bigbreakfast wrote:21shumpshumpst wrote:
Thank you so much for this. So basically their stats are based on criteria they made up and don't take into account all defensive schemes and in some cases it is left to an analyst judgment.
That is all I needed to know that. thanks again.
You should call up all the collegiate and professional teams that actually pay to use synergy stats and tell them what a fraud they are and tell them your eye test said so.
also, it's my understanding that every single play that is annotated in synergy includes a video clip of said play. if synergy is incorrectly logging plays like 21shump is implying, they would easily be found out, customers would lose trust in them, and they would go out of business pretty quickly. the video of each play is right there for paying customers to see for themselves.
also i'm pretty sure they screen loggers pretty thoroughly for this very reason. i thought i did pretty well on that online exam, but i know i made some mistakes due to not remembering the exact notation and syntax they used to annotate plays, and at the time i was too lazy to go back a few pages to look it up. i thought i could half-ass it and get enough right to get consideration. they never e-mailed/called me back.
none of this is to defend lin. i've seen every rockets game this season and lin has been a fringe nba starting pg. the rockets will need to upgrade their PG position if they want to build a contender around harden. sorry lin fans, lin just isn't cutting it. so no, this post isn't to defend lin, it's more to defend synergy.