also be substituted for Fredette in another scenario.

This is from the first page. If we get all that and all we give up is Rip and Muhammad and a future pick how do you not do that


It says "a pick from Charlotte". That would have to be the Portland or Detroit pick they own. I doubt they can ever trade their own pick to us anyway right now, as WE already own it until they are mathematically eliminated from possibly being good enough for us to get it. And that's ignoring that it would be insane for them to trade what projects to be the #2 pick in their situation. The IDEAL scenario for Charlotte is that they draft Muhmmad or whoever with their pick and then become good enough that when we finally do get their pick it's a mid first.
https://august-shop.com/ - sneakers and streetwear
patryk7754
General Manager
Posts: 9,150
And1: 1,631
Joined: Jan 22, 2012

Re: Rumors: Bobcats, Bulls, Kings three-team discussions 

Post#116 » by patryk7754 » Fri Jan 18, 2013 12:37 am

It's unclear whether the Bulls would acquire the Bobcats own or Portland Trailblazers first round pick from the Gerald Wallace trade a few years ago. The Trailblazers pick is top-12 protected, and currently the Blazers have the 14th worst record in the league.

Also from the first page. Like it says, it's unclear what pick it is but if it is the Cats pick I don't see how you don't do it.
kodo
RealGM
Posts: 21,259
And1: 15,621
Joined: Oct 10, 2006
Location: Northshore Burbs
 

Re: Rumors: Bobcats, Bulls, Kings three-team discussions 

Post#117 » by kodo » Fri Jan 18, 2013 12:39 am

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nba-ball- ... --nba.html

Charlotte should deal its lottery pick, according to scouts, ‘no matter where it is'

The Observer consulted with two long-time scouts (neither connected to the Charlotte Bobcats) as conference seasons commence in the college game. Each works for a team likely to have a top-10 pick. Each spoke on condition of anonymity because neither is authorized by his employer to speak publicly on draft prospects.
While the two conversations were separate, each conveyed the same conclusion: This isn’t the year a franchise-changer will emerge from the draft process.
“I don’t think this is a good draft,” said one scout. “This is the year you should consider trading your draft pick — no matter where it is.”


That pick probably won’t go to Chicago until 2016, though, due to its massive protection. In the meantime, the Bobcats will also get Portland’s unprotected 2015 pick (assuming the Trail Blazers make the playoffs this year and next), and Detroit owes them a selection that becomes unprotected in 2016, while only having protection up to the top spot in the 2015 draft. This team isn’t hurting for selections, which to us means an unspectacular lottery choice in 2013 is passable.


FWIW I also think this draft is pretty bad. I'm not that impressed with either Shabazz or Noel, at least not as players to build a franchise around.
User avatar
Jimmy Forums
Veteran
Posts: 2,833
And1: 970
Joined: Jun 07, 2012
Location: Midwest
     

Re: Rumors: Bobcats, Bulls, Kings three-team discussions 

Post#118 » by Jimmy Forums » Fri Jan 18, 2013 12:42 am

Jason Thompson? No. We're set with Boozer and Taj, eventually Niko and Taj. Tyreke Evans, however, is being paid nearly an identical salary to one Tyreke Evans.

Bulls In: Tyreke Evans, Jeffrey Taylor, Bobcats 2013 1st rounder
Bulls Out: Rip Hamilton, Nazr Mohammed, Bobcats future pick

Kings In: Gerald Henderson, Nazr Mohammed
Kings Out: Tyreke Evans

Bobcats In: Rip Hamilton, Bobcats future pick.
Bobcats Out: Gerald Henderson, Jeffery Taylor

It looks pretty good to me, with the only snag possibly being Charlotte? For the Bulls though, we certainly get younger and more athletic. Lots of like Tyreke, lots of us salivated over Taylor pre-draft, and lots of us would like Charlotte's top pick this year.
patryk7754
General Manager
Posts: 9,150
And1: 1,631
Joined: Jan 22, 2012

Re: Rumors: Bobcats, Bulls, Kings three-team discussions 

Post#119 » by patryk7754 » Fri Jan 18, 2013 12:42 am

If we do get the 2013 cats pick I would draft Mclemore.
BullsFTW
Head Coach
Posts: 6,550
And1: 1,893
Joined: Apr 08, 2012
       

Re: Rumors: Bobcats, Bulls, Kings three-team discussions 

Post#120 » by BullsFTW » Fri Jan 18, 2013 12:45 am

DuckIII wrote:If the pick iz Charlotte's actual pick then I would be all over this. Doubt it is though.


Regarding how much the Bobcats want their pick back really bad, then they may give up their own pick in the end. I don't care for Jimmer, give me Thompson + CHA unprotected 2013 pick.

Return to Chicago Bulls